Op-ED: Ohio Man Accused Of Burning 100 Black, Jewish, LGBTQ Library Books. Wonder Where He Got That Idea?
Source: deepblue4you / Getty
A man in Beachwood, Ohio, stands accused of checking out 100 books on Black, Jewish and LGBTQ studies and burning them all — and all I can think is: Gee, I wonder where he got that idea from?
According to NBC News, the Beachwood Police Department stated that the man, whom the department did not publicly identify, checked out the books in April, days after he went to the Beachwood library branch on Shaker Boulevard and got a library card. So, allegedly, this man's only reason for getting a library card was to target certain reading materials just to destroy them, which, of course, indicates that he's a member of a certain political cult of red hat-wearers who seem to firmly believe books on sexuality, gender studies and non-whitewashed Black history should be banned into 'woke' oblivion.
To make matters worse (albeit, completely predictable), the man also allegedly posted a photo of the books in the trunk of his car to an online site frequented by white supremacists.
From NBC:
He allegedly told the librarian that his son was a member of the LGBTQ community and that he was trying to learn more about it, the news station reported.
The library was informed that the man had posted a photo showing a car trunk full of books on the site, Gab.com, according to WKYC. The books had Cuyahoga County Public Library stickers on them. The library was later informed that the man posted a video that appeared to show him burning all of the books he checked out.
The books were worth around $1,700, the news station reported.
The Anti-Defamation League's Center on Extremism described Gab as 'an online hub for extremist and conspiratorial content' that it mostly used by 'conspiracy theorists, white nationalists, neo-Nazis, members of militias and influential figures among the alt right.'
Police indicated that the alleged burning of the books was likely a civil matter, not criminal, but the department did confirm that a local prosecutor will determine 'whether there is probable cause to believe a crime was committed.'
'The Beachwood Police Department is actively investigating this incident,' Chief Dan Grispino said in a statement. 'Our department stands against antisemitism and all acts of bias-motivated crimes. We are committed to vigorously investigating and prosecuting any hate-motivated incidents within the City of Beachwood. Our priority is to maintain a community that can thrive without the fear of threats of intimidation or violence.' (It's kind of weird that Grispino only specifically mentioned 'antisemitism' while reducing blatant racism and queerphobia as 'bias-motivated,' but whatever.)
Meanwhile, Interfaith Group Against Hate — which describes itself as 'a coalition led by Jewish, Muslim, and Christian congregations in solidarity with community partners united by the belief that we must confront white supremacy and create a society where people of all races and religions thrive together' — publicly condemned the alleged book burner's actions, and stated in a Facebook post Monday that it's seeking to collect 1,000 'new books lifting up Black, Jewish, and LGBTQ+ voices.'
'Whoever perpetuated the idea that you can burn us out of Cleveland, deport us out of Cleveland and deny our ideas and oppress us and frighten us to the corner…they picked the wrong community!' Rabbi Robert Nosanchuk from Mishkan Or said in a statement. 'And that community will continue to respond with love. Let's use this moment to instead of standing in fear, to stand against this oppressive act, and deepen our convictions to learn about each other's faith, race, culture and values.'
Rev. Ryan Wallace of Fairmount Presbyterian Church echoed similar sentiments, saying, 'We want to take this act of hate and turn it into a powerful symbol of unity, solidarity and love.'
Ohio state Sen. Kent Smith (D-Euclid) also released a statement denouncing the vandalism.
'I condemn this act, not only because it is a crime against our institutions and community, but also because it is fundamentally un-American,' Smith said. 'This act of violence is not just a crime against the public catalog of literature that was destroyed, but also is a violation of the marketplace of ideas that is a bedrock principle of American life.'
Of course, there are certain political figures of a certain party whom we shouldn't expect a statement from. Can you imagine a MAGA Republican condemning the actions of the alleged vandal?
'How dare you burn those books before we can ban them for no discernible reason outside of our own seething bigotry???'
Yeah — it would have to go something like that.
