
Breaking the MBA mould – A radical rethink of business education for the real world
Segran Nair, Director of Milpark Business School.
The old MBA is dead. Or at least it should be, according to Milpark Business School. Under the leadership of director Segran Nair, the school has rebuilt its MBA from the ground up to tackle the real, messy complexity of today's business landscape. Climate uncertainty, economic volatility, digital disruption and social inequality demand a new kind of leadership that is rooted in ethics, adaptability and systems thinking.
'The challenges facing today's business leaders are anything but straightforward, and we redesigned our MBA programme deliberately,' Nair explains. 'And not just for subjects in isolation, but around the real-world systems leaders must learn to navigate.'
While traditional MBAs are often criticised for their rigid, siloed structures, Milpark has overhauled its programme, weaving together ethics, sustainability, finance and technology into a single, integrated journey.
One example is the Leading an Organisation Responsibly module. Structured over 20 weeks, the course includes 10 weeks of intensive theoretical engagement followed by 10 weeks of real-world application.
Students work with South African non-profit organisations (NPOs) to tackle real-world sustainability challenges, applying business thinking to drive social impact. 'We want students to see that sustainability isn't just about green policies; it's financial sustainability. It's community resilience and how you use social media to amplify impact. This is business education for the real world,' Nair says.
The case for an evolved MBA
The MBA has been one of the world's most recognised business qualifications for more than a century, and for some, that's exactly the problem. As global challenges mount and digital disruption accelerates, many are questioning whether it's still fit for purpose, with critics arguing that it's too focused on Western capitalist models, too out of touch with the social and environmental imperatives of our time and too rigid to meet the needs of today's working professionals.
But Nair pushes back. 'The MBA today is not what it was even 10 years ago — at least not at institutions that are paying attention,' he says. 'The complexity of our modern programme — from operations and marketing to ethics and leadership — is unlike anything else. It's not just about business knowledge. It's about transformation.'
So is the qualification still relevant? According to Nair, the answer is a resounding yes — but only if it evolves 'in both content and context to stay meaningful for the world we live and work in today'.
This approach reflects a deliberate effort to foster systems thinking and integrated problem-solving. Milpark's redesigned curriculum encourages students to draw from multiple disciplines and consider the broader implications of business decisions.
He says Milpark's programme addresses South Africa's urgent need for ethical and innovative leaders: 'Look at our challenges: high youth unemployment, a fragile economy, infrastructure strain and leadership crises. We need professionals who are numerate, ethical and strategically agile. The MBA remains one of the best tools to build those capabilities — if done right.'
Integrated learning, real-world relevance
With artificial intelligence (AI) transforming industries, Nair adds that technology cannot be an afterthought. At Milpark Education, students are empowered to use emerging technologies ethically and responsibly without losing their uniquely human advantage. And although tools like ChatGPT are prohibited in certain assessments to ensure authentic and critical thinking, students are trained to engage with AI-generated content.
'We want our students to think critically, to ask where information comes from, and to question its validity. In a world flooded with data and misinformation, this is a non-negotiable leadership skill,' Nair explains.
By breaking down silos, Milpark is also fostering collaboration across industries and sectors. Students from finance, tech, mining, NPOs and government are encouraged to learn from one another, with the online delivery model offering flexibility without compromising community. Nair says that in-person meetups, including a Cape Town induction which has already taken place for the latest cohort, aim to bring students together, help build social capital and foster professional networks that last well beyond graduation.
The curriculum draws directly from emerging trends like AI, digital disruption, environment, social and governance (ESG) principles and stakeholder capitalism. Students engage with industry partners to apply their learning in real-world settings. And throughout it all, leadership and self-reflection remain central.
Inclusive, human-centred and African
'What good is a technical expert if they're not ethical? What good is a leader who can't reflect or empathise?' Nair asks. 'Soft skills aren't soft. They're foundational. We have to build a new generation of leaders who understand the system, who can navigate uncertainty, and who care deeply about people and the planet. That means breaking down silos — in our curricula, in our classrooms and our thinking.'
For Milpark Education, inclusivity and relevance go hand in hand. Once stereotyped as a space for white, male engineers with dominant personalities, the modern MBA cohort reflects a broader, more diverse South Africa.
'It's a pity that so many people still feel the MBA isn't for them,' says Nair. 'But we've come a long way. We've created space for mums, introverts, and professionals from all backgrounds to find their voice.'
