Five Government departments use AI to draft responses to questions in Parliament
Five Government departments are using artificial intelligence to answer questions in Parliament, The Telegraph can reveal.
Labour ministers were accused of providing 'stock answers generated by a computer' when responding to questions tabled by their fellow MPs.
It comes after it emerged that Peter Kyle, the Science Secretary, has used AI software ChatGPT to help him come up with policy advice.
All departments were asked last month by Tory backbencher Peter Bedford whether they were using AI to respond to MPs' parliamentary written questions.
The Department for Business and Trade, the Department for Education, the Department for Work and Pensions, the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology and the Foreign Office all confirmed that they were.
Justin Madders, the business minister, said a 'small proportion' of staff in his department had access to AI tools. 'These tools may be used to support the drafting process for responding to written parliamentary questions,' he said.
Janet Daby, the minister for children and families, said the Department for Education 'sometimes uses artificial intelligence software tools to support the drafting process for responding to written parliamentary questions'.
Andrew Western, a work and pensions minister, said the DWP 'has access to AI software tools to support day-to-day workings such as the drafting process for responding to written parliamentary questions'.
Feryal Clark, a minister at the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, said staff 'do have access to AI software tools to support the drafting process'.
And Catherine West, a Foreign Office minister, said the department 'has made Microsoft Copilot available to staff as part of a trial'.
She continued: 'It is therefore possible that officials have used Copilot to assist them when drafting replies to written parliamentary questions.'
Ministers from all departments insisted responses generated by AI were reviewed by policy officials before receiving sign-off from Government ministers.
'Potentially sensitive information'
Mr Bedford said the use of AI software to formulate official ministerial responses was 'alarming' and insisted that MPs 'deserve proper answers'.
He told The Telegraph: 'I have concerns with Government departments sharing potentially sensitive information with AI tools that have a global footprint.
'Given the limited regulation around AI, its use, and data sharing it is alarming that there is no overarching Government policy on its use.
'Furthermore, as democratically elected representatives Members of Parliament deserve proper answers to their parliamentary questions, rather than bland, stock answers generated by a computer system.'
Earlier this year, it emerged that Mr Kyle, whose brief covers AI, asked ChatGPT why small businesses in the UK had been so slow adopting the technology.
He went on to request suggestions for the 'best podcasts' he could appear on to reach a 'wide audience', while also asking ChatGPT to define 'digital inclusion'.
There have been growing fears that Labour could introduce a wealth tax after it backed AI software that can value people's homes.
The Welsh Government ordered a computer programme that relies on AI to review council tax bands.
Ministers later admitted the software could be adapted for use in England as they failed to rule out introducing a similar tax in the autumn.
Sir Keir Starmer outlined proposals for a 20-fold increase in public computing capacity at the start of the year.
The Prime Minister has also pledged to invest in a new supercomputer and 'AI growth zones' and billions of pounds in private investment in data centres as part of plans for Britain to become an 'AI superpower'.
More than 4,000 megawatts (MW) of data centre capacity is currently under construction or in development in Britain.
This means that more than a nuclear power station's worth of electricity would be needed in order to meet a surge in demand for AI under Sir Keir's data blitz plans.
In turn, this could raise concerns about demands on Britain's electricity grid as Ed Miliband, the Energy Secretary, plans to increase reliance on renewable energy.
A Government spokesman said: 'Not one parliamentary question has been answered solely by AI and it is false to suggest otherwise. Officials may use AI to help speed up drafting responses, but will always make sure they are accurate and ultimately signed off by ministers.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
25 minutes ago
- Reuters
Vance says Trump doesn't want long-term feud with Musk
WASHINGTON, June 11 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump was frustrated with billionaire Elon Musk, but doesn't want a long-term feud with the entrepreneur and big campaign donor, Vice President JD Vance said on Wednesday. Vance told reporters that he has spoken to both Musk and Trump about trying to make sure Musk is supportive of the president, adding that the Trump team was grateful for what Musk did early in the process of making government more efficient. Musk on Wednesday said he regretted some of the social media posts he had made about Trump, saying they had gone "too far," a gesture the U.S. president described as "very nice," in the latest sign of a tentative reconciliation between the two.
