logo
With Elon Musk out of the picture – what happens to DOGE now?

With Elon Musk out of the picture – what happens to DOGE now?

Independent5 days ago

On Wednesday evening, Elon Musk announced on X that his time as part of the Department of Government Efficiency was officially at an end.
As a Special Government Employee, he is restricted to serving 130 days – a period which was due to finish this week.
However, as well as thanking Donald Trump for the opportunity to 'reduce wasteful spending,' Musk wrote that: 'The @ DOGE mission will only strengthen over time as it becomes a way of life throughout the government.'
So what will happen to the controversial government agency now that its de-facto chief is stepping down? Here's what we know:
Will DOGE continue?
The agency's crusade to slash wasteful government spending isn't going anywhere, according to White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt.
Musk and Trump previously characterized DOGE, formerly the U.S. Digital Service, as 'tech support' to end 'waste, fraud and abuse.' DOGE is not so much an agency as an idea, according to the White House.
Employees within federal agencies are doing its work and, despite media perception, Musk has simply functioned as an adviser.
Speaking to reporters on Thursday, Leavitt said that although Musk was leaving the agency the 'entire cabinet' were still committed to DOGE's core values
'That's why they were working hand in hand with Elon Musk, and they'll continue to work with the respective DOGE employees who have onboarded as political appointees at all of these agencies,' she said: 'So surely, the mission of DOGE will continue.'
So who will lead DOGE and will Musk's staffers stay?
Leavitt reiterated at Thursday's briefing that the DOGE leaders 'are each and every member of the President's Cabinet and the President himself,' who were all 'wholeheartedly committed to cutting waste, fraud and abuse from our government.'
Questions about a specific leader of DOGE had swirled following the additional departure of Musk's right-hand man at the agency, Steve Davis.
Davis had been a key leader at the agency and handled day-to-day operations including hiring and firing, staffers told The Wall Street Journal, adding that he had helped guide the work of the DOGE engineers working across various agencies.
In addition, The Journal reported that much of the work done by DOGE will now be undertaken by the Office of Management and Budget – which is headed up by director Russell Vought. Vought has worked closely alongside Musk since 2024 and the two have driven the administration's vision of slashing the federal workforce and reducing spending.
As far as Musk's underlings were concerned, Leavitt highlighted that many were now 'political appointees and employees of our government.'
'To the best of my knowledge, all of them intend to stay and continue this important work,' she said.
What has the reaction been to the departure?
While Musk did receive an outpouring of gratitude from fans on his own social media site, who hailed him as 'courageous' and 'a true American patriot,' others were less impressed.
'Finally rooting out waste and abuse,' former Democratic vice presidential candidate Tim Walz joked in response to the news, with Democratic rep. Jasmine Crockett echoing the sentiment.
'Elon came to Washington thinking he could run the government like one of his companies—firing people left and right, gutting essential services, and tearing this s*** up from the ground up,' she wrote. 'It's time for a full investigation into the damage he's caused and for the truth to come to light.'
'Elon Musk in government is completely unprecedented, but there has never been a single person, certainly not a single non-presidential person, who has been as utterly and pointlessly destructive as Elon Musk,' Robert Weissman, co-executive director of Public Citizen, a progressive consumer rights advocacy group, previously told The Independent.
'He has commercial motivations,' he said, 'but primarily he's been engaged in an authoritarian wrecking project with no actual purpose, but really deadly impact.'
Trump and the White House did not specifically respond to Musk's announcement, but a spokesperson directed The Independent to Leavitt's comments at Thursday's press briefing.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Steel industry welcomes 25% tariffs but warns ‘uncertainty remains'
Steel industry welcomes 25% tariffs but warns ‘uncertainty remains'

South Wales Argus

time37 minutes ago

  • South Wales Argus

Steel industry welcomes 25% tariffs but warns ‘uncertainty remains'

