logo
For Patients Needing Transplants, Hope Arrives on Tiny Hooves

For Patients Needing Transplants, Hope Arrives on Tiny Hooves

New York Times10-03-2025

On a 300-acre farm in an undisclosed location in rural Wisconsin, surrounded by fields dotted with big red barns and bordered by wild blue chicory and goldenrod, live some of the most pampered pigs in the world.
They are delivered by C-section to protect them from viruses that sows can carry, and bottle-fed instead of nursed for the same reason. They are kept under warming lights and monitored around the clock for the first days of their lives, given toys and marshmallows as treats.
But they don't get to go outside and play in the dirt like other pigs. They are clones and constitutionally weak, genetically engineered to have kidneys, hearts and livers more compatible with the human body.
These miniature pigs are part of a bold scientific experiment that takes advantage of breakthroughs in cloning and gene editing to realize the centuries-old dream of xenotransplantation — the transfer of animal kidneys, hearts, livers and other organs into humans who need them.
Success could bring riches to the two biotech companies that are leaders in this space, the Cambridge, Mass.-based eGenesis and the Blacksburg, Va.-based Revivicor, owned by United Therapeutics Corporation. The demand for organs is huge.
More than 100,000 Americans are on waiting lists for donor organs, most needing a kidney. Only 25,000 human donor kidneys become available each year. Twelve Americans on the kidney list die every day on average.
Scientists first transplanted genetically engineered pig organs into other animals and then to brain-dead human patients. In 2022, researchers received permission to transplant the organs into a few critically ill patients, and then, last year, into healthier people.
Now, for the first time, a formal clinical study of the procedure is being initiated.
'Just imagine, you have kidney disease and know your kidneys are going to fail, and you have a pig's kidney waiting for you — and you never see dialysis,' said Mike Curtis, president and chief executive at eGenesis.
He foresees a future in which genetic engineering will make pig organs so compatible with humans that patients won't have to take powerful drugs that prevent rejection but make them vulnerable to infections and cancer.
Babies born with serious heart defects might be given a pig's heart temporarily while waiting for a human donor heart. A pig's liver could potentially serve as a bridge for those in need of a human liver.
Some scientists argue that there is a moral imperative to move forward.
'Is it ethical to let thousands of people die each year on a waiting list when we have something that could possibly save their lives?' asked Dr. David K.C. Cooper, who studies xenotransplantation at Harvard and is a consultant to eGenesis.
'I think it's beginning to be ethically unacceptable to let people die when there's an alternative therapy that looks pretty encouraging.'
But critics say xenotransplantation is a hubristic, pie-in-the-sky endeavor aiming to solve an organ shortage with technology when there's a simpler solution: expanding the supply of human organs by encouraging more donation.
And xenotransplantation is freighted with unanswered questions.
Pigs can carry pathogens that can find their way to humans. If a deadly virus, for example, were to emerge in transplant patients, it could spread with catastrophic consequences.
It might be years or even decades before symptoms were observed, warned Christopher Bobier, a bioethicist from the Central Michigan University College of Medicine.
'A potential zoonotic transference could happen at any point after a transplant — in perpetuity,' he said. The risk is believed to be small, he added, 'but it is not zero.'
Indeed, a post-mortem on a Maryland man who was the first patient to receive a pig's heart found a porcine cytomegalovirus in the organ that had not been detected before the transplant, despite rigorous testing. A closely related virus already infects humans.
No one knows how much an organ from a genetically engineered pig might cost, and whether insurance plans would cover it.
But many patients with organ failure, tethered to a dialysis machine four hours every other day, see in these small pigs hope for a return to normal life. 'My hope for a xenotransplant is stronger than my fear of the risks,' one dialysis patient said in a national survey.
Edited DNA
Scientists chose to use organs from genetically modified pigs, rather than chimps or baboons, for a simple reason: Pigs are easier to raise and mature in six months, and the size of their organs is compatible with adult humans.
At eGenesis, pig cells are collected by clipping notches from the pig's ear. Scientists edit the DNA in these cells as one might edit a manuscript: adding some genes, deleting others and altering still more.
The pigs at eGenesis have received dozens of gene edits. Revivicor produces pigs with 10 gene edits, and others with a single gene edit.
