Bay County community to join nationwide 'No Kings' Protest on Saturday
PANAMA CITY, Fla. (WMBB) – Bay County residents will gather at Carl Gray Park on Saturday, June 14, at 10 a.m. for the No Kings Protest.
The No Kings Protest is a powerful protest demonstration against the growing threat of authoritarianism, political corruption, and attacks on fundamental freedom.
Bay County TDC approves new tourism-driven weather page
According to a news release, participants will march across the Hathaway Bridge in a show of unity and resistance.
The No Kings Protest is part of a National Day of Action, with more than 1,800 events taking place across the country.
All members of the community who value democracy, accountability, and justice are encouraged to attend.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
36 minutes ago
- Fox News
ASRA NOMANI: The familiar hidden hand behind today's #NoKings protests
Yesterday, as protesters readied to descend on city squares across America for a mass demonstration branded #NoKings, California Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis took to MSNBC, praising the movement as a righteous stand for democracy. "People are very determined to get out there and be seen. This is the United States. We do not want a king," she said. What she didn't say: The California Democratic Party is itself organizing today's protests — from Orange County to Oakland — with the full institutional weight of the Democratic machine, and the Democratic National Committee is playing a critical role behind the scenes in protests across the country from California to Florida. Already, I established in analysis for the Pearl Project, a nonprofit journalism initiative, that the protests are organized by 197 organizations aligned with the Democratic Party. This network harnesses a machine of about $2.1 billion in total annual revenues toward this cause. That effort alone represents a partisan political enterprise that I call the protest industrial complex. Now, in a new analysis of 148 protest listings uploaded on a Democratic Party organizing platform, I have established that at least 70 Democratic National Committee affiliates are also organizing protests in at least 19 states and the District of Columbia. This is a clear indicator of the partisanship of these protests as an orchestrated, calculated expression of the opposition party, not a spontaneous grassroots outpouring. Despite the rhetoric of populist uprising, it's clear: #NoKings is the Democratic Party staging political theater in the streets of America. As editor-in-chief of the Pearl Project, I have spent the last week building this database of the protest organizers and the findings expose the true architecture of today's "day of defiance." From Mobilize links and protest pages to organizing toolkits, we traced the digital and physical infrastructure behind the June 14 demonstrations. I've added a tab with the Democratic Party events in a public spreadsheet that I invite readers to study. Here's what I found about the hand of the Democratic Party: It's important to recognize: the Democrat Party isn't just supporting these protests — they're leading them, often under the radar. Here's just a glimpse of the geographic footprint of Democratic National Committee club and committee activity. It's dense, but I share it so you can know we have the receipts: What does this list tell us? This is a party infrastructure, not a protest movement. Let's be honest: this isn't about stopping a "king." It's about protecting a political party. Across the country, Democratic Party chapters have flooded local organizing channels with official flyers, water bottles branded with county logos, talking points and coordinated slogans. In Santa Monica, Calif., the local Democratic Club is marching along the boardwalk. In Flagstaff, Ariz., the Coconino County Democratic Party is rallying on the steps of city hall. In Naples, Florida, the Collier County Democratic Executive Committee is mobilizing volunteers with signage pre-approved by national political action committees. In Seminole County, Fla., the advertising is about political canvassing with these details for volunteers: "Signs will be provided to place next to the cooler that say 'Free Water from SemDems.' Consider bringing trash bags to tie to the handle of the cooler to collect used bottles. Email deb4elections@ if you can bring a cooler with water. Passing out SemDems cards. Stand at protest area entry points and make sure people receive a SemDem card so they can connect with us. Passing Out Protest Signs. Hand out signs for people to wave if they didn't bring one. Help people make a sign using SemDems supplies. In this role, you will be too busy to participate in the protest at the street." In total, we tracked scores of unique combinations of state and club, proving that multiple organizations — including groups like Swing Left and Indivisible — are operating across several states with the