Charlotte is ready to spill its tech "secret"
Charlotte's growing tech workforce has long flown under the radar, but economic development leaders want to broadcast the city's hidden advantage to draw new businesses and investors.
Why it matters: Organizations like Charlotte Center City Partners say they believe they can lure more future-focused companies here by revealing the tech talent hidden in our banking, insurance and other industries.
What they're saying: Site selectors are catching on that Charlotte has a wealth of tech talent that's more affordable to hire, says James LaBar, senior vice president of economic development at Charlotte Center City Partners. Unlike in larger tech hubs, startups and smaller companies don't have to contend with industry giants when recruiting candidates in Charlotte.
In other major cities, such as Austin, they're up against not only "the salary of Google, but the coolness of Google," LaBar explains.
LaBar calls the tech talent Charlotte's "secret."
By the numbers: The average wage for a tech worker in Charlotte is $97,044 — far below $192,969 in the San Francisco Bay area or $119,983 in Austin, according to commercial real estate firm CBRE.
CBRE ranks Charlotte among the top markets for high-tech job growth, with the pool expanding 19.3% to 71,050 workers between 2018 and 2023.
Zoom out: The Triangle's well-established tech ecosystem has helped the region attract big employers like Wolfspeed, Fujifilm Diosynth and Meta.
The Raleigh-Durham market now boasts 75,150 tech workers, an increase of 17.9% between 2018 and 2023.
What's next: Charlotte Center City Partners emphasizes tech in its latest "State of the Center City" report, an annual publication designated to persuade prospective investors and companies of the area's potential.
This year's book, titled "Innovation Meets Momentum," highlights Charlotte's intention to transition into an innovation destination. Center City Partners is supporting the establishment of the North Tryon Tech Hub in Uptown, where UNC Charlotte opened CO-LAB, a dedicated space for entrepreneurs.
"Charlotte is not renowned for its entrepreneurship, yet it has a really strong community," says Michael Smith, president and CEO of Center City Partners.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Invitation for Interest to Participate for Development of the HKSTP San Tin Technopole
HONG KONG, June 11, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- CBRE has been appointed by Hong Kong Science and Technology Parks Corporation (HKSTP) as the lead consultant for the business, operation and investment models of the HKSTP San Tin Technopole (working title). CBRE will invite interested property developers and consortia to submit its Interest to Participate (ITP) for the development. The deadline for ITP submissions is set for 12:00 noon, June 21, 2025. As part of the Northern Metropolis development, the broader San Tin Technopole, encompassing over 600 hectares, will have half of its area to be designed for innovation and technology (I&T) use. This translates into 7 million sq.m. of gross floor area for research & development, prototyping, pilot testing, and advanced manufacturing. The project led by Hong Kong Science and Technology Parks Corporation (HKSTP) at the San Tin Technopole, will be developed on 20 hectares of government-granted land, with construction set to begin in 2027. As outlined in the 2024 Policy Address, the government aims to deliver approximately 20 hectares of new innovation and technology (I&T) sites in phases, starting from 2026–27, for HKSTP's development and operation. Strategically located near Shenzhen, the development is designed to complement Shenzhen's I&T zones in Huanggang and Futian, forming a synergistic innovation hub. It will become a comprehensive I&T ecosystem, catalysing growth in sectors such as AI and data science, life and health tech, new material/energy, microelectronics/electronics and advanced manufacturing. Hannah Jeong, Executive Director, Valuation and Advisory Services, CBRE Hong Kong said: "While the entire San Tin Technopole is envisioned as a major driver of Hong Kong's new industrialisation and a second economic engine in the North complementing the established financial engine in the South (CBDs), this development represents a rare opportunity to shape a world-class innovation powerhouse, particularly for artificial intelligence, advanced manufacturing, biotech, and green tech. We are laying the foundation for a new era of industrialisation, offering space and infrastructure for R&D, prototyping, and pilot production." Hannah added: "This is not just a development—it's a bold vision for the future of innovation. Backed by HKSTP's proven track record, the development is poised to become a dynamic I&T ecosystem and a global launchpad for innovation, especially in today's fast-evolving, AI-driven era. Leveraging CBRE's extensive client network, deep expertise in commercial real estate and land advisory, and its regulatory credentials—including SFC Type 1 and Type 4 licenses, as well as an EAA license—we are excited to support private investors and developers in exploring the tremendous opportunities this project offers. We invite them to share their perspectives in shaping a win-win public-private partnership model, with strong potential for attractive investment returns and long-term capital appreciation." For any additional details, please contact Ms Hannah Jeong, Executive Director (Email: Tel: +852 2820 2818), or Mr. Eddie Tsui, Senior Director, (Email: Tel.: +852 2820 2845) of Valuation and Advisory Services, CBRE Hong Kong. Follow us on Instagram: cbre_hongkongAnd on LinkedIn: company/cbre-asia-pacific DISCLAIMER:Neither CBRE nor its affiliated companies make any