American academic returning to U.S. after Thai charges dropped
Thai Crown Prince Maha Vajiralongkorn, seen here as crown prince in 2016. An American academic has been permitted to lave the country after prosecutors decided against prosecuting him on charges of insulting the monarchy. File Photo by Rungroj Yongrit/European Pressphoto Agency
May 30 (UPI) -- An American academic facing up to 15 years in a Thai prison on allegations of insulting the monarchy has been permitted to leave the country, according to a nonprofit that advocates for Americans imprisoned abroad.
Global Reach told UPI in an emailed statement that Paul Chambers was permitted to leave Thailand on Thursday after resolving what it called "false" lese-majeste charges.
"I am relieved that this situation has been resolved," Chambers said in a statement.
"I have always had great respect for the Thai royal family, and anyone who knows me understands that these charges were always based on false allegations by unnamed parties in the military."
Chambers, a Thai studies scholar and lecturer at Thailand's Naresuan University, was arrested and charged by Thai authorities in April following a complaint filed against him by the military over an October online post promoting a webinar that he was to participate in.
The English-language post was published on the website of Singapore's ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute. The academic webinar was on Thai studies, and Chambers, a leading expert on the Thai military and Southeast Asian politics, gave a talk about the Thai military.
Chambers was not involved in the post's creation.
According to Thai Lawyers for Human Rights, Chambers was allowed to leave the country after the Attorney General's Office announced Wednesday that prosecutors decided not to continue the case against the American.
Prosecutors made the decision in early May, but the attorney general needed to affirm the decision.
Chambers was originally detained April 9, but was later permitted to leave police custody and was required to wear an ankle monitor and surrender his U.S. passport and work visa, Global Reach said.
Following his arrest, the U.S. State Department issued a statement saying it was monitoring Chambers' situation while condemning the controversial lese-majeste law.
Kieran Ramsey, who worked with Chambers on behalf of Global Reach, praised the United States for its response to the case, saying, "This was one of the best responses I have ever seen from the U.S. government."
According to Global Reach, Chambers will return to Oklahoma to see his family and will work from the United States.
More than 270 people have been detained, prosecuted and punished under the lese-majeste laws since 2020, according to an expert panel from United Nations that said such laws "have no place in a democratic country."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
an hour ago
Poland holds a pivotal presidential runoff influenced by Trump, the far right and the war in Ukraine
WARSAW, Poland -- Poland is set to hold a presidential runoff election on Sunday between two candidates offering starkly different visions for the country's future. The winner will succeed President Andrzej Duda, a conservative who is finishing his second and final term. The outcome will determine whether Poland embraces a nationalist populist trajectory or pivots more fully toward liberal, pro-European policies. An exit poll by Ipsos will be released when polls close on Sunday at 9 p.m. local time, with a margin of error of plus or minus 2 percentage points. Final results are expected Monday. Whoever wins can be expected to either help or hinder the agenda of the centrist government of Prime Minister Donald Tusk thanks to the presidential power to veto laws. The vote comes amid heightened regional tensions driven by Russia's war in neighboring Ukraine, security concerns across Europe and internal debates about the rule of law. It follows a first round on May 18, in which Warsaw Mayor Rafał Trzaskowski won more than 31% of the vote and Karol Nawrocki, a conservative historian, earned nearly 30%. Eleven other candidates were eliminated. Opinion polls show the two men running neck and neck. Other factors add to the unpredictability. Nawrocki did much better in the first round than surveys had predicted, indicating that his strength was underestimated. On the other hand, large numbers of Poles abroad have registered to vote in the second round, which could help Trzaskowski. Nawrocki is a 42-year-old historian who was tapped as by the national conservative Law and Justice party despite a lack of political experience or party membership. But this is seen as acting in his favor, as the party, which governed for 2015-2023, seeks to refresh its image before a parliamentary election in 2027. Nawrocki's supporters describe him as the embodiment of traditional, patriotic Polish values. They believe U.S. President Donald Trump's support for him will strengthen Poland's ties with the United States and make the country safer. Trzaskowski, 53, is Warsaw's mayor and a close ally of Tusk. A deputy leader of Civic Platform, a pro-European Union party, he has been prominent in national politics for years. This is his second