Democratic Party, deploying scripts, signs, and staff. Here is what you won't hear on most of the media's coverage: These are not the spontaneous actions of private citizens. They are events sanctioned by the Democratic Party dressed up in the language of moral resistance. These are not the spontaneous actions of private citizens. They are events sanctioned by the Democratic Party dressed up in the language of moral resistance. These protests amount to a new chapter of political puppetry. One longtime Democratic volunteer, granted anonymity, described to us the internal pressure they felt to participate: "It feels less like a movement and more like a performance. We are told which graphics to share, what signs to print and even how to answer reporters. It is like the whole protest is a campaign rollout — but in protest clothes." This comment is telling. The Democratic Party is not showing up to these protests as supporters. They are stage managers. The very people warning us against authoritarianism are deploying authoritarian tactics to choreograph outrage. It's political cynicism at its finest—activism from above, not below. Why does this matter? In 2002, my friend and colleague Daniel Pearl was murdered by extremists in Pakistan. The ideology that led to his death — sectarianism, division, moral absolutism — has haunted me ever since. That same dogma is now playing out in American streets, cloaked in slogans like "No Kings" and "Save Democracy." In my 2023 book, Woke Army, I warned of an unholy alliance between far-left radicals and ideological opportunists that undermines institutions from within. Today's protests manifest this alliance and they are the logical next step: not organic resistance, but manufactured dissent designed to influence the next election cycles. This isn't about Donald Trump's flaws or strengths. It's about the weaponization of protest by those already in power. Today's protest is not a revolution. It's a message that refuses the 2024 election results. The message is this: the Democratic Party is willing to use every tool available — PACs, nonprofits, public unions and even street protests — to control the narrative heading into the next elections. Voters should be wary of any party that cries "democracy" while scripting the applause, supplying the signs and managing the stage. Today, as you watch video clips of marchers chanting and waving signs, ask yourself: who paid for the microphone? Who printed the signs? And who benefits when the crowd disperses? The answer is clear with Trump's birthday party for the Army: it's an expression of the ruling Republican administration. That's the kind of transparency we need to have about the street protests. The protests aren't grassroots. They are the political puppeteering of the Democratic Party.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
DC/DOX Festival Kicks Off With Rousing Documentary On Amy Goodman, ‘Democracy Now!' Host Who Gives Voice To People 'Outside The Frame'
Hours before tanks rumbled into Washington for Donald Trump's military parade, ground shaking applause erupted in DC for someone who couldn't be more opposed to everything the president stands for — author and Democracy Now! host Amy Goodman. The renowned journalist traveled from New York to the nation's capital for the world premiere of Steal This Story, Please!, a documentary chronicling her work over many decades to give voice to the voiceless, make the powerful accountable, and to support democracy as the foremost means to safeguard human rights and human dignity. More from Deadline DC/DOX To Showcase A Dozen World Premieres, Oscar Contenders, Films On Barbara Walters, Robert Reich, Deepfaked Sam Altman Amy Goodman Doc 'Steal This Story, Please!' To Open DC/DOX Festival; 'Bodyguard Of Lies,' 'The Alabama Solution' Also Slated 'The Janes' Directors On How Donald Trump Spurred Their Film Reminding What It Was Like For Women Before Roe V. Wade - Contenders Documentary 'Okay, let's go,' Goodman says at the beginning of the film, an instruction to her camera person as she spots P. Wells Griffith III, the climate change policy adviser to Pres. Trump in his first administration. The year is 2018, the location the UN Climate Summit in Poland, and Goodman is trying to get an answer to what would seem like an appropriate and straightforward question for a senior policy adviser on climate change. After identifying herself and her news outlet, she asks, 'Can you tell us what you think about President Trump saying climate change is a hoax?' For over two minutes, through the busy corridors of the climate summit, Goodman politely but persistently attempts to get a response from Griffith, who almost breaks into a sprint to avoid her. 'Why not answer a few simple questions?' she continues before he secrets himself behind a door marked United States of America Delegation Office. Goodman could have used the occasion of the film premiere to laud herself, but instead she directed the focus onto her colleagues at Democracy Now!, her family, and the filmmaking team on stage with her for a Q&A – directors Carl Deal and Tia Lessin, and producer Karen Ranucci. 