logo
Are Biomarker Testing and Genetic Testing the Same Thing?

Are Biomarker Testing and Genetic Testing the Same Thing?

Health Line19 hours ago

Biomarker testing and genetic testing have different purposes in diagnosing colorectal cancer. The first helps doctors understand cancer's growth and spread, while the second assesses a person's inherited risk.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) starts in the colon or rectum of the large intestine. It's sometimes referred to as 'colon cancer' or 'rectal cancer,' depending on the area it first develops.
According to the American Cancer Society, more than 150,000 new cases of colorectal cancer are expected in 2025. It's one of the top causes of cancer-related death, while the overall risk of developing CRC for people assigned male at birth is about 1 in 24, and 1 in 26 for those assigned female at birth.
Despite being one of the most common cancers globally, survival rates for CRC have improved in many parts of the world due to medical advancements in biomarker testing and genetic testing.
Both biomarker testing and genetic testing in CRC involve screening for genetic mutations, but these tests have distinct purposes during the diagnosis process.
You'll notice that the language used to share stats and other data points is pretty binary, fluctuating between the use of 'male' and 'female' or 'men' and 'women.'
Although we typically avoid language like this, specificity is key when reporting on research participants and clinical findings.
The studies and surveys referenced in this article didn't report data on or include participants who were transgender, nonbinary, gender nonconforming, genderqueer, agender, or genderless.
What is biomarker testing?
Biomarker testing in medicine is used to assess, predict, or monitor disease progression.
Biomarkers (biological markers) are measurable biological processes, molecules, and cellular changes that provide insight into what's happening in your body at an exact moment. The presence or absence of biomarkers or their changes provides important insight into a developing or progressing medical condition.
In CRC, biomarker testing, also called 'tumor testing,' is performed on cancer cells to look for tumor-specific changes. It detects the presence of acquired genetic mutations (somatic mutations), cellular changes, and DNA changes in cancer that could influence its growth and spread. CRC biomarkers can relay information about your overall outlook and whether CRC may be responsive to certain treatments more than others.
What is genetic testing?
Genetic testing is a specific type of biomarker testing that analyzes your DNA to determine your risk of cancer.
In CRC, genetic testing looks for inherited genetic mutations or variants (called germline mutations) associated with an increased risk of CRC.
Genetic testing is mainly used as a form of risk assessment. Doctors perform these tests if you have a family history of CRC or meet the criteria for an inherited cancer syndrome.
If you've received a diagnosis of CRC and didn't undergo genetic testing first, your doctor may still recommend testing after a diagnosis in certain instances. These include when there's a family history of CRC or if the disease appears to follow a hereditary pattern of development.
Types of testing
There are several types of tests doctors run when assessing biomarkers and genetic risk in CRC, including:
Single gene: This looks for an isolated gene.
Panel test: This screens multiple genes at once.
Whole-genome sequencing: This assesses all the DNA in a cell.
Whole-exome sequencing: This screens only the components in a gene responsible for protein coding.
Tumor-mutational burden: This determines the overall number of genetic changes in a tumor's DNA.
Common tumor biomarkers
Biomarker testing in CRC screens for various measurable tumor indicators, including genetic mutations, protein expression levels, signaling molecules, DNA sequencing patterns, antigens, and more. Common CRC tumor biomarkers your doctor may test for include:
MSI-H/dMMR
sidedness (which side of the colon the cancer is located on)
KRAS
NRAS
BRAF
HER2
EGFR
CEA
TRK fusions
DPD
ctDNA
PD-L1 pathway
WNT pathway
RET
VEGF
CTC
MMR deficiency
Common genetic tests
Genetic testing for CRC typically includes screening for genetic mutations relating to inherited cancer syndromes such as:
Lynch syndrome
familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)
MUTYH-associated polyposis
Peutz-Jeghers syndrome
These are inherited conditions that significantly increase your risk of developing CRC.
Genes that may be screened in genetic testing for CRC risk include:
MLH1
MSH2
MSH3
MSH6
PMS2
APC
MUTYH
POLE
POLD1
NTHL1
GREM1
RNF43 (primarily used in research)
RPS20 (primarily used in research)
Benefits of testing
Genetic testing and biomarker testing in CRC are part of precision medicine and can help improve your cancer outcomes.
Genetic testing before a potential cancer diagnosis allows you and your doctor to understand your individual risk for CRC. Knowing your likelihood can help you take preventive steps to lower your overall risk of cancer and can help detect cancer in its earliest, most treatable stages.
If you've received a CRC diagnosis, biomarker testing reveals details about the disease that help your doctor treat it with the most effective therapies right from the start. Certain biomarkers, for example, can indicate if CRC will be responsive to immunotherapy or monoclonal antibody therapy. Other biomarkers can help predict treatment response and monitor recurrence.
Qualification criteria
Anyone with a CRC diagnosis is a candidate for biomarker testing to help direct treatment planning, but not everyone requires genetic testing to determine their inherited risk.
Genetic testing is typically recommended when:
you have a family history of CRC or a hereditary cancer syndrome in more than one biological relative
you received a CRC diagnosis before the age of 50
CRC was diagnosed in a first-degree relative younger than age 50
multiple family members have received a diagnosis of another type of cancer associated with hereditary cancer syndromes (like ovarian or stomach cancer)
you've received a diagnosis of two or more primary types of cancer
biomarker testing suggests a germline mutation
you have a significant number of colorectal polyps
How to talk with your doctor
Anyone can develop CRC, so the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends screening for all adults ages 45 and over.
However, you don't have to wait until you are 45 to talk with your doctor about CRC, especially if you have a family history of the condition or inherited cancer syndromes.
To help make the most of this conversation with your doctor, consider these tips:
Research CRC and learn as much as you can before your appointment.
Talk with your parents and biological family members to verify your family medical history.
Bring a written list of questions.
Have a friend or loved one come with you for support and another perspective.
Take notes on what your doctor says to review at home.
If you've already had biomarker testing or genetic testing for CRC, questions that may be helpful to ask your doctor include:
Which genes and biomarkers were tested for?
Did my tests show any biomarkers or inherited mutations?
What do the results of my tests mean for my CRC risk or treatment planning?
Were all possible biomarkers tested for? If not, why?
Will more genetic or biomarker testing be necessary?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Neuralink Device Helps Monkey to See Something That's Not There
Neuralink Device Helps Monkey to See Something That's Not There

