We now ‘need a new process' that scales global solutions
David Maddox,
The Independent
Tony Blair has warned Western policies to tackle global climate change are 'failing', demanding a radical reset to win over hearts and minds on the issue. The major intervention by the former prime minister torpedoes current net zero policies and calls for the COP process to be torn down and replaced. It is a shot across the bows of the current Labour government and energy secretary Ed Miliband's plans to push headlong towards renewables. Writing the foreword for his own think tank's new paper, The Climate Paradox: Why We Need to Reset Action on Climate Change, Sir Tony warned that there is a widening credibility gap with voters who are 'being asked to make financial sacrifices and changes in lifestyle when they know that their impact on global emissions is minimal.' The intervention could not come at a more sensitive time for Sir Keir Starmer's government which is facing local elections in 48 hours, a first serious electoral test since the general election.
Sir Tony endorses the paper, authored by the Tony Blair Institute (TBI)'s director of climate and energy policy Lindy Fursman, which calls for the COP international series of conferences to be dismantled, while a 'new coalition' must be built to tackle the climate crisis. It claims that COP is struggling to 'deliver change at the speed required' and must evolve to match ambition with delivery. In his foreword, Sir Tony argues that while climate activism has succeeded in raising awareness, today's policy strategies have become disconnected from political, public, and economic reality, and the debate is 'riven with irrationality'. The result is a widening credibility gap between climate policy and climate delivery.
'Activists have shifted the political centre of gravity on climate,' he said, but 'the movement now needs a public mandate - attainable only through a shift from protest to pragmatic policy.' Highlighting a cycle that pushes proposals but delivers little real progress on global emissions, he wrote that 'political leaders by and large know that the debate has become irrational' but are 'terrified of saying so, for fear of being accused of being 'climate deniers.'' Meanwhile, voters 'feel they're being asked to make financial sacrifices and changes in lifestyle when they know that their impact on global emissions is minimal.'
Sir Tony pointed to global trends that undermine today's climate approach: fossil fuel use is set to rise further up to 2030, airline travel is to double over the next 20 years, and by 2030, almost two-thirds of emissions will come from China, India, and Southeast Asia. These are 'inconvenient facts' he says, that mean that 'any strategy based on either 'phasing out' fossil fuels in the short term or limiting consumption is a strategy doomed to fail.'
While acknowledging COP's role in scaling ambition, Sir Tony said that 'the process will not deliver change at the speed required': 'The great gathering of all the nations has its place — though probably not every year. But the reality is it is the decisions of the large countries, and the policy direction they give towards the technology and the financial flows, which can in truth solve the climate issue.' He proposes a new model which must evolve to match ambition with delivery: 'We now need a new process that scales global solutions. A new cooperative approach to technological Instead of eliminating emissions with green energy and electric cars, the papers urges governments to prioritise global investment in carbon capture — investing in solutions that capture emissions at source before they reach the atmosphere, together with breakthrough technologies like direct air capture that permanently remove carbon.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
44 minutes ago
- Gulf Today
Russian attacks kill 2, wound 13 in Ukraine; Zelensky says its biggest air attacks
Russia sent waves of drones and missiles in an attack on two Ukrainian cities early on Tuesday that killed two people and wounded at least thirteen others, Ukraine officials said. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said on Tuesday that Russia launched one of its biggest air attacks on Kyiv overnight, using 315 drones and seven missiles in strikes that also hit other parts of the country. "Russian missile and Shahed strikes drown out the efforts of the United States and others around the world to force Russia into peace," Zelensky wrote on X. A maternity hospital and residential buildings in the center of the southern port city of Odesa were damaged in the attack, regional Gov. Oleh Kiper said. Two people were killed and nine injured in the city, according to a statement from the regional prosecutor's office. A local resident looks at a burned building following drones strike on Ukraine's capital Kyiv, Ukraine, on Tuesday. AFP Four people were injured in the attack on the capital, Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko said. Associated Press journalists heard explosions and the buzzing of drones around the city for hours. The fresh attacks came hours after Moscow launched almost 500 drones at Ukraine in the biggest overnight drone bombardment in the three-year war. Ukrainian and Western officials have been anticipating a Russian response to Ukraine's audacious June 1 drone attack on distant Russian air bases. Plumes of smoke were visible in Kyiv as air defense forces worked to shoot down drones and missiles Tuesday morning. Meanwhile, Ukrainian residents took shelter and slept in metro stations during the hourslong attack. Nina Nosivets, 32, and her 8-month-old son Levko were among them. A view shows a burning apartment building after it was hit by a Russian drone strike, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in Odesa, Ukraine, on Tuesday. Reuters "I just try not to think about all this, silently curled up like a mouse, wait until it all passes, the attacks. Distract the child somehow because its probably the hardest thing for him to bear," she said. Krystyna Semak, a 37-year-old Kyiv resident, said the explosions frightened her and she ran to the metro at 2 a.m. with her rug. Russia has been launching a record-breaking number of drones and missiles targeting Ukraine while the two countries continue to swap prisoners of war, the only tangible outcome of recent direct peace talks held in Istanbul. A ceasefire, long sought by Kyiv, remains elusive. Rescuers and members of funeral service carry the body of a resident killed in apartment building during a Russian drone strike, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in Odesa, Ukraine, on Tuesday. Reuters In Kyiv, fires broke out in at least four districts after debris from shot down drones fell on the roofs of residential buildings and warehouses, according to the Kyiv City Military Administration. Vasyl Pesenko, 25, stood in his kitchen, damaged in the attack. "I was lying in bed, as always hoping that these Shaheds (drones) would fly past me, and I heard that Shahed (that hit the house),' he said. "I thought that it would fly away, but it flew closer and closer and everything blew away.' Agencies
Gulf Today
16 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Could 'going nuclear' finally end Ed Miliband's career?
