The Marxist teaching union leader planning to use strikes to ‘reorganise Britain'
'The British education system is fundamentally and institutionally racist,' announces the speaker, on stage at the Socialist Workers Party's Marxism 2019 conference in east London. The national curriculum has been whitewashed by powerful white men, he explains, and simply teaches a 'little-Englander, white-saviour narrative'.
It's certainly a radical position to take, though perhaps one not entirely surprising given the company to whom it is directed. Yet what indeed might shock is the identity to whom it belongs – Daniel Kebede, now chief of Britain's biggest education union and in charge of representing the views of nearly half a million teachers and school leaders.
As general secretary of the National Education Union (NEU), he is currently readying his troops for strike action in the coming months after branding Labour's offer of a 2.8 per cent pay bump for public sector workers 'insulting'. This week, delegates at the NEU's annual conference in Harrogate, North Yorkshire, are due to vote on whether union districts and branches should 'immediately prepare' for a formal industrial action ballot. Kebede's members, it is claimed, are burnt out, working up to 60-hour weeks as they deal with ever increasing class sizes and shrinking budgets.
Their reward? Salaries that in real terms are worth a fifth of what they were over a decade ago. Government ministers will have watched with concern that the results of an indicative ballot, announced on Friday, showed 93.7 per cent of voting members rejecting the pay offer and 83.4 per cent would be willing to strike.
Yet for Kebede, 38, an avowed Marxist and hardened protester, joining the picket line is about more than just compensation. Instead, it would appear to serve a greater purpose – to 'take back control of an education system from a brutally racist state'.
'It's much more [than] about the issue of pay,' he told another Socialist Workers Party conference in 2022, while president of the NEU and standing for election as general secretary. 'It's about reorganising society where we are free from racism, and free from oppression.'
A grand ambition indeed, though colleagues close to Kebede suggest that this is unlikely to be among the demands at any negotiation table currently. With schools struggling to recruit and retain teachers, more money remains the number one priority. To some extent, Kebede is limited by his membership, a broader church than their leader's narrow politics suggest who must agree to any strikes first. But with just over 47 per cent of members taking part in the indicative poll, parents, who may remember the chaos caused by the last school strikes in 2023, will be concerned about any repeat. More than 100,000 teachers across 23,000 schools took part, with one in 10 schools closed and around 40 per cent of pupils missing classes.
What Kebede's words do provide, however, is a snapshot of the militant zeal fuelling the man that Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson is now facing. The outspoken primary school teacher, a Corbyn loyalist, has spent much of the past decade pounding the streets on countless anti-fascism and racism marches. The two issues, he says, run through him 'like a stick of rock' and remain central to his trade union work. So where did it all start?
Kebede was born in 1987 to a white British mother and a father who came to the UK seeking sanctuary from the Mengistu regime in Ethiopia, which had sought to turn the east African country into a socialist state after overthrowing Emperor Haile Selassie. Ever since he was a child, he has told how the issue of racism never strayed far, recalling how Stephen Lawrence's murder had a profound effect on him aged six.
While his early years were spent in west London, his family later moved to a 'predominantly white area' in Northampton. It was here that he experienced for the first time the racism that would go on to define his activism. At school, where he acted the 'class clown' to fit in, he told how in a Year 9 geography lesson the teacher scolded him for being disruptive, telling him: 'You're not in the jungle now.' 'I can remember being physically shocked by that,' he told the Talking Race podcast in 2020. It led him to join his first protest march, aged 17, against the National Front.
After studying law at the University of Wales, Kebede chose to pursue a career in teaching after volunteering to help a child with special needs at a primary school in his early 20s. 'I fell in love with it,' he says, and moved to Newcastle to begin his teacher training. But it was witnessing the 'sorry' conditions faced by pupils at a school in Wallsend, North Tyneside, and delving into the works of Karl Marx, that then turned him into a true socialist. Further motivated by the police shooting of Mark Duggan in 2011, and the rise of the far-Right in the North East, he soon took his anger onto the streets as a coordinator for Unite Against Fascism.
His move into the teaching unions came during one far-Right counter-protest when he spotted a banner for the NUT – precursor to the NEU – and decided to join as a rep in 2013. Since then, his rise through the ranks has been swift. Winning the union's prestigious Blair Peach award for his anti-racism campaigning in 2017, he joined the national executive two years later and became NEU president in 2021.
Kebede had established firm links to the Left of the Labour Party. For several years he was in a relationship with Laura Pidcock, the Corbynite MP for North West Durham. In 2017, the couple – who have a six-year-old son – bought a £230,000 three-bedroom home together in County Durham. The move courted controversy as it came just months after Pidcock had said raising a deposit for her first home was 'out of reach' – even on her then £76,000 salary – and claimed she would 'love a council house' but 'there aren't enough'.
