With paid sick time law set to take effect, lawmakers have days to reach deal
CEDAR SPRINGS, Mich. (WOOD) — Michigan lawmakers have just days to reach a deal before the state requires small and large businesses to offer paid sick time to all employees.
While lawmakers preserving the tipped wage for restaurant workers, they have until Friday to reach a compromise on paid sick time. If they don't, the state will require businesses with 10 or more employees to provide up to 72 hours of paid sick leave a year. Smaller businesses would need to provide at least 40 hours.
Servers cheer Michigan Senate's tipped wage 'compromise'
The changes, known as the Earned Sick Time Act, will go into effect after from the Michigan Supreme Court. The new law would also allow employees to miss work for three days at a time without calling their employer.
Ryan Sebolt, the director of government affairs for the Michigan AFL-CIO, previously told News 8 workers should be able to focus on getting better or helping their loved ones.
'Medical emergencies happen,' he said. 'Nobody's thought, 'Oh no, I have to call my boss in the next 10 minutes.' I think it's important to realize life isn't always planned out.'
Business owners worry the way the law is designed, it would put them in a tough spot with staffing.
'No one is against the spirits of these initiatives,' said David Ringler, the owner of Cedar Springs Brewing Company.
New paid sick time law worries business owners
For the last decade, Ringler has been serving up German beer in Cedar Springs, just over a 20 minute drive from Grand Rapids.
'Small business owners such as myself, we've mortgaged our homes and we've bet our kids' future on being able to create something that was going to last,' he said.
Ringler has followed the latest news out of Lansing for the last several months. He said he's felt frustrated that small business voices like his aren't being heard.
'With small businesses, we're the chief floor sweeper, the chief toilet washer and we're HR,' he said. 'These are all things we're having to work and keep up on.'
He said the law, if left unchanged, wouldn't allow businesses to set policies that are right for them and their own employees.
'The version the way it is reduces a lot of flexibility,' he said. 'That may eliminate PTO or flexible time for a lot of small businesses that just can't facilitate both.'
If the changes go through as planned, he's worried small businesses won't be able to survive.
'You're going to start to see places that just can't do it,' he said. 'And I can't say for certain what our future is.'
The costs are often passed onto consumers, he said. But he fears some businesses wouldn't be able to raise prices.
'In small communities like this, it's very difficult to raise prices because people are resistant to it,' he said. 'I don't blame them. Everything costs more, we see when we go to the grocery store.'
Alarmed over what will happen if lawmakers won't reach a deal, he's already been working on updating his employee handbook. He may have to do it again if the law is adjusted.
'We have to now wait to the very last minute before we can reform any policies that need to be reformed or make any changes,' he said.
Speaking in favor of the new law, Sebolt that this is 'about treating people with dignity of being human beings.'
'I think every parent out there knows the panic of having a sick kid and not being able to take care of their kid when they're sick, being able to take care of themselves when they're sick or being able to take care of one of their parents when they're sick,' he said.
Union: 'Every worker deserves' benefits of pending paid sick time law
The GOP-led House already passed legislation that would exempt small businesses with fewer than 50 employees from the changes. That represents the majority of businesses in Michigan. Cedar Springs Brewing Company has about 30 workers, so it would be exempt as well. The Democrat-led Senate has been working on a modified version of the plan.
Democrat and Republican leaders have both told reporters they're optimistic they'll reach a deal after the tipped wage compromise came through.
In a , the Michigan AFL-CIO asked lawmakers to respect the Michigan Supreme Court's ruling. The group said the law would guarantee paid sick leave for nearly 1.5 million people.
'Allow the minimum wage to increase and guarantee all workers have the ability to take care of themselves and their families when they are sick,' the group said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
BioNTech buys mRNA, courtroom rival CureVac in all-stock deal
This story was originally published on BioPharma Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily BioPharma Dive newsletter. COVID vaccine maker BioNTech is buying rival CureVac, announcing Thursday an all-stock deal weeks before the two companies were due to face off in a German court over potentially billions of dollars worth of royalties related to intellectual property on messenger RNA drugs. Per deal terms, each CureVac share will be exchanged for about $5.46 worth of BioNTech's U.S.-listed shares, valuing the company at $1.25 billion. Upon the deal's close, CureVac shareholders will own between 4% and 6% of BioNTech. In the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, BioNTech and CureVac were among the companies racing to develop the first coronavirus vaccines. BioNTech, however, partnered with Pfizer and won approval of the first COVID-19 shot, while CureVac's program never made it to market. The two companies have since been embroiled in patent litigation. CureVac was a leading candidate to develop the first COVID-19 vaccine, launching rumors, later denied, that the U.S. government might even buy the company or its research. But while BioNTech and fellow mRNA drugmaker Moderna succeeded in making vaccines that saved millions of lives and earned billions of dollars in revenue, CureVac fell short. Its initial project wasn't effective enough at preventing sickness, prompting it to scrap development. A year later, CureVac sued BioNTech, claiming it infringed four patents. CureVac has since changed course, selling off most rights to influenza and COVID-19 vaccines to partner GSK and focusing on cancer instead. But its legal spat with BioNTech has lingered. The European Patent Office had upheld two CureVac patents, and a trial in a Dusseldorf regional court was set on July 1 to determine if BioNTech had infringed on them. A separate trial in the U.S. was scheduled to begin Sept. 8 in Virginia. Some Wall Street analysts, as a result, speculated that BioNTech's primary purpose is buying CureVac is to sidestep the risk of a loss in court. A single-digit percentage royalty awarded to CureVac could've cost BioNTech as much as $3 billion, Evercore ISI analyst Umer Raffat wrote in a note to clients. 