Bloomberg

time18 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Neuralink Device Helps Monkey to See Something That's Not There

Elon Musk's Neuralink Corp. used a brain implant to enable a monkey to see something that wasn't physically there, according to an engineer, as it moves toward its goal of helping blind people see. The device, called Blindsight, stimulated areas of a monkey's brain associated with vision, Neuralink engineer Joseph O'Doherty said Friday at a conference. At least two-thirds of the time, the monkey moved its eyes toward something researchers were trying to trick the brain into visualizing.

EULAR 2025
EULAR 2025

Medscape

time23 minutes ago

  • Medscape

EULAR 2025

Updated SSc Recommendations Use 'Therapeutic Continuums' The recommendations highlighted the use of immunosuppressive agents and antifibrotics to treat skin fibrosis and lung fibrosis, as well as changes to upfront treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Medscape Medical News , Jun 26, 2024 Updated SSc Recommendations Use 'Therapeutic Continuums' New Gout Drugs Might Increase Patients at Target Urate Level New options in late stages of clinical testing for refractory gout promise to increase the chances of reaching the guideline uric acid target with relatively modest risks for adverse events. Medscape Medical News , Aug 01, 2024 New Gout Drugs Might Increase Patients at Target Urate Level Taper, Dose Down, Discontinue: Striving for Less Steroid Use Now in the 75th year since the first presentation on the clinical use of glucocorticoids, what consensus has been reached in sparing their use to avoid their many potential adverse effects? Medscape Medical News, Jul 25, 2024

RFK Jr. Spreads Disinformation To Congress. Here's What That Means For Public Health
RFK Jr. Spreads Disinformation To Congress. Here's What That Means For Public Health

Forbes

time26 minutes ago

  • Forbes

RFK Jr. Spreads Disinformation To Congress. Here's What That Means For Public Health

Under Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the HHS sent a document to Congress defending their stance on removing COVID-19 recommendations for healthy children and pregnant women. The problem? Many of the studies cited in the document are taken out of context, unpublished or are under dispute. As an example, the HHS document cites a study and states the study found 'an increase in placental blood clotting in pregnant mothers who took the (COVID-19) vaccine.' However, the study makes no references to placental blood clots in pregnant females. In addition, the HHS document also cites additional studies to support the claim that the COVID-19 vaccine can be dangerous to pregnant women, but the studies mentioned actually support the safety and efficacy of the vaccine. There are several other instances of questionable citations and unpublished studies cited. But what does this all mean for public health and policy going forward? The majority of Congress are not scientists and may not have the expertise to recognize false citations or mischaracterized findings from studies. However, proper citations to substantiate claims that will undoubtedly affect public policy should not be optional- it is critical to ensure the health and well-being of all Americans. If studies that are misinterpreted or unpublished without peer-review are being used to justify public policy for the general public, then the recommendations should not be upheld because they are not grounded in evidence or real facts. If the recommendations are upheld, as may be the case for COVID-19 vaccines not being recommended for healthy children and pregnant women, less Americans will have access to life-saving vaccines and Americans will get sicker. Remember, COVID-19 vaccines were responsible for saving more than 14 million lives, according to research, and this includes the lives of children and pregnant women. Policies and recommendations not based on science and evidence also open the door for the promotion of fringe theories that have no basis in facts or science. If vaccines are not promoted by the federal government, vaccine hesitancy soars and more people will opt out of getting vaccinated or may not have access to getting vaccines even if they desire it since insurance coverage for vaccines is largely dependent on endorsement from the federal government and government-based advisory committees. Lower uptake of vaccines means more infectious disease outbreaks and cases rising throughout the country, just as is occurring currently with whooping cough and measles. Currently, well over 1,000 cases of measles have been documented throughout America, largely fueled by vaccine hesitancy and decreased vaccination rates among children. Deeper than just the health and public health effects is the strained trust for science that will continue to pervade the United States. If agencies like HHS and the CDC are viewed as politicizing decisions to promote various agendas of those in power, the public will become skeptical of following important health guidelines for public health issues. Without trust and transparency in public health, parents and Americans cannot make informed decisions to uphold their health. Public health depends on trust, and trust is built on evidence-based recommendations that have been shown to benefit society, not theories that cannot be substantiated. RFK Jr. promised 'radical transparency' as well as gold-standard science. This would be impossible to accomplish by sending documents to lawmakers that are filled with unpublished studies and citations that are completely misinterpreted. Gold-standard science is based on facts, evidence and rigorous peer-review, all noticeably absent from the document the HHS sent to Congress. Public health cannot survive in a world where misinformation comes from the top.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store