logo
Pork and chicken are key to easing US trade tensions: Steenhuisen

Pork and chicken are key to easing US trade tensions: Steenhuisen

News24a day ago

South Africa, struggling to reset relations with the US, is willing to give way on so-called phytosanitary requirements for poultry-meat imports, but fears an impasse with its second-biggest trading partner over pork shipments.
Washington's trade complaints against Pretoria — which have triggered a threat of a 30% tariff on imports from Africa's largest economy — span a range of industries from vehicles to citrus. The meat trade has also been a sticking point, with US producers viewing Pretoria's animal-health requirements as a constraint on doing business, according to Agriculture Minister John Steenhuisen.
The health rules and excise duty charged on pork and chicken from the US 'are the two key focus areas' in easing trade tensions, he said in an interview at a meat conference in Somerset West near Cape Town on Thursday.
Differences between the two nations extend beyond trade — President Donald Trump has spread the false conspiracy theory that white farmers have been subjected to a genocide in South Africa and the authorities have been seizing their land. There have been no official land seizures in South Africa since apartheid ended in 1994.
The US has also criticized South Africa for taking Israel to an international court over its war with Hamas in Gaza and its relations with American foes, including Iran.
To assuage concerns over its restrictions on poultry imports from countries that have avian influenza outbreaks, South Africa plans to allow the US to determine when it should halt and resume exports.
'What we've done is build a new system of self-ban, self-lift,' Steenhuisen said. 'We hope that this will be seen as a removal of what they've regarded as a trade barrier.'
The minister considered it unlikely the two countries will resolve their difference over South Africa's requirements that glands be removed from pork meat prior to it being sold in the country — a measure intended to avoid the spread of the highly contagious porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome disease.
'They regard that as a trade barrier because they say that that process renders their meat uncompetitive,' Steenhuisen said. 'It's going to be one of those impasses because we cannot compromise our local pork sector.'
South Africa is one of a handful of nations that are free of the disease, and if it were detected it would increase pork production costs as pigs would have to be vaccinated against it, said Peter Evans, the chief executive officer of the South African Pork Producers' Organisation.
'It's a disease we want to keep out of the country,' he said in an interview. The US is 'irked by it. They perceive it as a hindrance to large-scale exports.'
The US also complains that tariffs of about 62% on poultry imports, along with the health requirements, have stopped it from filling its annual quotas of about 70,000 tons of chicken meat that it is permitted to ship into South Africa, according to the agriculture minister.
That levy, along with those imposed on cars and farm equipment, are higher than those charged on products from the European Union, with which South Africa has a trade agreement. The US has, until recently, given a range of South African goods duty-free to its markets under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA).
'Their argument is that we are giving you AGOA and all of these things, but you are giving our competitors a better deal,' Steenhuisen said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israelis calm as Iranian retaliatory attacks loom
Israelis calm as Iranian retaliatory attacks loom

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Israelis calm as Iranian retaliatory attacks loom

By Alexander Cornwell TEL AVIV (Reuters) -The streets of Tel Aviv were calm on Friday morning, even as the country's leaders warned the public to brace for Iranian retaliation after Israel launched a widescale attack on Iran. The military closed schools nationwide and banned public gatherings, cancelling the annual Tel Aviv Pride parade, which normally attracts tens of thousands of revellers to the city. "We've already been in this scenario twice," said 31-year-old Uri, sitting on a bench outside a supermarket, questioning whether to open his restaurant or have to throw out the day's food. "I don't really care, honestly. I'll just go to a shelter and I'll be okay," he said, when asked whether he had any concerns about his own safety. Iran fired hundreds of drones and ballistic missiles at Israel in two attacks last year in response to Israeli strikes, rattling the Israeli public but causing only modest damage. Tehran has vowed retaliation for Israel's early morning attack on Friday on Iranian military and nuclear facilities that killed several top commanders. Israel said it was working to intercept 100 drones that were launched by Iran, but had not reached Israel. The Israeli public has been told to be prepared to spend long hours in bomb shelters, with the government warning that it would be carrying out a prolonged attack against its arch foe. Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel's longest-serving prime minister, invoked the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust during World War Two to justify his decision to attack Iran, framing the strikes as a decisive step to protect Israel from a future existential threat. Over the past year, Israel has openly clashed with Tehran, firing rocket salvos deep into Iran. After militant group Hamas launched a surprise attack on Israeli communities in October 2023, Israel dismantled many of Iran's allies, including Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon. "Iran? That's the first place we need to attack if you ask me," said Aviv, 38, adding he hoped the strikes would lead to the release of 53 mostly Israeli hostages held by Hamas in Gaza. In Gaza, which has been reduced to a wasteland by Israel's devastating campaign, some hoped that the strike on Iran might pave the way for an end to the war in the coastal enclave. "We hope that this time the Iranians will push for a comprehensive solution," said Abu Abdallah, a Palestinian businessman displaced to the south of Gaza. STOCKING UP Across Israel, supermarkets and some cafes remained open, although some businesses chose to keep their doors shuttered. Shoppers stocked up on food and bottled water, prompting long queues at checkouts. "My fridge is empty," said 41-year-old Noha as she made her way to a supermarket. The mother of two said she was due to celebrate their wedding anniversary with her husband at a hotel. Noha said she was worried about the severity of any potential retaliatory strike, adding that people were asking whether the bomb shelters in their apartment buildings would be strong enough to withstand it, or if it might be safer to seek refuge underground. The strike on Iran comes as Netanyahu's right-wing coalition has faced growing domestic and international pressure over the Gaza war, now in its 21st month. "The way the government is handling things is horrible," Noha said, adding that she condemned the decision to strike Iran, fearing that it will put the country in further danger. "Because I feel like we have reached the top end of the scale, like this is serious this time. It feels like okay, they have nothing to lose," she said. In Jerusalem, others expressed support for the decision. "I am very happy for this. We were waiting for this," said 66-year-old Oral Liral. "Am Yisrael Chai. We are strong. We will be here. It's our country," she said, using a Hebrew expression of perseverance that means "the people of Israel live".