This commitment extends to how the programme is delivered. Designed for working professionals with families, Milpark's MBA offers a manageable workload, flexible access, and psychosocial support for students navigating work-life pressures.
'We don't inherit businesses — we inherit a country,' says Nair. 'Our MBAs need to be ready to lead both.'
Business as a force for good
This, he says, is business education reimagined for the African context. With high youth unemployment, mounting infrastructure challenges and persistent social inequality, entrepreneurship and innovation are not just desirable — they're essential.
Nair explains: 'At Milpark's Business School, we know business is not just a means of profit; it is a vehicle for societal change. This ethos is embedded throughout the programme — not as a single module, but as a consistent value system. Business, per se, is neutral, but it's what we do with it that matters. Our graduates leave not only with skills, but with a conscience. They know that leadership today demands more than competence. It demands character.'
The future of business education must be integrated, inclusive and built for the real-world challenges of Africa and beyond. The MBA is not obsolete, but in order to stay relevant, it must evolve. And at Milpark, it already has.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mail & Guardian
2 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
Starlink raises questions about necessity and relevance of BEE laws
The licensing of Elon Musk's Starlink has sparked debate about whether South Africa's black economic empowerment laws are an impediment to growth or path to an inclusive economy The South African government may have said that black economic empowerment is not negotiable, but Starlink's battle to enter the market has brought into play the influence of international trade. During a Q&A session in parliament last week President Cyril Ramaphosa said his administration is seeking to create an inclusive economy making broad-based clack economic empowerment (broad-based BEE) legislation critical. Ramaphosa was asked a barrage of questions about racial categories by members of the National Assembly on Tuesday and whether he was willing to do away with BEE laws. Starlink's efforts to set up shop changed in February shortly after US President Donald Trump was inaugurated into office and the company withdrew from licensing hearings. Instead the company argued in submissions that its global policy does not allow local ownership. Democratic Alliance (DA) member George Michalakis asked Ramaphosa whether he would do a cross-departmental review of legislation that stifles investment and limits growth at 1%. This came after Minister of Communication and Digital Technologies Solly Malatsi, a DA member in the coalition government, issued a policy directive to review ownership requirements in the information and communication technology (ICT) sector. Malatsi Portfolio committee chairperson Kusela Diko had invited Malatsi to explain the policy directive and said other telecom companies do business in the country without complaint. Malatsi told committee members that his department sought to allow contribution to transformation besides share ownership to historically disadvantaged groups. Portfolio committee members accused Malatsi of seeking to draw back transformation for the sake of one multinational company and for using a ministerial policy directive instead of tabling a bill to amend legislation. After receiving public comments in the next 30 days, the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (Icasa) will conduct a six-month study on whether equity equivalent programmes (EEIPs) can be implemented in the ICT sector. While the ANC is considering EEIPs under the Transformation Fund as an alternative to the 30% share requirement, it rejected Malatsi's policy directive, stating there was no deal struck during the Washington visit. Economic Freedom Fighters committee member Sinawo Tambo criticised Malatsi for using a ministerial directive to amend legislation, and said the tactic sought to circumvent parliamentary processes. uMkhonto weSizwe party portfolio committee member Colleen Makhubele said Malatsi was using a 'clandestine unilateral approach' to fast-pace licensing of Starlink instead of empowering 490 already licensed network providers. Although South African billionaire Johann Rupert, When answering Michalakis' question during the Q&A Ramaphosa said he would initiate a 'regulatory review process' that would unleash 'speed of execution' in government administration but doubted BEE was the issue holding the economy back. Corné Mulder, leader of the Freedom Front Plus, asked whether Ramaphosa was prepared to take a different approach, away from BEE and the Expropriation Act, to stimulate the economy. Ramaphosa said his starting point was the redress of past black economic exclusion and cited an International Monetary Fund report that highlighted the concentration of capital and ownership, where the top 10% own 86% of the wealth as the hurdle for growth. 'I'm rather surprised and taken aback when I hear that the policy of BEE militates against the growth of our economy. That I find surprising,' he said. 'If we accept that ownership of our economy is imbalanced, the clause on equality in our constitution seeks to undo that. So therefore ownership in our economy should be broadened,' he said. Build One South Africa leader Mmusi Maimane agreed that the EEIPs as an alternative to share holding are important to attract foreign investment and asked Ramaphosa whether these will be extended to South African companies. Ramaphosa said his government was looking at a number of laws that would address both past racial exclusion and growth to build an inclusive economy. 'To do so we need to take into account where we come from, what our constitution says, what our laws say and be able to move forward in a very determined way,' he said.


