19 Future Challenges For Leaders And How To Face Them Today
The challenges coming down the pike for business leaders are evolving faster, and differently, than many may be prepared to face. While today's leaders are focused on navigating hybrid work, economic shifts and technological change, a new wave of challenges—some of which are still under the radar—is fast approaching.
The unexpected obstacles ahead will demand new mindsets, deeper self-awareness and novel strategies for organizational success. Here, 19 members of Forbes Coaches Council share the future challenges they see on the horizon and what forward-thinking leaders can do now to stay ahead of the curve.
Leaders are likely not fully anticipating the erosion of trust in traditional leadership, including their own. As AI and decentralized technologies empower individuals, leadership based on title will lose influence. Leaders will need to earn followership through transparency, adaptability and shared purpose. Influence will depend on the ability to co-create meaning and foster dynamic trust. - Greg Smith, FranklinCovey Executive Coaching
Balancing the speed at which technology is moving the world forward with workplace well-being will certainly be a challenge. As AI accelerates, there is a growing demand for companies to continuously innovate and push products and services with efficiency and expediency to stay competitive. This puts more pressure on employees at a time when they are seeking purpose, connection and better work-life integration. - Jaclynn Robinson, Nine Muses Consulting, LLC
Baby Boomers are retiring in massive numbers (10,000–11,000 per day in the U.S. alone). Leaders need to be thinking about the impact this will have on the workforce, including loss of institutional knowledge, huge leadership gaps, succession pressures and mentorship gaps. Gen-Z will make up about 30% of the global workforce by 2030, but there aren't enough of them to fully replace the Boomers. - Lindsey Zajac, Ascendant
Change isn't just constant—it's volatile, messy and merciless. The real failure won't be falling behind. It'll be getting steamrolled by what you didn't see coming. Most leaders mistake disruption for a speed bump when it's a cliff, and they're using linear thinking in a world that's gone exponential. Yesterday's logic will be tomorrow's liability. - Ira Wolfe, Poised for the Future Company
Forbes Coaches Council is an invitation-only community for leading business and career coaches. Do I qualify?
Generational shifts redefine work, environment and culture for success and well-being. New generations value integration, purpose, fulfillment, well-being, growth, belonging and authenticity. Leaders can leverage this by offering flexible work, a well-being focus, impact and future growth investment. This benefits all, fostering engagement and a sustainable future. - Lori Huss, Lori Huss Coaching and Consulting
Tomorrow's leaders will wrestle with hybrid workforces of humans and generative AIs, a landscape where coded bias shapes decisions, authenticity is commoditized and accountability vanishes into algorithms. They'll need ethics playbooks for synthetic colleagues, to guard against moral drift in data, and to retrain mindsets for a machine-mediated culture. Yet, few are preparing. - Patricia Burlaud, P. Burlaud Consulting, LLC
A future challenge leaders may not be ready for is leading teams shaped by AI-driven collaboration, where emotional intelligence, rather than technical skill, becomes the true differentiator. Building human connections in a hybrid, tech-heavy world will be more complicated. We are not effectively developing EQ early enough, and it remains a blind spot for many. - Alex Draper, DX Learning Solutions
Mental overload, not just long hours, is the new burnout. With constant pings, emails, meetings and news, attention is now our most valuable resource. The brain has limits, and leaders who ignore cognitive bandwidth risk team burnout. They must design for clarity, reduce noise and model unplugging. Mental sustainability is the next key leadership skill. - Dr. Sharon H. Porter, Vision & Purpose LifeStyle Magazine and Media
Cognitive fragmentation—our growing inability to maintain sustained focus—may be the hidden crisis facing leaders in the future. As digital interruptions multiply, we must intentionally design workplaces that protect deep thinking or risk losing innovation quality. - Dana Williams, Dana Williams Co., LLC
Many leaders are too overwhelmed by current demands to plan for future growth. Since talent drives success, leaders must pair strong interviews with candidate assessments. I help executives assess candidate fit for culture, role and leadership—boosting hiring confidence and reducing turnover. - Jamie Griffith, Echelon Search Partners
One future challenge leaders aren't thinking enough about is the erosion of meaning at work. As automation and AI take over routine tasks, employees will increasingly ask: 'What's my role in this ecosystem, and why does it matter?' Leaders must be ready to re-anchor their teams in purpose, identity and impact. Without this, retention, engagement and innovation will quietly unravel. - Kiran Mann, M2M Business Solutions Inc.
