logo
Marion County Commission turns into shouting match in wake of Cinalli 'firing' incident

Marion County Commission turns into shouting match in wake of Cinalli 'firing' incident

Yahoo06-02-2025

Feb. 6—FAIRMONT — Marion County Commission President Ernie VanGilder tried to distract from his botched dismissal of County Administrator Kris Cinalli by going on the offensive at Wednesday's County Commission meeting.
However, former commissioner Randy Elliott did not let VanGilder forget why VanGilder was in hot water to begin with.
"I'm here today in support and defense of County Administrator Kris Cinalli," Elliott said. "Against a ridiculous, unauthorized, and I might add, unsuccessful attempt by Commissioner VanGilder to fire Kris, which happened after the last County Commission meeting two weeks ago."
Elliott accused VanGilder of acting outside his authority, with no legal cause or the required vote to remove Cinalli from his position. Elliott added VanGilder demonstrated his personal animosity toward Cinalli by calling the County Deputy's office and requesting them to escort Cinalli out of the building.
"Sheriff Roger Cunningham, Chief Deputy Jeff Carpenter, showed up and found out what was going on," Elliott said. "They did not escort him out of the building. Kris left of his own accord, with a box of his belongings from his office and totally embarrassed and humiliated by Ernie's actions."
VanGilder declined to comment on Cinalli's firing in the past, citing policy regarding privacy of personnel issues. However, that did not stop one of his colleagues from revealing what happened the day VanGilder tried to dismiss Cinalli without authorization. VanGilder's unilateral action caused discomfort to the Commission. In an email obtained through a records request, Commissioner Bobby DeVaul strenuously emphasized that commissioners' actions should be legal and ethical.
"I will not participate in any decisions or actions that fail to meet those standards," DeVaul wrote.
One accusation VanGilder tried to engage in unilateral action led to other accusations of unilateral action from at least one of his colleagues. Elliott echoed those concerns in his remarks to the Commission.
VanGilder went on the offensive as soon as the meeting opened. Before starting the commission's agenda, he furiously criticized coverage by the Times West Virginian, calling articles featuring him smears and attacks on his personal character.
However, VanGilder could be seen visibly pressing into his seat as Elliott held his attention for VanGilder's unauthorized attempt to fire Cinalli.
VanGilder offered corrections to the original story. He pointed out it was Commissioner DeVaul who nominated VanGilder for the role of commission president. The minutes of the meeting where that took place bear him out. He also disputed attempting to build a Hydrogen Hub in Marion County, calling it a pure fiction.
"We have the Hydrogen Hub, we have to get that project finished and developed," he said in an article from Oct. 22, 2024, bringing up the Hydrogen Hub as one of the projects he wanted to see finished if he won reelection. "It will bring not just jobs in the hydrogen industry but also develop the proposed industrial park there on the south end of Fairmont, closest to the interstate."
VanGilder also objected to a claim which stated County Attorney Chuck Shields found no conflict of interest with his ownership of a property that was under scrutiny due to the potential of it being developed as part of a project to create an access road leading to the proposed site of the Hydrogen Hub. Shields clarified what VanGilder said, stating that his opinion was he agreed with a finding of the West Virginia Ethics Commission that there was no conflict of interest.
VanGilder defended his record on the County Commission.
"The pay isn't very good to start with," he said. "I do it because I enjoy the job and I feel like I'm giving something back to the community. Until a few years ago, we made a lot of decisions in this room. I worked with two democrats — sitting right there — many years. Did not have all this contention and did not have a press continually try to create chaos in this county and keeping this county from advancing in any way or form."
On the issue of VanGilder not ceding the commission's presidency to Longstreth according to what VanGilder disputes is an unwritten tradition, he said he spoke to Longstreth on the phone where she asked him if he would want to serve another term.
What VanGilder didn't discuss during the eight minutes he lashed out, was the injury he inflicted on himself when he tried to fire Cinalli without authorization. His choice to do so provided the inciting incident which led to the chain of events VanGilder had to defend himself against on Wednesday.
After Elliott shared his opinion, VanGilder called Elliott's comments unfactual. Elliott asked VanGilder to tell him which portions were unfactual. VanGilder told Elliott the remarks about Elliott attacking him over the years was unfactual and refused to elaborate further. Elliott and VanGilder butted heads in 2022, when Elliott accused VanGilder of letting his business interest and animosity against the City of Fairmont get in the way of his work as a commissioner.
Elliott pressed forward, attempting to get VanGilder to clarify what exactly was unfactual about Elliott's remarks.
"I told you, I'm not making any comment because that's exactly what you want me to do," VanGilder said. "Please, take a seat. You've had your five minutes of fame. You're done. Next item."
Commissioner Longstreth gave her remarks at the end of the meeting. She said traditionally, Marion County Commissioners have always worked together in a collaborative manner. She said observers should not take the articles published as an indication of how the commission is being run. Instead, they highlight the need for commissioners to recognize that the residents of Marion County have entrusted them to make decisions to maintain and improve their community and quality of life.
She recharacterized what she felt articles was describing the current situation at County Commission as a rift. She said her hope was the commission would get its house in order and return to making decisions together for the county.
"It is a disagreement only effective communication and following correct procedures should have prevented," Longstreth said. "As Commissioners, we are here to serve the people. We must discuss and deliberate on issues of all levels of importance based on what we were elected to do regardless of personal agendas or political affiliations. People depend on us and frankly it's our job to meet those expectations."
Reach Esteban at efernandez@timeswv.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's travel ban could drive some African nations closer to America's adversaries
Trump's travel ban could drive some African nations closer to America's adversaries