Mail & Guardian
8 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
South Africa must take the lead in pan-African climate solidarity
For Africa, climate action isn't just about emissions — it is a development imperative. The continent faces a myriad of challenges: a population boom, rising energy demands, persistent poverty and fragile infrastructure. International funding has historically come at a huge cost to Africa, undermining sovereignty and saddling its countries with cycles of debt. Climate action remains heavily dependent on external financing. Africa receives just 2% to 4% of global climate finance with 90% coming from outside sources. The moral imperative lies with wealthier countries to contribute funds to development and climate justice on the continent, given their use of Africa's natural resources and their disproportionate contribution to the climate crisis. Yet, the recent US decision to cut $555 million in funding to the African Development Bank (specifically the African Development Fund or ADF), as well as the earlier USAid cuts, have shifted the geopolitical landscape and the ability of Africa to respond to the climate crisis. The ADF supports programmes and projects that promote economic and social development in least developed African countries as well as providing technical assistance for studies and capacity-building activities. These funding shifts expose deeper vulnerabilities in Africa's dependence on foreign aid and the urgent need to find alternative pathways to ensure African sovereignty in our determination of economic and climate resilience. A space has opened up for South Africa to step up as a collaborative leader in pan-African climate solidarity. The new US government under Donald Trump has made it explicit that it will hinder global cooperation towards addressing climate change. It officially withdrew from the Paris Agreement and the International Partners Group, which has provided funding for just energy transitions in South Africa, Indonesia and Vietnam. For Africa, climate action isn't just about emissions — it is a development imperative. The continent faces a myriad of challenges: a population boom, rising energy demands, persistent poverty and fragile infrastructure. An energy transition on the continent is crucial to provide energy access to 600 million people in Africa who lack access to electricity . Simultaneously, Africa continues to be exploited for natural resources, with the latest pressure felt for minerals needed for the world's digital technology. This drop in funding for the continent worsens an already severe shortfall. The continent needs about $277 billion a year just to meet its climate goals, according to the Climate Policy Initiative and other climate trackers. Current flows reached $52 billion — a fivefold shortfall. Without adequate climate finance, adaptation projects are not seen as a priority and are delayed or abandoned. While other countries reaffirmed their commitments, the loss of US support created uncertainty — especially in institutions like the Green Climate Fund. For Africa, this means even fewer resources and more competition for already limited funds. The third report by the Independent High-Level Expert Group on climate finance in November 2024, indicated that a shortfall in investment in climate action before 2030 puts disproportionate pressure on the future, paving a steeper and potentially more costly path to climate stability. This moment demands a decisive leadership step-up from within the continent. To do this, Africa's leaders must tackle a web of interconnected issues. Most African governments are grappling with unsustainable debt levels, which limits the fiscal space and hinders development priorities and climate action. According to research from the AfDB and the UN Economic Commission for Africa, as much as 70% of the increase in African debt in 2023 was linked to currency depreciation. Domestic resources need to be mobilised to reduce dependence on borrowing in foreign currency. Strengthening the institutional and financial capacity of African public development banks could enhance their lending ability to mobilise local concessional finance for developmental and climate-related projects and crowd in private sector investment. This is particularly important for adaptation projects, which have struggled to attract funding. African leaders need to encourage local investment that redistributes wealth locally. They need to more closely monitor and control international extractive projects that exploit the continent's resources for the profits of a few local elites and foreign-led multi-nationals. We need a political environment that enables solid economic policies that are centred around social benefits, rather than just creating bankable climate investments. Local and foreign investment in fossil fuels should be heavily taxed and redistributed towards public benefits programmes. There is no longer an economic basis to justify continued investments in fossil fuels. Above all, the continent must unify around a strategic climate and development agenda that centres local solutions and resilience. The consequences of climate inaction are already playing out across the continent. As one of the regions most vulnerable to climate change, despite contributing only 4% of global emissions, Africa cannot afford to wait for political tides in the Global North to shift. It is an opportunity — a wake-up call to build greater autonomy, resilience and leadership. If Africa's leaders act boldly and collectively, the continent can mobilise local climate finance to enable sovereignty over climate action, while holding wealthier countries accountable for climate reparations. South Africa, which produces the bulk of the continent's emissions, can assume greater responsibility for the continent's development. South Africa must take a collaborative leadership role that cultivates pan-African solidarity. As the first African nation to preside over the G20, South Africa has an opportunity to advocate for equitable climate finance and debt relief, ensuring that the continent's needs are prioritised in global discussions. Taking this collaborative approach strengthens Africa's collective voice on the global stage and ensures that climate action is inclusive, just and reflective of the continent's diverse needs. Brighton Phiri is a climate activist working with Nu Clima. Kholwani Simelane is the deputy secretary of the Climate Justice Coalition. Tara Nair van Ryneveld is the climate policy coordinator at Southern African Faith Communities' Environment Institute.


