Curfew lifted in LA as Trump battles for control of California troops
By
Ben Turner
, AFP
Photo:
SCOTT OLSON
Calm appeared to be returning to protest-hit Los Angeles as the mayor lifted a
nighttime curfew
, while President Donald Trump battled to keep control of California troops he deployed to the city.
A fraction of the sprawling US city had been off-limits from 8pm to 6am to most people for a week after instances of looting and vandalism during demonstrations against Trump's
immigration raids
.
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said the curfew had been "largely successful in protecting stores, restaurants, businesses and residential communities from bad actors who do not care about the immigrant community."
However, she added that, "as we continue quickly adapting to chaos coming from Washington," she was prepared to reissue a curfew if needed.
Bass and other California officials have accused Trump of inflaming tensions by sending 4,000 of the state's National Guard troops - as well as 700 Marines - to the second-largest US city.
In a show of political muscle, Trump ignored the objections of Democratic
Governor Gavin Newsom
, who would usually oversee the Guard.
A judge said Thursday that the Republican president's actions were "illegal" and ordered that he return control of the force to Newsom.
But a higher court paused that ruling after the Trump administration lodged an appeal and slammed the judge's order as an "extraordinary intrusion on the President's constitutional authority as Commander in Chief."
At an appeals hearing Tuesday, the Justice Department argued that Trump needed to keep control of California's troops to ensure federal immigration officers could carry out arrests without
threats from the public
.
"Unfortunately, local authorities are either unable or unwilling to protect federal personnel and property from the mob violence ongoing in Los Angeles today," said Brett Shumate, representing the Trump administration.
California officials have rejected that charge, insisting that Trump's
use of the military
has escalated demonstrations that Los Angeles that law enforcement could have handled.
LA Mayor Karen Bass said she was prepared to reissue a curfew if needed.
Photo:
PATRICK T. FALLON
Samuel Harbourt, representing Newsom and California, pointed out that local authorities in Los Angeles have made around 1,000 arrests during the disorder.
"Are we in a world that's so different from normal conditions as to justify an extreme measure like militarizing the situation and bringing in the National Guard?" he said.
Harbourt urged the San Francisco court to lift the pause on the original order, meaning Trump would have to concede control of the Guard.
"Every day that this order remains in effect it is causing harm for our nation's broader democratic tradition of separation of the military from civilian affairs," he said.
That, he added, "sets a precedent for this president, and future presidents, to take similar actions going forward."
Trump has been accused of inflaming tensions by sending 4,000 of the state's National Guard troops - as well as 700 Marines - to LA.
Photo:
SAUL LOEB / AFP
The fatigue-wearing guardsmen have been tasked with protecting federal property in Los Angeles, stationed outside buildings with helmets and large shields.
US law restricts them from arresting citizens, though some guardsmen have fired tear gas and non-lethal rounds towards protesters, according to local media.
It is the first time since 1965 that a US president has deployed the National Guard without the express wishes of a state's governor.
Trump has been unrepentant
, taking credit for making Los Angeles "safe" and declaring that Newsom - a contender for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2028 - had "totally lost control."
Trump ignored the objections of Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, who would usually oversee the Guard.
Photo:
JUSTIN SULLIVAN / AFP
The dispute mirrors multiple other tussles over Trump's attempts to expand the limits of presidential power, but is the first to involve troops.
Like other cases, it could go all the way to the Supreme Court, where conservative judges hold a 6-3 majority.
Many in Los Angeles are angry about immigration raids carried out as part of Trump's ambition to
deport vast numbers of undocumented migrants
around the country.
Outrage at the use of masked, armed immigration agents has also
sparked protests in other cities
, including San Francisco, New York, Chicago and San Antonio, Texas.
