Canada Revenue Agency says it plans to cut 280 permanent roles
The Canada Revenue Agency is cutting up to 280 permanent employees in response to fiscal constraints.
The workforce changes will impact branches across the CRA but the reductions will mainly impact employees in the National Capital Region.
Commissioner Bob Hamilton and deputy commissioner Jean-François Fortin said in a message to staff Thursday that executive positions are also being impacted by the reductions.
The message said the CRA will run voluntary departure programs over the coming months.
The Government of Canada website says that permanent employees affected by workforce adjustment processes will receive a 'reasonable job offer' when possible for another position in the public service.
However, the message says that won't be the case this time around.
'Unlike previous (workforce adjustments), due to fiscal constraints, guaranteed reasonable job offers cannot be provided to most of the employees affected,' it says.
Story continues below advertisement
Affected employees have already been contacted by management.
1:42
Lower energy costs drive down inflation, but grocery prices stay high
The message says the CRA is taking steps to meet required government savings after examining its operating budget over the last two years.
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
It also says that while the agency's priorities and strategic direction remain unchanged, it's clear that adjustments to the workforce will change how it delivers on them.
'We need to reassess the way we work, which will involve reconsidering the number of projects we undertake, streamlining processes and governance, and pursuing innovation to further optimize our work and the services we offer,' the message reads.
'It is likely that some internal services will be impacted, with some services being eliminated entirely.'
Earlier this month, the Union of Taxation Employees announced that the Canada Revenue Agency wouldn't renew contracts for more than 1,000 term workers across the country. More than 3,000 jobs at the agency have been cut since 2024, the union says, including debt collector and call centre positions.
Story continues below advertisement
CRA spokesman Etienne Biram says a number of factors have impacted the CRA's budget in recent years, including the sunsetting of COVID program funding.
As of 2024, 59,155 people worked at the Canada Revenue Agency, up from 45,019 in 2020, when the pandemic hit. In 2019, the size of the CRA was 43,908.
2:12
Finance minister suggests Liberals will not table 2025 annual budget
In light of the new cuts, the Union of Taxation Employees says it's demanding accountability from the Government of Canada and calling for 'an immediate moratorium' on job cuts at CRA.
'With every position eliminated, processing delays grow longer, calls go unanswered, files pile up, and citizens are left behind in uncertainty,' union head Marc Brière said in a news release Friday.
'Those who remain are being pushed beyond their limits—expected to do more with less, while working under mounting stress and growing job insecurity.'
Story continues below advertisement
The federal public service has shrunk for the first time in a decade, Treasury Board Secretariat data shows.
Between 2024 and 2025, the number of government employees has dropped by 10,000, from 367,772 to 357,965.
In 2015, there were 258,979 people working for the federal government, with that number increasing until now.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
4 hours ago
- CBC
Liberals see a need for speed on major projects bill. Critics warn that's risky
Social Sharing Liberals are attempting to bulldoze their mega projects bill through Parliament, according to critics who say the legislation interferes with Indigenous rights, environmental protection and democracy itself. The government's One Canadian Economy Act is generating controversy inside and outside the House of Commons, with some arguing it confers king-like powers to rush projects deemed in the national interest to completion. The Liberals say the bill is intended to fast-track major projects as Canada faces the urgency of a disruptive Donald Trump presidency. "We have a trade war that is affecting sector after sector after sector. Canadian jobs are at risk. Canadians' livelihoods are at risk and, quite frankly, the prosperity of the country is at risk," said Tim Hodgson, the natural resources and energy minister, at a news conference Thursday. "We need to do things that we have not done in a long time, in time frames we have not done since the end of World War II." What's in the bill? The One Canadian Economy Act, or Bill C-5, will create a list of major nation-building projects. After a designated project is added to the list, the government will publish a document outlining all the conditions that builders must follow. A single designated minister — likely Dominic LeBlanc in this government — would be responsible for listing the projects and issuing the conditions document. "For far too long major projects, whether energy transmission lines, critical mineral developments, pipelines or clean technology projects, have been stalled by assessments, challenges and overlapping and duplicative regulations," said Leblanc on Friday during a procedural debate in the House Friday. What gets on the list? The prime minister has provided examples of projects that could be included on the list based on recommendations from Canada's premiers. Ports, mines, renewable energy and oil and gas pipelines could make the list, he said. The legislation offers the following criteria: Strengthening Canada's autonomy, resilience and security. Providing economic or other benefits to Canada. Having a high likelihood of successful execution. Advancing the interests of Indigenous Peoples. Contributing to clean growth and to meeting Canada's climate objectives. The legislation gives the government broad discretion to apply all or none of these criteria, which worries Conservatives who still seem generally supportive of the bill. "These concepts are broad enough that any interpretation or any argument could be made about each factor either way for each project," said Shannon Stubbs, the Conservative critic for energy and natural resources, during debate on the bill on Friday. 