logo
Trusted employee stole £30k worth of stock - and splashed the cash on a cockapoo

Trusted employee stole £30k worth of stock - and splashed the cash on a cockapoo

Yahooa day ago

A 'trusted employee' stole £30,000 of high quality bike parts - then spent the money he received for them on a cockapoo.
Jordan Banks, 35, was offered £2,000 to steal boxes of parts from Cycle Sport North in Preston, where he worked in the warehouse, LancsLive reported.
Ellie McManus, prosecuting, told Preston Crown Court the thefts came to light when an audit manager carried out a regular stock check on September 27, 2022.
READ MORE: UKHSA 'stay at home' advice as Covid variant NB.1.8.1 confirmed in UK
READ MORE: New Covid variant NB.1.8.1 spreading in UK as doctors warn of nine key symptoms
He noticed two boxes of e-bike batteries were missing and checked the company's CCTV. Eight boxes had been delivered on September 14 and had been booked in by Banks.
However, only six had been placed into the secure cage, where high value parts were stored. Other boxes had been left in the 'goods in' area overnight, the court was told.
At 7.30 the following morning, Banks was seen taking items from the area and making a small wall around his car, obscuring the view of the CCTV cameras. He took a pallet of boxes to the car and placed one box in the boot and another on the floor of the vehicle.
He left work that evening but did not return with any of the stock, Ms McManus said. The total value of goods stolen on that occasion was £10,517.14.
Further CCTV enquiries revealed the defendant had carried out similar thefts on two further occasions in September 2022. The manager said over £100,000 of stock had gone missing in the past 12 months.
The police were called and Banks was arrested at his home in Penwortham. He and his vehicle were searched but nothing untoward was found. He later pleaded guilty to theft by employee to a total of £30,000 of stock.
In a business impact statement, Cycle Sports North said Banks was a long standing employee who had never given any cause for concern. He was trusted to work alone and without supervision, given his experience on the goods in team.
"He acted dishonestly and deceived them through his behaviour", Ms McManus said. "He deviously engaged in deception and had become so practised he was brazen enough to place £6,000 of goods in his car in broad daylight, with his colleagues passing by.
"His long term behaviour sought to defraud the business for personal gain without thought for the business, his colleagues' job security or customer orders."
She said the stock that was stolen left the company unable to fulfil £150,000 of orders which had an impact on the company's turnover and put jobs at risk.
It caused ill sentiment and distrust towards the company as customers were left without the bikes they had ordered.
Naomi Duckworth, defending, said Banks had been struggling with his finances when he was approached and offered money to take the stock.
"He made a stupid, misguided mistake which cost him his family", she added. "With the £2,000 he received, he purchased a cockapoo for his son."
However he has since separated from his wife, Ms Duckworth said.
Recorder Ayesha Siddiqi, sentencing, said: "What is very clear is that your actions had a significant impact on the business and had a significant impact on your colleagues and their job security.
"You breached a high degree of trust and responsibility as an employee. Your employer trusted you and you had autonomy in your role.
"You were trusted to work without supervision or instruction, and there was some degree of planning - this was not spontaneous on your part.
"You were in financial difficulty. Quite simply, this was never the answer - you don't need me to tell you that. You destroyed your life over what you say is £2,000."
She jailed Banks, of Aspinall Close, Penwortham, for 22 months.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Apple Valley woman latest to be charged in Feeding our Future fraud
Apple Valley woman latest to be charged in Feeding our Future fraud

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Apple Valley woman latest to be charged in Feeding our Future fraud

An Apple Valley woman is the 72nd person federally charged for her role in the $250 million fraud scheme that exploited a federally funded child nutrition program during the COVID-19 pandemic, acting U.S. Attorney Joseph H. Thompson announced on Friday. Dorothy Jean Moore, 57, of Apple Valley, was charged in a federal indictment with three counts of wire fraud and two counts of money laundering, Thompson said in a news release. According to the release, Moore launched two purported federal child nutrition program sites in late 2020 under the sponsorship of Feeding Our Future. Moore completed and signed meal count forms, claiming to have served 1,500 meals to children each day at each of her sites, which she said she operated out of community churches. Moore claimed and received reimbursements for those meals through the Feeding Our Future program, the release said. In addition, she said she operated a catering company called Jean's Soul Food and claimed additional federal reimbursements for food from that company used at the other sites. The release cited her bank records, saying they show she used 'little of the reimbursement dollars she received to purchase food. Instead, Moore used those funds for other purposes, including to purchase cars and fund an enhanced lifestyle.' She is the 72nd Minnesotan charged with defrauding the U.S. Department of Agriculture's child nutrition programs during the pandemic, when regulations temporarily were loosened and a variety of businesses and nonprofits were allowed to help feed hungry kids while schools were closed. Federal prosecutors have called the scheme the nation's largest coronavirus pandemic fraud, amounting to more than $250 million. 'This fraud is outrageous, brazen, and seemingly never-ending,' said Thompson in the release. 'Stealing from a program designed to feed vulnerable children is not only criminal — it's unconscionable,' said Special Agent in Charge Alvin M. Winston Sr. of FBI Minneapolis. Moore made her initial appearance in U.S. District Court Friday. Brooklyn Center attorney suspended by Minnesota Supreme Court U.S. Customs Border Protection officer charged with possessing child porn Man once convicted in Minnesota of supporting al-Qaida is now charged in Canada for alleged threats Jury finds Milwaukee man guilty of killing and dismembering 19-year-old woman 'We feel relief': Derrick Thompson found guilty in Minneapolis crash that killed five young women

Christine Van Geyn: Do police have the right to peer at you in your car with a drone?
Christine Van Geyn: Do police have the right to peer at you in your car with a drone?

