CNBC's The China Connection newsletter: U.S. regulatory scrutiny fans Chinese stock delisting fears
A monitor displays Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. signage on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York, U.S., on Wednesday, Jan. 30, 2019.
Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images
This report is from this week's edition of CNBC's The China Connection newsletter, which brings you insights and analysis on what's driving the world's second-largest economy. Each week, we'll explore the biggest business stories in China, give a lowdown on market moves and help you set up for the week ahead. Like what you see? You can subscribe here. The big story
Increased regulatory scrutiny of U.S.-listed Chinese firms has stoked delisting worries, threatening the decade-plus run of Alibaba and other Chinese companies on U.S. exchanges.
A broad 'everything is on the table' comment from U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on April 9 has reignited fears on Wall Street that hundreds of billions of dollars may flow out in a forced delisting of Chinese stocks from U.S. exchanges.
Thanks to the latest version of a law made in 2020, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission can prompt a Chinese stock delisting if the company is deemed noncompliant with audit requests for two straight years. Paul Atkins, sworn on Monday as SEC chairman, indicated during a hearing last month that he would uphold that process for scrutinizing U.S.-listed Chinese stocks.
The continuing analyst and press coverage of Bessent's comments reflects how uncertainty is broadening out — even warranting a related piece in the New York Post tabloid.
'In an extreme scenario, U.S. investors may have to liquidate US$800bn worth of holdings in Chinese stocks if they are banned from investing in Chinese securities,' Goldman Sachs said in a note last week.
They predicted Chinese investors might also need to sell their U.S. financial assets, with an estimated worth of roughly $370 billion in stocks and $1.3 trillion in bonds.
KraneShares, which runs a popular $5.9 billion U.S. exchange-traded fund tracking Chinese stocks, told its clients last week that delisting of Chinese companies was a 'low probability.' Back during an earlier round of delisting fears in 2022, the company started shifting the bulk of its KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) holdings to the Hong Kong-traded shares of U.S.-listed Chinese companies. KraneShares reiterated taking that approach in the 'unlikely event' that Chinese companies are delisted in the U.S. Read More Microsoft tops Apple as world's most valuable public company
Alibaba listed additional shares in Hong Kong in 2019, five years after a massive initial public offering in New York. While Baidu, JD.com and several other Chinese companies have also offered shares in Hong Kong in recent years, Temu parent PDD Holdings notably has yet to do so.
PDD did not immediately respond to a CNBC request for comment. The e-commerce company moved its headquarters from China to Ireland in 2023. A White House memo
The backdrop here is U.S. President Donald Trump's 'America First Investment Policy' memo published in late February. It called for a review of U.S. investments in Chinese entities, as well as renewed scrutiny of publicly traded Chinese companies — both through commonly used listing structures and through the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act that became law in 2020.
The memo is a broad mandate for many government agencies, including the SEC, 'to enforce existing rules and create new rules' relating to U.S.-listed Chinese companies, said Winston Ma, adjunct professor at NYU School of Law.
Ma, author of 'The Digital War: How China's Tech Power Shapes the Future of AI, Blockchain and Cyberspace,' said that if regulators act now, they could use a fiscal reporting period ending April 2025 as year one, meaning that year two would end in 2026, fulfilling the 'two year' compliance period necessary for delisting. 'Delisting could come faster than you think,' he said.
The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, which falls under the SEC's oversight, said in 2022 that it was able to inspect audit records of potentially affected Chinese companies. For now, 'there are no issuers at risk of having their securities subject to a trading prohibition' under the law, according to the SEC website. Read More Jamie Dimon says India optimism is 'completely justified'
The SEC did not immediately respond to CNBC's request for comment, while the PCAOB declined to comment. Political momentum
The House Select Committee on China late last week sent letters to JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon and Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan demanding the investment banks pull out from underwriting the Hong Kong IPO of Chinese battery giant Contemporary Amperex Technology. JPMorgan declined to comment, while Bank of America did not respond.
Trump's recent spat with Harvard also means more scrutiny on how U.S. universities' endowment funds have made billions from their Chinese investments.
The House committee previously cited research from U.S. advocacy group Future Union on how U.S. pension funds and university endowments have invested in China.