One future challenge leaders will face is navigating the emotional impact of constant change. While we prepare for innovation and disruption, we often overlook the human side of adapting to change. Change isn't just technical; it's deeply personal, and addressing this will differentiate those who lead successfully from those who merely manage. - Rahul Karan Sharma, RahulKaranSharma.com
What will shareholder value look like in our world of finite resources? We can no longer extract more from nature than what it provides. New models of commerce are required alongside new models of organizational design and work. - Brittney Van Matre, Rewild Work Strategies
Leaders face a silent crisis: governing autonomous AI in shared physical spaces. While we regulate digital content, we're unprepared for AI making real-time decisions alongside humans—from delivery robots to medical devices. This demands new frameworks for responsibility, liability and social coordination that balance innovation with safety and address the inevitable public trust challenges ahead. - Maryam Daryabegi, Innovation Bazar
One challenge is building resilience within their organizations. With the geopolitical, financial and technological changes that are occurring at a rapid pace, leaders who build resilient organizations, including their employees, finances, product pipelines and customer paths, will survive in the long run. - Gregg Frederick, G3 Development Group, Inc
Emotional fragmentation in hybrid teams is a future challenge that leaders are not thinking about enough. As work becomes more digitized, keeping connection, trust and a shared sense of purpose will be even more essential. Leaders will have to take on a role as emotional architects to keep teams feeling unified and motivated over distances. - Shikha Bajaj, Own Your Color
The psychological fatigue of constant reinvention is certainly a challenge. As change accelerates, leaders must pivot not just their strategy, but also their identity, again and again. Leading in ongoing ambiguity demands emotional endurance, narrative agility and the strength to stay grounded while evolving at speed. Most aren't ready. Develop deep self-awareness and embrace reflective practices for honest dialogue. - Stephan Lendi, Newbury Media & Communications GmbH
The biggest challenge for leaders is the systemic implications of their decisions in an increasingly interconnected world. As technology, climate, economics and social issues intertwine, a choice in one area will ripple unexpectedly across others. Leaders who fail to see the big picture will struggle. The true challenge will be developing the know-how to map these hidden connections and not deal with every event reactively. - Thomas Lim, Centre for Systems Leadership (SIM Academy)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
43 minutes ago
- CBS News
Judge approves landmark NCAA settlement, clearing way for schools to pay athletes directly
A federal judge signed off on arguably the biggest change in the history of college sports on Friday, clearing the way for schools to begin paying their athletes millions of dollars as soon as next month as the multibillion-dollar industry shreds the last vestiges of the amateur model that defined it for more than a century. Nearly five years after Arizona State swimmer Grant House sued the NCAA and its five biggest conferences to lift restrictions on revenue sharing, U.S. Judge Claudia Wilken approved the final proposal that had been hung up on roster limits, just one of many changes ahead amid concerns that thousands of walk-on athletes will lose their chance to play college sports. The sweeping terms of the so-called House settlement include approval for each school to share up to $20.5 million with athletes over the next year and $2.7 billion that will be paid over the next decade to thousands of former players who were barred from that revenue for years. In a letter penned by NCAA President Charlie Baker following the announcement, Baker wrote that the settlement "opens a pathway to begin stabilizing college sports. This new framework that enables schools to provide direct financial benefits to student-athletes and establishes clear and specific rules to regulate third-party NIL [name, image and likeness] agreements marks a huge step forward for college sports." The agreement brings a seismic shift to hundreds of schools that were forced to reckon with the reality that their players are the ones producing the billions in TV and other revenue, mostly through football and basketball, that keep this machine humming. The scope of the changes — some have already begun — is difficult to overstate. The professionalization of college athletics will be seen in the high-stakes and expensive recruitment of stars on their way to the NFL and NBA, and they will be felt by athletes whose schools have decided to pare their programs. The agreement will resonate in nearly every one of the NCAA's 1,100 member schools boasting nearly 500,000 athletes. Wilken's ruling comes 11 years after she dealt the first significant blow to the NCAA ideal of amateurism when she ruled in favor of former UCLA basketball player Ed O'Bannon and others who were seeking a way to earn money from the use of their name, image and likeness, or NIL — a term that is now as common in college sports as "March Madness" or "Roll Tide." It was just four years ago that the NCAA cleared the way for NIL money to start flowing, but the changes coming are even bigger. Wilken granted preliminary approval to the settlement last October. That sent colleges scurrying to determine not only how they were going to afford the payments, but how to regulate an industry that also allows players to cut deals with third parties so long as they are deemed compliant by a newly formed enforcement group that will be run by auditors at Deloitte. The agreement takes a big chunk of oversight away from the NCAA and puts it in the hands of the four biggest conferences. The ACC, Big Ten, Big 12 and SEC hold most of the power and decision-making heft, especially when it comes to the College Football Playoff, which is the most significant financial driver in the industry and is not under the NCAA umbrella like the March Madness tournaments are.
