
Goodbye Goodison, hello ‘Hickory Dickory Dock'? Everton fans battle with Hill Dickinson stadium name
Sunday was Anne and John's final time watching Everton.
'We're hanging up our scarves,' they said, sitting shoulder to shoulder, basking in the late morning sun that rises above the Gwladys Street End.
John attended his first game at Goodison Park 60 years ago, a 5-1 win against Sheffield Wednesday. In their eighties, they will not be following the club to their new home at Bramley-Moore Dock.
Advertisement
The stands are too steep for Anne, and besides, the drive to Liverpool feels longer every week. Goodison is done, and so are they.
'Things move on,' said John. 'We're excited for the Bramley-Moore — it just won't be with us.' Will they be calling it the new name?
'We're just going to ignore that,' they reply. 'Who's come up with the Hickory Dickory Dock?'
On Friday evening, less than 48 hours before their final Premier League game at Goodison, Everton announced they had struck a 'long-term' naming rights agreement for their new ground with law firm Hill Dickinson.
'Welcoming Hill Dickinson as our naming rights partner is a bold and strategic step forward,' said the incoming CEO, Angus Kinnear. 'This partnership goes beyond branding – it's a shared commitment to progress, excellence and the regeneration of our city. Hill Dickinson Stadium will stand as a symbol of Everton's ambitions, our values, and the global future we are building together.'
Though it may now boast 11 offices worldwide, Hill Dickinson was founded in Liverpool back in 1810 — predating Everton by 68 years. Originally specialising in maritime law, it prospered on the city's docks.
'It brings together two Liverpool institutions, united by a global outlook, a deep commitment to the city of Liverpool, and a shared history that dates back to the very founding of Everton in 1878,' an Everton statement added.
Naming rights deals are nothing new. Six Premier League clubs have them, including Arsenal (The Emirates) and Manchester City (The Etihad). Tottenham Hotspur have been searching for a title partner since opening their new stadium in 2019.
Internationally, some of the sport's most iconic grounds have seen their names changed — from Barcelona's Spotify Camp Nou to Bayern Munich's Allianz Arena.
That is not to say they are always popular. Newcastle United fans were furious when former owner Mike Ashley branded St James' Park as the Sports Direct Arena in 2011. Former England World Cup-winning head coach Clive Woodward accused the Rugby Football Union of 'selling its soul' after the board renamed Twickenham Stadium the Allianz Stadium.
Advertisement
But having received points deductions in two of the past three seasons for breaching profit and sustainability regulations, Everton know the importance of generating income.
They say it 'represents one of the largest stadium naming rights deals in Europe', reportedly worth up to £10million ($13.4m) per season. That represents over five per cent of last season's revenue.
Goodison may still have had one game left to host, but changes were being made to reflect Hill Dickinson's importance even before kick-off. Behind the rostrum where manager David Moyes was to give his post-match press conference, an Everton staff member was rushing to erect new branding with the law firm's name.
At half-time of the 2-0 win over Southampton, the PA system reiterated Friday evening's announcement — Everton were thrilled to announce their new ground would be known as the Hill Dickinson Stadium.
Inside Goodison, the quiet murmur that met that announcement was indicative of a wider mood. Later, during post-match festivities, a group of fans react to the same message by shouting: 'The Bramley-Moore!'
'I'm not keen at all,' Phil, an Everton fan from north Wales, told The Athletic pre-match. 'It's awful. I like the name Bramley-Moore Dock, or even if they called it just plain Everton Stadium.
'Obviously it's because of the money issue. But it would have been better if they'd had a poll where Everton fans could pick from maybe three or four names, with the offers attached. But this is a bit sad.'
Thirty metres down Bullens Road, Terry agrees.
'It's just the way the modern world is these days, isn't it?' he says. 'It'll be prone to taking the mickey out of, I would imagine — being shortened to Hill Dick.
'I'm surprised with the way it's come out with the Friedkin Group, because there's been a lack of communication. They're keeping Goodison for the ladies, fair enough, I don't mind that. But then to announce the new name of the ground just before this final game at Goodison? They'd have been better off leaving it until the season had finished.'
Others are apathetic. 'Honestly, if it's got an Everton badge on it, I don't care what they call it,' says one.
But in general, the predominant mood is rationalisation — that this is the sport's reality, that Everton could have done worse, and that Hill Dickinson bring their own benefits.
Stuart is at Goodison with his daughter, Caroline, and is clearly an Everton expert. 'Did you know that it is the same distance from Prince Rupert's Tower to the new stadium as it is to Goodison Park?' is one of his opening gambits.