Trump gives off strongman pageantry with military parade we're paying for
Trump gives off strongman pageantry with military parade we're paying for

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump gives off strongman pageantry with military parade we're paying for

We've all had that friend. The one who drops a year's salary on a one-day wedding with monogrammed cocktail ice and fireworks timed to the couple's first kiss. You smile politely, wear the overpriced bridesmaid dress, and pretend the champagne tower wasn't funded with a 401(k) withdrawal. Now imagine that wedding, but with tanks. Because on June 14, the 250th birthday of the U.S. Army and, coincidentally, the 79th birthday of President Donald Trump, we're all invited to his "Big Fat Military Parade." It's unnecessary. It's over the top. It's wildly expensive. And yes — we're paying for it. Letters: House budget provision exempts executive branch from following court orders So in the spirit of love, liberty, and judgment, here are 6 ways Trump's parade is like your friend's over-the-top gauche wedding: Your friend spent $100,000 on a single day while still renting a studio apartment and paying 23.99% interest on her credit card balance. This parade? Same energy. It's projected to cost up to $45 million dollars, but just like any good wedding, this one will likely blow the budget. We're talking tens of millions of dollars for tanks, jets, porta-potties, and housing the troops. Let's hope Rudy Giuliani's appearance fee these days is just a bottle of scotch and partial immunity. That's money that could actually help our troops and veterans with housing, healthcare, and food assistance. Instead they're being paraded around like GI Joe action figures at an America First themed birthday party with enough red, white, and blue smoke to make a bald eagle develop asthma. Trump's argument that tanks rolling down Pennsylvania Avenue is a demonstration of 'patriotism' is about as believable as your friend's horse-drawn carriage, champagne wall and a third outfit change demonstrating her love and commitment to Chad. This parade is about creating an Instagram thirst-trap but with tanks. We're about to get an epic amount of social media content set to a Lee Greenwood soundtrack. Just like a destination wedding, this isn't something most people asked for — and yet, we're the ones footing the bill. Americans struggling with rent, insulin costs, and groceries now get to sponsor the equivalent to a wedding in Bali they never RSVPed to — except instead of frequent flyer miles, they're paying for it in federal deficit. We didn't ask for this. We didn't budget for this. And we certainly don't need a military-themed engagement party for a man who avoided military service and now wants to wear patriotism like a rented tux. After the wedding? Broken wine glasses, credit card debt, and a drunk cousin crying by the photo booth. After the parade? Damaged streets, a gross misuse of public funds, and a fresh round of international side-eye. And like any bad wedding, the rest of us are left with a hangover and haunting memories of forced applause. Some brides plan weddings that are less about a joyful union and more about going viral. She's not inspired by love; she's copying Kim Kardashian's flower wall and Marie Antoinette's budget. Trump's parade Pinterest board seems to be emulating an aesthetic that is part Putin, part Kim Jong Un, with a little young Mussolini mustache twirl. The whole thing screams 'strongman pageantry,' except instead of tiaras and couture, we're flexing tanks and fighter jets. Trump's June 14 parade isn't about the country. It's about control, image, and the illusion of strength — just like your friend's over the top wedding was less about commitment and more about drone footage of the Amalfi Coast. Letters: Making Canada 51st state is a great idea, but not for reason Trump thinks Let's stop pretending this is normal. A true celebration of America doesn't need tanks. Just like a good wedding doesn't need a fog machine, a 17 piece big band or a commemorative hashtag. If this really were a wedding? I'd give it six months. Kristin Brey is the "My Take" columnist for the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: True celebration of America doesn't need tanks or flyovers | Opinion

Senate Republicans seethe as blue-state lawmakers dig in
Senate Republicans seethe as blue-state lawmakers dig in

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Senate Republicans seethe as blue-state lawmakers dig in