SEE ALSO:
Trump's DOJ Thinks Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson Hired Too Many Black People, So It Launched An Investigation
Family Of 5-Year-Old Black Child Allegedly Frisked By Ohio Police During Routine Traffic Stop Speaks Out
SEE ALSO
Op-ED: Ohio Man Accused Of Burning 100 Black, Jewish, LGBTQ Library Books. Wonder Where He Got That Idea? was originally published on newsone.com
Black America Web Featured Video
CLOSE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
35 minutes ago
- The Hill
DC park will close after all for WorldPride weekend
The National Park Service said Friday it would temporarily close the park at the center of Washington's historic LGBTQ neighborhood ahead of the city's annual Pride weekend, moving forward with plans that local officials believed had been scrapped. The temporary closure of DuPont Circle Park came at the request of the U.S. Park Police (USPP), the Park Service said in an order uploaded Friday to its website approving the installation of anti-scale fencing around the park's perimeter through 6 p.m. Sunday. 'Less restrictive measures will not suffice due to the security-based assessment of the USPP that this park area needs to be kept clear,' the Park Service said. In a letter dated June 4, Major Frank Hilsher wrote to Kevin Griess, superintendent of National Mall and Memorial Parks, that the USPP's closure request 'is based solely on several previous years of assaultive, destructive and disorderly behavior exhibited in Dupont Circle during the DC Pride weekend.' 'The USPP maintains that a physical barrier effecting a full closure of Dupont Circle is necessary,' Hilsher wrote, to 'secure the park, deter potential violence, reduce the risk of destructive acts and decrease the need for extensive law enforcement presences.' An earlier letter sent in April to USPP Chief Jessica M.E. Taylor from Pamela A. Smith, chief of Washington's Metropolitan Police Department, recommended that tall no-climb fences be temporarily installed around the park. 'Over the years, DuPont Circle Park has been a popular location for Pride attendees to congregate, despite not being a sanctioned Pride event,' Smith wrote in the letter. 'In the past five years, the Metropolitan Police Department and the United States Park Police have taken proactive steps, including increased police presence and enhanced lighting around the park.' 'However, significant challenges persisted, including unpermitted large gathering with sound equipment, illegal vending and grilling, alcohol use, multiple physical altercation, and vandalism of the historic fountain and statue,' she added. Smith withdrew MPD's request to temporarily close the park earlier this week 'after hearing from community leaders and residents,' she wrote in a June 3 letter to Taylor. In the same letter, Smith pointed to specific disruptions that influenced her initial request, including a 2019 arrest in DuPont Circle Park after parkgoers heard gunshots and vandalism during Pride weekend in 2023 that resulted in roughly $175,000 in damage to the park's more than 100-year-old fountain. The park's closure is another obstacle for those in charge of WorldPride, an international LGBTQ Pride celebration taking place this year in Washington. The Capital Pride Alliance, the organizers of WorldPride DC, have hit several snags related to Trump administration policies that disproportionately affect LGBTQ people. In April, the group issued a travel advisory for transgender visitors from abroad, citing President Trump's executive order recognizing only two sexes, male and female, and a new State Department policy barring trans, nonbinary and intersex Americans from updating the sex designations on their passports. The same month, the Capital Pride Alliance announced it was moving WorldPride events from the Kennedy Center to 'ensure our entire LGBTQ+ community will be welcome' following Trump's takeover of the cultural institution in February. In posts on Truth Social, Trump said drag performances at the Kennedy Center 'will stop' under his leadership and called drag, an art form that is deeply rooted in LGBTQ culture and history, 'anti-American propaganda.' The White House has also declined to issue a proclamation for Pride month. In an emailed statement, the Capital Pride Alliance said it 'is frustrated and disappointed in the National Park Service's decision – again – to close Dupont Circle during the culmination of WorldPride this weekend.' 'This beloved landmark is central to the community that WorldPride intends to celebrate and honor. It's much more than a park, for generations it's been a gathering place for DC's LGBTQ+ community, hosting first amendment assemblies and memorial services for those we lost to the AIDS epidemic and following tragic events like the Pulse nightclub shooting,' the group said. 'This sudden move was made overnight without consultation with the Capital Pride Alliance or other local officials.' No official WorldPride activities were planned in DuPont Circle Park, the Capital Pride Alliance said, 'thus no events will be impacted.' D.C. Councilmember Brooke Pinto (D-Ward 2), representing the DuPont Circle neighborhood, said she is 'extremely disappointed and frustrated' that the park will not remain open for Pride weekend. 'This closure is disheartening to me and so many in our community who wanted to celebrate World Pride at this iconic symbol of our city's historic LGBTQ+ community,' Pinto wrote Friday in a post on the social platform X. '. I wish I had better news to share.' 'World Pride will continue this weekend and it will be a time of celebration and commitment to uplift our LGBTQ+ neighbors,' she added.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Oregon middle school hosts 'Drag Day' encouraging students to cross-dress during Pride Week
