logo
K-P is abandoning children

K-P is abandoning children

Express Tribune2 days ago

The writer is a Lecturer in English at the Higher Education Department, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Email him at namdar057@gmail.com
Listen to article
Let's call it what it is: K-P is abandoning its children. Not metaphorically, not in the way people toss around, 'Oh, the system is broken.' No. The system isn't broken; it's functioning exactly as it's allowed to, with chilling indifference to the rights of the most vulnerable.
A recent report by the provincial Education Department pulls no punches. Legions of children enrolled in over 10,000 public schools across K-P arrive each day at buildings as bare as unfinished construction sites. No boundary walls. No electricity. No washrooms. Not even drinking water.
Over 5,000 schools in K-P operate without a single watt of electricity. In more than 2,000 schools, safe drinking water is a rarity. Thousands more lack washrooms or a protective wall around them. In Peshawar — the provincial capital itself — 21 schools are in the dark, 15 can't offer clean water, 17 lack even a toilet and eight stand exposed, wall-less, to the city's sprawl. Peshawar, not some remote hillside village!
Think about that for a second. We send our children off to elite schools in cars, armed with water bottles, packed lunches and backpacks stuffed with textbooks. Meanwhile, countless children in this country walk into schools that don't even have a toilet. Is this the dignity we promise every child under the Constitution?
Yet, millions don't even get this indignity because they never enter a school at all. Thirty-seven per cent of children in K-P are out of school altogether. That's millions of futures we're snuffing out before they even begin. Nearly eight out of every 10 children in Lower and Upper Kohistan never even make it into a classroom. In Peshawar alone, over half a million are out of school — of those, 319,000 are girls. It's not a gender gap anymore; it's a gulf.
And if you thought the ones lucky enough to be enrolled were at least getting a decent education, think again. Because unable to fund enough textbooks, the province now prints half and asks schools to source the rest from promotees, turning scarcity into strategy.
The hand-me-down model might sound thrifty, but in practice, it's a debacle. Most old books either fall apart, go missing or are defaced with scribbles, tears and tea stains. And let's be honest: a lot of students just don't return them. So expecting this to work as a long-term plan isn't just lazy or absurd; it's negligent!
What all this adds up to is a blatant violation of Article 25-A of the Constitution which guarantees every child the right to free and compulsory education. It also tramples all over the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Free Compulsory Primary and Secondary Education Act, 2017. Laws on paper, like fire alarms in buildings no one checks.
Turning this around requires the provincial government to act decisively across several fronts.
First, it needs to stop pretending its job is done at enrolment. Children need functioning schools, not just roll numbers. Fixing basic infrastructure — electricity, toilets, clean water, boundary walls — isn't some high-minded reform; it's the minimum standard of decency.
Second, launch a real plan - not just window dressing - to bring out-of-school children (OOSC) into the system. This must include targeted efforts in high-need areas like Kohistan — even Peshawar — and the tribal districts, especially for girls left behind in droves.
Third, stop slashing textbook budgets and start facing reality. If the government wants students to reuse books, it must put in place a real system to collect and track them. Or better yet, fund a full print run, because this isn't where we should be paisa-pinching.
This isn't a resource issue; it's a priority issue. And so far, our priorities are glaringly apparent in every broken classroom, every empty desk and every torn-up textbook.
K-P is failing its children. And if this doesn't set off alarms, maybe we've failed too. Because at the very least, K-P's children deserve better. That shouldn't be a radical thing to say.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

PM writes to opp to confer on new CEC
PM writes to opp to confer on new CEC

Express Tribune

time15 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

PM writes to opp to confer on new CEC

After months of dead air and no movement on key electoral appointments, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Wednesday extended an olive branch to National Assembly Opposition Leader Omar Ayub, inviting him for consultations on the appointment of a new Chief Election Commissioner (CEC). In a letter, the premier stated that the term of the CEC, as well as that of two other members of the ECP, ended on January 26. However, all three have continued their duties under Article 215 of the Constitution. He stated that, according to Article 218, proposals for the CEC and its members must be submitted to the parliamentary committee. The letter comes as the constitutional logjam has been festering since January, as the five-year terms of CEC Sikandar Sultan Raja, Sindh Member Nisar Durrani and Balochistan Member Shah Muhammad Jatoi ended on January 26. The process, laid out clearly in Article 213, requires a consensus between the prime minister and the opposition leader. In the event of no agreement, both sides are supposed to send separate lists of three names to a 12-member bipartisan committee, which would then pick one and send it to the president for formal appointment. However, the process has been gathering dust. Though the seats of the CEC and two members expired in January, the government allowed the 45-day constitutional deadline for new appointments, which lapsed on March 12, to come and go without resolution. The impasse now rests at the feet of both the treasury and opposition, with neither side making serious contact until the PM's letter. On the other hand, the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) has already taken the government to court in March. A petition filed in the Islamabad High Court by Ayub and Senate Opposition Leader Shibli Faraz lambasts the inaction as a constitutional violation. It names the federal government, Senate chairman, National Assembly speaker and the ECP as respondents. The petition urges the court to compel the National Assembly speaker to constitute the required parliamentary committee and calls on the Senate chairman to provide names of senators for the same. It further asks the court to order the prime minister to hold meaningful consultations with Ayub, as required under Article 213, and to declare the continued presence of the CEC and two expired members as illegal. Constitutional experts point to the 26th Amendment, which altered Article 215(4) to allow officeholders to continue "till successors are appointed". Both opposition and observers allege the amendment is a legislative patch over executive indecision, especially when key posts meant to guarantee fair elections remain in limbo. Of the four members of the ECP, only the Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa representatives - Babar Hassan Bharwana and Justice (retd) Ikramullah Khan - still have valid tenures, both stretching till mid-2027. It is worth noting that CEC Sikandar Sultan Raja's tenure has been full of political minefields. Opposition parties, particularly the PTI, have accused him of everything from election mismanagement to open partisanship. He has been criticised for failing to ensure timely general elections and for stripping the PTI of its iconic 'bat' symbol ahead of the 2024 polls. The ECP has also come under fire for failing to implement the Supreme Court's verdict on reserved seats and for not holding Senate elections in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, a delay denounced by critics as undermining federal parliamentary integrity.