'Carl and Tia,' she said, 'your dedication to this and your artistry in doing this, we thank you so much.' That's just how she rolls. Deal observed, 'Amy's concerned about the other person.' She's been manifesting that throughout her career in journalism, beginning with her earliest days on, literally, an 'in-house' publication – a newsletter created by her brother Dave when they were children, with a modest circulation encompassing only family members. In the film she shares the story of seeking a job on Phil Donohue's talk show after graduating from college, only to be offered what amounted to a cameo – appearing on his program as a guest to represent unemployed young people. Her journalism career formally began at the Pacifica Radio station in New York – WBAI. In 1996 she cofounded Democracy Now! The War and Peace Report. 'We went from nine stations to today over 1,500 public television and radio stations around the country and around the world,' she told the DC/DOX audience. 'And translated into Spanish, our headlines every day on hundreds of stations in Latin America and Europe, in the United States, because it is critical that we break down as many barriers as we can.' Lessin – who along with Carl Deal earned an Oscar nomination for the 2008 documentary feature Trouble the Water – contributed to Goodman's reporting in 2000 at the Republican National Convention in Philadelphia, where Pres. George H.W. Bush was nominated to run for a second term. 'No sooner did I show up than someone put a lanyard around my neck, a press credential, and a camera in my hand. And I was off chasing Amy. And we actually wanted to call this film Chasing Amy, but the title was taken,' Lessin joked. 'In the film… you might remember George Bush Sr. coming down the stairs with Barbara [Bush] and Amy stops him. And the question she asks is, 'What do you say to people who call you a war criminal for the Gulf War?' …I captured it except I looked at my camera as Amy's having this exchange, and I realized the camera mic was overridden by a mic that I had put on top and we were getting no audio. And so they had this exchange and then Bush walks away, and I have to tell Amy there's no audio. And without hesitating, she said, 'Well, let's do it again.'' Lessin continued, 'She went down the hall and we went around and then [Bush] came up and then down [the stairs] again and [Amy] asked him the same question. He answered it the same way.' Lessin said the anecdote illustrates Goodan's 'focus and her persistence, and she's not going to get a little technical glitch in the way of reporting the truth. And she also was really kind to me, and I saw that kindness reflected in the work she did with her team. I saw it in the footage that she shared with us. I saw it every day.' Democracy Now! is completely funded by viewers, listeners, and foundations and doesn't accept corporate or government money or advertising. Goodman has reported in the field from Nigeria where she investigated Chevron's alleged complicity in the brutal suppression of protests by local people impacted by the company's oil exploration. She reported from Haiti, Peru, and in 1997 risked her life to report from East Timor, where Indonesian troops opened fire on Timorese, killing 270 people. Goodman and a journalism colleague writing for The New Yorker were beaten by gun-toting Indonesian soldiers (their weapons, as she pointed out, supplied by the U.S.). Today, she has become not just admired and respected but beloved by an audience that gravitates to her moral compass, which points toward truth to be uncovered where many news outlets fail to look – in the streets, with the people. 'It's that global audience hungry for authentic voices, not your typical pundits who know so little about so much, explaining the world to us and getting it so wrong,' Goodman noted. 'That's how the corporate media covers issues. They go right away to the politicians. But what pushes them [politicians]? What changes their minds? What is the reason that they pass bills? It is that engine of grassroots activism that is the true story of history that is so often untold, and it is our job in the media to put that on the record.' In the film, Democracy Now!'s Nermeen Shaikh says it's about widening the frame of new coverage to center those kept at the margins or ignored by traditional media. Referring to groups often cropped out by the largest and most lucrative media entities, Goodman commented, 'I do think that those who care about war and peace, those who care about human rights, about inequality, those who care about the environment, about LGBTQ issues, about racial justice, economic justice are not a fringe minority, not even a silent majority, but the silenced majority — silenced by the corporate media — which is why we have to [report] the facts.' As the moderator of the panel, I asked Goodman if she considered herself an unlikely rock star of journalism. She wouldn't bite on that inquiry, but producer Karen Ranucci spoke to the Goodman effect. 