
'We need to go back to the streets': A new era of HIV activism
Sisonke Msimang was a vocal critic of the Aids denialism of the Mbeki era, supporting the Treatment Action Campaign in what became a landmark legal victory in 2002 that secured access to lifesaving treatment for HIV-positive pregnant women that stopped them from infecting their babies.
She is one of 29 health rights activists featured in the Health and Human Rights Oral History Project, which launched in late March, just as the world scrambles to count the costs of the Trump administration's drastic cuts to funding HIV programmes and research.
This time, the fight is different - the government needs to cough up an estimated R2.82 billion for this financial year to sustain its fight against the virus. Those who were around for SA's last HIV battle think it is time to get back to basics.
"So, the US funding cuts happened, and I was looking for the noise! I was asking the other day, where are my people? Why aren't they shouting?" says Sisonke Msimang, the South African writer and political scientist.
Msimang was a vocal critic of the Aids denialism of the Mbeki era, supporting the health advocacy organisation Treatment Action Campaign (TAC) in what became a landmark legal victory in 2002 that secured access to lifesaving treatment for HIV-positive pregnant women that stopped them from infecting their babies.
She is also one of 29 health rights activists featured in the Health and Human Rights Oral History Project, which launched in late March just as the world scrambles to count the costs - in dollars and in lives - of the Trump administration's drastic cuts to funding of HIV programmes and research studies.
In South Africa, more than half of HIV and TB projects funded by the US government's Aids fund, Pepfar, closed down at the end of February or are in the process of closing down. The programmes that are still running, only have budgets until the end of September (the end of the US financial year).
The health department commissioned a modelling study from Wits University's HE²RO project to tally the fallout if - as they expect - all US government funding for health projects ends on 30 September.
The study found that, without replacing that funding, there will be between 150 000 and 295 000 new HIV infections - in addition to about 130 000 annual new HIV infections - in the next four years. It also shows up to a 38% increase in Aids-related deaths.
The preprint of the study's results will be published this week.
"We need to see urgency from the government to reverse this. We're not seeing that," warns Sasha Stevenson, who heads up the social justice organisation, Section27.
The cost to contain those numbers? R2.82 billion.
Activists say getting the government to find the money might require a back-to-basics approach to HIV advocacy.
"I was thinking it's time for noise again," says Msimang, who now lives in Perth, Australia. "We must meet this moment, pushing for full funding of health by our own government."
Looking back to move forward
The series of video testimonies that capture three decades of health activism from around the world might provide a blueprint for the next wave of activism.
The interviews are housed by the Institute on Inequalities in Global Health at the University of Southern California (USC), which has partnered with Wits University's school of public health, history department and Section27. The idea for the archive came as a series of global, community-led health justice projects funded by the Open Society Foundation were coming to an end.
"We saw that the projects represented so much that needed to be preserved, to be able to learn from and to be inspired," Jonathan Cohen, director of policy engagement at the Global Health Institute, told Bhekisisa.
WATCH | Vuyiseka Dubula's testimony
Activism in South Africa occupies prominent space in the archive, with testimonies from Msimang and Vuyiseka Dubula, a central figure in the TAC's leadership.
The archive also includes a powerful account from Umunyana Rugege, former executive director of Section27, on how the Constitution has served as a tool to hold the government accountable for people's health rights.
Grants can be ended, speakers at the oral history project's online launch in late March argued, but history can't be erased.
Making history
Stevenson said the archive gives unique insights into the back stories of the many layers of activism that eventually bring about change.
In the "essential medicines" case in the late 1990s and early 2000s, public protests drew attention to the need for HIV treatment around the world. In South Africa, those protests took on the form of scientists, activists, lawyers and the news media coming together to take on a government that refused to provide HIV-positive people with lifesaving treatment, arguing poverty and not HIV caused Aids and that antiretroviral drugs were poisonous.
That activism resulted in a landmark legal victory in 2002 that gave HIV-positive pregnant women access to free preventive treatment to stop them from transmitting the virus to their babies. The ruling paved the way for the state to provide free antiretroviral therapy to people with HIV in 2004, which increased life expectancy and slowed down the spread of HIV.
