logo
Migrant deaths hit record in 2024, UN agency says

Migrant deaths hit record in 2024, UN agency says

Yahoo21-03-2025

GENEVA (Reuters) - Last year was the deadliest on record for migrants, with nearly 9,000 people confirmed to have died on perilous routes that include crossing the Sahara Desert or the Mediterranean Sea, the U.N. migration agency said on Friday.
"The increase in deaths across so many regions in the world shows why we need an international, holistic response that can prevent further tragic loss of life," International Organization for Migration Deputy Director General for Operations Ugochi Daniels said in a statement.
In 2024, at least 8,938 people died on migration routes, with Asian routes being the most deadly followed by the Mediterranean crossing and Africa, which includes the Sahara.
The IOM data goes back to at least 2014. Each year since 2021, the annual total of recorded migrant deaths has increased, with many thousands more thought to be unrecorded annually due to the lack of official records, IOM says.
The Geneva-based agency is one of several groups helping displaced people that have been hit by major aid cuts from the United States, forcing it to scale back or shutter programmes in moves it says will have a severe impact on migrants.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ICE used ‘deceptive' practices to detain asylum seeker at Portland courthouse, attorneys say
ICE used ‘deceptive' practices to detain asylum seeker at Portland courthouse, attorneys say

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

ICE used ‘deceptive' practices to detain asylum seeker at Portland courthouse, attorneys say

PORTLAND, Ore. () – Amid the Trump administration's crackdown on immigration, immigration agents detained a woman seeking asylum at a Portland immigration courthouse on Monday, attorneys representing the asylum seeker said. According to the attorneys, OJM — a pseudonym used to protect the woman's identity because of safety concerns — was at a hearing for her asylum case in Portland when Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials asked the court to dismiss her case and detained her. Now, the attorneys at the Portland-based Innovation Law Lab say they are filing an emergency petition, arguing ICE used 'deceptive and unethical practices' to detain her and strip her of her due process to OJM's attorneys, after she left the courtroom, ICE agents arrested her 'in an attempt to end her asylum claim, transfer her, and rapidly deport her.' OJM is a 24-year-old transgender woman from Mexico, where she was abducted and raped because of her gender identity and sexual orientation 'at the hands of a dangerous cartel,' OJM's attorneys said, noting she fled to the United States for safety. 'This is a dangerous attempt by ICE to circumvent due process, speed up deportations, and eviscerate the right to asylum,' said Innovation Law Lab Attorney Jordan Cunnings, who represents OJM. 'This unethical behavior goes against the values we hold as Oregonians, ensuring that everyone is welcomed and included in our state.' Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now The emergency petition, obtained by KOIN 6 News, states that OJM was released from custody by immigration authorities nearly two years ago in California. Later, in February of 2025, she filed for asylum, and in the following month, immigration officials started removal proceedings, the petition says. 'Only nearly two years after OJM was released from custody and months after she applied for asylum, (authorities) commenced removal proceedings against her in immigration court where she could present her asylum claim under the due process rights,' the petition explains. The petition goes on to claim, 'in a deceptive sleight of hand, (authorities) seek to eject OJM from her own asylum case, detain her and transfer her away from the District of Oregon so that they can rapidly deport her.' Neighbors, PBOT fed up with NW 13th outdoor plaza The petition cites the Refugee Act of 1980, which gives people the right to apply for asylum when seeking safety in the U.S. The petition also states that noncitizens who apply for asylum are entitled to a full hearing in immigration court before they can be removed from the U.S. 'OJM had properly filed her asylum application, but ICE appears to be attempting to place her in expedited removal, a rapid deportation process with minimal protections,' Innovation Law Lab said. OJM's case mirrors a 'troubling national trend,' her attorneys say. Hood River-White Salmon Bridge project secures Washington funds, eyes $105M from Oregon 'Courthouse arrests destroy the integrity of our legal system and undermine the rule of law,' Cunnings said. 'We ask immigrants and refugees who are fleeing violence to abide by an asylum process. Detaining them for showing up to court is heartbreaking and harmful to our justice system.' Innovation Law Lab notes that OJM's gender identity matters in this case, explaining she, like others across the United States, traveled to Oregon for its inclusivity and to escape violence because of her identity. The attorneys raised concerns over an executive order issued by President Donald Trump that states transgender women will no longer be detained with other women, meaning they will likely be held with male detainees, which can threaten their safety. 'No one, including transgender women, should be incarcerated in unsafe detention facilities where their lives are at risk,' said Reyna Lopez on behalf of Oregon for All, a coalition of organizations including the ACLU, Innovation Law Lab and the Oregon Food Bank, advocating for immigrant justice. 'Transgender people are part of what makes our Oregon beautiful, and they deserve to be treated with dignity and respect just like every other Oregonian.' KOIN 6 News has reached out to Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Department of Homeland Security and the United States Department of Justice, which were named in the petition. This story will be updated if we receive a response. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

White House insists FEMA is taking hurricane season 'seriously,' blasts 'sloppy' reporting
White House insists FEMA is taking hurricane season 'seriously,' blasts 'sloppy' reporting