The US President has decided to 'provide different treatment' to the UK after a deal that was struck between Washington and London last month, as he doubled tariffs on imports from elsewhere to 50%. Levies will remain at 25% for imports of steel from the UK into America, however Britain could still be subject to the higher 50% rate from July, or the quotas in the agreement could come into force, effectively eradicating the tax. The 50% tariff rate for imports of steel and aluminium from other nations is due to come into force from 12.01am Washington DC time on Wednesday, which is shortly after 5am in the UK. The Government said on Tuesday night they were 'pleased' that the industry 'will not be subject to these additional tariffs'. Gareth Stace, the director general of UK Steel, said that Mr Trump's decision is a 'welcome pause'. He added: 'Continued 25% tariffs will benefit shipments already on the water that we were concerned would fall under a tax hike. 'However, uncertainty remains over timings and final tariff rates, and now US customers will be dubious over whether they should even risk making UK orders. 'The US and UK must urgently turn the May deal into reality to remove the tariffs completely.' Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer's trade deal with the US, struck last month, included relief on the steel and aluminium tariffs, but it has not yet come into force. Officials have been working to try and finalise the details of the agreement. According to the text of the order, published by a White House X account on Tuesday, Mr Trump has 'further determined that it is necessary and appropriate to allow for the implementation of the U.S.-UK Economic Prosperity Deal of May 8, 2025 (EPD), and to accordingly provide different treatment, as described below, for imports of steel and aluminium articles, and their derivatives, from the United Kingdom'. 🚨 @POTUS just signed the order raising tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to 50%. Here is the text of the order: 1. On January 11, 2018, the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) transmitted to me a report on the Secretary's investigation into the effect of imports of steel… — Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) June 3, 2025 The order later says that rates will for now stay at 25% and adds: 'On or after July 9, 2025, the Secretary may adjust the applicable rates of duty and construct import quotas for steel and aluminium consistent with the terms of the EPD, or he may increase the applicable rates of duty to 50 percent if he determines that the United Kingdom has not complied with relevant aspects of the EPD'. The Government has pledged to keep working with the US to get the agreement up and running, and the 25% tariff rate 'removed'. A spokesperson said: 'The UK was the first country to secure a trade deal with the US earlier this month and we remain committed to protecting British business and jobs across key sectors, including steel as part of our Plan for Change. 'We're pleased that as a result of our agreement with the US, UK steel will not be subject to these additional tariffs. We will continue to work with the US to implement our agreement, which will see the 25% US tariffs on steel removed.' The Conservatives have said that Labour's 'botched negotiations have left businesses in limbo'. Shadow business and trade secretary Andrew Griffith said: 'Keir Starmer stood in front of the nation and insisted to the British public that his Labour government had achieved a trade deal with the US – and now one month later our industries face a fresh tariffs blow. 'So once again it seems that Keir Starmer's promise was just like the rest: hollow and broken. Labour's botched negotiations have left businesses in limbo and this country simply cannot afford their continuing failure.' Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds met White House trade representative Jamieson Greer in Paris on Tuesday. According to the Department for Business and Trade, Mr Reynolds and Mr Greer discussed a desire to implement the deal struck between London and Washington as soon as possible, and committed to working closely to make it happen. The general terms for the agreement between the UK and US were published in May when the deal was announced, and outline the intended plans. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt was asked if there was a text of the full deal ready to be released, and told reporters on Tuesday: 'There 's most definitely text with this deal, there is language that this side has seen. 'You'll have to ask the UK Parliament why they haven't seen it from their own Government, I obviously can't answer that question.'

Committee calls on Government to ban NDAs to tackle misogyny in music industry
Committee calls on Government to ban NDAs to tackle misogyny in music industry

