Local Sheriffs react to Federal program 287(g)
SAVANNAH, Ga. (WSAV) – For many sheriffs in our community the answer to the question of Federal Program 287(g) was the same: We will uphold the law, but we won't allow anything unconstitutional to happen to the citizens who reside in their communities.
Chatham County Sheriff Richard Coleman stated, 'In my view as long as they reside in Chatham County, they are citizens.'
If state and local Law Enforcement agencies choose to participate, the program gives them the authority to perform specified immigration officer functions under the agency's direction and oversight.
Sheriff Coleman along with Liberty County Sheriff William Bowman both have the same stance on the 287(g) program. If it is required of the law, then they will uphold their civic duty but as far as volunteering to work with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), both are opposed.
'I heard that a lot of sheriffs are opting out you know, they're challenging the constitutional position of these orders that are coming forward. But I'm sure that like myself, you know, they are also law men and women who understand that their duty is to protect and uphold the Constitution,' Coleman said.
'After speaking with Sheriff Bowman, as far as anything that comes down, you know, are we only going to do what the law requires. We're not going to volunteer to do anything. We're going to do what the law states,' said Lt. Phillip Bohannon, Liberty County Public Information Officer.
Other counties in the state have opted in and will be working with ICE, but as far as our counties, these were these were the reasons stated for why they won't be opting in include cost, time, and staffing measures.
'Whether its federal enforcement or local enforcement you know there's a tax dollar hat applies to any situation that, you know, any police or law enforcement operation, and so you have to consider the taxpaying citizens of your county when you make these decisions with any of these law enforcement operations,' Coleman explained.WSAV News 3 reached out to eight different law enforcement agencies across various counties and are still waiting for six to respond.
This is a developing story and we will provide updates as soon as they are made available.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Live updates: Protests against Trump ICE raids flare across US
Update: Date: 52 min ago Title: At least three detained in Tuscon, Arizona during anti-ICE protest Content: At least three people have been detained in Tucson, Arizona, during an anti-ICE protest, according to CNN affiliate KOLD. More than 100 people gathered in the city Wednesday, KOLD reported. 'We're here to protect Tucson. We're here to protect our neighborhoods. We're here to protect our community,' one unnamed protester told KOLD. Some protesters vandalized property, including breaking windows and spray painting walls, video from KOLD shows. Four policemen can be seen carrying one protester by their arms and legs, video shows. Update: Date: 34 min ago Title: 700 mobilized Marines will be deployed to LA within 2 days. Here's how they've been preparing Content: Activated US Marines have completed their training and will be deployed to Los Angeles within the next 48 hours, according to the US Northern Command. About 700 Marines have finished a 'pre-deployment workup,' it said late on Wednesday. 'When called up for this mission, the battalion underwent additional training specific to this mission. This training included de-escalation, crowd-control, and understanding the Standing Rules for the Use of Force (SRUF),' it said. These rules govern the use of force by military personnel during missions to support law enforcement inside the US. Northern Command notes the forces themselves 'do not conduct civilian law enforcement functions.' The Marines are bolstering a deployment of about 2,000 National Guard troops currently on active duty and helping ICE agents, and another 2,000 Guard members who will be ready for duty Thursday afternoon, according to Maj. Gen. Scott M. Sherman, who is leading the task force. Happening today: A hearing is scheduled for this afternoon in federal court over whether the Trump administration can use the National Guard and Marines to assist with federal immigration enforcement actions. Update: Date: 1 hr 34 min ago Title: 8 arrested in Seattle following Wednesday's protests Content: Police in Seattle, Washington, have arrested eight protesters after anti-ICE protests flared in the city Wednesday, its police department said in a statement. Protesters 'marched peacefully from Capitol Hill to downtown Seattle as part of a demonstration,' the statement said. While most of the march was peaceful, officers intervened after some individuals set fire to a dumpster at around 10 p.m. local time, police said. 'Police staged near the group while they waited for the Seattle Fire Department to arrive. Individuals from the group confronted them, throwing bottles, rocks, and concrete chunks at them,' the statement said. 