warranties or claims on the express or implied accuracy of the information contained herein. All information contained herein, including projections, has been obtained from materials and sources which we believe to be reliable at the date of publication but which we have not verified its accuracy and make no guarantee, warranty or representation about it., and is not to be used or considered as an offer or the solicitation of an offer to sell or buy or subscribe for securities or other financial instruments. Readers are responsible for independently assessing the relevance, accuracy, completeness and currency of the information of this report. It is submitted subject to the possibility of errors, omissions, change of price, rental or other conditions, prior sale, lease or financing, or withdrawal without notice. You are advised to conduct your own assessment, property inspection and measurement, and/or seek advices from your independent professional advisors. CBRE shall not be liable for any loss, damage, cost or expense incurred or arising by reason of any person using or relying on information in this report. All rights to the materials are expressly reserved and none of the materials, nor their content, nor any copy of it, may be altered in any way, transmitted to, copied or distributed to any other party without the prior express written permission of CBRE. For any information of or relating to floor area, readers should note that there is no standardized or commonly adopted definition of any description of floor area in the market for non-residential properties. About CBRE Group, Group, Inc. (NYSE:CBRE), a Fortune 500 and S&P 500 company headquartered in Dallas, is the world's largest commercial real estate services and investment firm (based on 2024 revenue). The company has more than 140,000 employees (including Turner & Townsend employees) serving clients in more than 100 countries. CBRE serves a diverse range of clients with an integrated suite of services, including facilities, transaction and project management; property management; investment management; appraisal and valuation; property leasing; strategic consulting; property sales; mortgage services and development services. Please visit our website at View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE CBRE Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
OpenAI Seems to Be Making a Very Familiar, Very Cynical Choice
Last spring, Sam Altman, the chief executive of OpenAI, sat in the chancel of Harvard Memorial Church, sermonizing against advertising. 'I will disclose, just as a personal bias, that I hate ads,' he began in his usual calm cadence, one sneakered foot crossed onto his lap. He said that ads 'fundamentally misalign a user's incentives with the company providing the service,' adding that he found the notion of mixing advertising with artificial intelligence — the product his company is built on — 'uniquely unsettling.' The comment reminded me immediately of something I'd heard before, from around the time I was first getting online. It came from a seminal paper that Sergey Brin and Larry Page wrote in 1998, when they were at Stanford developing Google. They argued that advertising often made search engines less useful, and that companies that relied on it would 'be inherently biased towards the advertisers and away from the needs of the consumers.' I showed up at Stanford as a freshman in 2000, not long after Mr. Brin and Mr. Page had accepted a $25 million round of venture capital funding to turn their academic project into a business. My best friend there persuaded me to try Google, describing it as more ethical than the search engines that had come before. What we didn't realize was that in the midst of the dot-com crash, which coincided with our arrival, Google's investors were pressuring the co-founders to hire a more experienced chief executive. Mr. Brin and Mr. Page brought in Eric Schmidt, who in turn hired Sheryl Sandberg, the chief of staff to Lawrence H. Summers when he was Treasury secretary, to build an advertising program. Filing for Google to go public a couple of years later, Mr. Brin and Mr. Page explained away the reversal of their anti-advertising stance by telling shareholders that ads made Google more useful because they provided what the founders called 'great commercial information.' My senior year, news filtered into The Stanford Daily, where I worked, that Facebook — which some of us had heard about from friends at Harvard, where it had started — was coming to our campus. 'I know it sounds corny, but I'd love to improve people's lives, especially socially,' Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook's co-founder, told The Daily's reporter. He added, 'In the future we may sell ads to get the money back, but since providing the service is so cheap, we may choose not to do that for a while.' Mr. Zuckerberg went on to quit Harvard and move to Palo Alto, Calif. I went on to The Wall Street Journal. Covering Facebook in 2007, I got a scoop that Facebook — which had in fact introduced ads — would begin using data from individual users and their 'friends' on the site to sharpen how ads were targeted to them. Like Google before it, Facebook positioned this as being good for users. Mr. Zuckerberg even brought Ms. Sandberg over from Google to help. When an economic downturn, followed by an I.P.O., later put pressure on Facebook, it followed Google's playbook: doubling down on advertising. In this case, it did so by collecting and monetizing even more personal information about its users. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Mark Zuckerberg has created the saddest place on the internet with Meta AI's public feed