presidential bid after narrowly losing to Duda in 2020. Supporters credit him with modernizing Warsaw through infrastructure, public transit expansion and cultural investments. He is widely seen as pragmatic and focused on strengthening ties with other European nations. Nawrocki recently received a boost from Trump and other U.S. conservatives, who see the Polish election as part of a global battle between liberal and populist right-wing forces. His campaign has echoed themes popular on the American right, including skepticism toward EU bureaucracy and emphasis on Christian identity. His supporters feel that Trzaskowski, with his pro-EU views, would hand over control of key Polish issues to Paris and Berlin. Nawrocki also has been endorsed by the Trump administration and conservative Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán. Many European centrists are rooting for Trzaskowski, seeing in him someone who would defend democracy as it faces pressure from authoritarian forces across the globe. He has received the support of new centrist Romanian President Nicusor Dan — who recently defeated a far-right nationalist. Nawrocki has faced a number of scandals over the past months, but it's not clear that they are hurting him. In fact, they might have the opposite effect. Many right-wing voters don't believe the allegations and accuse the media of using its power to hurt him, creating what appears to be a rallying effect around him. Nawrocki himself has acknowledged that he took part in an organized brawl including football hooligans in 2009. A former boxer, he said he has taken part in various forms of 'noble male battle' in his life. Polish media have also reported on his connections to gangsters and the world of prostitution. Tusk accused Law and Justice party leader Jarosław Kaczynski of tapping Nawrocki despite questions about his past. 'You knew about everything, Jarosław. About the connections with the gangsters, about 'fixing girls,'" Tusk wrote on X. "The entire responsibility for this catastrophe falls on you!' 1. Security and war in Ukraine: With Russia's war in Ukraine in its fourth year, Polish voters are acutely attuned to issues of regional security. Both candidates support continued backing for Ukraine, but to different degrees. Nawrocki believes that Ukraine should never join NATO, while Trzaskowski believes Ukraine should be allowed to join one day when the current war is over. 2. Rule of law and democracy: Trzaskowski has pledged to support the restoration of judicial independence and repair relations with the EU, which viewed changes by Law and Justice as anti-democratic. Tusk has tried to change some legislation, but has faced resistance from the the outgoing president, Duda. Nawrocki, while less outspoken than his party patrons, is seen as likely to preserve Law and Justice's changes that politicized the courts. 3. Women's rights: Abortion remains a divisive issue in Poland, especially after a near-total ban was imposed under Law and Justice. Trzaskowski supports loosening restrictions and has backed proposals to legalize abortion up to 12 weeks. Nawrocki opposes any liberalization and has campaigned as a defender of traditional conservative values.
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Why can't Democrats take advantage of all this obvious Republican failure?
Why can't Democrats take advantage of all this obvious Republican failure? | Opinion President Donald Trump and Republicans are failing at running the country. So why are Democrats so bad at responding? Show Caption Hide Caption New poll shows Trump with low approval ratings in first 100 days Less than half of Americans approve of President Donald Trump in his first 100 days, a new NPR/PBS News/Marist poll show. I've self-identified as a Democrat since 2008, when I voted for Barack Obama in a mock election in my fifth-grade class. I've voted Democrat in every real election I've participated in since 2016. I agree with the core value of the party, that a strong centralized government that supports social safety nets leads to a better country. Despite this, I've never been registered as a Democrat – probably because I'm further left than the party. I've always said I want the freedom to vote for whoever I want, even though I have never cast a ballot for a Republican or third-party candidate. It wasn't until I moved to New York, a state with closed primary elections, that I even considered affiliating myself with the Democrats. Now, as someone with limited political power in my city's upcoming mayoral race, I've been rethinking my aversion to aligning myself with the party. But if the Democrats want me in their party, something must change. Republicans are failing on a large scale. Where are the Democrats? The Democratic Party is losing the messaging war. It's losing elections. And it's losing the American public – a recent Economist/YouGov poll found that 57% of Americans view the Democratic Party unfavorably. It's not like the Republicans are well-liked, either. That same poll found that 52% of Americans have a negative view of the GOP. The economy shrank during the first quarter due to President Donald Trump's trade war. Anything labeled "diversity, equity and inclusion" is being rooted out by the federal government. Transgender people are losing their rights. People are being deported without due process. It seems like everywhere you turn, there are unconstitutional actions taking place – yet the Democrats aren't fighting back. Opinion: This liberal influencer calls Democrats 'smug, disinterested.' He's right. It is no longer sufficient to be the party of people who aren't Trump, and it has not been for quite some time. The Democrats need to change course now, and there are several instances where they could correct the record. They need to start fighting back against what is objectively one of the worst presidencies in modern politics. Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act should be easy win for Democrats Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act – a 1,116-page policy proposal that includes tax cuts that mostly benefit the wealthy and cuts $1 trillion worth of social safety net programs – is barely getting attention from Democratic leaders. Party leadership should be on television, on social media and in Washington talking about how this bill would add $3.8 trillion to the national debt while harming people who rely on federal programs like Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Democrats should be stoking divisions in the Republican Party to get moderate Republicans to vote against the bill. Opinion: Trump's administration is off the rails because it's unqualified to do the job Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-New York, is doing this already, but on a very small scale. On May 29, the senator railed against the megabill in New York City, saying the budget proposal was 'big in bad ways.' Why isn't Schumer carrying this message across the country, particularly to states where Trump won? Why isn't he sharing these thoughts on Fox News? House Republicans are publicly and gleefully trying to rip insurance coverage and Medicaid help from the poorest Americans while also helping the richest. How are Democrats losing to that? Democrats have a relatability problem Because younger voters are more likely to align with the Democratic Party, you would think its leaders would do more to engage those voters and reflect this reality within the party. Instead, Democrats seem to largely operate on seniority. It's why Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-New York, is not running to be the ranking member on the House Oversight Committee after the death of Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-Virginia, in May. Ocasio-Cortez ran against Connolly, only to lose the position because it was meant to go to a more senior member. In the end, this only hurts Democrats. Sure, experience is important, but so is energy. There are several candidates who could replace Connolly on the committee. If Democrats were ready to win, they'd go with Texas Rep. Jasmine Crockett, an outspoken progressive who knows how to use social media and traditional news outlets to her advantage. If the party were to elevate Crockett to a leadership role, it would show voters like me that they're serious about bringing younger, newer leaders into the fold. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. The Democrats also made an error in going after Democratic National Committee Vice Chair David Hogg, a Gen Z activist who wants the party to have competitive primary elections – something that would require sitting legislators to actually go out and talk to their constituents. Instead of accepting this as a great idea, and one that would give the party a jolt of energy, the DNC has tried to oust Hogg from his position over a procedural error. It's the kind of move that shows the party isn't serious about committing to younger leaders, even though young people play a huge role in getting Democrats elected. Spending money to solve simple problems It appears that the Democrats' biggest issue is messaging. They are supposedly doing something to combat this – but even that is causing controversy. On May 25, The New York Times reported that the Democratic Party had created a $20 million strategic plan to learn how to speak with American men, a group from whom they lost support in the 2024 presidential election. They were immediately – and rightfully – lambasted for this strategy. Research is a necessary tool for political campaigns, and I understand the idea behind the $20 million plan. But it also feels like this is something they could achieve by simply doing what the Trump campaign did: Pay attention to what young men like and go from there. It just seems like the Democratic Party would rather sit around and ask themselves what went wrong instead of changing things ahead of 2026 elections. I want the Democratic Party to be better. I'm just not sure that's what party leaders want. Follow USA TODAY columnist Sara Pequeño on X, formerly Twitter, @sara__pequeno
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Long-term unemployment hits 2-year high as hiring slows amid economic uncertainty