South Wales Guardian
28 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Reeves announces £6 billion to provide millions of NHS tests and procedures
New scanners, ambulances and urgent treatment centres are among the things which the additional cash will pay for, with the aim of providing up to four million more tests and procedures over the next five years. The announcement comes after the Chancellor put NHS funding at the heart of her spending review on Wednesday, raising its budget in a move worth £29 billion a year. This comes, however, at the expense of other areas of public spending. The new £6 billion funding will help to meet the Government's target of reducing NHS waiting lists in England, the Chancellor claimed. 'Over a decade of underinvestment from the previous government put the NHS on its knees, with people across the country unable to get the care they need. We are investing in Britain's renewal, and we will turn that around,' Ms Reeves said. She added: 'Part of our record investment will deliver four million tests, scans and procedures, so hard-working people can get the healthcare they and their families need. 'There is no strong economy without a strong NHS, and we'll deliver on our Plan for Change to end the hospital backlog, improve living standards and get more money in people's pockets.' The latest spending commitment will help patients get access to diagnostic scans and treatment in places such as shopping centres and high streets, speeding up their diagnoses. The Government hopes this will help to cut NHS waiting lists, meeting Labour's goal of ensuring the health service carries out 92% of routine operations within 18 weeks. Health Secretary Wes Streeting said: 'Since taking office we have been relentless in our drive to cut waiting times for patients, delivering over 3.6 million extra elective care appointments and reducing the overall waiting list by over 200,000. 'The £6 billion investment we are announcing today will generate millions more vital diagnostic tests, scans and procedures for patients across the country.' On Wednesday evening, Ms Reeves said the Government was 'confident' it could meet its pledge to reduce waiting lists after giving the NHS a 3% annual increase in funding at the spending review. Some health leaders are, however, sceptical that the Government will meet its target, despite the funding boost provided at the spending review. Matthew Taylor, chief executive of the NHS Confederation, which represents all health organisations, warned 'difficult decisions will still need to be made as this additional £29 billion won't be enough to cover the increasing cost of new treatments, with staff pay likely to account for a large proportion of it'. He added: 'So, on its own, this won't guarantee that waiting time targets are met.' Sarah Woolnough, chief executive of the King's Fund charity, said: 'The Chancellor said she wants the public to have an NHS there when they need it. 'It is hard to see how all the things she mentions: faster ambulance times, more GP appointments, and adequate mental health services and more can be met on this settlement alone. 'Particularly when large parts of this additional funding will be absorbed by existing rising costs, such as the higher cost of medicines, which are currently being negotiated, and covering staff pay deals.'
South Wales Guardian
28 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Land value tax in Wales could replace council tax and rates
The former first minister said the Welsh Government continues to explore the feasibility of LVT as used in countries such as Denmark and Singapore. Professor Drakeford has long supported a LVT, arguing those who have the privilege of ownership should pay something back for that privilege. LVT is levied on the value of the land rather than the property itself. Proponents argue LVT is easier to collect, more efficient and difficult to avoid, while discouraging speculation and encouraging people to bring idle land back into use. Professor Drakeford told the Senedd: "I am anxious to see this discussion move beyond the theoretical and into the realms of the practically possible. He explained that the Welsh Government has invited tenders to test approaches to valuing land, with submissions for every aspect of the work. The finance secretary said: "I want to use the coming months to test the boundaries of what might be possible in the next Senedd term. "Let's open the door to more radical, fundamental and progressive reform in the future." He added: "The current system is unfairly weighted against those who experience difficulty in paying. "I want to shift the focus from harmful escalation towards supportive prevention." He stated ministers will introduce a new council tax appeals process by April 2026 that will be "easier to navigate and provide a better, modern system for taxpayers". Peter Fox agreed that council tax is regressive by nature "and that it will never really become a fair local tax". Mr Fox accused the Welsh Government of increasing tax on families "by stealth" through underfunding councils which, in turn, pass on the shortfall to people. He called for reform of the "outdated and flawed" funding formula. Professor Drakeford replied: "Almost every local authority in Wales will agree that the formula needs revision – nobody can agree on how that should be done. "The 22 local authorities each believe that the formula uniquely disadvantages them."