An Oregon middle school encouraged students to dress up as "drag queens" and their favorite "queer hero" this week in celebration of Pride Month, but one parent said families weren't notified ahead of time. At the Arts & Technology Academy in the Eugene School District 4J, students celebrated "Pride Spirit Week" with a different theme each day intended to celebrate the LGBTQ+ community, according to a memo obtained by Fox News Digital. On Monday, students were encouraged to "wear as many colors as they could" for "Rainbow-Out" day. On Tuesday, they were told to wear all black "in remembrance of lost members of the LGBTQIA+ community." Wednesday was "Drag Day" where students were told to "dress like a drag queen/king/monarch or dress up as a different gender." Washington School Board Fights 'Radical' State Education Chief Defying Trump's Transgender Athlete Ban Thursday was "Queer Hero Day" where students picked their favorite "queer hero," such as Freddie Mercury or Chappell Roan. Read On The Fox News App The week's events concluded with "Pride Flag Friday," where students were told to "dress up as the pride flag of your choice." A parent who spoke to Fox News Digital said that the school principal sent out a notice to parents about the Pride Spirit Week on Monday afternoon, about 15 minutes after students were let out for the day. The email also said that the weekly activities would coincide with learning in the classroom about "the history of the LGBTQ+ civil rights movement." The parent was surprised to learn of the activities after the week had already kicked off and wondered why the school hadn't shared with families in advance. According to Oregon state law, schools are required to notify parents and guardians ahead of instruction on human sexuality. Conservative School Board In Blue State Asking Trump Admin To Intervene On Gender Policy When reached for comment by Fox News Digital, a spokesperson for the Eugene School District 4J confirmed that parents were notified Monday afternoon about the week's activities. Most of the lessons and activities were not considered part of formal instruction on human sexuality, the district said, but parents should've been notified earlier. The district vowed to "work more closely with schools around notice for thematic and spirit weeks," saying it is their expectation that schools communicate with families about special events weeks in advance and comply with Oregon law in allowing families the opportunity to review human sexuality curriculum and opt out in advance. The activities and lessons aligned with the Oregon Department of Education's LGBTQ2SIA+ Student Success Plan, the district added. LGBTQ2SIA+ stands for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender/non-binary, Queer/Questioning, Two-Spirit, Intersex and Asexual, with the plus sign referring to other identities. The success plan "ensures students learn about the histories and contributions of historically marginalized communities, including LGBTQ+ individuals," the district said. Target Swaps Out Rainbow Flags For Stars And Stripes As Shoppers Notice Shift During Pride Month The school's Pride Spirit Week was meant to show support for LGBTQ+ students and their families and cultivate an inclusive climate. "We remain deeply committed to fostering inclusive, safe learning spaces—-and doing so in partnership with families. That means ensuring our communication is clear, our curriculum is aligned, and our students feel like they belong," the district said. The Oregon school district is one of several that have taken a stand against President Donald Trump's actions to root out gender ideology and diversity, equity and inclusion in public schools. Two days after Trump issued an executive order declaring recognition of "two sexes, male and female," the Eugene 4J school board adopted a resolution on Jan. 22 "affirming gender identity, expression and equity for transgender and gender-expansive students and staff." The resolution said the district would stand in support of "LGBTQ2SIA+" people and rejected "any attempt to diminish, politicize or marginalize these identities." It was also the first public K-12 school district to join a federal lawsuit in February challenging Department of Education guidelines on racial discrimination. The Department of Education notified educators in February that they must stop using racial preferences and stereotypes as a factor in their admissions, hiring, promotion and other practices, or risk losing federal funding. The lawsuit, filed by teachers' union the American Federation of Teachers and the American Sociological Association, argues that the Department of Education was threatening educators' constitutional right to free speech and due process with the order. "Our equity programs are part of our board and district goals to make sure our students have fair access to achievement and that our schools are effective in reaching all students, including our most vulnerable," Eugene 4J School Board Chair Jenny Jonak said in a press release announcing the lawsuit. In April, a federal judge in Maryland temporarily blocked the Department of Education from cutting funding or prosecuting school districts while the policy is being article source: Oregon middle school hosts 'Drag Day' encouraging students to cross-dress during Pride Week
