President Trump to be interviewed by Fox News host Maria Bartiromo on Sunday
President Donald Trump will sit down for an exclusive interview with Fox News Channel host Maria Bartiromo on this Sunday's "Sunday Morning Futures", the network announced.
This will be the president's first interview since brokering a ceasefire between Israel and Iran on Tuesday. Trump will also discuss the latest following the U.S. strikes on three of Iran's nuclear facilities in Operation Midnight Hammer last weekend.
Trump and other top officials defended the strikes as successful, despite media reports of a leaked US intelligence assessment that questioned the effectiveness of the strikes.
Bartiromo will also ask Trump about his "Big Beautiful Bill," which passed in the House last month by just one vote.
The sweeping tax and spending cuts package advances the president's agenda on taxes, immigration, defense and energy and would add trillions to the national debt.
Conservatives in the Senate told Fox News Digital they have "real problems" with the bill, after the Senate made key changes to the legislation, such as deferring the expiration of certain green energy tax credits put in place by the Biden administration.
Trump has pressured Congress to get the legislation to his desk by July 4.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
ETFs vs. index funds: Key differences and similarities
Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and index funds both offer a straightforward way to diversify your investment portfolio. Both fund types can have low fees, though index funds often charge less. You may own index mutual funds through your workplace retirement plan, while ETFs are more often purchased separately with a brokerage account. Index funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are both great wealth-building tools that work well in many different investment scenarios. But it's important to note that index funds are often ETFs and ETFs are almost always index funds. Both index funds and ETFs are often low-cost and passively managed, meaning they can be a 'set-it-and-forget-it' solution. Plus, both investment vehicles can offer built-in diversification; these qualities and more make them ideal for the average investor. Here we'll compare these two types of investments to help you decide if either (or both) are right for you. Get started: Match with an advisor who can help you achieve your financial goals ETFs and index funds present a few differences that investors need to be aware of. If you invest in a 401(k) or 403(b) through your employer, there is a good chance you will have index mutual funds as an investment option, but not ETFs. If you want to buy ETFs, your best bet is usually to open an IRA, Roth IRA, or a taxable brokerage account. Depending on where you open these accounts, you will likely have access to a much broader range of funds, including a wide variety of mutual funds and ETFs. Ultimately, online brokers offer you the greatest number of options for buying index funds. The major brokers offer all of the common types of index funds. Investment minimums vary depending on the type of index fund. For example, mutual funds have investment minimums that can be a barrier for some investors. Vanguard's VTSAX had a minimum investment of $10,000 in the past. The minimum has since been reduced to $3,000, which is much better, but can still sideline some who don't readily have that much cash on hand. When you have an account with an online broker, you can often buy as little as one share of an ETF. Better still, several online brokers now offer trading in fractional shares. These fractional shares allow you to buy as little as 1/100,000th of one share in some cases, meaning you can invest exactly as much as you want. Trading fees work differently for mutual funds and ETFs. These days, trading commissions for stocks and ETFs are almost non-existent when you deal with major brokers. Index mutual funds generally don't have trading commissions when buying directly through the company that issues them. However, they may have load fees, which are a form of sales commission. ETFs have no load fees, either on the front end or the back end. The lesson here is to see the whole picture in terms of the fees, because even if a mutual fund has a lower expense ratio than an equivalent ETF, that can be offset by trading fees. If you buy and sell frequently, ETFs are the clear winner when it comes to taxes. When shares of an ETF are sold, only the seller pays capital gains taxes. That's different from index mutual funds because a fund manager is involved. If the fund manager then sells the underlying assets for a gain, those gains are spread among every investor who owns shares in the fund. Despite their differences, ETFs and index funds are quite similar, and they can serve a lot of the same roles for the investor. One of the biggest benefits of both index funds and ETFs is how easy they make it to diversify your portfolio. Total stock market funds, for example, track the performance of every publicly traded company in the United States, meaning at the moment, they track nearly 4,000 U.S. companies. Vanguard funds VTSAX and VTI track this same index, but the former is a mutual fund and the latter is an ETF — but they're both still index funds. The fees on both index funds and ETFs are low, especially when compared to actively managed funds. Many ETFs track an index, and this investment style keeps fees low. Since the fund changes based only on changes to the index — a passive approach — there are few labor costs associated with index funds. In 2023, the average expense ratio for index equity mutual funds was 0.05 percent, according to the Investment Company Institute's latest report. For equity ETFs, it was 0.15 percent. On the other hand, the average fee in 2023 for actively managed mutual funds and ETFs was 0.65 percent and 0.43 percent, respectively. Index funds and most ETFs simply try to replicate an index of stocks or other assets. They don't make active trading decisions and try to beat the market. Instead, they try to mimic the index and match its returns over time. And investors can use index funds and ETFs as a passive investment strategy. For instance, you may have an employer-sponsored retirement plan that allows you to invest using payroll deductions. If you invest a certain percent of your salary every pay period in index funds, your portfolio will need little to no ongoing maintenance. The same is true if you invest in ETFs or index funds in a brokerage account. When you buy S&P 500 index funds, for example, most brokers offer the option to invest automatically. Another benefit of both index funds and ETFs is strong long-term performance. An active fund manager or stock picker might make a few winning trades here and there; few, though, can do so for a sustained period and beat the market. Over the long term, most active fund managers fail to beat or even meet their index funds and ETFs provide more consistent performance that wins in the long run. The S&P 500, for example, has historically returned about 10 percent per year, on average. This makes broadly diversified