When Jessica Chibuzor-Muko graduated from college a year ago, she figured her degree in cybersecurity – one of the hottest fields – would serve as a ticket to a near-certain job at a good salary. Then she ran into the brick wall known as the 2025 U.S. job market. After more than 3,000 applications, five interviews and zero job offers, her excitement has congealed into something closer to a beaten-down stupor. 'After your get your first 50 rejections, you're running to your mom crying,' says Chibuzor-Muko, who is 22 and lives in Denton, Texas. 'Eventually, you become very numb to it.' Recently, she took a break from the job hunt, got a part-time position as a nurse's notetaker and is considering a new career path – medicine. Need a break? Play the USA TODAY Daily Crossword Puzzle. 'I've always wanted to get a master's,' she said. 'Maybe I should look at medical school.' Chibuzor-Muko is among the 1.7 million Americans who have been out of work six months or longer – the most in more than two years – classifying them as long-term unemployed, the Labor Department's April jobs report showed. Their growing ranks defy the common perception that the job market remains healthy despite the uncertainty spawned by President Donald Trump's sweeping import tariffs. The long-term jobless now make up nearly a quarter of all unemployed workers. That's well below their 45% share during the depths of the Great Recession in 2010 and 43% during the COVID downturn in 2021. But it also marks a two-year high and exceeds the 20% of unemployed workers they comprised in early 2020 just before the health crisis. Economists say that's a concern because long spells of unemployment can affect the course of workers' careers, especially for recent college graduates and other new entrants to the labor market. 'I definitely think there's a stigma to being unemployed for long periods,' said Brad Hershbein, senior economist at the W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. Is the job market good or bad now? It's unusual for so many people to be out of work so long in a seemingly sturdy labor market. Job growth averaged a robust 181,000 in March and April and the unemployment rate is a historically low 4.2%. Friday, Labor is expected to report a solid 150,000 job gains for May, according to estimates by Barclays and Capital Economics. But forecasters largely attribute the rosy figures to business' continued reluctance to lay off workers following pandemic-related labor shortages from 2021 to 2023. Initial claims for unemployment benefits, a reliable gauge of layoffs, unexpectedly surged the week ending May 24 but remain historically low. What is going on with hiring right now? At the same time, companies have pulled back hiring. That trend began more than a year ago as sharp employee pay increases and high interest rates combined with flattening consumer demand to squeeze firms' profits. It intensified this year as Trump's tariffs threatened to reignite inflation, further narrow corporate profit margins and possibly trigger a recession in the months ahead. 'The economy was going to slow regardless' after a post-COVID-19 burst of demand, Hershbein said. "(Tariffs) made the problem worse.' The 5.4 million U.S. hires in March was down from a peak of 6.8 million in November 2021 and 5.8 million in late 2019 before the pandemic. The upshot: While not many people are losing jobs, those who do are struggling to find new roles as they join a slowly widening river of unemployed job seekers who are vying against each other and employed Americans for a limited stock of vacancies. 'Getting back into employment after you've been unemployed is getting increasingly difficult,' said economist Dante DeAntonio of Moody's Analytics. In May, the average number of applications job hunters submitted on LinkedIn was 45% higher than the year ago figure, the networking site says. While companies are replacing employees who leave, 'they're not necessarily adding staff,' said Brandi Britton, an executive director at Robert Half, a recruiting firm. 'Employers are definitely proceeding with caution' amid the uncertainty sparked by trade conflicts. How is the job market for college grads? Unemployed job seekers broadly are paying the price but the hiring chill is especially affecting new entrants to the labor force as well as workers returning after leaving to care for a child or other reasons, Hershbein said. So far this year, the number of 20 to 24-year-olds who are long-term unemployed is up 32% compared to the same period in 2019, versus a 19% rise for similarly idled workers of all ages, Labor Department figures show. During a period of limited hiring and pervasive uncertainty, 'You want people with a track record,' Hershbein said, describing the view of many employers. 'It's just a lot of silence' Chibuzor-Muko, the May 2024 graduate, said she frequently responds to job ads seeking entry-level candidates but companies later reveal they prefer that applicants have three to five years of experience. 'What really is entry level?' she asked. 