Meta's stand-alone AI app launched in late April, and like many people, my first thought was, "Huh?" After trying it out a little, my next thought was, "Oh no." A few weeks later, after the initial surge of curious new users, my thought is now: "Dear God." Meta AI's public stream is perhaps the most depressing feed I've come across in a long time. It's full of people sharing intimate information about themselves — things like thoughts on grief, or child custody, or financial distress. And it seems like some people aren't aware that what they're sharing will end up on a public feed. The Meta AI app is a bot more geared to casual chatting than complicated tasks like writing code or analyzing large data sets. And the part that's most different from ChatGPT or other large language models, like Google's Gemini, is Meta AI's public "Discover" feed. It shows off prompts, conversations, and image outputs from other users. Think of it like your Facebook feed, or your never-ending Instagram scroll, except on an app just for Meta AI. I'm not sure why someone would want to share some of the things I've read — nor am I sure why anyone who's not a nosy weirdo like I am would want to look at a feed of a bunch of strangers' interactions with a chatbot. And yet, people do share. Maybe they want to show off something like an image they thought was particularly cool. Meta AI's 'Discover' feed is full of personal interactions Back in late April, after the initial launch, Meta AI's feed was indeed mostly images. But mixed in, I noticed a few conversations that seemed more personal — someone asking about vitamin supplements for a 65-year-old woman, or for legal advice about getting fired, or for a special prayer. When I checked back on the app more recently, I was seeing even more of these personal takes — some even including a person's phone number and email address when they asked for help drafting a letter to a judge in a child custody case. Did that person mean to share that information with the world? Maybe, but I'm guessing they might have clicked the wrong button and didn't realize what they were doing. I could be wrong! Meta spokesman Daniel Roberts told me there's a multi-step process to sharing a chat history or image to Meta AI's Discovery feed. And to be clear, conversations with Meta AI aren't public by default. Like Roberts said, you have to explicitly choose to make something public by clicking "Share" and then "Post." Some other things I saw on the public feed: someone asking for help writing a poem for his wife's birthday, someone asking medical questions, someone asking for weight-loss tips. And someone who was talking to his wife who had died from cancer. Other conversations I saw: someone asking the AI to send them a reminder at the end of the month to cancel their Experian credit-monitoring subscription. One woman asked for help writing a letter to her local Elks Lodge after she said she'd been suspended for an altercation she had with another member. So, maybe some of those people wanted the world to read their AI chats. And others, maybe not. What I found even more eerie than the text and image feed was the audio feed. If a person uses the voice chat function, you can actually listen to recordings of their conversation if they're shared. At least two recordings I listened to appeared to be from people who didn't realize they had hit the audio button. One was having a conversation with a coworker about their shift schedule. Another sounded like a pocket dial: A man was having a conversation with another person, and Meta AI kept chiming in with suggestions. I found Meta AI's Discover feed depressing in a particular way — not just because some of the questions themselves were depressing. What seemed particularly dark was that some of these people seemed unaware of what they were sharing. People's real Instagram or Facebook handles are attached to their Meta AI posts. I was able to look up some of these people's real-life profiles, although I felt icky doing so. I reached out to more than 20 people whose posts I'd come across in the feed to ask them about their experience; I heard back from one, who told me that he hadn't intended to make his chat with the bot public. (He was asking for car repair advice.) Other users can reply to the posts that show up on the Meta AI Discover feed. On a few particularly personal posts, strangers warned the user that the potentially sensitive stuff they were sharing could be seen by the public. Meta wants its AI to be the future. But this doesn't feel like it. Mark Zuckerberg has said he thinks AI is super important. His company is reportedly making a huge investment in ScaleAI and could tap its CEO to lead a project with the goal of creating "superintelligence" that's smarter than a human. And yet, the consumer-facing features using Meta AI are kind of, uh, meh. There are user-generated romance chatbots on Instagram Messenger. There were the ill-fated ones voiced by celebrities (don't ask John Cena about this). Does Meta really want its AI efforts to amount to people posting — possibly accidentally — their interactions with its Meta AI bot on a public feed? In its rollout in April, Meta said the Discover feed was a "place to share and explore how others are using AI." I have to say that most of the stuff on Meta AI's Discover feed isn't grim and overly personal. Mostly, it's just silly images, mixed in with some other anodyne requests for recipes, or questions about how to even use this new technology. But I'm not convinced that this is "useful" or even "fun" to look at as a feed; it's a jumble of unrelated, random stuff, most of which actually is pretty boring. If Meta wants its users to adopt its AI like it's a useful and great thing, it's hard to square this with my awful experience on the Meta AI app.