The companies clone embryos from the modified cells, implanting them in sows, where they gestate for about four months before birth.
Scientists at eGenesis first transplanted the pig kidneys into macaque monkeys. The organs came from pigs that had undergone 69 genetic edits, a number that skeptics had thought was not possible.
'They said, 'You can't do that many edits, you'll turn the genome into Swiss cheese,'' Dr. Curtis said. 'We showed you could.'
The scientists soon proved that monkeys with kidneys from gene-edited pigs lived longer than those receiving kidneys from untouched pigs. One macaque survived for more than two years after the transplant.
It was 'proof of principle' that the organ was 'safe and supports life,' said Wenning Qin, senior vice president for innovation at eGenesis.
But would it work in humans?
In 2021, scientists tried to find out, taking a radical approach that seemed plucked from a sci-fi novel. With the consent of the families, the researchers transplanted pig kidneys into patients who were brain-dead and maintained on ventilators, then tracked how their bodies responded.
The novel idea has been attributed to Dr. Thomas Starzl, widely known as the father of modern transplantation, who died in 2017. Two pioneering surgeons tried it, though neither knew what the other was up to.
One was Dr. Robert Montgomery, a charismatic surgeon at NYU Langone in New York City who is himself alive thanks to a heart transplant. He used an organ from a Revivicor pig with a single gene knocked out and thymus gland tissue attached.
The second surgeon was Dr. Jayme Locke, then at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, who trained under Dr. Montgomery.
Dr. Locke didn't make a public announcement, waiting until her paper was published in a medical journal. She used a kidney from a pig with six added human genes and four of its own silenced to prevent rejection.
Soon after the pig kidneys were attached to the brain-dead patients, the organs started functioning as a human's would — making urine and clearing a waste product called creatinine from the blood.
Dr. Montgomery maintained one brain-dead patient with a pig's kidney on a ventilator for two months. The so-called decedent studies yielded a trove of data. Blood samples and biopsies could be taken as often as needed, without disturbing a live patient.
The information is critical, because kidneys perform important functions besides making urine: They filter blood, removing waste and extra fluid, and help maintain healthy balances of water, salts and minerals like potassium. They produce hormones that control blood pressure, keep bones strong and help make red blood cells.
'Part of what we were able to answer with the two-month decedent was, 'Can the pig kidney do all these things?'' Dr. Montgomery said.
The answer? 'Not all of them. But most of them.'
As for the other functions, he said, 'We have medications.'
In early 2022, a 57-year-old patient in Maryland became the first human to receive a heart harvested from a genetically modified pig, produced by Revivicor.
David Bennett had a life-threatening arrhythmia and had been hooked up to a heart-lung bypass machine. But he had run out of treatment options and was not even allowed on the waiting list for a human donor heart because of his history of not following doctors' orders.
When Dr. Bartley Griffith, a surgeon at the University of Maryland Medical Center, offered him the pig's heart, he wasn't sure that Mr. Bennett understood.
Then Mr. Bennett asked, 'Will I oink?'
The new heart started pumping after it was implanted, and Mr. Bennett's body didn't turn on it, at least not right away. But his immune system eventually mounted a very aggressive response, and he died about two months later.
The official cause of death was heart failure, but his poor health had limited the use of anti-rejection drugs, Dr. Griffith and his colleague Dr. Muhammad Mohiuddin said.
In September 2023, a second terminally ill man opted to receive a pig's heart. Lawrence Faucette, of Frederick, Md., had advanced heart failure. Mr. Faucette, 58, survived for only six weeks after the procedure, but his wife, Ann Faucette, said she had no regrets.
'It's like you're in the middle of the ocean, and you have a choice of staying there to be eaten by sharks or having pirates rescue you, and then at least you have a chance,' Ms. Faucette said.
The deaths may have signaled failure to the general public, but the xenotransplant community was optimistic. Neither of the patients experienced a dreaded outcome, hyperacute rejection, when the body attacks and destroys a transplanted organ, turning it black within hours, even minutes.
Last year, the pace of development picked up.
In March 2024, Richard Slayman, 62, a transportation department supervisor from Weymouth, Mass., known as Rick, became the first patient to have a genetically engineered pig's kidney transplanted.
He had suffered from kidney failure for over a decade, and a human donor kidney had failed. He developed heart disease and vascular problems. His kidney doctor at Massachusetts General Hospital, Dr. Winfred Williams, said he 'was growing despondent.'