The South African
19 hours ago
- The South African
Here's how Elon Musk got his BLACK EYE
Billionaire Elon Musk bade farewell to Donald Trump in an extraordinary Oval Office appearance on Friday, sporting a black eye, brushing aside drug abuse claims and vowing to stay a 'friend and advisor' to the US president. As the world's richest person bowed out of his role as Trump's cost-cutter-in-chief, the Republican hailed Musk's 'incredible service' and handed him a golden key to the White House. But Trump insisted that Musk was 'really not leaving' after a turbulent four months in which his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) cut tens of thousands of jobs, shuttered whole agencies and slashed foreign aid. 'He's going to be back and forth,' said Trump, showering praise on the tech tycoon for what he called the 'most sweeping and consequential government reform programme in generations.' South Africa-born Musk, wearing a black T-shirt with the word 'Dogefather' in white lettering and a black DOGE baseball cap, said many of the $1 trillion savings he promised would take time to bear fruit. 'I look forward to continuing to be a friend and advisor to the president,' he said. But many people were more interested in the black bruise around Musk's right eye. Speculation about the cause was further fueled by accusations in the New York Times on Friday that Musk used so much of the drug ketamine on the 2024 campaign trail that he developed bladder problems. The SpaceX and Tesla magnate said that his son was to blame for the injury. 'I was just horsing around with lil' X, and I said, 'go ahead punch me in the face,'' 53-year-old Musk said. 'And he did. Turns out even a five-year-old punching you in the face actually is…' he added, before tailing off. Musk, however, dodged a question about the drug allegations. The New York Times said Musk, the biggest donor to Trump's 2024 election campaign, also took ecstasy and psychoactive mushrooms and traveled with a pill box last year. Musk, who has long railed against the news media and championed his X social media platform as an alternative, took aim at the paper instead. 'Is that the same publication that got a Pulitzer Prize for false reporting on the Russiagate?' said Musk, referring to claims that Trump's 2016 election campaign colluded with Moscow. 'Let's move on. Okay. Next question.' Later in the day, when a reporter asked Trump if he was 'aware of Elon Musk's regular drug use,' Trump simply responded: 'I wasn't.' 'I think Elon is a fantastic guy,' he added. The White House had earlier played down the report. 'The drugs that we're concerned about are the drugs running across the southern border' from Mexico, said Trump's Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, whose wife works for Musk. Musk has previously admitted to taking ketamine, saying he was prescribed it to treat a 'negative frame of mind' and suggesting his use of drugs benefited his work. The latest in a series of made-for-TV Oval Office events was aimed at putting a positive spin on Musk's departure. Musk is leaving Trump's administration under a cloud, after admitting disillusionment with his role and criticising the Republican president's spending plans. It was a far cry from his first few weeks as Trump's chainsaw-brandishing sidekick. At one time Musk was almost inseparable from Trump, glued to his side on Air Force One, Marine One, in the White House and at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida. The right-wing magnate's DOGE led an ideologically-driven rampage through the federal government, with its young 'tech bros' slashing tens of thousands of jobs. But DOGE's achievements fell far short of Musk's original goal of saving $2 trillion dollars. The White House says DOGE has made $170 billion in savings so far. The independent 'Doge Tracker' site has counted just $12 billion while the Atlantic magazine put it far lower, at $2 billion. Musk's 'move fast and break things' mantra was also at odds with some of his cabinet colleagues, and he said earlier this week that he was 'disappointed' in Trump's planned mega tax and spending bill as it undermined DOGE's cuts. Musk's companies, meanwhile, have suffered. Tesla shareholders called for him to return to work as sales slumped and protests targeted the electric vehicle maker, while SpaceX had a series of fiery rocket failures. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news. By Garrin Lambley © Agence France-Presse