Twenty years later, the Life Esidimeni judicial inquiry - or inquest - into the deaths of 141 mental health patients who died in state care found there was enough evidence for then-Gauteng Health MEC, Qedani Mhlangu, and her former head of mental health in the department, Makgabo Manamela, to potentially be criminally prosecuted for deaths of at least nine patients.
It was largely due to the activism of organisations such as Section27 and the South African Depression and Anxiety Group that Mhlangu and the government were ultimately held accountable.
In her video testimony for the archive, Msimang says activism can be highly political or deeply personal. She says telling these stories for the archive helps turn key moments into history.
WATCH | Sisonke Msimang: Activism can be political or deeply personal
But only if journalists, activists and researchers tap into it. That point, says Noor Nieftagodien, head of the History Workshop at Wits University, is "amplified by the current circumstances of Trumpism, where… there is an urgent need for more of this kind of human rights activism".
The universal lesson from the archive, he says, is that results come from organising and mobilising people around a cause.
Holding the state accountable
"In 20 years, we'll look back to what happened in 2025, and people will want to know a fuller story about how people responded," says Fatima Hassan, the founder and director of the Health Justice Initiative (HJI). The human rights organisation has been pushing for people to have lifesaving medicines.
She says the oral histories give courage, but in some ways, activism today is more complicated.
In South Africa, activists now have to deal with a government of national unity (GNU) instead of a single party with one ideology. The GNU is fragile, and Hassan says HJI and other civil society organisations have sent a number of letters to the government seeking clarity and progress on plans to address the consequences of the US funding cuts, but they are not hearing back.
So far, the health department says it has commissioned the modelling study previously mentioned and obtained data from Pepfar, which it used to calculate the amount needed to pay the salaries of people employed by Pepfar-funded projects. However, it hasn't yet secured any of the R2.82 billion it needs for this financial year.
The department's deputy director general for the country's National Health Insurance scheme, who led the calculations, told Bhekisisa on 15 April that the department is in the process of applying for emergency funding from the treasury, via section 16 of the Public Finance Management Act.
But Hassan finds the department's slow progress to this point frustrating.
She says the business community should also have stepped forward by now to acknowledge the scale of the crisis. "History will judge those with money and resources that didn't come forward and say they're trying to mitigate the impact."
But, she argues, some of the "noise" of activism was initially stifled; people speaking for organisations affected by cuts wouldn't go public - or did so anonymously - so as not to poke the bear (Trump) and lose their contract.
Other things have changed, too.
Mark Heywood, a founding member of the TAC, now serving on its board, says activism is debased because activists get sucked into policy processes.
WATCH | Umunyana Rugege's testimony
For example, he says, the South African National Aids Council (Sanac) is an institutionalised collaboration between civil society and the government in South Africa, relying on mutual trust to function.
For Cohen, the close working relationship between activists and the government in South Africa is a sign of activist success - it usually means that governments have started fulfilling their health obligations and need civil society to help them.
Back to basics?
The funding crisis is a reminder that the need to hold the state accountable never ends, activists say.
Msimang says working with the state is both essential and seductive. "Where activists find themselves now is [that] we became friends with government, helping to expand the capacity of the state to reach out to communities."
She says the shutdown of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), through which more than half of Pepfar funding for HIV and TB projects to South Africa was channelled, has exposed how civil society has not been pushing hard enough for South Africa to pay for its own health services. Meanwhile, activism itself had been funded through USAID. Now that sector is hobbled too, and unable to fully mount the activism that is needed now.
Mluleki Zazini, the director of the National Association of People Living with HIV and Aids, says maybe it's time to go back to the basics.
"I think we need to go back to the streets so that we can voice our needs," says Zazini, who also chairs the civil society forum within Sanac. "We criticise them in boardrooms … maybe they've forgotten that we used to mobilise people to get action."