Kebede's leadership bid in 2023 was also backed by his friends in the NEU Left, a powerful faction within the union pushing for more work to address social injustice within education. Kebede defeated his more moderate rival Niamh Sweeney by three to one to become general secretary, taking over at the start of the last school year.
In the near 18 months since, his robust stance on underfunding in schools, teacher workload and calls to reform Ofsted have proved popular. Yet questions have continued to be raised amongst union members whether his political sentiments have distracted from the NEU's ultimate aims. The union after all is not supposed to be affiliated with any political party. For all his dedication to teaching reform, Kebede has continued to wade into various political debates, no matter their relevance to education.
Most recently, his strident views on Palestine have been met with unease from some NEU members. A clip from 2021 shows him speaking at an anti-Israel rally in Newcastle calling to 'oppose apartheid… and fight for Palestinian liberation'. In the background are chants of 'Khaybar, oh Jews', a phrase historically associated with inciting violence against Jewish communities. After the footage emerged, Conservative Friends of Education called for an investigation and warned of the impact it could have on Jewish teachers and students within the union.
That same year, Kebede also had to apologise after posting an anti-Semitic trope on Facebook claiming those close to the downfall of Corbyn were being paid '30 pieces of silver' for book deals – the price for which Judas Iscariot betrayed Jesus Christ in the Bible. Deleting the post, he said he did not realise the phrase had been used by the Nazis to suggest that the Jews were traitors and responsible for Christ's death.
Last year, Kebede used the NEU's annual conference in Bournemouth to reaffirm his anti-Israel stance, condemning its 'relentless' bombardment of Gaza following the Hamas atrocities of October 7. A few months later, he was taken to task on Teachers Talk Radio as to whether this stance was in danger of losing members. 'Let me be really clear: I do not care what your opinion is on the situation in Gaza or Israel,' he replied, stating that all were welcome regardless of their view. 'That is the point of being in a union, that there is a diversity of opinion.'
One key area Kebede is particularly keen to influence is the national curriculum. He has welcomed the Government's review led by education expert Prof Becky Francis, a Left-winger whose life mission is to even the playing field for disadvantaged children. For Kebede, the aim should be 'decolonising education and embedding anti-racism throughout the curriculum', he told the Talking Race podcast in 2020. Children are taught a 'nationalistic, simplistic' version of history that is 'alienating' for pupils. 'I think we should be teaching children about the brutality of the British past,' he said, citing the Mau Mau rebellion in Kenya and the Amritsar massacre in India.
But for now, the focus remains on improving the proposed pay deal. Last academic year, teachers received a fully funded 5.5 per cent pay rise, but the amount put forward this year is less than half – an unfunded increase of 2.8 per cent. 'It's an issue that every teaching union leader would fight for, no one could agree to more cuts,' says Kevin Courtney, who, with Mary Bousted, was Kebede's joint predecessor as general secretary of the NEU.
Having known Kebede since they first marched together on the streets of Newcastle a decade ago, Courtney suggests Kebede has toned down his language since becoming leader, becoming more 'thoughtful'. He continues: 'I think his fundamental drives are the same, but when you're speaking on behalf of an organisation of half a million people, you have to use words they would be happy to hear.'
Kebede agrees. Speaking to this newspaper earlier this year, he said: 'I certainly do feel a great sense of responsibility in my role. I no longer can just speak as an individual, anything that comes out of my mouth is a representation of the union, and that's something I take really seriously.' He stands by his comments that teachers need to 'take back control'. Education is now broadly led by bureaucrats in Whitehall, he says, with 'teacher autonomy greatly removed, and their professional control eroded'.
Any industrial action is 'by no means an empty threat', but 'the reality is we absolutely want to avoid it'. 'I prefer to deal with these things through dialogue,' he adds. The earliest time frame would be autumn, he says, 'so it gives loads of opportunity for me to talk with the Secretary of State to try and avoid this action.' So what should Bridget Phillipson expect around the negotiating table? Kebede himself said shortly after the election that the pair enjoyed 'a very good relationship' and he has backed the Government's Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill.
'He gets on very well with people, it's a real gift,' says Courtney, though he adds that Kebede's steely determination should not be underestimated.
One former Tory minister, who has dealt closely with Kebede, agrees. 'The most interesting thing about Daniel is how nice he is,' the former minister says before adding: 'But he's proper Left-wing.