South Wales Argus

time37 minutes ago

  • South Wales Argus

Committee calls on Government to ban NDAs to tackle misogyny in music industry

A report by the WEC found 'misogyny remains deeply rooted in the music industry' and 'meaningful change requires both cultural and structural reform', as the committee also called for changes to the Equality Act and the Employment Rights Bill to ensure freelancers are fully protected. Speaking about her experience in the report, which was published on Wednesday, singer Celeste told the committee: 'What is most prevalent in the daily experience of being female in the music industry is this idea of an ingrained bias, or even an unconscious, sexist bias.' Singer Celeste said an 'unconscious, sexist bias' was prevalent in the music industry (Ian West/PA) The WEC called for improved protections and reporting mechanisms, after finding that sexual harassment remains pervasive in the industry, with reporting rates low due to fear of retaliation, and added that women in music still faced unequal pay and ageism. It urged the Government to bring forward proposals to prohibit the use of NDAs and other forms of confidentiality agreements in cases involving sexual abuse, sexual harassment or sexual misconduct, bullying or harassment, and discrimination relating to a protected characteristic. The WEC said doing so would 'demonstrate decisive leadership and ensure that the silencing of victims of abuse will no longer be tolerated'. It also underlined the 'inadequacy' of legal protections for freelance musicians, saying the Equality Act did not 'clearly extend' to freelancers and those working under temporary conditions such as 'depping', which means substituting for another musician. The report also highlighted challenges faced by parents and carers in the music industry, saying freelancers in particular struggled with 'inadequate maternity support and the high cost of childcare'. The WEC called on the Government to amend the Employment Rights Bill to align maternity allowance with statutory maternity pay to allow self-employed women 'greater flexibility during maternity leave and remove unfairness within the system'. Chairwoman of the WEC and Labour MP Sarah Owen said: 'One year on from the Women and Equalities Committee's report on misogyny in music, significant issues within the industry remain unaddressed and appear to be on repeat. 'WEC's 2024 report warned women pursuing careers in music face endemic misogyny and discrimination in a sector dominated by self-employment. 'It laid bare a boys' club where sexual harassment and abuse is common, and the non-reporting of such incidents is high. 'The misuse of NDAs is a major concern. 'NDAs are frequently used to silence victims of harassment and abuse, often under coercive circumstances. 'The report presents evidence of the psychological toll these agreements take and the power imbalances that make them particularly harmful in the music industry. 'Women working in music feel rightly frustrated at the lack of support from the Government in tackling the challenges they face. 'Female artists should not encounter limitations in opportunity or have to work far harder to get the recognition their ability and talent merits. 'We urge ministers to accept the recommendations in our new report and help set the music industry on a path of lasting change free from discrimination and harassment.' The report also called on the Government to support the Creative Industries Independent Standards Authority, a new independent body designed to address misconduct across the creative sectors, by 'providing it with the legal assurances it needs to undertake its crucial work'. The UK Government has been contacted for comment.

Oregon high school star reveals shocking message from officials after protesting trans athletes
Oregon high school star reveals shocking message from officials after protesting trans athletes

Daily Mail​

time42 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Oregon high school star reveals shocking message from officials after protesting trans athletes

Oregon track star Alexa Anderson has revealed she was ordered away from the high jump podium by angry officials after she protested the inclusion of a trans athlete. Anderson and fellow competitor Reese Eckard were filmed refusing to step onto the podium during the medal ceremony, in an apparent protest of a fifth-place finisher who is reportedly transgender. Rather than taking their spots on the podium, footage obtained by Fox News showed the girls turning their backs to the crowd before being ushered away from the ceremony by an official. Now, Anderson has revealed that the official was apparently deeply unimpressed by the gesture. She told Fox: 'We stepped off the podium in protest and, as you can see, the official kind of told us "hey, go over there, if you're not going to participate, get out of the photos". 'They asked us to move away from the medal stand, so when they took the photos, we weren't even in it at all.' Anderson had finished third in the competition while fellow protestor Eckard had just clinched fourth place. Anderson continued: 'It's unfair because biological males and biological females compete at such different levels that letting a biological male into our competition is taking up space and opportunities from all these hardworking women. 'The girl in ninth who should have came in eighth and had that podium spot taken away from her, as well as many others.' She added: 'This was my first time competing against a transgender individual and the first public stand I have taken in this issue. 'But I have privately supported all the other girls who have done the same.' Anderson insisted at the time, in a separate interview with Fox, that she was not trying to stir hatred towards the trans community. 'We didn't refuse to stand on the podium out of hate,' she said. 'We did it because someone has to say this isn't right. 'In order to protect the integrity and fairness of girls sports we must stand up for what is right.' Daily Mail has reached out to the Oregon School Activities Association for comment on the controversy. Oregon is one of several states challenging President Donald Trump's 'Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports' executive order, which threatens to deny federal funding to rogue governments. The American Medical Association and American Psychiatric Association have both stated that gender is a spectrum and not a binary structure, as the White House argued in its January 20 executive order 'defending women from gender ideology.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store