Wall Street Journal
43 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
United Switches Off Starlink Internet on Regional Jets After Static Problem
United Airlines started rolling out free Starlink Wi-Fi last month with fanfare. But it has had to disable the service on roughly two dozen planes to address problems with static interference. United said Friday that it is working with Starlink to address 'a small number of reports' about the problem, which it said isn't a flight-safety issue. While it is being fixed, the Starlink-equipped regional jets have been operating with the Wi-Fi turned off.
Wall Street Journal
an hour ago
- Wall Street Journal
Landmark House v. NCAA Settlement Approved by Judge, Allowing Colleges to Pay Athletes
A federal judge in California finally approved a $2.6 billion settlement for college athletes that upends a century-old tenet of college sports—the notion that schools cannot pay the athletes that play for them. U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken on Friday ushered in a new era—a professional era—for college sports by signing off on a plan for the NCAA and the five most prominent sports conferences to settle a class-action lawsuit with current and former college players. The deal will give backpay to some, as well as creating a system in which each Division I school will be able to distribute roughly $20 million a year to their athletes. Schools are poised to begin implementing the new model this fall. The decision has been months in the making, drawn out in its final weeks by the judge's insistence that the NCAA find a way to stop current athletes from losing their roster spots. The settlement would 'enable NCAA schools to share their athletic revenues with Division I college student-athletes for the first time in the history of the NCAA,' Wilken wrote in her 76-page opinion. She added that it was 'expected to open the door for Division I student- athletes to receive, in the aggregate, approximately $1.6 billion dollars in new compensation and benefits per year, with that amount increasing over the next ten years.' Each school that elects to share revenue with athletes will start by distributing more than $20 million in the coming academic year. That amount will reach about $32.9 million per school by 2034-35, the end of the injunctive-relief settlement, Wilken wrote. The settlement brings the biggest changes yet to college sports, which until recently had banned athletes from earning much more than a scholarship, room and board. It comes on the heels of years of upheaval that have included loosened restrictions on off-the-field compensation for players, liberalized transfer rules and blockbuster television deals for schools and the chaotic conference realignment that followed. Yet during all of that time, many college sports leaders had still resisted paying athletes directly from the billions of dollars in revenue they helped generate. Now, that restraint is off. Schools have been readying for months for the settlement effects to land on their athletic departments, most immediately by transforming how they recruit and manage rosters in football and basketball. 'People have been doing a lot of work on a contingent basis to try to create the infrastructure that's envisioned by the settlement,' NCAA President Charlie Baker said ahead of the final approval. 'It'll definitely be rocky and kind of messy coming out of the gate, because big things are that way.' Private equity has already been circling college sports, pledging to inject capital into schools but also to advise them on how to grow their sports business. And athletic departments are openly wrestling over what the ruling means for the future of Olympic sports on campus. Most of these sports do not generate much revenue, but American campuses serve as the primary Olympic training ground for Team USA. The settlement largely immunizes the NCAA against similar claims, a provision the association considered essential as it seeks to move past decades of court battles over payments for players. But it will almost certainly not end litigation over the shape of college sports. It isn't clear whether the money needs to be distributed equitably in accordance with Title IX, the federal statute that requires publicly funded institutions to provide equal opportunities to male and female athletes. Aside from preparing for schools to distribute roughly $20 million a year to athletes, the settlement didn't specify how exactly much should be allocated to each sport. The majority will likely go to football, the financial engine of most athletic departments, as well as men's basketball. Female athletes have raised questions over the payouts they are set to receive and what fair compensation looks like for them going forward. 'This settlement doesn't come close to recognizing the value I lost,' LSU gymnast Livvy Dunne said in an unsuccessful attempt to object to the settlement. There's also the open question of whether athletes getting paid by their institutions are working for them—a distinction that could open up schools to more legal challenges. But even without employee status, the settlement will transform the relationship between players and schools. Write to Louise Radnofsky at Laine Higgins at and Rachel Bachman at