'While he can be disarming, one should never be disarmed.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
25 minutes ago
- New York Post
There's nothing ‘spontaneous' about radical ICE protests — here are the groups behind them
The same media who told you in 2020 that the violent Black Lives Matter riots were 'fiery, but mostly peaceful' are at it again, pretending that your eyes are lying to you: No, they claim, there are no rampaging throngs or marauders waving foreign flags and attacking the forces of order. And the peaceful protests in Los Angeles are spontaneous. Nobody is organizing them. Advertisement Or so pretends the media. 'The Trump administration's immigration raids in the California city prompted mostly peaceful protests,' blared the leftwing British paper The Guardian. Of course, these supposedly perfectly serene public gatherings then 'escalated when the president sent in the National Guard — and then the US Marines,' added the Guardian. So, no, the scenes of mayhem and invasion that played on TV for days before the first National Guard unit arrived in the City of Angels didn't prompt Trump to act — don't believe your lying eyes. Advertisement It's like Guardian writer Chris Michael has no idea of the mockery that CNN correspondent Omar Jimenez has succumbed to since August 2020, when he went on air in front of a building engulfed in flames and complete chaos behind him, and a chyron with the 'mostly peaceful' claim. One other key thing that the left-wing media is not telling you is who is organizing the disorder, and who is funding it. Ignoring this aspect leads the public to believe two things that aren't true: that the violence is spontaneous, and that it reflects true national discontent with the deportation raids. Advertisement In fact, the opposite is true. A Polling Insights newsletter that the pollster Scott Rasmussen sends out reports that, 'In the current stand-off, 57% approve of efforts by immigration officials to find and arrest illegal immigrants in Los Angeles. Fifty-two percent approve of President Trump's decision to send in the National Guard.' Other opinon surveys support this trend. So, if the American people largely support the deportation raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), who is organizing the riots against them? Advertisement We can see, from the placards and signs captured in photographs, that one key group organizing the protests comes from what one can call the list of usual suspects: the Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL). The PSL, a communist party, has been involved with BLM and pro-Hamas terrorism violence. The PSL has organizational ties with the ANSWER Coalition, which the Network Contagion Research Institute says has ties with the Chinese Communist Party. ANSWER was involved with organizing a rally in sympathy with the Los Angeles rioters on June 10 in Columbus, Ohio. The PSL is an old-style communist party that will seize on any crises to try to dismantle the United States. It says that 'the United States today is a dictatorship of the capitalist class. This reality will not change without a socialist revolution.' It is funded indirectly by donations from Neville Roy Singham, an American millionaire with close ties to the CCP who lives in Shanghai. Advertisement Elias Rodriguez, the terrorist who shot and killed the couple at the Jewish Museum in Washington, DC, in late May, was a member of both the PSL and ANSWER. Another group involved in organizing the LA riots is the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), a radical leftist American union with extensive overseas ties. It is a regular attendee at the conferences and workshops held by the Foro de Sao Paulo, a hemispheric network of Marxist parties founded by Cuban dictator Fidel Castro and Brazilian President Inazio Lula da Silva. Advertisement The Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights LA (CHIRLA), also an organizer, received $33 million in government grants in FY2023. Then there are the 'charities' helping the rioters, such as Mutual Aid Los Angeles Network, Operation Healthy Hearts, LA Poverty Department, and Mutual Aid/Social Therapy. These riots are sure to expand in the days to come, which means that it is a good thing that some congressmen are looking to investigate who these groups are, and why they are seeking to destabilize our streets. Mike Gonzalez is a senior fellow at The Heritage Foundation and co-author of 'NextGen Marxism: What It Is and How to Combat It.'

Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pentagon to review US role in AUKUS submarine pact
The Pentagon is reviewing America's role in a historic, multibillion-dollar pact among Washington, the United Kingdom and Australia to ward off China's growing influence. The widely supported deal calls on the three countries to jointly develop hypersonic weapons and nuclear-powered submarines, a unique security partnership that could strengthen seapower gaps in the Pacific and produce transformative new weapons. Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby — who has expressed skepticism about the program's worth — is running the review, according to two defense officials, granted anonymity to discuss internal policy talks. 'This is an opportunity for the [Defense Department] to ensure the effort is in alignment with the Trump administration's priorities,' one of the officials said. The Biden administration inked the deal, known as AUKUS, four years ago. The people did not say how the Trump administration could tweak the massive package of cooperative efforts or when officials would make a decision. But the agreement appears to have the backing of numerous lawmakers and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who expressed support for it during his confirmation hearing. The Defense Department did not respond to a request for comment. The Financial Times first reported the review. Such assessments aren't entirely unusual. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer initiated a review of AUKUS after his election last year. A U.K. government spokesperson, granted anonymity to discuss the situation, said the review was 'understandable' and that London would continue to work closely with the U.S. and Australia on the deal. But the development was met with frustration from congressional Democrats, especially on the Eastern Seaboard, which houses some of America's largest shipyards. Australia has committed to investing $3 billion in modernizing U.S. shipyards that produce nuclear-powered submarines, a massive influx in cash that would benefit American industry and bulk up its ability to produce submarines. New Hampshire Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said news of the review 'will be met with cheers in Beijing.' She added that scrapping the partnership would 'further tarnish America's reputation and raise more questions among our closest defense partners about our reliability.' Colby has challenged major parts of the AUKUS deal, including a plan for the U.S. to sell three Virginia-class submarines to Australia, citing the need for the U.S. to maintain a robust undersea presence in the Pacific. The Virginia sales would come in three-year intervals starting in 2032 and would replace the retiring Collins-class submarines in the Australian arsenal. But Colby appeared more open to the project during his Senate confirmation hearing in March. 'It should be the policy of the United States government to do everything we can to make this work,' he said. Colby did note he was concerned that selling submarines to Australia, or using U.S. shipyards to help build them, could put the U.S. Navy in 'a weaker position' since they weren't going to American submarine development. The agreement would also mean closer cooperation among the three nations in building quantum computers and hypersonic weapons. And it has largely moved forward without controversy. Australian Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles met with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth at the Pentagon in February and pledged the first $500 million of a $3 billion investment. President Donald Trump 'is very aware, supportive of AUKUS, recognizes the importance of the defense industrial base,' Hegseth said at the meeting. The three nations already have poured millions into training to operate nuclear-powered vessels. Australia has funneled even more into expanding its base in Perth on the country's western edge. Connecticut Rep. Joe Courtney, the top Democrat on the House Armed Services seapower subcommittee, questioned why the administration would launch the review when so much is underway. 'To walk away from all the sunk costs invested by our two closest allies, Australia and the United Kingdom, will have far-reaching ramifications on our trustworthiness on the global stage,' he said. 'It is a direct contradiction to the administration's 'America first, but not alone' goal of countering aggression from China, Russia and other adversaries.' Joe Gould and Esther Webber contributed to this report.

Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
New Nuclear Plant to Power Six Million British Homes
Weeks after Germany decided to reverse course and 're-embrace' nuclear power following their supreme idiocy on the matter, the UK government announced on Tuesday that it would invest 14.2 billion pounds (US$19.3 billion) to build a new nuclear plant in the southeast of England. The move was revealed by the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero as part of its broader spending review, which will lay out priorities for the next four years. The new plant, named Sizewell C, will be located in Suffolk county, and is predicted to create around 10,000 jobs during construction, according to a government statement. Once operational, it will create enough electricity power roughly 6 million homes. "We need new nuclear to deliver a golden age of clean energy abundance, because that is the only way to protect family finances, take back control of our energy, and tackle the climate crisis," said Energy Minister Ed Miliband. "This is the government's clean energy mission in action, investing in lower bills and good jobs for energy security." As the Epoch Times notes further, the UK has also been tapping up new investors to fund the construction of Sizewell C, but no new partners were mentioned in the announcement. Neither the total cost of construction nor a date for expected completion has been announced. Sizewell C was originally an EDF Energy project but is now majority-owned by the British government, with EDF Energy a minority shareholder. EDF Energy is the British arm of Électricité de France (EDF), which is wholly owned by the French state. The UK government's stake was 83.8 percent and EDF's stake was 16.2 percent at the end of December, EDF's financial results showed in February. Sizewell C would be just the second new nuclear plant built in Britain in more than 20 years, after another EDF project, Hinkley Point C, which was first announced in 2010. Hinkley Point C, based in Somerset, southwest England, has been beleaguered by delays and budget overruns and is currently expected to come online in 2029. Sizewell C would be the third power station built on the site after Sizewell A and Sizewell B, both of which are currently in the process of being decommissioned. The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero also announced that it had picked Rolls-Royce SMR to build Britain's first small modular reactors (SMRs). About 2.5 billion pounds ($3.4 billion) of government funds will be dedicated to the SMR program over the next four years, in a bid to get one of Europe's first small-scale nuclear industries going. SMRs are usually around the size of two football fields and composed of parts that can be assembled in a factory, making them quicker and cheaper to build than conventional plants. The moves by Britain come amid a renewed interest in nuclear power across Europe, sparked by spiraling energy costs due to the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine, which is hampering the continent's supply of natural gas. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said in a keynote speech in August 2024 that the European Union needed more nuclear power. By More Top Reads From this article on