'When I walk down the street with Amy, people are stopping her all the time, thanking her,' Ranucci shared. 'At all the protests or whatever she's filming, people are coming up and thanking. And that's such an odd thing to thank a journalist and it's for showing up and it's love. They call her 'Amy,' and it's like this affection. So, for me, it is really thrilling to feel that coming from the public, they're so appreciative.' Ranucci added, 'As far as myself being a producer, yes, we wanted to make this for the general public to turn people onto Democracy Now! for them to understand why independent media is critical in a democracy.' As tanks threaten to symbolically crush American democracy in an unprecedented display of militarism and authoritarian-style politics in the capital, Goodman and Democracy Now! can be counted on to document not just that telegenic spectacle, but the heart of resistance in the streets, across America. Deal said he was struck by how different the approach of Goodman and Democracy Now! is to covering stories of this magnitude after he watched CNN report on the ICE protests in Los Angeles. 'They had three reporters on the ground in the middle of these protests, and they were describing what was happening and then they'd go to a studio interview, and they didn't talk to a single person who was out there, and you had no idea why people were there,' Deal said. 'It was like a big a-ha thing of you need to go to this school of Amy Goodman. It really did help me understand… having seen Amy and watched Amy and sat with her for so many months, how important it is to listen, to let people say why they're doing what they're doing and to understand it. The whole film for us was in dialogue with the world we're living in today.' Best of Deadline 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery 2025 TV Cancellations: Photo Gallery 2025-26 Awards Season Calendar: Dates For Tonys, Emmys, Oscars & More
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
UF's DeSantis-aligned board chair backed a star president and lost. Now what?
The University of Florida is staying the course — and so too, for now, is Mori Hosseini. That's the message Gov. Ron DeSantis sent this week when he reappointed Hosseini — a strong-willed and politically formidable Volusia County real estate magnate — as chairman of UF's board of trustees, even after prominent conservatives called for his resignation over the failed effort to install Santa J. Ono as UF's next president. The reappointment injects fresh certainty into an volatile moment for Florida's flagship university, which remains without a permanent president and with no clear plan for finding one after the state university system's Board of Governors voted 10-6 last Tuesday to reject Ono's nomination. At a UF board meeting last Thursday — just two days after Ono's candidacy was torpedoed — Hosseini read a prepared statement later blasted out through the university's social media accounts. He defended the search process and called Ono's rejection 'deeply disappointing,' but urged the board and the broader university community to 'move forward with strength, purpose, and an unshakable belief in UF's future — with or without Mori Hosseini.' A week later, that future remains murky. Interim President Kent Fuchs has previously said he does not plan to extend his contract beyond its July 31 expiration. As of Thursday, UF has not announced any contingency plan or next steps for restarting the presidential search — raising questions about how the university will navigate a pivotal budgetary and academic planning stretch without a permanent leader in place, as well as how its influential board chairman will be able to regain his footing and continue his mission to make UF the top-ranking state school after losing a battle with Florida's ideological purists. The rejection of Ono — a three-time university president and the sitting president of the University of Michigan — came as a shock to many in academia. Hosseini, along with the rest of the UF board, had framed their poaching of Ono as a signal of the university's rising national stature. UF has long aspired to surpass Michigan in U.S. News & World Report's public university rankings, where Michigan currently holds the No. 3 spot; UF sits at No. 7. Hosseini, for his part, has not hidden his ambitions to raise UF's national standing vis-à-vis rankings. The board chair proudly declared in December that he was 'laser-focused' on the rankings climb, pulling language from a recent New York Times article that suggested former President Ben Sasse's resignation that summer had to do with a disagreement with Hosseini over rankings. Under Sasse, UF lost its heralded No. 5 title. For Hosseini, losing out on Ono is also potentially bruising on a personal level. He once lamented in a Tampa Bay Times op-ed that his eldest daughter refused to consider any Florida university and instead enrolled at — and graduated from — the University of Michigan. In his remarks on Thursday, Hosseini's frustration over Ono's ouster was palpable. 