Judge dismisses Jan. 6 riot charges against Topekan Will Pope and his brother
A federal judge signed a court order Tuesday formally dismissing charges against Topekan Will Pope and his brother, Michael Pope, linked to the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol.
U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras signed the order, which Assistant U.S. Attorney Jennifer Leigh Blackwell had requested in response to President Donald Trump's order Monday pardoning or dismissing federal indictments against more than 1,500 people charged with — and in most cases, convicted of — crimes linked to that event.
Contreras dismissed five non-violent charges against Will Pope, 39, against whom three other charges had previously been dismissed.
Michael Pope, 36, of Sandpoint, Idaho, was found guilty last October of four federal charges. Because Michael Pope was never sentenced or had judgment entered in his case, he received a dismissal instead of a pardon, Will said.
Michael Pope had also sought a retrial, but no ruling had been made on that request prior to Monday's executive order, Will Pope said.
Will Pope had represented himself as his own attorney since 2022
Will Pope had told The Capital-Journal in a text message that he felt convinced Contreras would sign the dismissal order.
"It feels good to win and be vindicated," he said, "but I'm still angry about the conduct of the government and various other individuals and organizations."
Michael Pope and Will Pope, who ran unsuccessfully in 2019 for the Topeka City Council, were visiting Washington, D.C., at the time of the Capitol riot.
The criminal complaint involved alleged Will Pope was caught on video trying to force his way into the office of then-U.S. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi. He said that was inaccurate.
Will Pope had represented himself as his own attorney in the case since the summer 2022, he said.
Contreras agreed after Trump was elected last November to postpone Pope's trial, which was set to be held Dec. 2, until after Trump took office.
Contreras earlier this month allowed Will Pope to travel to accept an invitation to attend Trump's inauguration Monday, temporarily suspending his prohibition on traveling to Washington, D.C., for anything unrelated to his court case.
Pope said he attended an inaugural ball Monday evening in Washington, D.C.
Moving ahead, he told The Capital-Journal on Tuesday, "There will be some loose ends to tie up, but I look forward to starting a new chapter in life."
Contact Tim Hrenchir at threnchir@gannett.com or 785-213-5934.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
8 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump's $1,000-per-baby investment accounts: What to know
President Trump has lauded the House-approved spending bill for the 'pro-family initiative' tucked inside the legislation, which creates investment accounts for newborn babies. 'They'll really be getting a big jump on life, especially if we get a little bit lucky with some of the numbers and the economy,' Trump said at a Monday event at the White House that touted the accounts. The 'Big, Beautiful Bill' lays out rules for the Trump accounts. To qualify, a child must be a U.S. citizen, born within the next four years to at least one parent with a Social Security number. The money could be withdrawn starting at age 18. Here's what you need to know about the proposed federal program: Under the current bill text, the program would be available to families of all income levels, with babies born after Dec. 31, 2024, and before Jan. 1, 2029. A one-time $1,000 contribution would be provided by the Treasury Department and deposited into a diversified U.S. stock index fund or its equivalent. Families, guardians and private entities will be able to contribute no more than $5,000 per year to the account. An estimated 7 percent return on the $1,000 would compound to roughly $3,570 over 18 years, according to the Associated Press. The legislation does not provide a limit on the amount of money a nonprofit or company can donate to a child's investment account within the $5,000 annual contribution limit. Several businesses, including Uber, Dell, Goldman Sachs and Altimeter have committed to setting aside billions to invest in the accounts of company employees who become new parents. 'It's not just an account; it's a launchpad. It puts the unstoppable engine of compounding to work for our kids, building a future for them from day one,' Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi said about the initiative during a White House roundtable. Children enrolled in the investment program are eligible to withdraw half of the cash value amount between their 18th and 25th birthdays, according to CNN. Families and beneficiaries would pay a penalty for early withdrawal as there is no allowance for emergency use of the funds, the outlet reported. Funds withdrawn for anything other than 'qualified expenses,' including paying for higher education, buying a residence or starting a business, will be taxed. Researchers have said the investment accounts could widen America's wealth gap. 'Under the current proposal, every child starts with the same amount, and families can contribute up to $5,000 annually,' the Urban Institute, a think-tank focused on social policy, wrote in a late May report. 'But relatively few households hold substantial liquid wealth in the United States, meaning higher-income households are far more likely than their lower-income counterparts to have the means to contribute additional funds,' it continued. The study noted that Trump accounts are likely to only benefit those who have already maxed out existing tax-preferred savings opportunities, like 529 accounts. Instead, they suggested low income families with job insecurity are more likely to gravitate towards investing in traditional accounts that offer flexible guidelines. Trump's 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' still needs approval from the upper chamber. Senators considering potential changes or cuts to the legislation, hoping to pass the bill before July 4.
Fox News
19 minutes ago
- Fox News
Diddy's ex-girlfriend preps for cross examination after 'graphic, days-long' testimony
All times eastern FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage WATCH LIVE: SecDef Hegseth testifies before House subcommittee as active-duty Marines deployed to LA
The Hill
19 minutes ago
- The Hill
Hegseth filibusters on cost of Trump's Los Angeles deployments
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Tuesday declined to discuss the expected cost of deploying National Guard troops and Marines to Los Angeles to suppress immigration raid protests, instead attacking Democratic leaders for their handling of current and previous incidents of civil unrest. Rep. Betty McCollum (D-Minn.), House Appropriations defense subcommittee ranking member, asked Hegseth about funding the deployment of the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles. He instead defended Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) as having 'the right to safely conduct operations in any state and any jurisdiction in the country.' He also referenced the George Floyd murder protests in 2020 in Minneapolis, attacking Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (D) for his actions at that time and arguing that the National Guard was 'eventually far too late mobilized.' 'President Trump recognizes a situation like that, improperly handled by a governor, like it was by Governor Walz, if it gets out of control, it's a bad situation for the citizens,' Hegseth said. The answer prompted McCollum to interrupt him to press him to address her original question. 'Chairman, I have limited time, I asked a budget question,' McCollum interjected. McCollum also asked Hegseth whether any trainings were being pushed off due to the troop deployment, but grew frustrated at his lack of answer. 'I will yield back my time if the secretary refuses to answer the budgetary questions I put before him. They're important,' she said. 'What training missions aren't happening? Where are you pulling the money from? And how are you planning this moving forward? These are budget questions that affect this committee and the decisions we're going to be making in a couple of hours.' Hegseth only replied that the Pentagon has the funding 'to cover down on contingencies, especially ones as important as maintaining law and order in major American city.' In her opening remarks, McCollum criticized President Trump's decision to call in some 4,000 California National Guard troops as 'premature,' and the decision to deploy 700 active duty Marines as 'downright escalatory.' 'I ask you Mr. Secretary, and I ask the president, follow the law,' she said.