Within days of the xenotransplant, Mr. Slayman was walking around the hospital. A week later, he was discharged — the first patient to go home with an internal pig's organ making urine and clearing creatinine. The kidney was produced by eGenesis.
The next month, in April 2024, NYU Langone surgeons transplanted a Revivicor pig kidney into Lisa Pisano, 54, a critically ill New Jersey woman who also had a mechanical heart pump implanted. Doctors had to remove the kidney because she developed complications.
Mr. Slayman died in May after a cardiac event, and Ms. Pisano, who never left the hospital, died in July.
Dr. Montgomery said doctors had learned from each procedure.
'We forget, but the first person to receive a human heart transplant also died within two weeks,' he said. (The first heart transplant was done in 1967 by Dr. Christiaan Barnard. The patient, 53-year-old Louis Washkansky, died after 18 days.)
'A Win-Win'
In November, Towana Looney, 53, from Gadsden, Ala., was sitting in her dialysis chair when she got the call she had been waiting for ever since she heard news reports about pig kidneys years earlier.
Ms. Looney had kidney failure. But she also carried antibodies that made organ rejection likely, meaning she probably would not receive a donated human kidney.
Dr. Locke was calling to tell her that a pig's kidney was waiting for her in New York.
'I said, 'But what about Christmas?'' Ms. Looney recalled in an interview. ' Dr. Locke said, 'This is going to be the best Christmas present you ever got.'
The new kidney changed Ms. Looney's life. She no longer needed dialysis, and she could urinate again. Her blood pressure normalized, her nausea subsided, her appetite roared back to life, and she was able to walk nine or 10 city blocks at a clip.
'Dialysis took so much out of me, I felt like I had to fight to live,' she said over dinner recently. 'Now my voice is strong, my energy is strong, I sound different — it's a win-win.'
Ms. Looney was the first patient to make it to the three-month mark, and she flew home to Alabama last month.
In January, Mass General surgeons transplanted an eGenesis pig's kidney into 66-year-old Tim Andrews, of Concord, N.H. Mr. Andrews was taken to his first pre-surgical consultation in a wheelchair — and felt well enough to do a short tap-dance by the time he left the recovery room.
The Food and Drug Administration has given Revivicor the green light to begin a formal clinical trial that could pave the way to routine approved use of pig kidneys. eGenesis also received the go-ahead to study a series of patients, of whom Mr. Andrews was the first.
As routine pig organ transplants move closer to reality, researchers have begun wrestling in earnest with ethical dilemmas.
Bioethicists have asked how trial participants can be properly informed of the risks of the procedure when there are so many unknowns. Unlike participants in any other clinical trial, for example, xenotransplant patients must agree to lifelong surveillance and cannot withdraw from the trial.
Relatives and caregivers would need to be informed of the potential risks, too, since they could be among the first infected if a pathogen crosses species.
To minimize the risk of an animal disease spillover, organs will be procured from pigs born and raised in pathogen-free facilities with much stricter regimens than those on the Wisconsin farm.
The companies will recruit kidney failure patients who depend on dialysis and are relatively healthy, but not eligible for a human donor organ because of their age or an additional medical condition.
Concerns about equity have also surfaced. Medical centers have been besieged by calls from patients begging to be next in line. But who will be first to get the pig organs? The burden of chronic kidney disease is disproportionately borne by Americans of color.
'When innovations are rolled out, it's commonly those with money who get them before anybody else,' said Dr. Peter Reese, founding director of the Vanderbilt Center for Transplant Science, who has served as an unpaid adviser to eGenesis.
Some critics object to cloning animals for their organs as unethical. Still, the United States raises almost 150 million hogs for consumption each year.
For now, caregivers at the eGenesis facility in Wisconsin are making sure the coddled pigs live their best lives.
The animals, which are very social, always have 'snout-to-snout' contact with other pigs. And they are well fed, even though they often pretend that they missed a feeding.
The caregivers, who grow attached to the pigs, know that most of them will be sacrificed for research or transplantation as soon as they mature, but they believe in the mission.
'We know what they're being used for is so important,' said Haley Rymut, the manager of donor resources. 'We know their lives are changing the world.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Kennedy's overhaul could make vaccines more expensive
How Kennedy's overhaul could make vaccines more expensive