'Atkins is under pressure to take an assertive stand against decades of duplicitous double standards,' Future Union Executive Director Andrew King said in an email. He is also managing partner at San Francisco-based venture capital firm Bastille.
'The delisting is overdue, and China overplayed its hand by stonewalling regulators and flaunting cases like Luckin Coffee fraud with inaction,' he said. 'Now they are going to lose their path to secondary funding without oversight.'
China's securities regulator has sought to increase its oversight of domestic companies listing overseas, especially following ride-hailing company Didi's U.S. IPO in 2021 and its subsequent delisting. Under the Chinese securities regulator's new process, few large Chinese companies have been able to list in the U.S. in recent months, including Chinese milk tea company Chagee just last week.
As the protracted delay over a legally binding TikTok divestiture has shown, the worries over delisting could be exaggerated — at least in the near term. Investors, however, may choose to vote with their feet first. Top TV picks on CNBC Need to know
The White House is signaling a potential easing in China tensions. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told investors Tuesday he expected the U.S.-China trade war to de-escalate in the 'very near future,' a person in the room told CNBC. The comments came a day after China vowed retaliation against countries that follow U.S. calls to isolate Beijing.
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang visited China and met several prominent figures. Huang had an official meeting with Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng in Beijing Thursday— and reportedly DeepSeek's Liang Wenfeng. The latest Pew Research survey of Americans found a softening in negative views on China.
Local governments in China mull bitcoin sales to shore up empty coffers. That consideration was reported by Reuters on Thursday. China has banned cryptocurrencies for years, and cash-strapped local authorities have been sitting on the seized assets. Unemployment among Chinese youths aged 16 to 24 fell in March to 16.5%, down from 16.9% in February, according to official data. In the markets
Chinese and Hong Kong stocks were trading in positive territory Wednesday as investors cheered the potential easing of U.S.-China trade tensions.
Mainland China's CSI 300 rose 0.15% while Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index — which includes several major Chinese companies — climbed 2.16% as of 11:00 a.m. local time.
Since the start of this year, the CSI 300 has lost 3.7% while the Hang Seng Index has risen 9.67%.
The benchmark 10-year Chinese government bond yield edged up slightly to 1.660%.
The offshore Chinese yuan strengthened marginally to 7.3049 against the greenback. Stock chart icon
The performance of the Shanghai Composite over the past year. Coming up
April 27 – 30: China's parliament standing committee to meet and review a private sector support law
April 30: Official Purchasing Managers' Index for April; Caixin Manufacturing PMI
May 1 – 5: China's Labor Day holiday
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
12 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
How Does the UK's New Tax Policy Affect Where the Ultra Wealthy Live?
The end of the non-dom rule is sending millionaire Britons to new cities in the EU, but is it really a wealth exodus? (Source: Bloomberg)
Associated Press
21 minutes ago
- Associated Press
ROSEN, RECOGNIZED INVESTOR COUNSEL, Encourages Red Cat Holdings, Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - June 8, 2025) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces the filing of a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of securities of Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: RCAT) between March 18, 2022 and January 15, 2025, both dates inclusive (the 'Class Period'). A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than July 22, 2025. SO WHAT: If you purchased Red Cat securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Red Cat class action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than July 22, 2025. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company at the time. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers. DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) the Salt Lake City Facility's production capacity, and Red Cat's progress in developing the same, was overstated; (2) the overall value of the SRR Contract was overstated; and (3) as a result, defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages. To join the Red Cat class action, go to call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff. Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: on Twitter: or on Facebook: Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. ------------------------------- Contact Information: Laurence Rosen, Esq. Phillip Kim, Esq. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. 275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor New York, NY 10016 Tel: (212) 686-1060 Toll Free: (866) 767-3653 Fax: (212) 202-3827 [email protected] To view the source version of this press release, please visit
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
California's fishermen are struggling. Is this tiny catch their last big chance?