PECA Act: Respondents asked to submit comments
PECA Act: Respondents asked to submit comments

Business Recorder

time16 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

PECA Act: Respondents asked to submit comments

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) gave a deadline to the respondents to submit comments in the petitions challenging amendments in the PECA Act. A single bench of Justice Inaam Ameen Minhas on Wednesday heard the petitions of Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists (PFUJ), anchors association and Islamabad High Court Journalists Association (IHCJA). In the petition, counsel of the journalist body adopted the stance that the PECA (Amendment) Act is unconstitutional and illegal; hence, the court should conduct judicial review on it. The petition said the PECA (Amendment) 2025 increased the government control and restrictions on freedom of speech. It said the PECA law violated Article 19 and 19(A) of the Constitution as well. Therefore, it pleaded, the law should be suspended. PECA amendments challenged in SC During the hearing, Advocate Imran Shafiq and other lawyers appeared in the court on behalf of the petitioners. Advocate Shafiq said the federal government has filed its reply only through the Ministry of Interior and the Ministry of Information while the Ministry of Law and Justice, Parliamentary Affairs and the PTA have not submitted any response yet. He informed the bench that the federal government has raised a question on the jurisdiction of this court. He added that the federation has stated that after the 26th Constitutional Amendment, only the Constitutional Bench of the High Court can hear this case. The lawyer said the second objection was raised while giving a reference of a Quranic verse that before spreading the words, do research. The lawyer said the FIRs are being registered against people and the court should hear this case soon. The IHC bench asked whether there is no news going on? Is someone preventing news from being given or published? Riasat Ali Azad advocate prayed the court to issue a stay order that there will be no FIR or arrest against the journalist for reporting the news. He said that the parties are not submitting a response and are taking time from the court. Journalist Mazhar Abbas said that an atmosphere of harassment has been created in the media industry and the journalists are being summoned and harassed by the FIA. The petitioner's lawyer said the parties should be directed to file their replies and provide a copy of the replies to the petitioners in advance before the next hearing. Justice Inaam remarked that even if the response is not filed, the hearing will still be continued. He said that this case would take a long time and therefore, it will be scheduled after Eid. Later, the court deferred hearing of the case till the second week of July. The PFUJ said in the petition that the law infringed international human rights as well as digital rights in Pakistan. The petition read: '…a writ may be issued declaring that the Prevention of Electronic Crimes (Amendment) Act, 2025 is unconstitutional, being violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution, due process, fair trial, and the concept of regulatory independence, as well as the doctrines of fairness, proportionality, reasonableness, and constitutional limitations or restrictions, hence void, and liable to be struck down.' Therefore, the PFUJ prayed that the respondents may be restrained and prevented from employing the coercive powers under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes (Amendment) Act, 2025, in general, and against the journalist community, in particular till final disposal of the instant petition. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

PM Shehbaz invites Omar Ayub for consultation on new ECP chief
PM Shehbaz invites Omar Ayub for consultation on new ECP chief

Express Tribune

timea day ago

  • Express Tribune

PM Shehbaz invites Omar Ayub for consultation on new ECP chief

Listen to article Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has invited Opposition Leader in the National Assembly Omar Ayub for a meeting to discuss the appointment of the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and other members of the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP). In a letter on Wednesday, the PM highlighted that the term of CEC Sikandar Sultan Raja, along with two other members, Nisar Ahmad Durrani from Sindh and Shah Muhammad Jatoi from Balochistan, ended on January 26. However, they have continued to serve under Article 215 of the Constitution. The letter pointed out that, according to Article 218, proposals for the new CEC and members must be forwarded to the parliamentary committee. The appointment process for the CEC and members of the ECP is outlined in Article 213 of the Constitution, which mandates that the prime minister and the leader of the opposition jointly propose three names to the president for approval. In case of disagreement between the two, the prime pinister and opposition leader will submit their individual nominations to a parliamentary committee. Following this, the National Assembly speaker will establish a 12-member committee, with equal representation from both the government and opposition benches. The committee will then select one nominee to forward to the President for approval, ideally by consensus. Under Article 217, if the CEC's term expires, the senior-most member of the Commission will assume the duties of the Chief Election Commissioner. Should the senior member be unavailable, the next senior member will take over the responsibilities.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store