'A protestor threw a large firework at officers, but no one was injured.' Update: Date: 1 hr 9 min ago Title: LAPD detains protesters outside of curfew area Content: Footage shared with CNN on Wednesday night shows Los Angeles police pulling people out from the crowd of protesters to be detained. The video, provided by non-profit news organization CalMatters, showed police confronting protesters in and around Koreatown, about 3 miles from the curfew zone that went into effect at 8 p.m. Pacific Time. It showed officers walking toward a group of protesters, taking hold of one person and escorting them away with their hands held behind their back. In another video, several officers are seen running toward a different group, shouting: 'Get back, get back!' as they detain another individual. Earlier on Wednesday night, a CNN reporter on the ground witnessed protesters driving through an area where the curfew does not apply — heading in the direction of Koreatown. Videos shot by CNN show a line of cars honking loudly, with some passengers leaning out the window or standing upright on truck beds waving Mexican and American flags. Some protesters are seen walking on foot. The curfew currently in place only covers about 1 square mile in area in Downtown Los Angeles where the protests had been concentrated. Update: Date: 2 hr 48 min ago Title: In maps: Where protests are hitting the US Content: Protests have spread beyond Los Angeles, with demonstrations against ICE and the Trump administration popping up in major cities across the United States. In both LA and Spokane, Washington, city authorities imposed curfews on Wednesday night. In many other cities, police departments worked to disperse protesters long after night fell. The curfew in parts of downtown LA lasts from 8 p.m. to 6 a.m. Pacific Time. But the curfew is only in place for a very small strip of the city, measuring about 1 square mile in area. LA Mayor Karen Bass said the curfew could be in effect for several days. Things could pick up on Saturday, when there are 'No Kings' protests and anti-Trump rallies scheduled across the country. The protests, organized by the nonviolent 50501 movement, come on the same day as President Donald Trump's planned military parade through Washington, DC. The name of the protests represents a rejection of the Trump administration's sweeping actions since he took power, which the group describes as authoritarian. 'In America, we don't do kings,' the 50501 movement's website reads. 'The corruption has gone too. far. No thrones. No crowns. No kings.' Update: Date: 3 hr 4 min ago Title: In pictures: Protests across the nation Content: Protesters took to the streets in cities across the country Wednesday, demonstrating against President Donald Trump's immigration policies and raids by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The protests began on Friday in Los Angeles, where a curfew is in place and where the Trump administration has federalized the National Guard. See more images from the protests in Los Angeles. Update: Date: 3 hr 1 min ago Title: Hundreds gather in San Antonio as anti-ICE protests spread Content: Hundreds of people gathered in San Antonio, Texas, late Wednesday to protest against raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement, according to CNN affiliate KSAT. The protests were peaceful and there were no reports of violence, KSAT reported. 'I'm here because I want to be a voice for the people that are too scared to come out here and speak their own truth,' one protester told KSAT. The gathering started before 7 p.m. local time with a crowd of about 100 people, before swelling to hundreds by about 9 p.m., according to KSAT. Texas' governor deployed the Texas National Guard to San Antonio ahead of the protests. San Antonio Police Chief William McManus said Wednesday that officers would intervene if 'it turns violent,' KSAT reported. Troops with the Texas Department of Public Safety were seen patrolling the area as San Antonio police officers drove through downtown, according to KSAT. Update: Date: 3 hr 4 min ago Title: Seattle firefighters extinguish dumpster fire as police work to disperse crowds Content: Firefighters in Seattle extinguished a dumpster fire that was set on the road and police were still working to disperse protesters just before midnight, according to the city's police department. Videos shot on Wednesday night showed a large crowd on the streets and a fire burning at an intersection. At points, protesters threw items into the fire, including a traffic cone. The fire department 'has extinguished the dumpster fire. Police are attempting to get crowd to disperse,' the police department wrote on X. 'Officers continue moving the groups away from the federal building. Individuals are shining lasers at officers as well as throwing rocks and bottles at them. We will continue to move protestors until the individuals stop assaulting officers,' it wrote. Update: Date: 3 hr 1 min ago Title: Protests are flaring across the US. Here's what you need to know Content: Protests flared Wednesday night across the US, with two cities imposing curfews and police working to disperse crowds late into the night. In Los Angeles, police declared an unlawful assembly outside City Hall ahead of the curfew taking effect. CNN Correspondent Nick Watt reported seeing 20 to 30 people being taken into custody ahead of curfew. The protests began on Friday in LA after ICE immigration raids that detained dozens of people, including at their workplaces. Here's the latest: Update: Date: 3 hr 12 min ago Title: Trump administration officials dig in on president's decision to deploy military Content: Trump administration officials are doubling down on their defense of President Donald Trump's decision to mobilize National Guard troops and Marines to respond to protests in Los Angeles. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth suggested to lawmakers yesterday that Trump's order on Saturday to federalize the National Guard was also intended to create a precedent so that playbook could be replicated in other states. 'Part of it was about getting ahead of the problem, so that if in other places, if there are other riots, in places where law enforcement officers are threatened, we would have the capability to surge National Guard there, if necessary,' Hegseth said. Hegseth said that 'thankfully, in most of those states, you'd have a governor that recognizes the need for it, supports it and mobilizes it, him or herself. In California, unfortunately, the governor wants to play politics with it.' Attorney General Pam Bondi said Wednesday the Trump administration 'is not scared to go further' in expanding its legal authorities to deploy troops in Los Angeles. 'Right now in California, we're at a good point. We're not scared to go further. We're not frightened to do something else if we need to,' she said when answering questions at the White House from CNN about the threshold for invoking the Insurrection Act, which permits the president to use military forces to end an insurrection or rebellion on US soil.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The big, beautiful AI disaster coming to a school near you
"AI-generated images and chatbot responses about the Los Angeles situation have further exposed the startling lack of information and AI literacy among the American public." (Getty Images) Predictably, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement riots in Los Angeles have been viewed through a partisan lens. The left has suggested that the federalizing of the California National Guard is a mere dress rehearsal for a full military dictatorship by President Donald Trump, while the right has pounded the drum of pseudo-law and order with '[i]f they spit, we will hit.' Both of these viewpoints are irresponsible, ill-conceived, and lean into misinformation. Trump is within his lawful and precedential authority to federalize the National Guard given the current circumstances seen in and around Los Angeles. Spitting on a law enforcement officer is assault. However, Trump's remark about spitting directly leading to hitting overtly encourages disproportionate use of force. Couple this with the speaker of the House saying that the governor of California 'should be tarred and feathered.' Lost among the politics of this moment is something media analysts have been concerned about for quite some time — moments of social upheaval ceding fertile ground to the rapid spread and uptake of misinformation via artificial intelligence. AI-generated images and chatbot responses about the Los Angeles situation have further exposed the startling lack of information and AI literacy among the American public. It is one thing for adults to engage with potential AI-driven misinformation, but consider that the minds of Generations Z and Alpha are developing within this information environment. The pertinent question to be asked is this: How will this caustic environment shape their information consumption habits? The information environment surrounding Los Angeles right now is not an outlier. It once again reveals the scale of misinformation AI is capable of generating and the ease with which it can inflame public discourse. Yet, amid this crisis, Congress is pushing forward with what has been dubbed the big beautiful bill — a federal budget package that includes a 10-year moratorium on any state-level AI regulation. This regulation would prevent schools from teaching the vital skill of AI-driven information literacy. Squirreled away in the 1,000-plus pages of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is a clause which reads: '…no state or political subdivision may enforce, during the 10-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this act, any law or regulation limiting, restricting, or otherwise regulating artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems, or automated decision systems entered into interstate commerce.' This clause explicitly forbids states and their political subdivisions (i.e. school boards) from enacting or enforcing any law or policy that 'limits, restricts, or otherwise regulates' artificial intelligence systems. This broad language would ban everything from AI plagiarism checkers to basic AI literacy curricula in public education. While proponents claim this is about ensuring regulatory uniformity, the effect is much more pervasive. It locks state governments and schools into inaction in a time of dynamic technological change. When teaching students to assess the authenticity of information, there is a hard line to walk between healthy skepticism and corrosive cynicism. AI makes this line ever more opaque to navigate. Developing minds are already traversing AI-saturated landscapes without the tools they need. Teaching AI literacy in schools is not a partisan demand; it is a civic necessity. Teachers should not demand students to be zealots or Luddites in regard to any topic. But teachers should encourage them to become