From the cockpit of his 63-foot fishing boat in Monterey Bay, Porter McHenry is on the hunt for what might be the last lucrative catch in California — though competitors and tariffs are closing in on his profit. To spot his prey, he scrutinizes the behavior of seabirds, the patterns on his sonar screens and especially the tell-tale movements of the boats around him. His tiny target: California market squid, sometimes called Monterey squid, each 6 inches and 10 arms of opalescent white and purple. With salmon season closed for three years in a row and Dungeness crab season dramatically shortened, squid is now the only species in the state that still holds the promise of a massive payday for struggling fishermen. 'A good crab season, you could probably gross $3… $400,000,' said McHenry. 'Squid here, you could gross well over a million.' But when squid season opened in late April, there was no mad dash for the first catch. Instead, with Chinese tariffs threatening the price, a standoff ensued. Fishermen refused to fish, and their local processors, who buy and freeze their catch for transport, refused to offer a high price in an industry reliant on exports. The vast majority of all squid caught in the U.S. is shipped abroad, with the largest portion caught in California and sent to China. Last year, China purchased some $113 million worth of squid from the U.S. — 64% of the exported product. That makes today's tariffs particularly ominous for squid fishermen. 'It's just the uncertainty,' said McHenry. During a 2018 trade dispute, China temporarily stopped buying U.S. squid altogether. Even after the U.S. and China agreed in early May to substantially lower their tariffs on each other, the price of squid stayed down 25% from last year. There's an ongoing effort to sell more market squid to local buyers, bypassing tariffs and expanding the niche market for squid that stays in California. Michelin-starred restaurants like San Francisco's Kin Khao are already on board, offering diners some of the freshest, most tender squid caught in the U.S. But China remains the No. 1 customer, and this year, fishermen like McHenry could face even fiercer competition in an industry that is cutthroat even in times of economic peace. 'If I went and caught five tons of squid tonight, by the morning, everybody in the industry would know that I'd caught five tons of squid, and probably where I caught it,' said McHenry. 'The amount of espionage is incredible.' The games begin Squid season starts with a rumor. Around April, the cephalapods return to their favored spawning grounds in Monterey Bay. Until then, fishermen like McHenry wait impatiently, passing the time by working on their boats until they catch wind of a recreational fisherman who has spotted a shoal, or a halibut fisherman reports that his catch have mouths full of squid guts. News travels fast in this small community. Last year, just 72 boats brought in the season's 126 million pounds of squid. And getting into the squid fleet is its own competition: With a fixed number of permits, each with a one-time cost of about $900,000, the only way in is to wait until someone else retires or sells a coveted permit. But 72 can feel like a lot when a few dozen 60-foot vessels are crisscrossing paths as they furiously search for fortune. On April 23, after weeks of anticipation, word spread that a fisherman in Monterey found 50 tons of squid. That should have marked the opening of the season. Instead, when he brought his catch to a processor expecting $1,200 per ton, they offered $800, citing concern over the impact of tariffs. The rest of the fleet decided not to fish until a price was settled. But solidarity is fragile when every day spent waiting is a day of income lost. On April 29, local processors offered several of the fishermen in Monterey $900 per ton, which they accepted. Squid season had begun. Dropping an anchor Rather than broadcast their deal, the Monterey fishermen seized the advantage. They used their head start to deploy one of the most powerful moves in squid fishing: dropping an anchor. A dropped anchor is effectively a force field — no other boat is supposed to fish within an eighth of a nautical mile of an anchored boat. 'That's where the competitive nature of the squid fishery comes in,' said Frank Sousa, McHenry's fishing partner. 'You've got to be kind of aggressive in trying to find the right spot, and guys will try to push other people off their eighths, or try to get as much room as they can get in the best area.' Sometimes, a massive shoal of squid picks a spot to spawn and doesn't move. When that happens, the first one to drop anchor in the right place can keep their boat there for weeks, hauling up hundreds of tons from their untouchable supply. The cavernous belly of McHenry's boat can hold 120,000 pounds of squid, enough to fill four semitrucks at the dock. When he's found squid, he unrolls the massive seine net bolted to his deck, unspooling it like a giant web of thread, then uses it to encircle up to 80,000 pounds of prey, cinching it at the bottom to trap them. Almost every squid fisherman also employs a smaller secondary vessel, called a light boat, which shines bright lights into the water at night, attracting squid to their capture like moths to a flame. But squid are unpredictable. Just as easily as they settle on a spot, they can drift away, out of your eighth and into the next boat's. 