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Christine Van Geyn: Do police have the right to peer at you in your car with a drone?

Can police use a drone with a zoom lens to peer into the interior of vehicles stopped at red lights? Can police enter a home's private driveway and look in the windows of vehicles? Can the government track the cellphone location data of millions of Canadians to track their movements? And can a private foreign company scour the internet collecting photos of Canadians for use in facial recognition technology that is sold to police? These questions are not hypotheticals; they are real live issues in Canadian law. We are living in the mass surveillance era. But many Canadians do not have a thorough understanding of how far surveillance goes, or what the limits on it are, or whether our legal protections are adequate. The police in Kingston, Ont., are ticketing drivers at red lights for merely touching or holding their cellphones based on evidence collected by a drone. The Supreme Court recently heard a case about police entering a private driveway and not just looking in a truck window, but opening the door and collecting evidence — all without a warrant. The Alberta Court of Kings Bench just considered a case involving the facial recognition technology of Clearview AI. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Canadian government was tracking the cellphone location data of 33 million Canadians. After the Trudeau government invoked the Emergencies Act, the government ordered the freezing of bank accounts of a police-compiled 'blacklist' of demonstrators, which was distributed by the government to a variety of financial institutions and even lobby groups. What these cases are demonstrating is that we have entered the era of mass surveillance, and Canada's legal protections are inadequate. First, Canada's privacy legislation is outdated. Privacy Commissioner Philippe Dufresne has said we are at a 'pivotal time' for privacy rights in Canada. Former Ontario Privacy Commissioner Dr. Ann Cavoukian has also called for updates to Canadian privacy laws, 'so they apply to all data, including anonymized data.' Much has changed since the current federal privacy legislation was drafted in the early 2000s, but efforts to modernize this law died when Parliament was prorogued. Second, when it comes to state intrusions, the concept of privacy may be inadequate. Section 8 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the right to be secure against unreasonable searches and seizures, and the Supreme Court has interpreted this right to mean the protection of a person's 'reasonable expectations of privacy' against state intrusions. The notion of 'reasonable expectations of privacy' has become a mantra in Section 8 jurisprudence. But some academics have said that in the era of mass surveillance, this guiding principle is an inadequate gatekeeper. In a lecture for the Canadian Constitution Foundation's new free course on privacy rights, Osgoode Hall Law professor François Tanguay-Renaud proposes a thought experiment that reveals the inadequacy of 'privacy' as an organizing principle. What if the police were recording people on the street, with drones following people and recording their movements as they went about their day, zooming in on their cellphones and recording their conversations? In such a scenario, where people are in plain view, privacy is an inadequate concept to limit what we all see intuitively as oppressive state conduct. At one time, this hypothetical might have been considered far-fetched. Today it is eerily similar to the Kingston police drone scenario. In Kingston, police are using a drone to take aerial images peering into cars and zooming in on cellphones. Those drivers do have reasonable expectations of privacy inside their cars, but what would limit this police conduct if they surveilled citizens on sidewalks or parks, where they were in plain view without those privacy expectations? A principled line must be drawn between things done in plain sight that police can view and constant surveillance using enhanced technology. It may not be possible to draw that line on the basis of the existence or not of 'reasonable expectations of privacy.' There are other values that could serve as guiding or informing principles for Section 8. There is nothing in the text of Section 8 that mandates the gatekeeper of the right be 'reasonable expectations of privacy' rather than another interest, like dignity, liberty, security, anonymity, public confidence in the administration of justice, and many more. Indeed, American jurisprudence has been moving away from the concept of 'reasonable expectations of privacy' as the sole guiding principle for their 4th Amendment. To meet the challenges of the surveillance era, it is well past time for Parliament and the provincial legislatures to update privacy laws. But as recent police conduct shows, it's time for our Section 8 jurisprudence to be revisited as well, to meet the emerging challenges of the surveillance state. National Post Christine Van Geyn is the litigation director for the Canadian Constitutional Foundation. Canadians who want to learn more about their privacy rights in Canada can sign up for the Canadian Constitution Foundation's free course at Opinion: In 2020 the world shut down, and Canadians lost their privacy rights Facial recognition tool used by RCMP deemed illegal mass surveillance of unwitting Canadians

Man admits causing death of pregnant woman's unborn child in horror crash
Man admits causing death of pregnant woman's unborn child in horror crash

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Man admits causing death of pregnant woman's unborn child in horror crash

A 20-year-old man has pleaded guilty to causing death by dangerous driving after he hit a pregnant woman whose baby later died in hospital. Ashir Shahid, of Windsor Road, Walton le Dale, Lancashire, pleaded guilty to the charge at Preston Crown Court on Wednesday (June 4). Shahid was driving on Station Road in Bamber Bridge, south of Preston, on the evening of September 29 last year. READ MORE: Did anyone win Euromillions £208 million jackpot on Friday night? READ MORE: How the new Covid variant NB.1.8.1 in UK is different to Omicron A woman in her 30s from Bamber Bridge was on the pedestrian crossing when she was hit. Lancashire Police said she was left with serious injuries and is still recovering. The woman was pregnant at the time and, despite undergoing emergency surgery to have her baby boy delivered, he tragically later died in hospital. Following enquires, Shahid was arrested and subsequently charged with causing death by dangerous driving and causing serious injury by dangerous driving. He pleaded guilty to both charges. A 16-year-old boy from Walton le Dale, who cannot be named for legal reasons, appeared in the dock alongside Shahid and pleaded guilty to assisting an offender. Shahid was remanded into custody to be sentenced on August 14 at the same court. The 16-year-old will be sentenced at the same time.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store