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's travel ban could drive some African nations closer to America's adversaries

Donald Trump's travel ban, a purportedly security-focused measure largely targeting African nations and Muslim-majority countries, underscores his administration's ignorant and potentially destructive approach to a continent with growing global influence. In announcing the ban, Trump said it's meant to ensure the U.S. only allows people to enter who 'do not bear hostile attitudes toward its citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles.' Whereas the Biden administration took steps to ingratiate itself with African leaders and slough off some of the American paternalism that has driven some African nations closer to Russia and China in recent years, Trump's administration seems to have doubled down on an outmoded strategy of exploitation, conspiratorial brow-beating and ostracism. In just the first few months of Trump's second term, his administration has pressured African nations to permit Elon Musk's Starlink internet service to operate within their borders and has sought to use war-torn nations in Africa — including a country known for its human rights abuses — as landing spots for people booted from the U.S. as part of Trump's mass deportation plan. The president also personally turned the Oval Office into a screening room for bigoted conspiracy theories when he invited the president of South Africa to the White House and then bombarded him with false allegations of 'white genocide' being committed in his country. Needless to say, this hasn't helped the U.S. build on its rapport with African nations. And fundamentally, what that could mean for the U.S. is that a continent full of countries that American officials have pinpointed as crucial partners in our geopolitical strategies related to security and commerce could drift further toward our adversaries. That's certainly the vibe given off by the African Union Commission and its dozens of member states, which denounced Trump's travel ban and warned about its potential impacts. 'The Commission remains concerned about the potential negative impact of such measures on people-to-people ties, educational exchange, commercial engagement, and the broader diplomatic relations that have been carefully nurtured over decades. Africa and the United States share mutual interests in promoting peace, prosperity, and global cooperation,' the commission said in a statement, adding: 'The African Union Commission respectfully calls upon the U.S. Administration to consider adopting a more consultative approach and to engage in constructive dialogue with the countries concerned.' University of Michigan economics professor Justin Wolfers identified one clear way that Trump's travel ban could harm the American economy. 'One obvious economic implication of the latest travel ban is that genuinely international conferences will no longer be held in the U.S.,' he wrote on X. And that may just be the tip of the iceberg. It's also true that the materials used to make batteries in everything from cutting-edge cars to phones and computers most often come from African mines. Which is to say: Trump's cold shoulder toward African nations could have dire consequences for America's future, particularly with regard to the economy and U.S. national security. This article was originally published on