-
AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Analysis: Shadow of Iraq war and Baghdad's collapse hangs over US debate over intervention
In the years since America's wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the idea of 'regime change', or military action to topple hostile foreign governments, has become politically radioactive in Washington. Few political leaders have criticised the concept as much as President Donald Trump, who has spent years attacking both Democrats and
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Immigration minister faces questions over deportations, parent visas, asylum and Gaza
Immigration Minister Erica Stanford. Photo: RNZ / REECE BAKER Medical insurance for the new parent boost visa will cost migrants up to $8000 a year, according to the immigration minister. Erica Stanford was quizzed on Tuesday by MPs in the Education and Workforce Committee, as part of budget scrutiny week in topics that covered everything from skilled migrants, to children born as overstayers and visas for people from the Middle East. The new five-year parent visa allows parents of New Zealand citizens and residents to visit and possibly renew their visa - with a maximum stay of 10 years. Health insurance prices vary according to age and health, with costs over the five-year visa period estimated at between $10,000 and $40,000. But Stanford said those costs were less than half the annual policies they looked at initially, which would have required comprehensive cover for all doctors' fees and specialists. "It was like $15,000 to $20,000 for full insurance and we just thought it's not doable and it's going to defeat the purpose of the visa. So we didn't go with comprehensive. We went with literally the minimum, which is emergency only. We added cancer [treatment] in there as well because it really made very little difference to the amount." Other financial requirements of the visa were designed to make sure families could support their visiting parents' other health, housing, and living costs, she said. Labour's immigration spokesperson Phil Twyford said it risked being viewed as a visa reserved for families of a wealthy minority. Stanford said other visas were available. "Are you saying it's easy for migrant families to bring their parents in on those other visas?" asked Twyford. "Because that's not at all what people in the community say." Stanford disputed that, and also stressed that the government was being careful to ensure parents were being looked after on a long-term visa. Under questions about whether the criteria were set to ration the number of potential applications, she said the government had not looked at rationing or numbers, and feedback had been overwhelmingly positive. "When you draw a line somewhere, there are always people below and always people above - that's just the nature of drawing a line." INZ head Alison McDonald, immigration minister Erica Stanford and MBIE chief executive Carolyn Tremain at Tuesday's hearing. Photo: Screenshot / Education and Workforce Committee Stanford told the committee there were four children born since 2006 to parents without residence visas or citizenship who had been deported in the last five years. She said lawyers had suggested to her that affected numbers of youngsters were 'likely to be very low'. Others say increasing numbers of those babies are now turning 18 and 19, and some cannot get a work visa or a university education - and in some cases face deportation. Neither she nor Immigration New Zealand answered a question on how many affected children and young people were being worked with by compliance staff. Green Party immigration spokesperson Ricardo Menéndez March said if numbers were low it may be because they had already been pressured into 'removing themselves from the country'. INZ head of compliance Steve Watson said they would not be deported until 'they had exhausted every other option available to them.' Teenagers or their parents could also approach the associate minister for a decision. Twyford said the numbers being seen was a tip of the iceberg because they lived in 'extreme insecurity'. He asked whether Stanford thought the system was right, saying the current crop of teenagers facing deportation was a feature of the system, 'not a bug'. "It is important that people stick to the conditions of their visa, because we can't have a situation where if you have a child and wait long enough, then everything will be okay," Stanford replied, first noting it was Helen Clark's government which introduced the law change. "Everyone has to abide by the conditions of their visa. And I'm not sure why in this case we would say 'well, you are okay' because the very next question you are going to ask me after we say yes to the child ... is 'oh, but what about their parents? And that's exactly what's happening." Twyford asked whether she had considered what Australia and the UK do, granting citizenship after the first 10 years of a child's life. "We are not Australia and the UK," she said. "There is already a process for these children, and I understand that they're in a difficult situation but there is a pathway. Apply to the associate minister of immigration." Twyford asked her whether in hindsight, not creating humanitarian visas for relatives of Palestinians living here was the right decision, given the scale of the tragedy unfolding there. A special category visa category had been opened in similar circumstances for families of Ukrainians. Stanford said the difference between Ukraine and Gaza was that Palestinians could not physically escape to get to New Zealand. Cabinet's decision was not being reviewed. "At this point, it's not something that we've considered, it would have to go through Cabinet, and Cabinet have decided at this time that they're satisfied with the settings that are in place." INZ was facilitating people from Gaza who were applying for other visas, she said. Asked about Palestinians already here, INZ head Alison McDonald told the committee that staff would look carefully at those cases. "Not just from Gaza, from Israel, from Iran, from Iraq, people who can't return home... we'll find a way to regularise [their visas] until they can get home." The immigration minister told the committee that changes to skilled migrant visas are coming soon, the numbers of high-rolling investors are increasing and entrepreneur visas will also be given a makeover. The update to the entrepreneur visa would drive productivity, GDP and employment, and help in finding buyers for businesses whose owners needed to sell, said Stanford. AEWV (work visas) were now much quicker for businesses to navigate and more overseas workers were arriving to fill skill shortages. Overseas investor visa application numbers had outstripped expectations, she said, and many of them were also 'huge philanthropists', hinting that some would be well-known names. "I remember we got 200 in the first year, I'd be really happy - we've had 175 since April and almost half of those are out of the States, lots out of Germany, some from China, Hong Kong, Singapore - so a mix, but certainly more than we thought. "There's a billion dollars about to be invested - but it's not the money, it's the people, their skills, their talent. Some of the applicants and where they've come from, you would all know. They're amazing people." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Fiery debate over deportations, parent visas, asylum and Gaza