The Hill

time35 minutes ago

  • The Hill

How Kennedy's overhaul could make vaccines more expensive

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s moves to upend decades of vaccine policy could hit patients hardest in their wallets, as shifting guidance over shots could make insurance coverage confusing and scattershot. For decades, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) independent advisory panel recommended which shots Americans should get and when. The Affordable Care Act requires all insurance companies to cover, for free, all vaccines the panel recommends. Those recommendations also help states decide which shots should be mandated for schoolchildren. Kennedy's most recent move to purge the entire advisory panel and replace them with his own handpicked members, including several vocal vaccine critics, is throwing that process into doubt. 'If we have a system that has been dismantled — one that allowed for open, evidence-based decisionmaking and that supported transparent and clear dialogue about vaccines — and then we replace it with a process that's driven largely by one person's beliefs, that creates a system that cannot be trusted,' Helen Chu, a newly ousted member of the panel and professor of infectious disease at the University of Washington School of Medicine, said during a press conference. Vaccine prices vary, but without insurance, coronavirus vaccines can cost nearly $150, the MMR shot ranges from $95 to nearly $280, and the HPV vaccine can exceed $300, according to CDC data. Individual pharmacies could charge even more. Candace DeMatteis, policy director at the Partnership to Fight Infectious Disease, said she worries about creating a two-tiered system. 'Out of pocket costs for vaccines become an issue where we could end up with a system where some people can afford vaccinating themselves and their families and others cannot,' DeMatteis said. Prior to enactment of the Affordable Care Act, vaccine coverage varied significantly depending on the type of insurance a person had. If the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) changes recommendations for existing vaccines or doesn't recommend new ones, maintaining access will be difficult. 'It's a seismic shift, if you will, away from facilitating access by removing coverage and cost barriers, to one where there's great uncertainty and coverage and cost issues become barriers,' DeMatteis said. It's not clear what the vetting process was for the eight people Kennedy appointed to the ACIP, or how prepared they will be for their first meeting, which is scheduled to occur in less than two weeks. According to a Federal Register notice, the panel is scheduled to vote on recommendations for COVID-19 vaccines as well as meningococcal, HPV, influenza, and RSV vaccines for adults and maternal and pediatric populations. Health experts said they have serious questions about what direction the new panel will take and whether Americans will still have access to free vaccines, including the coronavirus shot, in time for fall respiratory season. If the ACIP is no longer a reliable, independent authority on vaccines, it 'will be replaced by a patchwork of different policies by different states, and each state will have to make its own decisions,' Chu said. 'Washington state is a place where we have experts and scientists who work together. There are other states where this may not exist, or where they may not choose to recommend vaccines. So that is going to create a lot of chaos,' she added. Some state health officials have already begun taking steps in that direction. The Illinois Department of Health said on social media it will be convening its own vaccine advisory committee and national experts 'to ensure we continue to provide clear, science-backed vaccine guidance for our residents.' When Kennedy unilaterally changed the COVID-19 vaccine guidance earlier this month to remove recommendations for pregnant women and change the open recommendation for children, the Wisconsin Department of Health Services said it would continue to recommend the shots for every person at least 6 months old. 'The recent changes in CDC guidance were not made based on new data, evidence, or scientific or medical studies, nor was the guidance issued following normal processes,' the agency said in a statement. Tina Tan, president of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, said her organization as well as other major medical groups including the American Medical Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics Academy have been speaking with insurance companies to urge them to continue paying for shots, even if the panel changes recommendations. Tan mentioned an initiative launched in April by a group of public health experts called the Vaccine Integrity Project, which is working to create an alternative process to maintain vaccine access. The initiative is funded by a foundation backed by Walmart heiress Christy Walton and led by Michael Osterholm, director of the University of Minnesota's Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy. Federal law is specific that insurance provisions are tied to the ACIP. Specialty organizations may have expertise to make their own recommendations, but they will still require the cooperation of insurance companies. States are also more limited, and they don't have the same power as the federal government to force coverage. 'I think it remains to be seen what the insurers are going to do,' Tan said. 'However, hopefully, with the discussions going on, they can get the insurers to understand that vaccines are extraordinarily safe and effective and are the best tool that we have to protect persons of all ages against serious vaccine preventable diseases.'

Americans Warned Not to Drink Coffee in 3 States
Americans Warned Not to Drink Coffee in 3 States

Newsweek

time3 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Americans Warned Not to Drink Coffee in 3 States