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

White House insists FEMA is taking hurricane season 'seriously,' blasts 'sloppy' reporting

The White House insisted Tuesday that the Federal Emergency Management Agency is taking hurricane season "seriously" while criticizing the media following reports claiming its director was unaware of such a time period. During a recent meeting, acting FEMA administrator David Richardson told staff he was unaware the U.S. had a hurricane season, Reuters and the New York Times reported Monday, citing people familiar with the remarks. A spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security later told Reuters that the comment was a joke and that FEMA is ready for the season, which began on June 1 and runs through Nov. 30. "Well, of course, we know that we are into hurricane season now, and I know FEMA is taking this seriously, contrary to some of the reporting we have seen, based on jokes that were made and leaks from meetings. But Secretary Kristi Noem and the FEMA leadership are all over this," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday when asked about the reporting. "They are committed to ensuring that federal resources and tax dollars are there for Americans in need. And the president continues to review requests for emergency aid and carefully considering them. However, this president has made it clear – we're not going to enable states to make bad decisions with federal tax dollars and then have the federal government later have to bail these states out," Leavitt continued. Gop Senator Says Federal Government Will 'Need To Play A Big Role' After Tornadoes Ravage Midwest "We want to see states be responsible with their tax dollars to do as much as they possibly can. And then the president will deeply and thoughtfully consider any requests for federal aid that come to his desk. And I think some of the media reporting we've seen on this is, frankly, sloppy and irresponsible. There are serious people who are taking this issue seriously, starting with the president himself," she also said. Read On The Fox News App Trump, Lawmakers At Odds Over Whether Fema Should Be Elevated To Cabinet-level Agency Or Completely Overhauled However, the reporting didn't stop Democrats from pouncing on Richardson. "I'm unaware of why he hasn't been fired yet," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., wrote on X while flagging the Reuters article about his alleged remarks. "Suffice to say, disaster response is no joke. If you don't know what or when hurricane season is, you're not qualified to run FEMA. Get someone knowledgeable in there," Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., told Reuters. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said last week, "Forecasters within NOAA's National Weather Service predict above-normal hurricane activity in the Atlantic basin this year."Original article source: White House insists FEMA is taking hurricane season 'seriously,' blasts 'sloppy' reporting

US judge says prisons must provide gender-affirming care for inmates
US judge says prisons must provide gender-affirming care for inmates

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US judge says prisons must provide gender-affirming care for inmates

By Dietrich Knauth NEW YORK (Reuters) -A U.S. judge on Tuesday ruled the U.S. Bureau of Prisons must keep providing transgender inmates gender-affirming care, despite an executive order President Donald Trump signed on his first day back in office to halt funding for such care. U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth in Washington, D.C., allowed a group of more than 2,000 transgender inmates in federal prisons to pursue a lawsuit challenging the order as a class action. He ordered the Bureau of Prisons to provide them with hormone therapy and accommodations such as clothing and hair-removal devices while the lawsuit plays out. The ruling does not require the bureau to provide surgical care related to gender transitions. White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said the Trump administration expects to ultimately prevail in the legal dispute. "The District Court's decision allowing transgender women, aka MEN, in women's prisons fundamentally makes women less safe and ignores the biological truth that there are only two genders," Fields said in an email. The American Civil Liberties Union, which represents the inmates, said the ruling was "a critical reminder to the Trump administration that trans people, like all people, have constitutional rights that don't simply disappear because the president has decided to wage an ideological battle." About 2,230 transgender inmates are housed in federal custodial facilities and halfway houses, according to the U.S. Department of Justice. About two-thirds of them, 1,506, are transgender women, most of whom are housed in men's prisons. The named plaintiffs, two transgender men and one transgender woman, sued the Trump administration in March to challenge Trump's January 20 executive order aimed at combating what the administration called "gender ideology extremism." The executive order directed the federal government to only recognize two, biologically distinct sexes, male and female; and house transgender women in men's prisons. It also ordered the bureau to stop spending any money on "any medical procedure, treatment, or drug for the purpose of conforming an inmate's appearance to that of the opposite sex." Lamberth, appointed by Republican President Ronald Reagan, said in Tuesday's ruling that the plaintiffs were likely to succeed in their lawsuit because the bureau did not perform any analysis before cutting off treatment that its own medical staff had previously deemed to be medically appropriate for the inmates. Even if it had extensively studied the issue before deciding to stop gender-affirming care, the decision might still violate the U.S. Constitution's Eighth Amendment's protections against "cruel and unusual" punishment, Lamberth wrote. The Department of Justice had argued that the judge should defer to the policy decision of a democratically elected president, but Lamberth said a functioning democracy requires respect for "all duly enacted laws," including those that blocked the executive branch from acting in an "arbitrary and capricious" manner. Democratic self-governance "does not mean blind submission to the whims of the most recent election-victor," Lamberth wrote. The executive order said it was meant to promote the "dignity, safety, and wellbeing of women, and to stop the spread of "gender ideology" which denies "the immutable biological reality of sex." But the inmates receiving hormone treatments had little interest in promoting any ideology, and were instead taking "measures to lessen the personal anguish caused by their gender dysphoria," Lamberth wrote.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store