Senate Republicans want to slash — or in some cases kill — the $40,000 state and local tax deduction cap that the House added to President Donald Trump's megabill — but avoiding a protracted battle may require them to bend. Senators are cutting deals on Trump's campaign priorities as they craft their version of the massive tax and spending plan, delaying a foreign 'revenge' tax and changing other divisive provisions the House passed. The so-called SALT deduction is one of the last sticking points: Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, told Semafor that the details of how his chamber treats the issue might look blank in its first draft because of the lingering bicameral disagreement. House Republicans say they won't back off their position, which would quadruple the current limit on SALT deduction. The main problem for those House members? Some senators' olive branch to the House reminds them of Michael Corleone's infamous offer: Nothing. 'Zero is a good number' for a SALT cap, Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., told Semafor. It's an epic clash between the disparate wings of the Republican Party – all over a tax break that disproportionately aids wealthy people in blue states. On one side is a Senate GOP almost entirely representing lower-cost states that is tired of kowtowing to the House; on the other side is a handful of House members whose electoral wins gave Republicans the majority, and the ability to even write a party-line tax bill. Several Senate Republicans said the chamber wouldn't totally zero out the SALT deduction, but they are contemplating making a big cut to the House language. That could lead to a protracted disagreement between the two chambers — and stall Trump's megabill well past the GOP's self-imposed July 4 deadline. 'Unless there's at least $40,000 of SALT in the bill, it can't pass the House,' said Rep. Nick Lalota, R-N.Y. 'Those who are thinking pragmatically understand that reality.' 'We all think it's a rather unrealistic demand that the few members in the House are driving such a huge deficit creator,' shot back Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis. LaLota flipped his vote Thursday on legislation clawing back federal spending on public media and foreign aid. Asked how leaders got him to 'yes,' he replied that 'PBS and NPR will live on … and I expect my constituents will be quite pleased when they get $40,000 worth of SALT.' Several lawmakers are playing peacemaker between the chambers; Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Finance Chair Mike Crapo were expected to address the matter with Trump directly at a White House meeting on Thursday. Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla., is negotiating directly with Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., one of the most hardline SALT Republicans. And House Ways and Means Chair Jason Smith told Semafor Thursday that he is urging Senate Republicans to proceed with caution. 'They know what's necessary by what we passed out of the House,' Smith said. 'SALT, it's not an issue to them other than they want to have a bill on the president's desk.' 'We passed a very reasonable compromise in the House, and I just tell the Senate to thread the needle lightly,' Smith added. There are 'at least five' House Republicans who see $40,000 as a dealbreaker, LaLota said, who included Lawler and Rep. Tom Kean of New Jersey in that camp. He added that they are 'on a roadshow of sorts, making sure that folks … understand how resolved we are about $40,000 SALT.' While some Senate conservatives would prefer to blow up the SALT cap completely, they will likely have to finesse the language to avoid steamrolling the House. The increase to the SALT cap is estimated to cost roughly $350 billion over 10 years, and slimming it down could satisfy fiscal hawks. Senators are considering potentially imposing a more strict income cap on the deduction to wring more savings out of the bill. 'I'm certainly willing to try to pass a bill that the House is going to struggle with, but ultimately pass,' said Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas. Battleground-seat House Republicans, meanwhile, are so far out on a limb for SALT that backing down now could severely harm their election chances. Republicans from states like California, New York and New Jersey form the majority-making component of the House GOP. 'No Republican senator likes the SALT; raising the SALT cap. I don't either,' House Speaker Mike Johnson said on the 'Ruthless' podcast Thursday. 'But I told [senators], 'The reality is, our majority runs through states like California and New York.'' Most GOP senators understand that dynamic — to a point. Republican senators are also tired of swallowing whatever can pass the House, a dynamic that has repeated itself on several recent must-pass pieces of legislation. And conservatives vowed to pursue the most savings they can out of the bill. A House priority that almost no GOP senators support is a prime target. 'It's an easy way to go in and grab money and cut the deficit, which: Don't disagree. The problem we have is, we still got to get the votes over there,' Mullin told reporters. The general message from most Republicans is that blue-state House colleagues may have to climb down on SALT — at least a little. As Rep. Byron Donalds, R-Fla., put it: 'Everybody's having to accept stuff they don't like in this bill.' 'I think it's actually going to be cut down a lot over here [in the Senate] and we move on,' Donalds said. 'For my SALT colleagues: What matters more, SALT or small business taxes going up?' Republicans are closing in on a deal. But the last pieces are always the hardest, and the weird SALT dance has the potential to snarl things even more at the last minute — especially after Speaker Johnson labored to get some of the same pro-SALT members to codify spending cuts. It's hard to see the Senate passing something that doesn't slim down the House's SALT language. We've even heard they might put a lowball number in their legislation to throw a scare into the House. But in the end we think they'll back-channel a compromise. It doesn't seem like anyone wants a lengthy bicameral conference that delays the bill even longer. The so-called revenge tax is likely to be delayed in the final bill. LaLota met with Senate leadership staff this week to discuss SALT, according to POLITICO.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store