Bhekisisa' s Mia Malan was the moderator for the online launch of the archive.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The Coastal Health District offering free HIV testing
SAVANNAH, Ga. (WSAV) – The Coastal Health District HIV Prevention Program is partnering with Walgreens to hold free HIV testing events to commemorate National HIV Testing Day (NHTD). This year's NHTD events will be held on Friday, June 27, at these Walgreens locations in Chatham and Glynn counties: 2109 E. Victory Drive, Savannah: 10 a.m. – 5 p.m. 11509 Abercorn Street, Savannah: 10 a.m. – 3 p.m. 700 E. DeRenne Avenue, Savannah: 10 a.m. – 5 p.m. 4210 Augusta Road, Garden City: 10 a.m. – 3 p.m. 4575 Altama Avenue, Brunswick: 10 a.m. – 3 p.m. According to the Coastal Health District, Georgia has some of the highest HIV rates in the country. Many people living with HIV may not be aware of their status. There are many effective ways to prevent HIV or, if you are infected, to treat HIV so you can live a healthy and full life. But the first step is to know your status. As a reminder, HIV testing is always free by appointment at all health departments in Bryan, Camden, Chatham, Effingham, Glynn, Liberty, Long, and McIntosh counties. Free self-test kits are also available and can be used at home. For more information on the Coastal Health District, click here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Black Kids Are 5 Times More Likely to Get Severe COVID. Now Vaccines Are Being Cut.
The Trump administration has declared an end to COVID-19 vaccine recommendations for children and pregnant people, and health experts have a warning: This is a threat to Black communities. U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who oversees the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, announced the decision on May 27 and said vaccine guidance would now focus solely on adults over 65 and those with high-risk conditions, effective immediately. By June 3, Dr. Lakshmi Panagiotakopoulos stepped down from her role helping lead the agency's COVID-19 vaccine advisory group, saying she could no longer support decisions that put pregnant people and children at risk. Before the changes took effect, COVID-19 vaccines were recommended for anyone 6 months and older. Kennedy did not offer a scientific rationale for the new recommendations. For Black Americans, the policy shifts are more than bureaucratic changes, according to Oni Blackstock, a physician and founder of Health Justice, a racial and health equity consulting practice. 'These new guidelines don't exist in a vacuum,' she said. 'Limiting booster eligibility risks further compromising the already fragile health status of many Black Americans.' Black Americans are 1.5 times more likely to contract COVID-19 and four times more likely to be hospitalized, according to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Research from the Center for Primary Care at Harvard Medical School found that Black children are more than five times as likely to die from the virus. An estimated 165,000 to 220,000 Black Americans have died from COVID-19, according to data compiled by the APM Research Lab. According to a 2023 report from the U.S. Census Bureau, nearly 32% of Black Americans who contracted COVID-19 also experienced long COVID symptoms. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration cited a lack of evidence that annual boosters are needed by healthy, low-risk adults. However, Blackstock, a primary care and HIV physician, said the policy change marks a significant departure from past years when vaccines were broadly recommended and federally funded. 'This contradicts recent CDC data showing that the 2024–2025 boosters benefit people 18 years and older, especially early after vaccination,' she added. Blackstock noted that many Black Americans already struggle with health care access due to systemic barriers like a lack of insurance and residential segregation. 'When these combine with more restrictive vaccine guidelines,' she said, 'it becomes even harder for Black Americans to get boosters and worsens existing health disparities.' These barriers also deepen historic mistrust in health care, said Jerry Abraham, a family and community medicine physician. Abraham, who is director of the CDU-KEDREN Mobile Street Medicine program in Los Angeles, said the history of medical racism and continued treatment disparities fuel skepticism toward public health. Even as boosters offer real benefits, he said, many remain hesitant or disconnected from resources that ensure protection. 'If children and pregnant women are no longer recommended for vaccination, will grandma still go to CVS and get it herself?' he said. Abraham added that in an era where health care professionals can no longer trust the updated guidelines from federal agencies, it's deeply concerning and a reminder that Black communities must once again rely on themselves. For answers about what comes next, read on. Aisha Harris, a family medicine physician in Flint, Michigan, told Capital B that limiting access to COVID-19 vaccines for healthy adults exposes high-risk groups like seniors and those who are immunocompromised. 