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Americans are being advised to avoid drinking coffee, with forecasters warning of "dangerously hot conditions" across parts of Nevada, California, and Arizona. Why It Matters The National Weather Service (NWS) warns that heat related illnesses increase significantly during extreme heat events. What To Know It is generally recommended to avoid drinking coffee in hot weather due to its diuretic effect, which can lead to dehydration. Caffeine, found in coffee, can increase fluid loss through urination, making it harder for your body to stay hydrated, especially when you are already sweating more in the heat. Some parts of south central Arizona were expected to see temperatures up to 115 degrees Fahrenheit. The agency warned that overexposure to major heat can cause heat cramps and heat exhaustion to develop. Without intervention, it can lead to heat stroke, it added. Triple-digit temperatures were also expected in Lake Mead and its surrounding areas, with the service cautioning the these were dangerously hot conditions for early June. Death Valley National Park could see temperatures up to 120, according to the NWS. Signage warns of extreme heat danger at the salt flats of Badwater Basin inside Death Valley National Park on June 17, 2021, in Inyo County, California. Signage warns of extreme heat danger at the salt flats of Badwater Basin inside Death Valley National Park on June 17, 2021, in Inyo County, California. Patrick T. Fallon/AFP via Getty Images "Do not leave young children and pets in unattended vehicles," read the extreme heat warning, which also applied to a portion of northwest Arizona, southeast California, and southern Nevada. "Car interiors will reach lethal temperatures in a matter of minutes." A post from the NWS' Las Vegas office advised people in affected areas not to drink alcohol or caffeine, as they speed up dehydration. It also said heavy foods should be avoided, as meals high in protein can also speed up dehydration. The NWS noted that these warnings indicate dangerously hot weather, even by local norms. "Actions should be taken to lessen the impact of the extreme heat," it said. What People Are Saying AccuWeather meteorologist Chad Merrill told Newsweek that the Lake Mead area would see high temperatures between 107-112 degrees Sunday and Monday. "Tuesday's high will be 105-108 degrees. Wednesday will reach 107-115 degrees. Thursday and Friday will reach 105-112 degrees," Merrill said. "Temperatures will then drop several degrees next weekend with a more notable cooling trend Sunday, June 22-Tuesday, June 24." The National Weather Service forecast office, Las Vegas, said on X, formerly Twitter, Saturday: "Above-normal temps continue through the weekend & most of next week. Extreme Heat Warning in effect for Sunday (Father's Day). This heat coupled with very dry conditions will increase fire danger. Be extra cautious if recreating with sparks or flame." The NWS said on X, Wednesday: "During hot and humid weather, your body's ability to cool itself is challenged in ways you may not expect. When your body heats too rapidly, or when too much fluid or salt is lost through dehydration or sweating, you may experience a heat-related illness. Stay weather-ready by learning the symptoms of extreme heat exposure and the appropriate responses." What Happens Next At the time of writing, the latest extreme heat warnings were set to remain in effect until 8 p.m. on Monday.

Your morning shower is ruining your nighttime sleep, says expert — here's why
Your morning shower is ruining your nighttime sleep, says expert — here's why

Tom's Guide

time4 hours ago

  • Tom's Guide

Your morning shower is ruining your nighttime sleep, says expert — here's why

There's nothing like a refreshing shower in the morning to kickstart your day. However, if you're struggling to sleep this summer, that step in your morning routine may be to blame. Yes, while 60% of Americans like to shower in the morning, NHS physician Dr Tim Mercer at Opera Beds says it may be wise to switch to an evening shower to improve your sleep. And, no, it's not because a nice, warm shower before bed is relaxing. It actually all comes down to a particular reason regarding hygiene. So, if you're a morning showerer or prefer an evening rinse, read on to discover why your sleep hinges on your showering schedule. An evening shower is better for sleep for a particular reason: allergies. "Allergies can hit hard, especially at night," says Dr Mercer. 'For many, that means disrupted sleep, itchy eyes, and endless sneezing." Mercer explains that we collect allergens such as pollen or dust mites throughout the day, so you're likely taking all these allergens to bed with you by not showering in the evening. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. "Pollen also clings to clothes, hair, and bedding, creating an invisible storm of irritation," the physician says. "You can shower before bed to wash off pollen, stopping it from transferring to your pillow." For more advice about allergies and sleep read our guide on how to sleep with allergies. If you're debating whether a hot vs cold shower is better for sleep, research and sleep experts tend to lean towards warm. A 2019 review of 13 studies found a warm bath or shower between 40 and 42.5 °C improved sleep quality and efficiency. "A warm shower taken one to two hours before bedtime triggers vasodilation (blood vessel expansion) in your extremities, which helps dissipate core body heat more efficiently afterward," Dr. David Rosen, medical director at sleep apnea treatment company Complete Sleep, recently told Tom's Guide. "This enhances your natural temperature drop." While a warm shower can prepare you for bed, showering too close to your bedtime may actually ruin your sleep. Like Dr Rosen mentioned above, try to shower around one to two hours before shuteye. Studies have shown that aromatherapy can improve sleep and relaxation, so try incorporating soothing scents into your evening shower. You can introduce relaxing scents through soaps or even shower mists, selecting products with calming fragrances such eucalyptus (which research shows can reduce congestion and sleep apnea) and lavender (studies show it increases quality of sleep and reduce anxiety).

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store