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Cheerleaders for Violence: The Troubling Defense of Terror in Boulder
It was supposed to be a peaceful demonstration. Instead, it ended in flames. But what came after the attack in Boulder may be even more incendiary, especially online, where some users in their teens and 20s were not condemning the violence. They were endorsing it. On a clear afternoon in late May, a pro-Israel demonstration on Boulder, Colorados iconic Pearl Street Mall turned into a scene of terror. An Egyptian citizen, wielding improvised firebombs, attacked the crowd, injuring 15 people and igniting panic in a city more often associated with peaceful protests and college town calm. Authorities swiftly arrested the suspect, now charged with multiple felonies including attempted murder and arson. Law enforcement has labeled the incident an act of terrorism. But while the violence rattled the city and the Jewish community in particular, a very different response was unfolding online. Videos posted by major outlets such as ABC News, Daily Mail, and MSNBC quickly amassed thousands of views on TikTok and Instagram. In the comment sections, a disturbing trend emerged: Rather than denouncing the attack, many young users applauded it. "He just wanted freedom for Palestine." "Keep up the good work brother! Hero." "Free him, he did no wrong. He did what we all wanted." "I was about to comment about how terrible this is and then I realized it was a pro-Israel rally and I suddenly didnt feel bad anymore." Some expressed outright Jew-hatred, writing things like, "Reduce their population" and "We owe Germany an apology." Others painted the attacker as a martyr or revolutionary. Several claimed the incident was staged entirely, a so-called "false flag" to build sympathy for Israel. This chorus of justification, denial, and celebration is jarring but not entirely surprising given the current climate. Recent polling shows a dramatic shift in how young Americans view the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. According to Pew Research Center, 53% of U.S. adults now hold an unfavorable view of Israel. Support for the Palestinian cause has grown, particularly among Democrats and younger voters. In one RealClearPolling analysis,respondentsunder 28 years old were more likely than any other age group to sympathize with Palestinians over Israelis and to view Israels military actions in Gaza as unjustified. As someone from this generation, and from Boulder, Ive watched these sentiments evolve online, where politics blur with memes and moral lines often collapse under the weight of outrage or irony. Seeing this unfold in my own hometown made it feel less like an aberration and more like a wake-up call. Whats chilling isnt just the cruelty of the comments. Its how natural they seem to the people posting them, many of whom are my peers. Layered atop this political shift is a deepening distrust of institutions. A significant share of younger Americans express skepticism toward government narratives, traditional news media, and even the legitimacy of domestic law enforcement. According to the spring 2025 Harvard Youth Poll, fewer than one in three express trust in major institutions. But when that skepticism is applied to something as clear and violent as the Boulder attack, is it truly thoughtful or is it reflexive, corrosive doubt - the kind that opens the door to conspiracism and moral disengagement? That mindset helps explain the abundance of conspiracy-laden responses: "Yeah they set this up. Dont believe it at all," read one comment. Another called it a "planned distraction," while others insisted it was staged with actors. Though many of these reactions remain anonymous and ephemeral, they point to a generational divide not just in foreign policy, but in the moral frameworks through which violence is interpreted. Zoe Mardiks, a recent graduate of the University of Colorado Boulder and a Jewish student leader, was at her apartment when she learned of the attack. "My first reaction was to text some of my other Jewish friends to check in and ensure that everyone was okay and safe," she said. "I felt very scared that this had happened in my community." What disturbed her just as much as the attack itself was the flood of online comments defending it. "The ongoing justification for violence significantly downplays the rights of Jews and Israel to exist," Mardiks said. In her view, social media has warpedher generations sense of moral clarity. "Because of how the war has been broadcast on social media, everyone feels they have a say in the issue and believes they possess all the knowledge," she said. Mardiks said her response to those defending the attacker is simple: "If you truly care about saving or freeing anyone, we can only do that by educating each other in a non-attacking way … the line is drawn when you praise violence." The Boulder attack marks a grim milestone: a foreign conflict spilling onto American soil in the form of violence, and met, in some corners of the Internet, with tacit approval. That many of those corners are populated by Americans under 30 raises hard questions about what this generation, my generation, believes, whom they stand with, and what they consider justifiable resistance. For us, the line between protest and terrorism used to feel clear. Now, for too many, that line seems negotiable. "He did what we all wanted." If thats true, we may need to start asking what "we" really means now. Adair Teuton is a 2025 intern with RealClearPolitics.