Advertisement
Asked about the Hill Dickinson name, Stuart is relaxed. 'I'm fine with it, because it's an old, established Liverpool company,' he says. 'They've been going for 200 years, and have links with one of our really old chairmen from the St Domingo days.
'And it's one of the most valuable in Europe. Barcelona have the most valuable — that's worth something like £25m each season — and nobody calls it the Spotify Camp Nou, do they?'
The history Stuart references goes back to former Everton executive Will Cuff, the club's secretary from 1892 to 1918, and then chairman from 1921 to 1938. In that period, Everton won their second league title and first two FA Cups — but most significantly, Cuff was the man who signed all-time leading scorer Dixie Dean.
But the link to Hill Dickinson? Cuff founded Cuff Roberts, another solicitors' firm, in 1894. Cuff Roberts eventually merged with another company (Halliwells), before being taken over by Hill Dickinson in 2010.
For some supporters, this is effectively sponsorship from one of their most significant former director's companies. For others, the finances are the key consideration.
'Having a stadium sponsor is a necessary fact of modern football, so 'officially' naming it Bramley-Moore Dock Stadium, Dixie Stadium or anything else unsponsored would be throwing money away and we can't afford to do that,' Nik R wrote on The Athletic's discussion with Everton supporters. 'Surely fans understand that.
'Holding out for an unreasonable figure is daft — it hasn't done Spurs much good. They'll struggle to get a better deal now, so we've done the right thing by finding a sponsor early and at what looks like a competitive rate. Plus they are local — I like that; and I'm told they have decent values — I like that too.'
Good company, good deal, bad name is the consensus. Most fans accept two out of three. But does the Hill Dickinson name actually matter? Back on the Gwladys Street, a family stop to chat.
Advertisement
'We recognise Dickinson Hill,' says Steven Baker, with his son David and daughter Ashley. 'They've helped pay for it, and the new ground is fantastic. It's on the banks of the royal blue Mersey, the stands are incredible and you can see it from miles away.
'But everyone will continue to call it the Bramley-Moore. And if we want something else? We'll remember a legend — and call it the Hill Dixie.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox Sports
7 minutes ago
- Fox Sports
First World Cup ever! Uzbekistan clinches spot; Australia in, too
Uzbekistan has qualified for its first ever World Cup appearance, capturing one of the spots reserved for Asian countries for next year's tournament to be held in North a scoreless draw against the United Arab Emirates on Thursday, Uzbekistan picked up the point required to secure progress. As for Australia, a 1-0 win over Japan in Perth put the Socceroos into a sixth straight World Cup appearance. The already-qualified Japan fielded an experimental XI with only Daichi Kamada and Koki Machida having made more than four international appearances, but still had the majority of possession and chances. Substitute Takefusa Kubo had perhaps the best opportunity with 10 minutes remaining, but the midfielder shot wide of the post from inside the area. In the 90th minute, Riley McGree broke free down the right and pulled back for Behich to curl home to bring Perth Stadium to its feet and give Australia its first win over Japan in 16 years. Uzbekistan and Australia now join Iran and Japan as teams from the AFC (Asian Football Confederation) to reach the World Cup. Want great stories delivered right to your inbox? Create or log in to your FOX Sports account and follow leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized newsletter daily! recommended Get more from FIFA Men's World Cup Follow your favorites to get information about games, news and more

Associated Press
12 minutes ago
- Associated Press
FIFA signs another Saudi deal with sovereign wealth fund PIF backing Club World Cup
GENEVA (AP) — FIFA took another Saudi Arabian investment Thursday for the U.S.-hosted Club World Cup, announcing a top-tier commercial deal with the kingdom's sovereign wealth fund, which holds majority ownership of one of the 32 teams playing. The Saudi state's Public Investment Fund (PIF) is the 75% owner of Riyadh club Al-Hilal, one of four teams in the national league it has controlled since 2023. PIF also created the LIV Golf project. FIFA said PIF was an official partner of the June 14-July 13 tournament being played in 11 American cities, though the value of the deal was not stated. Saudi state money also is effectively funding the Club World Cup broadcasting deal that has largely backed the $1 billion tournament prize fund being shared among the 32 teams, including Al-Hilal, which will get an entry payment of $9.55 million. FIFA announced a global broadcast deal for the Club World Cup with streaming service DAZN in December, two days before confirming Saudi Arabia as host of the men's 2034 World Cup. A widely speculated Saudi investment in DAZN, reported to be around $1 billion, was confirmed several weeks later. FIFA also signed Saudi state oil company Aramco to a World Cup sponsor this year. The U.S. is hosting the first 32-team Club World Cup which will played every four years by teams that won an edition of a continental club championship, or ranked highly by results over the four-year qualifying period. Inter Miami, with star player Lionel Messi, was invited by FIFA to represent the host nation. Al-Hilal won the Asian Champions League in 2021 and was drawn by FIFA in a group with Real Madrid, Pachuca and Salzburg. The Club World Cup has become a personal project of FIFA President Gianni Infantino, who has built close ties since 2018 to Saudi Arabia and its Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the chairman of PIF. The gold Club World Cup trophy has spent much of this year at the White House with U.S. President Donald Trump, who is scheduled to present it to the winning team at the final at MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey. Trump also has worked closely with the LIV Golf tour. ___ AP soccer:


Forbes
18 minutes ago
- Forbes
Trump Travel Ban: Rubio Gets To Decide Which Athletes Get Exempted
Trump's travel ban for 12 countries has a key carve out for international athletes traveling to the U.S. for sports events like the World Cup and Olympics—but exceptions are at the discretion of Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who has yet to provide a full list of events that qualify. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio will decide which sports events get a carve out from President ... More Trump's travel ban. (Photo by Kayla Bartkowski) President Trump's executive order banning travel from 12 countries includes an exception for 'any athlete or member of an athletic team, including coaches, persons performing a necessary support role, and immediate relatives, traveling for the World Cup, Olympics, or other major sporting event as determined by the Secretary of State.' Sports tourism accounts for 10% of global tourism spending, according to UN Tourism, with a projected growth rate of 17.5% between 2023-2030. In 2024, sports tourism generated $114.4 billion in the United States and supported nearly 665,000 jobs, according to a study from Sports ETA—but upcoming major soccer tournaments are expected to boost those numbers for 2025 and 2026. International sports events further on the U.S. horizon include the 2028 Summer Olympics in Los Angeles, men's and women's Rugby World Cups in 2031 and 2033, and the 2034 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City. Beyond the World Cup and the Olympics, it's unclear which sports events will get a carve out from Trump's travel ban. For example, it is assumed but not specified that the 'World Cup' mentioned in the executive order applies to both the FIFA Club World Cup 2025, in which the world's top professional club teams are slated to play in U.S. venues this year, and the FIFA World Cup 2026, in which national teams compete next year. Dozens of Major League Baseball players hail from Cuba and Venezuela—two countries on the banned list. The State Department did not respond to Forbes' request for a full list of sports events that qualify for the exception. This year's FIFA Club World Cup 2025 and next year's FIFA World Cup 2026 are projected to drive a combined $71.8 billion in economic output across both years in the U.S., according to analyses from FIFA and OpenEconomics (OE). But those forecasts assume several million international tourists will come to the U.S. to watch the events in person both years. In March, when Trump created a White House task force for the World Cup, the U.S. Travel Association (USTA) projected the events could potentially draw 8 million visitors 'if we build the right processes for both the FIFA Club World Cup 2025 and the FIFA World Cup 26.' But tourism experts say the Trump administration has hamstrung the U.S. with unwelcoming messaging and policies. President Trump's tariffs, imperialistic rhetoric and viral headlines of foreigners with legal tourist visas and green cards being detained by U.S. immigration officials are 'stacking up as significant hurdles for the U.S. travel industry' and 'setting international travel back several years,' Adam Sacks, president of Tourism Economics, a nonpartisan Oxford Economics company tracking tourism statistics, told Forbes in March. Since Trump took office, the U.S. has experienced a dramatic downturn in inbound international tourism, with a projected 8.7% drop in U.S. international arrivals for 2025, according to the latest forecast from Tourism Economics. Visits from Canada (-20.2%) and Western Europe (-5.8%) show the sharpest declines. Airline bookings for international travel to the U.S.—a key forward-looking indicator—through July were down 10.8% as of April. Many experts see these as unforced errors that are harmful to the economy. The travel ban will not change the narrative, regardless of carve outs for athletes. 'I think increasingly, whether there's validity to it or not, we have to acknowledge these headlines around the world of people being detained, of their devices being searched, stories of deportation—it's causing a degree of fear,' Geoff Freeman, CEO of the USTA, told Forbes in April. 'And in the absence of effective communication to explain what CBP is doing, what US policy is the fact that we want you to come we've allowed this negative publicity to run rampant.' FIFA president Gianni Infantino was a guest at Trump's inauguration in January, has attended White House meetings and has been a vocal supporter of the president. Infantino's coziness with Trump has drawn criticism from international soccer organizations. Earlier this month, the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) excoriated Infantino for arriving late to the FIFA Congress in order to meet with Trump during his tour of the Middle East, accusing the FIFA chief of putting 'private political interests' ahead of his commitment to soccer. Trump Bans Travel From 12 Countries—Here's What We Know (Forbes)