friendly critics of digital information and AI — capable of examining the tools they use with both curiosity and caution. To its supporters, the 10-year moratorium is being championed as a win for unfettered innovation. In a purely capitalistic sense, this is true and could lead to widespread economic prosperity. However, it is worth recalling that similar rhetoric surrounded the onset of social media platforms. We now know what happened when those technologies were left unregulated and used as substitutes for the in-person socialization of developing minds. Mental health spiraled, polarization deepened, and a generation came of age in an isolating echo chamber. We cannot afford to wait and see what AI will do on a larger, accelerated scale. As the R Street Institute argues, the moratorium is a way to avoid a patchwork of conflicting state laws. What it actually does is prevent local communities from crafting age-appropriate, culturally relevant responses to a fast-moving technological frontier. This is not about red states or blue states, right or left. If Democrats controlled the Legislature, the tech lobby would have courted them the same way. This is about whether any policymaker who claims to care about children or families will acknowledge the responsibility of schools to prepare their students for the rapidly changing world beyond their walls. The next chapter of American life will be molded by the technologies developing minds use. This is precisely why a 21st-century, technology-focused curriculum needs to be at the forefront of every school board discussion this summer. Students should learn not only how to prompt AI responsibly, but how to verify the accuracy of its output. They should study its biases, understand its limitations, and consider its societal impacts. In doing so, they will be less likely to fall for the kinds of digital falsehoods intended to exacerbate moments of social upheaval. AI and information literacy are not passing educational trends like social-emotional learning or whole language instruction. They are part of a new baseline for civic competence. School districts should be empowered, not prohibited, from integrating these skills into their curricula. The technology shaping this generation will evolve faster than the ability to legislate solutions to its shortcomings. Education is the answer to prepare young minds for a world awash in AI and digital information. Let us hope this answer does not get taken away from states and local school boards, leading students down the road to a big, beautiful AI disaster.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Ohio ‘state to watch' for U.S. constitutional convention measures, concerned advocates say
Stock photo from Getty Images. Ohio is one of the states where legislators are pushing for conventions that could make constitutional amendments related to term limits and other issues, but advocates are concerned about the free-for-all that could result. These measures have garnered strong opinions on both sides of the issue. Opponents, going back to James Madison, say constitutional conventions are risky because of their lack of regulation once a convention is called. This could allow for uncontrolled power-grabs that could result in amendments that may not be popular with the general public. The U.S. Constitution can be amended in two ways: through Congress with amendments passed with two-thirds support of each chamber and then sent to the states for ratification; or through a constitutional convention invoked by Article V. Article V is silent about rules and regulations once a convention is called. In order to call a convention, two-thirds of states, or 34 of the 50, would have to pass their own resolutions applying for a constitutional convention for a certain purpose. Past applications by states have aimed to force the federal government to balance their budget, but no such convention has happened in the history of the United States. Recently, however, the draft of a lawsuit has been circulating to attorneys generals in some states, looking to make the convention happen based on a legal argument that applications from states — no matter the purpose or age of the request — can be combined and counted toward the 34 needed to bring about a constitutional convention, according to critics of the move. 'This is literally a rewrite of our Constitution,' said Viki Harrison, policy director for civil rights and civil liberties with Common Cause, a nonpartisan voting rights advocacy and government watchdog group with branches all over the country. 'There would be nothing safe, there would be no guardrails.' Ohio has seen out-of-state interest in their measures, in what Common Cause Ohio's Catherine Turcer called a 'full-court press' this year of legislation and movement to see passage. Former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum appeared in March to support Senate Joint Resolution 3 in the Ohio Senate General Government Committee, and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis came to Ohio to support House Joint Resolution 3. 