'I just graduated.' Britton, of Robert Half, said many businesses 'want someone with work experience at an entry-level salary' as they try to conserve cash and minimize risk. And because of the cooling labor market, they generally can get what they want, she said, advising job candidates to 'be adaptive and flexible' and drop demands to work remotely or hybrid if necessary. After she graduated, Chibuzor-Muko said she applied to cybersecurity jobs 'every single day, the second I woke up….I treated it as my job.' But after several months of rejections, her enthusiasm waned, she said, adding she didn't get responses from most employers. This year, Chibuzor-Muko has taken classes online in the hope of qualifying for the more plentiful crop of openings for data analysts. She snared two interviews but no offers. What are the side effects of long-term unemployment? Long-term unemployment can become a self-perpetuating cycle even for experienced workers, Hershbein said, noting some companies believe the skills of long-sidelined job seekers may dull. The dilemma, he said, is amplified for recent graduates who may take the first offer they receive and find themselves overqualified for the job. 'It can have a long-term impact on the money you're able to earn and the companies you're able to work for,' he said. DeAntonio downplayed the concern, saying that while that was a big worry during the Great Recession, today's job market is more resilient and should pick up swiftly after tariff-related uncertainty fades. 'I'd think some of those negative effects will be minimized,' he said. Experienced jobless workers, meanwhile, are also struggling. In mid-May, 1.9 million Americans received ongoing unemployment benefits – indicating they had been laid off – the most since November 2021. 'I had no idea it would take this long' When Kiersten Ortiz-Cole of Houston lost her marketing job at a recruiting agency last August, she figured she would land a new position within a couple of months. Although her firm was chopping workers, its clients were still spending money, seemingly reflecting a stable economy and labor market. 'I had no idea it would take this long,' said Ortiz-Cole, 37, who has nearly a decade of marketing experience. At first, Ortiz-Cole sent out five to 10 applications a week, tailoring each to the relevant employer. But she found that companies were being especially selective, requiring candidates not only to have a marketing background but experience in that company's industry. She also has been frustrated by the job market's seasonal ebbs and flows, Last fall, many businesses dragged their feet on hiring because of uncertainty related to the presidential election and then because of the holidays. Employer interest picked up in January and February but then slowed again in March due to Trump's tariffs. 'It's just been a rollercoaster,' she said. Early this year, she decided to focus more on burnishing her skills through online marketing courses, connecting with people she knows on LinkedIn and attending networking events for marketing professionals. But the latter strategy fizzled when most of the attendees turned out to be unemployed themselves. They 'were in the same boat as I was,' she said. Ortiz-Cole has notched seven or eight interviews and twice made it to the third round. But one hiring manager told her he still had 600 resumes to review. And when job postings pop up on LinkedIn, they often draw about 100 applications within a couple of hours, she said. 'It's extremely discouraging and deflating because you don't have any control,' she said. In January, she began several rounds of interviews with a company over three months, feeling confident it would culminate in a job offer. But a candidate who was already working got the position. 'That was my low point,' she said. 'Living day by day' Ortiz-Cole's unemployment benefits have long run out. She and her husband, who is employed, were already 'living paycheck to paycheck' before her layoff to afford their mortgage and daycare for their 5-year-old son, she said. She has increasingly excised small pleasures from her life: streaming services, ordering dinner deliveries a few times a week, clothes shopping and a morning coffee from a local shop. She burned through most of her 401(k) money to pay off a car loan and maxed out her credit cards. 'We're constantly having conversations,' she said. 'We're living day by day and prepared to make whatever necessary cuts we have to make.' She said she's cautiously optimistic hiring will perk up soon but employers don't seem to have any clearer picture. As recently as early April, myHR Partner, a human resources consulting firm, planned to add nine employees to its staff of 41, said Tina Hamilton, who owns the Bethlehem, Pennsylvania-based company. But after Trump announced global reciprocal tariffs on April 2, demand for her hiring services plunged 50%, she said. While revenue from its payroll, employee relations and other HR services is up this year, its overall sales are flat because of the hiring pullback, prompting Hamilton to scale back her own hiring plans. She's looking to add just one or two employees in 2025. 'It happened almost suddenly,' she said. The trade war, meanwhile, has been in near-constant flux. This week, an international trade court struck down most of Trump's reciprocal fees but they remain in place while officials appeal the ruling. And Trump could adopt other legal strategies to impose tariffs, experts say. 'Nobody knows what to believe,' Hamilton said. 'Everyone's delaying… everyone's waiting.'