'Leap before you look' assessments Some academics are concerned about what happens if the bill's broad powers to speed up projects aren't used carefully. "That could be good for the economy if it is used wisely," said University of Ottawa law and economics professor Stewart Elgie. "But it could be bad for the environment if it is used poorly." For major infrastructure and development projects on the list, such as hydroelectric dams, ports and large-scale mines, the bill removes the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada's authority to limit them. But it does place limits on the minister's ability to fast-track cross-border pipelines and nuclear reactors. It states the minister cannot issue the approval document until both the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission and the Canada Energy Regulator are "satisfied that issuing the document will not compromise the health or safety of persons." However, the bill suggests the power of all federal regulators and departments is constrained, as it states that every opinion and decision formed about a project once listed must be "in favour of permitting the project to be carried out in whole or in part." This creates what some academics are calling a "leap before you look" approach that turns the federal environmental review's informed decision-making "on its head." Henry VIII clauses Those same researchers also note that a legislative tool — Henry VIII clauses, named after the autocratic King Henry VIII of England — are tucked into the bill. WATCH | PM Mark Carney says 'more will be done' on energy: Carney says 'more will be done' on energy, but conversation isn't all about pipelines 17 days ago Duration 3:52 Asked by CBC's Power & Politics host David Cochrane about the separatist sentiment in Alberta, Prime Minister Mark Carney says his government is 'committed' to working with Canadians across the country. Proposed legislation grants the Carney government, or future governments, the authority to exempt pipelines, mines or other listed projects from any law or government regulation. Near the very end of the 18-page bill, it states that cabinet can exempt national-interest projects from not only environmental laws but also acts of Parliament. "The combined effect of Sections 21, 22 and 23 gives cabinet an unconstrained ability to make regulations that not only alter the application of other federal regulations … but also to alter the operation of virtually all laws duly passed by Parliament, including outright exemption," as noted in a post co-authored by University of Calgary law professors David Wright and Martin Olszynski. What about Indigenous rights? The proposed law commits to consulting with provincial and territorial governments, as well as Indigenous Peoples, before a project is listed and a conditions document is issued or altered. Indigenous Services Minister Mandy Gull-Masty on Thursday told reporters that the bill does not "do away with impact assessments" and there are "multiple points" where First Nations and other groups can bring forward their concerns. "The prime minister has been clear: these projects will be selected if the communities wish to participate," she said. Nevertheless, a national Indigenous group has raised concerns about a lack of consultation on the bill itself and what that could mean for the prospect of ongoing consultation. "Unfortunately, the government provided First Nations only seven days to respond to an outline of the bill and did not provide the full text (a consultative draft) in advance," the national chief of the Assembly of First Nations, Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak, said in a statement. Likely Conservative backing Conservatives have signalled that they are open to backing the bill, proposing some changes during the House of Commons debate. Stubbs said the party would like to see it go further and faster while calling for a repeal of regulations like the Trudeau-era law that banned the oil tankers from ports or marine installations along British Columbia's north coast. "Canadians deserve a government that backs them. Not a government that blocks them," Stubbs said. However, with C-5's broad powers to sidestep existing laws for approved projects, the tanker ban could be overriden without repealing anything. The Bloc Québécois has said the bill, in theory, could exempt a company building a major project from a range of laws, including the Labour Code, Criminal Code and language laws. The party is calling for more scrutiny of the bill. "How could we go forward with such a huge bill, with huge consequences for Quebec and Canada, without at least doing what we have been elected to do — and that means studying effectively this bill in committee," Bloc Leader Yves-François Blanchet said. Concerns over bad-faith use The Liberals intend to send the bill to committee for two days of study before hoping to get it passed on Friday. Green Party Leader Elizabeth May takes issue with what she calls an "abbreviated bulldozer time frame." At least one Liberal is calling for changes to the bill, which is supposed to terminate in five years. Vancouver MP Patrick Weiler wants the government to shorten the bill's five-year sunset clause, which he noted would go beyond Trump's term and "at least one more federal election." "We need to consider how this legislation could be used in bad faith by a future government," he said.