index funds and ETFs solid long-term investments. Determining whether an index fund or ETF is better is difficult because the answer depends on the specific funds being discussed and your goals as an investor. Many index funds are available in ETF form, which provides trading throughout the day and rock-bottom fees. If you're buying an index mutual fund, you'll likely run into investment minimums of a few thousand dollars, plus you'll only be able to buy and sell at the end of each trading day. But it's important to remember that mutual funds and ETFs aren't investments in and of themselves, they're just vehicles for investing in securities like stocks and bonds. If you're investing in a mutual fund and an ETF that both track the same index and therefore hold the same underlying securities, you're likely to end up with similar performance over longer periods of time as long as the fees for each fund are similar. Learn more: A guide to financial planning and how to get started Whether you invest in an ETF or an index fund, you are choosing to invest in your future. The differences between the two tend to be small; in fact, index funds and ETFs are often (but not always) the same thing. Thus, which one you choose is less important than the choice to start investing. In doing so, you take advantage of low fees and diversification, and an investment that will grow over time. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How the US used its bunker-buster bombs at Iranian nuclear sites
WASHINGTON (AP) — The deep penetrating bombs that the U.S. dropped into two Iranian nuclear facilities were designed specifically for those sites and were the result of more than 15 years of intelligence and weapons design work, the Pentagon's top leaders said Thursday. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said at a press briefing that they are confident the weapons struck exactly as planned. Caine, the nation's top military officer, offered new details about the work that went into building the 'bunker-buster' bombs and how the U.S. used them to burrow into the Iranian sites. He sought to show the level of destruction but did not directly address President Donald Trump's assertion that Tehran's nuclear program has been 'obliterated.' A classified briefing that pushed US work on bunker busters The bombs, called the GBU-57 A/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator, have their roots in a decades-old classified briefing 'of what looked like a major construction project in the mountains of Iran,' Caine said. That turned out to be the Fordo fuel enrichment plant, with construction believed to have started around 2006. It became operational in 2009, the same year Tehran publicly acknowledged its existence. The classified briefing was shown in 2009 to a Defense Threat Reduction Agency officer, who with a colleague 'lived and breathed' Fordo for the next 15 years, studying the geology, construction dig, the earth moved and 'every piece of equipment going in and every piece of equipment going out," Caine said. What they concluded: The U.S. didn't have a bomb that could destroy those sites. So the Pentagon got to work, Caine said. 'We had so many Ph.D.s working on the mock program — doing modeling and simulation — that we were quietly and in a secret way the biggest users of supercomputer hours within the United States of America,' he said. How the bunker busters are designed The 30,000-pound bomb is comprised of steel, explosive and a fuse programmed to a specific detonation time. The longer the fuse, the deeper the weapon will penetrate before exploding. Over the years, the military tested and retested it hundreds of times on mock facilities, Caine said. Crews fine-tuned the bombs to detonate in the mock enrichment rooms, delaying detonation until they had reached a position to send a pressure blast through open tunnels to destroy equipment underground. How the US said it bombed an Iranian underground nuclear facility Fordo had two main ventilation routes into the underground facility — and officials carefully eyed these entry points as a way to target the site. Each route had three shafts — a main shaft and a smaller shaft on either side, which looked almost like a pitchfork in graphics provided by the Pentagon. In the days preceding the U.S. attack, Iran placed large concrete slabs on top of both ventilation routes to try to protect them, Caine said. In response, the U.S. crafted an attack plan where six bunker-buster bombs would be used against each ventilation route, using the main shaft as a way down into the enrichment facility. Seven B-2 stealth bombers were used, carrying two of the massive munitions apiece. The first bomb was used to eliminate the concrete slab, Caine said. The next four bombs were dropped down the main shaft and into the complex at a speed of more than 1,000 feet per second before exploding, he said. A sixth bomb was dropped as a backup, in case anything went wrong. In addition to the 12 bombs dropped on Fordo, with six on each ventilation route, two more hit Iran's main Natanz facility, Caine said. Each crew was able to confirm detonation as they saw the bombs drop from the aircraft in front of them: 'We know that the trailing jets saw the first weapons function,' Caine said. The pilots reported back that it was the brightest explosion they had ever seen — that it looked like daylight, he said. Questions remain about the whereabouts of Iran's highly enriched uranium Caine said the munitions were built, tested and loaded properly, guided to their intended targets and then exploded as designed. 'Iran's nuclear facilities have been destroyed,' Hegseth said. However, questions remained as to whether the highly enriched uranium that Iran would need to develop a nuclear weapon was at the site at the time. Asked repeatedly, Hegseth did not say if the uranium had been destroyed or moved. 'I'm not aware of any intelligence that I've reviewed that says things were not where they were supposed to be — moved or otherwise,' Hegseth said.
Forbes
30 minutes ago
- Forbes
What We Know About Kilmar Abrego Garcia Case As Prosecutors Seek His Deportation
Federal prosecutors are looking to deport Kilmar Abrego Garcia after he is released from a Tennessee jail ahead of his trial on human smuggling charges, according to multiple outlets, opposing his attorneys' attempt to return him to Maryland, where he lived with his wife and children. Katheryn Millwee holds a portrait of Kilmar Abrego Garcia outside the federal courthouse Wednesday, ... More June 25, 2025, in Nashville, Tenn. (AP Photo/George Walker IV) Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved Prosecutors with the Trump administration told a judge Thursday the administration is seeking to deport Abrego Garcia to a country other than El Salvador, where he was initially deported to in March over an 'administrative error,' the Associated Press reported. A Nashville, Tennessee-based federal judge who ordered Abrego Garcia's release Wednesday chose to keep Abrego Garcia in jail a few days longer over concerns he would be quickly deported upon release. This is a developing story. Check back for updates.