Immigration Minister Erica Stanford. Photo: RNZ / REECE BAKER Medical insurance for the new parent boost visa will cost migrants up to $8000 a year, according to the immigration minister. Erica Stanford was quizzed on Tuesday by MPs in the Education and Workforce Committee, as part of budget scrutiny week in topics that covered everything from skilled migrants, to children born as overstayers and visas for people from the Middle East. The new five-year parent visa allows parents of New Zealand citizens and residents to visit and possibly renew their visa - with a maximum stay of 10 years. Health insurance prices vary according to age and health, with costs over the five-year visa period estimated at between $10,000 and $40,000. But Stanford said those costs were less than half the annual policies they looked at initially, which would have required comprehensive cover for all doctors' fees and specialists. "It was like $15,000 to $20,000 for full insurance and we just thought it's not doable and it's going to defeat the purpose of the visa. So we didn't go with comprehensive. We went with literally the minimum, which is emergency only. We added cancer [treatment] in there as well because it really made very little difference to the amount." Other financial requirements of the visa were designed to make sure families could support their visiting parents' other health, housing, and living costs, she said. Labour's immigration spokesperson Phil Twyford said it risked being viewed as a visa reserved for families of a wealthy minority. Stanford said other visas were available. "Are you saying it's easy for migrant families to bring their parents in on those other visas?" asked Twyford. "Because that's not at all what people in the community say." Stanford disputed that, and also stressed that the government was being careful to ensure parents were being looked after on a long-term visa. Under questions about whether the criteria were set to ration the number of potential applications, she said the government had not looked at rationing or numbers, and feedback had been overwhelmingly positive. "When you draw a line somewhere, there are always people below and always people above - that's just the nature of drawing a line." INZ head Alison McDonald, immigration minister Erica Stanford and MBIE chief executive Carolyn Tremain at Tuesday's hearing. Photo: Screenshot / Education and Workforce Committee Stanford told the committee there were four children born since 2006 to parents without residence visas or citizenship who had been deported in the last five years. She said lawyers had suggested to her that affected numbers of youngsters were 'likely to be very low'. Others say increasing numbers of those babies are now turning 18 and 19, and some cannot get a work visa or a university education - and in some cases face deportation. Neither she nor Immigration New Zealand answered a question on how many affected children and young people were being worked with by compliance staff. Green Party immigration spokesperson Ricardo Menéndez March said if numbers were low it may be because they had already been pressured into 'removing themselves from the country'. INZ head of compliance Steve Watson said they would not be deported until 'they had exhausted every other option available to them.' Teenagers or their parents could also approach the associate minister for a decision. Twyford said the numbers being seen was a tip of the iceberg because they lived in 'extreme insecurity'. He asked whether Stanford thought the system was right, saying the current crop of teenagers facing deportation was a feature of the system, 'not a bug'. "It is important that people stick to the conditions of their visa, because we can't have a situation where if you have a child and wait long enough, then everything will be okay," Stanford replied, first noting it was Helen Clark's government which introduced the law change. "Everyone has to abide by the conditions of their visa. And I'm not sure why in this case we would say 'well, you are okay' because the very next question you are going to ask me after we say yes to the child ... is 'oh, but what about their parents? And that's exactly what's happening." Twyford asked whether she had considered what Australia and the UK do, granting citizenship after the first 10 years of a child's life. "We are not Australia and the UK," she said. "There is already a process for these children, and I understand that they're in a difficult situation but there is a pathway. Apply to the associate minister of immigration." Twyford asked her whether in hindsight, not creating humanitarian visas for relatives of Palestinians living here was the right decision, given the scale of the tragedy unfolding there. A special category visa category had been opened in similar circumstances for families of Ukrainians. Stanford said the difference between Ukraine and Gaza was that Palestinians could not physically escape to get to New Zealand. Cabinet's decision was not being reviewed. "At this point, it's not something that we've considered, it would have to go through Cabinet, and Cabinet have decided at this time that they're satisfied with the settings that are in place." INZ was facilitating people from Gaza who were applying for other visas, she said. Asked about Palestinians already here, INZ head Alison McDonald told the committee that staff would look carefully at those cases. "Not just from Gaza, from Israel, from Iran, from Iraq, people who can't return home... we'll find a way to regularise [their visas] until they can get home." The immigration minister told the committee that changes to skilled migrant visas are coming soon, the numbers of high-rolling investors are increasing and entrepreneur visas will also be given a makeover. The update to the entrepreneur visa would drive productivity, GDP and employment, and help in finding buyers for businesses whose owners needed to sell, said Stanford. AEWV (work visas) were now much quicker for businesses to navigate and more overseas workers were arriving to fill skill shortages. Overseas investor visa application numbers had outstripped expectations, she said, and many of them were also 'huge philanthropists', hinting that some would be well-known names. "I remember we got 200 in the first year, I'd be really happy - we've had 175 since April and almost half of those are out of the States, lots out of Germany, some from China, Hong Kong, Singapore - so a mix, but certainly more than we thought. "There's a billion dollars about to be invested - but it's not the money, it's the people, their skills, their talent. Some of the applicants and where they've come from, you would all know. They're amazing people." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