Not far from me, in the lovely Leicestershire village of Nevil Holt, for some reason a replica of the notorious "Ed Stone" has been erected in a churchyard. It's all part of the small but growing Nevil Holt art and literature festival, and I imagine it's to remind passersby of the ephemeral nature of so much of politics — if not life. If you recall, the mini obelisk was commissioned as a stunt by the Labour Party for the 2015 general election, held a decade ago last month. Ed Miliband was then the leader of the party, and had trouble persuading people of his seriousness. Hell, yes, he did! The idea was to — all too literally — carve his promises into stone to prove just how serious he was. He lost. To be fair to Miliband, one of politics' great survivors, he himself tells the story about when he was last a cabinet minister, during the Brown government. He was a great advocate for building more nuclear power stations in a carbon-free future, but as a here-today-gone-tomorrow energy secretary he couldn't do much about it before Labour lost the 2010 election. Only now can he launch a renewed attempt to build Sizewell C, with £14.2bn of public money behind it. Whether he's still in government by the time it opens, circa 2036, is debatable. As Miliband knows better than most, general elections have a habit of thwarting all kinds of ambitions. The nuclear point is that these nukes take so long to build, are so costly, so prone to overruns and vulnerable to unpredictable trends in global energy prices — it's impossible to say whether Sizewell C is a good idea or not. But the pressure of current assumptions means we will have to go ahead anyway. The private sector can't and won't bear the risk, so it's down to the taxpayers. As things stand, and given that fossil fuels are undesirable on climate grounds, atomic power is the only way we can guarantee a reliable base load of energy for when the sun doesn't shine and the wind doesn't blow. It could be that by 2040, say, battery or other storage of electricity generated by renewables could be so advanced that nuclear power is unnecessary — or that someone will invent such a clean and secure system of carbon storage we can go back to burning coal, as Nigel Farage suggests. Albeit, he doesn't mind the soot, or sentencing young Welsh people to an old age of emphysema and pneumoconiosis. But maybe those developments don't materialise, and we will need the kind of plentiful clean, green, cheap, safe nuclear electricity that has been so long promised to us. In the 1950s, they said it would be so inexpensive it wouldn't be worth metering it. It's a strange case of walking into something knowing that that could end up as a financial or environmental catastrophe, or both, because the alternatives are even less bearable. The Rolls-Royce mini-reactors are more problematic. We know where we are with big nukes. Mostly they're fine, and, if they ever lived up to their scientific promise, they'd bring the planet to the closest it has ever come to utopia. But we also know it can go very, very wrong: Fukushima, Chernobyl, Three Mile Island and other, hushed-up "incidents" periodically remind us that, so far, utopia remains just a nice idea. Somehow we can rationalise the risks. Having one down the road, on a corner where the petrol station used to be, with all the secret sinister menace that lies beneath its humming, brightly-coloured exterior is another matter. Are they really safe? Where does the nuclear waste go — green bin or brown bin? Will the council come and get it every week or every fortnight? What will a mini-nuke do to property prices? People are already nervous enough about moving in close to an electricity substation or a quarry. One morning you'll be strolling down to the park to give the dog some exercise and ka-boom! The roof's blown off the local baby nuke, and glowing hot radioactive ash is showering the surrounding streets. A small Armageddon, but an Armageddon all the same. This is the kind of thing that, among other things, such as leaving a toxic legacy for thousands of years and an upsurge in deformities and cancers, could end political careers. Even Ed Miliband's.