'We believe Dr. Ono was uniquely qualified to lead this University at this moment,' Hosseini said. 'The symbolism and substance of a sitting president of a university as prestigious as the University of Michigan choosing to come to the University of Florida should not be lost.' For critics of Ono's appointment this was a concerted victory. Christopher Rufo, a New College of Florida trustee who celebrated Ono's rejection as 'another scalp on the wall,' and on Friday urged Hosseini to resign as UF's board chairman, calling him prestige-obsessed and 'delusional' for backing an 'ultra-leftwing ideologue' to lead the state's flagship university. But those on the Board of Governors who voted against Ono pointed to what they saw as a lack of conviction and honesty, pointing out his wishy-washy reversal on diversity and climate change initiatives, as well as his delayed response to antisemitism and pro-Palestinian encampments that sprung up on campus under his watch at Michigan. By the end of last Tuesday's grueling three-hour interview, the board's view was clear: Ono wasn't the right ideological fit for Florida. Scott Yenor, a Boise State University political science professor and leading conservative critic of higher education, faulted UF's board for prioritizing prestige over ideology, calling their enthusiasm for Ono a sign of the state's continued 'obsession' with elite validation — a mismatch with Florida's new political mission for public universities. He called Ono a 'confirmation convert' who had softened his left-leaning edges to win over Florida's conservative academic leaders. Within the Board of Governors — which Hosseini once chaired — several current members appeared to challenge not only Ono's unanimous recommendation by UF trustees, but Hosseini's influence. Hosseini, visibly frustrated, called the push to derail Ono 'heartbreaking' and accused fellow board members of trying to 'take somebody down' for political sport. The episode more broadly sets the stage for future clashes between Hosseini and those who opposed Ono — including members of the Board of Governors — who effectively challenged the trustees' unanimous pick and, by extension, Hosseini's judgment and authority. Aubrey Jewett, a political science professor at University of Central Florida, said the public nature of the breakdown has created awkward crosscurrents for Republican-aligned power players who are normally in lockstep. 'It was a pretty unusual situation to have such a high-profile conflict between people who supposedly are all representing the same party and ideology and all beholden to the same governor, DeSantis, and yet they came up with quite different conclusions on the suitability of Ono,' Jewett said. 'It's a slap in the face to the UF board to have come to an agreement unanimously and then have the state board overturn them.' Jewett said he suspects Hosseini is not only frustrated but personally insulted by the vote and the implications it carried. 'Personally, you feel like, 'we're supposed to all be on the same team, right? I'm a conservative Republican who's given a ton of money and golf machines to DeSantis. And now we get this group that's calling into question our judgment and suggesting somehow that we would install a liberal or progressive who would work against those ideas. It's insulting on a personal level, I'm sure.' 'I'm sure he is pretty disappointed and ticked about what happened,' Jewett added. 'It's a lot of work to see undone.' Yet DeSantis' reappointment of Hosseini — made public Monday — signaled that the governor is standing by one of his closest allies. Their relationship runs deep; Hosseini lent his private jet to the DeSantis' 2024 presidential campaign and helped bankroll a golf simulator at the governor's mansion. But Hosseini's now-precarious standing with other prominent Republicans underscore the growing fissures within the party over UF's leadership. He's been a major donor to Republican politicians like U.S. Senator Rick Scott, who publicly condemned Ono's nomination and criticized UF's search team. Now, as UF's de facto leader, Hosseini faces the twin challenge of winning back conservative confidence while trying to restart a presidential search that's become a national cautionary tale. UF may struggle to find a qualified leader after Ono's bid embarrassingly collapsed on a national stage. Moreover, at least two executive search firms have sworn off working for Florida universities because of the ordeal, The Chronicle of Higher Education reported Friday. And given that the UF board's composition is staying intact, Yenor said 'it's not clear that a conservative would want to come.'