'It is very clear that Ohio is a focus of moving an Article V convention, that it is in fact a priority, and we are a state to watch,' Turcer said in a media briefing with other Common Cause branches. Santorum spoke on behalf of Convention of States Action, an advocacy group pushing for support of a constitutional convention, arguing that America's founders included the option of a constitutional convention 'to give the states a way to counteract the federal government if it became abusive with its powers.' Convention of States Action said 19 states have passed resolutions for a constitutional convention, and 'we hope to see Ohio become state number 20,' according to state media liaison Diana Telles. DeSantis argued that without term limits in Congress, 'incentives to do really good policy are just skewed away,' making a constitutional amendment necessary. The resolution DeSantis came to support, HJR 3, specifically applies for a convention of the states to institute congressional term limits. The measure and its Senate counterpart, SJR 6, look to piggyback on a 1992 amendment to the Ohio Constitution that instituted term limits for Ohio's members in Congress of two successive six-year terms in the U.S. Senate and four two-year terms in the U.S. House. Those term limits aren't being enforced because of a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in 1996 that 'the states have no authority to change the qualifications for members of Congress,' according to an analysis of HJR 3 done by the Legislative Service Commission. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX While the resolutions spell out the necessary number of states needed to call a convention, they also point out that the Constitution 'does not specify how a convention to propose amendments to the U.S. Constitution must be conducted or how its delegates are to be chosen.' 'Further, the Constitution does not indicate whether the states that apply for a convention may limit the scope of amendments the convention is to propose,' the HJR 3 and SJR 6 resolution analyses state. While term limits are attractive to many Americans, the opposition to constitutional conventions has less to do with the specific issues and more to do with the freedom convention attendees would have if it takes place. 'Whether you like term limits or not, (the problem is) the mechanism to get it,' Harrison said. As for the other convention request currently working its way through the Ohio legislature, HJR 2 and its companion, SJR 3, also want to see a convention that touches on term limits, but go further, looking at amendments 'that impose fiscal restraints on the federal government' and 'limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government.' These measures go into more detail about the purported method through which conventions are formed, while also noting Congress 'does not have power beyond calling the convention and setting a reasonable time and place.' The Ohio bills name the state legislatures as authority-bearers when it comes to naming delegates to the convention, instructing delegates, and recalling delegates for 'breach of a duty or a violation of the instructions provided.' All four resolutions have seen hearings in their committees, but no votes have been cast on the measures yet, possibly because the legislature has had the main priority of passing a state operating budget by the end of June. Some states have been working to repeal resolutions that requested a convention, which, according to Georgetown University law professor David Super, could be the reason a lawsuit to combine existing resolutions is being floated. 'Congress decided long ago that it can only count applications together when they're for the same purpose,' Super said, in the media briefing with Common Cause. The Ohio resolutions on term limits specify that the application 'is valid only for the purpose of a convention that is limited to considering congressional term limits,' and say it 'should be aggregated with other state applications for a convention on term limits, but not with any applications on any other subject.' The resolutions focused on federal fiscal responsibility say the measures are only valid if combined 'with other applications from state legislatures that call for a convention for substantially the same purpose.' Telles said the movement for a constitutional convention would be for all of these issues. From the Convention of States Action point of view, 'it is necessary to address all of these areas, not just term limits or a balanced budget.' 'State amending conventions to propose amendments are a safe, civil and constitutional way for the states to flex their muscle and affect real change in Washington, D.C.,' Telles said. 'It's clear Washington is not going to fix itself.' Even if the lawsuit is filed – it's still just a draft at this point – Super said previous cases like it have fallen apart in the past, and 'there are some really serious problems with it.' 'The reason that these cases have failed is … they operate on the premise that the federal courts can tell the legislature what to do,' Super said. And while this issue has seen some momentum, according to Common Cause, the idea of implementing a constitutional convention isn't a universally supported issue by any means, even among the same political parties. 'This is not a standard red-blue issue, there are members of Congress who have strongly supported a constitutional convention,' Super said. 'But there are also members of Congress who are opposed to a convention.' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