Global News
4 hours ago
- Global News
What are the stakes for Canada as it hosts the G7 leaders' summit?
Canada is set to host leaders from the world's largest economies for the annual G7 summit beginning Sunday, and the stakes could not be higher. U.S. President Donald Trump's multi-front trade war has countries scrambling to get their tariffs lowered. Ceasefires have failed to stick in Gaza and Ukraine. Allies are collectively focused on boosting their defences to counter China, Russia and other threat actors. And the rise of artificial intelligence has opened up opportunities and risks on multiple fronts. For Prime Minister Mark Carney, it will mark his most high-profile stage yet as he seeks to both normalize relations with Trump and reposition Canada as an important ally. Here's what to expect over the course of the summit. Avoiding past discord, with U.S. deal possible The last time Canada hosted the G7 leader's summit was in 2018, and it quickly saw tensions flare. Story continues below advertisement Trump's clashes with then-prime minister Justin Trudeau and other leaders over trade led to the U.S. not endorsing the official G7 communique, and France's foreign minister dubbed the summit the 'G6 plus one.' A repeat of that spectacle would be a 'nightmare scenario' for both Canada and the alliance, Allen Sens, a political science professor at the University of British Columbia, said in an email. 10:54 Trump 'is not finished with tariffs' Since returning to office this year, Trump has only doubled down on actions that fuelled the discord at that earlier summit: imposing sweeping tariffs on allies, reversing or reducing climate change action, and reopening dialogue with Russia. Yet the scale of Trump's trade wars this time means leaders will likely be clamouring for their own deals on tariffs and other issues beyond the official G7 communique — including Canada. Story continues below advertisement The summit will mark the first time Carney and Trump will be face-to-face since their White House meeting in May. Pete Hoekstra, the U.S. ambassador to Canada, said Wednesday the two leaders see the gathering as an 'inflection point' in their direct negotiations toward a potential new deal. 'They're both going to be at the same place, they're both going to be in Canada, and there'd be lots of questions if there isn't something that is announced,' he said at an event in Ottawa. 'Until it happens, it's still a possibility.' What else will be discussed? Carney last week announced what he said were Canada's priorities for discussions at the G7 summit, all of which are aimed at 'building stronger economies.' Story continues below advertisement The Prime Minister's Office said Ottawa's top priority will be strengthening global peace and security, which includes countering foreign interference and transnational crime, as well as improving responses to wildfires. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Canada will focus on spurring economic growth by improving energy security, fortifying supply chains for critical minerals and accelerating the use of artificial intelligence. Lastly, Canada will discuss creating jobs by securing partnerships to open new markets and generate large infrastructure investments. G7 finance ministers and central bank governors who gathered in Banff last month ahead of the leaders' summit agreed to cooperate on pursuing economic growth, ensuring price stability and certainty, tackling financial crime, and supporting Ukraine. 'I would consider any communique that contains any substantive collective agreements on major issues to be a triumph, with a bland document the most likely outcome,' Sens told Global News. 1:42 G7 finance ministers agree on joint statement, no mention of tariffs David Perry, president of the Canadian Global Affairs Institute, told Global News that Trump's influence will likely mean past issues of agreement — including shared initiatives on the environment and 'equity, diversity, and inclusion' — will either be less prominent or reduced altogether. Story continues below advertisement Yet he still believes agreements can be struck among the allies on issues of shared importance that go beyond the tensions Trump's tariffs have caused — particularly on energy security and artificial intelligence. The PMO said discussions will also include securing peace in Ukraine and other global conflicts, as well as 'a forward-looking agenda that engages partners beyond the G7.' Who else will attend? Other world leaders whose countries are not part of the G7 but who will attend the summit are the heads of Mexico, Brazil, South Korea, Australia, South Africa and Ukraine. The attendance of Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum will mark the first time North American leaders will be together since Trump's trade wars threatened the Canada-United States-Mexico agreement on free trade (CUSMA) that's up for review next year. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has said he will ensure talks at the summit and other high-level gatherings in the weeks ahead don't lead to 'hollow' agreements on the war in his country. Story continues below advertisement Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will also attend at Carney's invitation, a move that has attracted criticism from diaspora groups in Canada — including members of Carney's Liberal caucus. Modi's government has been accused of being involved in violence and intimidation against Sikh activists and politicians in Canada, including the murder of Hardeep Singh Nijjar in British Columbia in 2023. 6:02 International relations expert says India should have a seat at G7 table Carney's government also invited Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman to the summit, Global News has learned, but the Saudi leader has not yet publicly accepted the invitation. NDP foreign affairs critic Heather McPherson accused the government of turning the summit into a 'showcase of tyrants' with the invitations of bin Salman and Modi during question period on Tuesday. Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand responded that the G7 is 'a critical forum for global leaders to have productive and frank discussions.' Story continues below advertisement Vina Nadjibulla, vice-president of the Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada, said Trump's election and the growing threat environment requires a 'different approach' to diplomatic relations, which is on display under Carney. The invitation to Modi was particularly necessary, she said, given the size of India's economy and strategic importance. She added that restoring the relationship with India could lead to further cooperation on the issue of transnational violence and foreign interference. 'I think we need to recognize that in today's more dangerous world, we need to be able to engage and have high-level talks with counties with whom we have serious disagreements,' she told Global News. 'Diplomacy is not a favour to our friends — it's a tool to advance our interests and protect our values.' Why Canada's leadership matters Perry said Canada will have its work cut out in chairing the G7, but agreed the timing was good that the responsibility came up this year, with Trump's trade war still in its early stages. Story continues below advertisement 'You do get to have a role in shaping things, and you do get to find yourself at a table that you arranged, literally, for a discussion that you helped set the agenda of, with the leaders of … most of the major economies in the world, including the president of the United States,' he said. 'It's a pretty unique role and opportunity for Canada.' He suggested the summit will also be a pivotal test for Carney as prime minister — not just in the relationship with Trump, but with the other leaders at that table. 'If the Prime Minister of Canada can't make good use of time with six world leaders and an opportunity of Canadian creation, he probably should be considering other lines of work,' he said.
CBC
12 hours ago
- CBC
Information about TFSA contribution limits now available, says the CRA
The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) says it has resolved an issue that prevented people from seeing how much contribution room they had left in their tax-free savings accounts (TFSAs). That information first became unavailable on April 17. CRA spokesperson Charles Drouin told CBC News in an email that the federal agency introduced a new data validation process this year to ensure that tax information submitted to them is accurate. "Upfront validations now advise these filers of errors with their information return submission in real-time and prevent the submission of invalid returns," Drouin wrote. He said the new system would ultimately improve the quality of the data the Canada Revenue Agency receives and allow for any errors to be corrected faster. But he added that "stricter validations and new processes caused delays in receiving and processing the information returns. As a result, there have been delays in processing TFSA annual information returns this year." Each year, Canadians 18 or older get more contribution room in their tax-free savings accounts, which shield investments from taxes. In 2025, for example, the new contribution limit was $7,000. If someone was 18 in 2009 – the year the the savings accounts were introduced – has lived in Canada since then and never contributed to their TFSA, their total contribution limit would be $102,000 as of Jan. 1, 2025. If someone didn't properly track their contributions over the years, though, they could risk going over their limit, which comes with a one per cent interest penalty per month for those funds over the limit. The CRA website notes that posted contribution limits do not take into account any contributions to the TFSA made since Jan. 1, 2025.