Middle East Eye
a day ago
- Middle East Eye
British MPs react to 'shocking' MEE report of Cameron threatening ICC over Israel probe
Several British parliamentarians have responded to Middle East Eye's revelation on Monday that the former UK foreign secretary privately threatened to defund and withdraw from the International Criminal Court if it issued arrest warrants for Israeli leaders. David Cameron, then foreign secretary in Rishi Sunak's Conservative government, made the threat in April 2024 in a heated phone call with Karim Khan, the British chief prosecutor of the court. Asked about Cameron's threat, Emily Thornberry, a senior Labour MP and the chair of parliament's foreign affairs select committee, told MEE: "I've always believed that when making difficult decisions, international law must always be our guide." Labour MP Naz Shah called the news "shocking" and said she would be "raising this matter directly" with the Foreign Office. "No rules-based system can function with legitimacy if it does not apply the rules equally," she told MEE. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Cameron told Khan over the phone on 23 April 2024 that the UK would 'defund the court and withdraw from the Rome Statute' if the ICC issued warrants for Israeli leaders. Khan replied that 'if this were to occur then we would have to accept that the rules-based system would be dead'. Exclusive: David Cameron threatened to withdraw UK from ICC over Israel war crimes probe Read More » This week MEE revealed details of the call based on information from a number of sources – including former staff in Khan's office familiar with the conversation and who have seen the minutes of the meeting. Cameron, a former British prime minister who was appointed foreign secretary by Sunak in November 2023, told Khan that applying for warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant would be 'like dropping a hydrogen bomb'. He said Khan was 'on the brink of making a huge mistake" and that "the world is not ready for this". According to MEE's sources, the foreign secretary spoke aggressively and repeatedly shouted over Khan, who had to ask to be able to complete his points. Approached by MEE for a response to the exchange with Cameron, Karim Khan said: 'I have no comment to make at this time.' The British Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office declined to comment. Cameron, who currently sits as a Conservative peer in the House of Lords, did not respond to multiple requests for comment. 'Cameron must be investigated' Labour MP Kim Johnson told MEE: "This revelation is a damning indictment of the previous Conservative government's disregard for international law." She added: "This Labour government must urgently and unequivocally distance itself from this position. "It must reaffirm its commitment to the ICC and uphold its rulings, including the arrest warrants that the previous foreign secretary sought to undermine." Labour MP Zarah Sultana said on social media platform X that "David Cameron — and every UK minister complicit in arming and enabling Israel's genocide in Gaza - must be investigated for war crimes." David Cameron — and every UK minister complicit in arming and enabling Israel's genocide in Gaza — must be investigated for war crimes. — Zarah Sultana MP (@zarahsultana) June 9, 2025 Less than a month after the call with Cameron, Khan announced that he was seeking arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his then-defence minister, Yoav Gallant, as well as for Hamas leaders Yahya Sinwar, Ismail Haniyeh and Mohammed Deif. Independent MP Ayoub Khan called for a parliamentary investigation into MEE's report. He said that "political influence must never be allowed to shape judicial outcomes. The parliamentary Code of Conduct is unequivocal on this point, and rightly so." He added: "If these allegations are accurate, they represent not just a breach of that code but a breach of public trust and the moral authority of Britain's commitment to international law. "I urge the relevant parliamentary standards committees to investigate this matter with the seriousness it deserves." Former Labour leader and independent MP Jeremy Corbyn told MEE that "not one of the former ministers involved in the last Conservative government has so far supported our call for an inquiry into the UK's complicity in the Gaza genocide. "This shocking revelation could explain why." Zack Polanski, the deputy leader of the Green Party who is standing to be the next leader, added: "It's been clear for all to see that both the former and current government have stood with the oppressors, not the marginalised. "That's why I support Jeremy Corbyn's call for an independent inquiry." Concerning new allegations, which suggest the last foreign secretary tried to shield Israeli leaders from facing justice for war crimes. We need an independent inquiry into the UK's role in the Gaza — Bell Ribeiro-Addy MP (@BellRibeiroAddy) June 9, 2025 Independent MP Iqbal Mohamed said: "If Lord Cameron did in fact issue such a threat, it would represent a grave lapse in judgement and a betrayal of our commitment to justice and international law. "These allegations deserve urgent and transparent scrutiny in Parliament." Independent MP Shockat Adam added that "it is outrageous for ministers to interfere in the workings of the international justice system - particularly as the UK is one of its main architects." On 10 June 2024 the Conservative government filed an objection to Khan's application to the ICC, arguing that the court did not have jurisdiction over Israeli nationals – a position the Israeli government has held for years. The next month, Keir Starmer's newly elected Labour government announced it would drop the objection. The ICC issued the warrants that November. Sanctioned by the US Labour MP Bell Ribeiro-Addy said on social media platform X that the report about Cameron's threat was "concerning" and backed calls for an "independent inquiry into the UK's role in the Gaza genocide". Scottish National Party MP Chris Law said on X: "Shocking that the UK Tory govt tried to undermine the International Criminal Court for investigating those responsible for war crimes in Gaza. "However not seeing much better under Labour." Shocking that the UK Tory govt tried to undermine the International Criminal Court for investigating those responsible for war crimes in Gaza. However not seeing much better under Labour #GazaGenocide — Chris Law MP (@ChrisLawSNP) June 9, 2025 As of February, Khan has been sanctioned by US President Donald Trump because of the arrest warrants issued for Netanyahu and Gallant. The prosecutor has had his US visa revoked and his wife and children have been banned from travelling to the US. His bank accounts have been frozen in the UK. The warrants for Israeli leaders are currently in the hands of two deputy prosecutors. Last Thursday, the US imposed further sanctions on four ICC judges whom it accused of being involved in 'illegitimate actions targeting the United States and Israel'. Neither the US nor Israel are parties to the Rome Statute and have long rejected the authority of the court. In a statement, the ICC said it deplored the sanctions against Khan and the four judges. It said it stood fully behind its personnel and would continue its work undeterred. The court recently ordered that any further warrants issued in relation to its Palestine investigation cannot be publicised.