'It's a chess game with a moving board,' said Sousa. Looking for clues Out on the ocean, sometimes for days on end, fishermen pass the time tuned into the same radio frequencies and talking on group calls. Even if a captain finds squid miles away from the nearest boat, chatty workers at the unloading docks and processing facilities make it nearly impossible to keep a secret. 'Everybody's got, you know, spies out,' said McHenry. There are clues to the squid's whereabouts on board, as well. McHenry's $14,000 sonar system scans the water around and below him for sea life. 'These are little pieces of squid,' he said, pointing to red, Rorschach-like blotches on a blue sonar screen. 'Four or five ton, maybe.' Tall and always dressed for a chilly night out on the ocean, McHenry is a second-generation Half Moon Bay fisherman, and he uses his historic knowledge of preferred spawning grounds and knowledge of habitat features like fathom curves to track his targets. 'The fishermen probably know more than any scientist about when the squid move in and how long they stay on the spawning beds,' said William Gilly, a professor at Stanford who has studied the physiology and behavior of squid for more than 40 years, catching thousands of market squid specimens in Monterey Bay. A big appetite For as long as he's been researching them, Gilly has been ordering squid at restaurants. Most of the time when he sees 'Monterey squid' on the menu, 'it's blatantly obvious that it's not Monterey squid … they'll be a quarter-inch thick, and Monterey squid mantles don't get that thick,' he said, referring to its body. Once, when Gilly was conducting research in La Paz, Mexico, he ordered what the restaurant assured him was market squid from California. Doubtful, he brought the dish back to his lab and tested the squid's DNA; it was Chinese. China is both a source and destination for squid because it processes more squid than any other country. When McHenry started squid fishing with his father in 2001, they earned $250 per ton. Today, thanks to buyers in China, he can make five times that. 'Asian countries have always liked this smaller squid because it's similar to what they have,' said Diane Pleschner-Steele, who spent nearly two decades as the executive director of the nonprofit California Wetfish Producers Association. The original squid fishermen in Monterey Bay were Chinese immigrants, pushed out of other, more profitable fisheries in the late 1800s, and fishing by night with torches to attract their catch. While countries halfway across the globe are clamoring for California's squid, Pleschner-Steele said it's been more of a challenge to find buyers close to home. And even if the U.S. appetite for market squid were stronger, there are few processing facilities here, and the U.S. can't compete with China's low cost of labor. Ultimately, it can be cheaper to send squid on a 12,000-mile round trip than to process it domestically. The irony is calamari rings consumed in the U.S. may have been caught here, shipped to China for processing, then shipped back. Keeping it local Still, the domestic market for squid has increased in recent years. At Japanese restaurant Rintaro, on the northern edge of San Francisco's Mission district, chef and owner Sylvan Mishima Brackett buys unprocessed squid wholesale from Monterey Fish Market at Pier 33 after it's trucked from Monterey. Brackett honed his instinct for ingredients while training in Japan and serving as the creative director at Berkeley's Chez Panisse. He likes the fresh, clean flavor of the market squid, and has made the small, delicate species the star of one of Rintaro's signature dishes, ika no nuta, for which it is poached, marinated in vegetable oil, and mixed with mustardy miso sauce and vegetables. With no cost for pre-processing, he said the squid is 'really cheap.' On his most recent order sheet, it cost $6.95 a pound, the same price as Manila clams from Washington and far less than the halibut that cost him $12 per pound. But it takes work. 'Cleaning squid is not, you know, super fun, but you just do it,' Brackett said. Five pounds of squid takes his team about 20 minutes to clean, debeak, and prepare for cooking. Brackett's outlook is rare. The most recent Fisheries of the United States Report, compiled by NOAA, estimated that 75%-90% of all seafood consumed in the U.S. is imported, the flip side of the roughly 80% of seafood caught in the U.S. that is exported. That's disappointing to some fishermen like Sousa. 'I wish that a lot of our seafood here was utilized more here,' said Sousa. 'But, you know, what it comes down to is we're trying to survive and support our families, and if shipping overseas is our best option, then I'm 100% okay with it.' Down in Monterey Bay on June 4, he and McHenry unloaded a small batch of squid through a tube at the dock. It hadn't been a great start to the season, but they found a decent spot around 3 a.m., and by the time the sun had warmed the walkways of the wharf, they'd caught 6 tons. This year's squid are bigger than last year's, about 10 per pound, which McHenry said signals a healthy ocean — and the potential for better fishing in the coming weeks. 'We've got that ever optimistic hope that it will get good,' he said.