'Reduced protection in healthy people increases their risk of being infected by COVID and of being a carrier,' said Harris, who owns the direct primary care clinic Harris Family Medicine. 'When more people are contagious, with or without symptoms, they have a higher chance of infecting others around them, including in their household or those they are taking care of as caregivers.' She warned this undermines community immunity. Without widespread coverage, even eligible groups face elevated risks. FDA officials say the new approach mirrors those taken by Australia and several European nations that limit vaccines to older or high-risk adults. But some critics argue the shift ignores U.S. disparities and bypasses standard CDC procedures. You can pay out of pocket, but it could cost up to $200. If the CDC doesn't recommend vaccines, Abraham said health plans are much less likely to cover them, since insurers typically follow CDC guidance. Yes, COVID-19 vaccines have already undergone extensive clinical trials before being authorized for public use. The FDA says it will require longer clinical trials before approving updated shots for healthy kids and adults, with studies lasting at least six months, likely delaying fall approvals. The CDC's vaccine advisory committee is expected to vote on fall vaccine recommendations in late June, but it's unclear how much influence it will have over the newly announced changes. High-risk conditions for COVID-19 vaccine eligibility generally include chronic kidney disease, chronic lung diseases, asthma, diabetes, immunocompromised states (from cancer treatment, organ transplant, HIV, etc.), heart conditions, Alzheimer's disease, obesity, sickle cell disease, smoking, and stroke or cerebrovascular disease. Yes. Studies show COVID-19 vaccination, including boosters, reduces the risk of severe illness and may lower the chances of developing long COVID symptoms after infection. The post Black Kids Are 5 Times More Likely to Get Severe COVID. Now Vaccines Are Being Cut. appeared first on Capital B News.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Republican rep indicates he will be 'a no' on Trump-backed rescissions measure if AIDS relief cut
As the Trump administration and congressional Republicans eye passage of a rescission proposal, Rep. Don Bacon, a Nebraska Republican who doesn't shy away from bucking President Donald Trump, has indicated that he won't support it if it guts an AIDS relief program. The president's proposed clawbacks include millions of dollars pertaining to global health programs. "I told them I'm a no," the congressman said of the measure, according to the New York Times. "I just want to make sure we're funding the medicine. We want to prevent AIDS, it's a noble program, it's George Bush's legacy. I put the marker out there; we'll see." In a post on X last week, Bacon described "The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR)" as "a noble program that America can be proud of funding." But in a statement to Fox News Digital on Monday, Bacon said, "If PEPFAR is gutted, I am a no. But I'm told that only parts of the program will be cut. I'll need more details," The rescission package "proposes to rescind $400 million from the PEPFAR program, which is appropriated $4.4 billion annually to provide bilateral assistance to countries, many of which do not support American interests, such as South Africa," a White House official told Fox News on Monday. Read On The Fox News App House Republicans Push For Spending Cancellations As Elon Musk And Conservatives Demand Deeper Budget Cuts "The $400 million rescission eliminates wasteful programming that does not serve the American taxpayer," the official said, while maintaining that the "package does NOT rescind any life-saving assistance and in fact, continues to make available billions of resources to implement life-saving medicine, medical services, as well costs necessary to deliver these services to maintain all current individuals on treatment." Bacon was the only House Republican to vote against a measure to rename the Gulf of Mexico the Gulf of America. "I thought it was dumb. That's what people told me — they said, 'It's so dumb; just vote for it.' That argument didn't work on me," he said, according to the Times. Gop Lawmaker Blasts 'Dumb' Trump Comment On Zelenskyy Despite 'Perfect' Criticism Of Putin House leaders have pressed Bacon to keep more of his views to himself, telling him to, as the congressman put it, "quit kicking President Trump in the nuts," the outlet reported. But the lawmaker indicated that he would only press back when he believes it is needed. "You can't be anti-everything," Bacon noted, according to the outlet. "I like what the president has done on the border, so I have no problem with that." "I'd like to fight for the soul of our party," he said, according to the Times. "I don't want to be the guy who follows the flute player off the cliff. I think that's what's going on right now." Pro-ukraine Gop Rep. Bacon Declares 'Real Republicans Know That Putin's Russia Hates The West And Freedom' Bacon has served in the House of Representatives since article source: Republican rep indicates he will be 'a no' on Trump-backed rescissions measure if AIDS relief cut