African Union issues appeal to Trump over travel ban
African Union issues appeal to Trump over travel ban

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

African Union issues appeal to Trump over travel ban

The African Union issued an appeal to President Trump on Thursday raising concern about the administration's travel ban affecting seven countries on the continent, calling for dialogue and cooperation on addressing the White House's concerns. Trump issued a travel ban against 12 countries and restricted travel on people from seven more in an executive order Wednesday night. The ban extended to seven countries in Africa, while the travel restrictions impact three more countries on the continent. 'While recognising the sovereign right of all nations to protect their borders and ensure the security of their citizens, the African Union Commission respectfully appeals to the United States to exercise this right in a manner that is balanced, evidence-based, and reflective of the long-standing partnership between the United States and Africa,' the commission said in a statement. The commission, the secretariat body of the union responsible for day-to-day activities, said it is concerned about the negative impact of the ban and travel restrictions on commercial engagement, people-to-people ties, educational exchange and broader diplomatic relations. 'The African Union Commission respectfully calls upon the U.S. Administration to consider adopting a more consultative approach and to engage in constructive dialogue with the countries concerned,' the statement continued. Trump announced a travel ban against Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Libya, Somalia and Sudan. His order also included travel restrictions targeting three countries on the African continent: Burundi, Sierra Leone and Togo. The Trump administration justified the expanded travel ban as a national security measure, saying the countries listed are places that lack proper vetting, exhibit high visa overstay rates or fail to share identity and threat information. 'The Commission appeals for transparent communication, and where necessary, collaborative efforts to address any underlying issues that may have informed this decision,' the African Union said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

African Union hits back at Trump over U.S. travel ban, calls for dialogue
African Union hits back at Trump over U.S. travel ban, calls for dialogue

Business Insider

time5 hours ago

  • Business Insider

African Union hits back at Trump over U.S. travel ban, calls for dialogue

The African Union has strongly condemned the Trump administration's recent expansion of its travel ban, which now includes seven African countries, calling the move discriminatory and urging Washington to adopt a more consultative and respectful approach. The African Union condemned the U.S. administration's expanded travel ban as discriminatory and urged a more respectful approach. The new ban affects nationals from 12 countries, including seven African nations, and imposes partial restrictions on individuals from seven other countries. The AU emphasized the potential harm to Africa-US relations, especially in the areas of education, commerce, and diplomacy. The African Union has criticized the new executive order signed by President Donald Trump earlier this week, which blocks nearly all travel to the United States for nationals of 12 countries—including Chad, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Libya, Sudan, and Somalia. In addition, a partial ban was imposed on citizens from seven other nations—Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela— restricting entry to certain visa categories, such as those for temporary employment. Framed as part of a broader immigration and national security policy, the expanded travel ban has drawn widespread international criticism, with many raising concerns over its fairness, lack of transparency, and disproportionate impact on African and developing countries. AU opposes ban, calls for more engagement The African Union has described the travel ban as a blow to Africa-US diplomatic ties and emphasized the need for mutual respect. While acknowledging nations' sovereign rights to protect their borders, the AU stressed that such actions should be balanced and evidence-based. The Commission expressed concern about the potential negative impact on people-to-people ties, education, commerce, and diplomatic relations. 'The Commission remains concerned about the potential negative impact of such measures on people-to-people ties, educational exchange, commercial engagement, and the broader diplomatic relations that have been carefully nurtured over decades. Africa and the United States share mutual interests in promoting peace, prosperity, and global cooperation, ' " The African Union Commission respectfully calls upon the U.S. Administration to consider adopting a more consultative approach and to engage in constructive dialogue with the countries concerned." it noted. President Trump stated that the list of affected countries could be revised if " material improvements" are made, and that additional nations may be added in the future as new threats emerge globally. The newly expanded ban is set to take effect on Monday at 12:01 a.m. EDT (04:01 GMT), allowing a brief window for implementation, unlike the abrupt rollout of the 2017 ban that caused significant disruption at airports across the United States.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store