'It seems to us that [BioNTech] assessed the cost of a cash settlement as substantially greater than the cost of buying [CureVac] outright,' Raffat wrote. The deal could also help BioNTech further its oncology ambitions. Like CureVac, BioNTech has made cancer research a top priority. It's invested in a variety of programs, from cell therapies to mRNA vaccines and a coveted type of bispecific antibody. Some are in advanced testing. CureVac's cancer vaccines are in earlier phases of development. A brain cancer shot has delivered early clinical data, while a lung cancer immunotherapy was cleared in April for human testing. The deal should help CureVac because of 'the early stage of the oncology pipeline and the need for a development partner to effectively compete in personalized cancer vaccines – which [BioNTech] is well positioned to execute,' wrote Leerink Partners analyst Mani Foroohar. Raffat, of Evercore ISI, however, wrote that the deal ascribes 'very little value' to CureVac's pipeline. Recommended Reading Recursion to acquire two Canadian drug discovery startups Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
David Lynch Explains Florian Wirtz's Liverpool Move
Liverpool's Elite Move for Florian Wirtz Signals a Bold New Era Florian Wirtz Deal Shows Liverpool Are Shopping Top Shelf Liverpool supporters woke up to a seismic shift on Friday the 13th. Contrary to superstition, it proved a day of jubilation as the club confirmed a deal with Bayer Leverkusen for Florian Wirtz. As revealed on Anfield Index's Media Matters podcast, journalist David Lynch was unequivocal in describing it: 'This is a huge, huge transfer.' Speaking with host Dave Davis, Lynch highlighted the rarity and scale of this kind of signing: 'To win one of those races is rare… Liverpool have seen off every competitor to sign one of the most exciting young players in world football.' That list of competitors, notably including Bayern Munich and Manchester City, makes the capture all the more impressive. Recruitment Confidence and a Club on the Rise Though Liverpool's recruitment strategy has historically leaned towards undervalued talents, Lynch was quick to stress that this isn't a shift in philosophy. 'People at Liverpool actually suggest to you this isn't actually a departure from our approach,' he said. 'Every time there's a transformational signing on the market who wants to join us… we will push the money out there.' Advertisement He added that the attacking profile naturally drives the fee up — reported in UK media as £100 million plus £16 million in potential bonuses — but reaffirmed confidence in the club's current recruitment staff. 'They've been able to convince him this is the right place in sporting merit over other places,' said Lynch. The role of key Liverpool figures also came under praise. Lynch noted, 'Well done to Richard Hughes… well done to Arne Slot.' It's understood that their meeting with Wirtz was pivotal, showcasing not just a vision of collective success but also a tailored development path. More Than Just a Fee: Wirtz's Character and Commitment What stands out is not just the financial package or the skill set Wirtz brings, but the player's decision-making. 'City would have been the easy option. Bayern Munich would have been the easy option,' Lynch emphasised. 'To come to Liverpool, to accept lesser wages because you believe in the sporting project… for me is something special.' Advertisement While Lynch acknowledged he's no expert on German football personalities, he drew a telling comparison with another transformative Liverpool signing. 'It was hugely significant that Virgil van Dijk chose Liverpool,' he explained. Wirtz's decision to join despite more lucrative options, in Lynch's eyes, hints at a character aligned with Liverpool's ethos. What Wirtz Brings to Liverpool's Attack On the pitch, the excitement is just as real. Lynch pointed to the statistical dominance of Wirtz's performances. 'The numbers are unbelievable… assists, goals, chance creation — he's good at absolutely everything in the final third.' There is still uncertainty around where Wirtz will line up under Slot. Lynch admitted, 'I haven't heard anything specifically on position yet,' though speculation around a number 10 role or even as a false nine remains strong. Advertisement What is certain is Wirtz's versatility and quality. As Lynch put it, 'He defends a little bit like an attacking midfielder rather than an out-and-out number 10.' With Liverpool having 'walked the league last season,' adding such a dynamic talent could widen the gap even further. 'If you're one of the rivals… you'd be seriously worried,' said Lynch. Final Word: A Statement of Intent 'This is not normally like Liverpool,' said Dave Davis during the discussion, and he's right. This signing is bolder, louder and utterly deliberate. It speaks of a club ready not just to maintain its position but to dominate. Liverpool have made their move. The Premier League has been warned.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
UN Ocean Conference makes headway in quest to protect high seas
The UN Ocean conference in southern France ended on Friday with some progress towards marine conservation and calls from environmental organizations for quick implementation if the international community is to reach its goals by 2030. Representatives from 170 countries spent five days in the French resort of Nice discussing the protection of the world's oceans, with signatories hoping to use the conference to make progress on the UN goal of effectively protecting at least 30% of the world's oceans by 2030, compared with 8% today. "This conference has made significant progress on marine protection, despite the difficult geopolitical situation," German Environment Minister Carsten Schneider said on Friday. The conference saw more support for an international agreement to protect the high seas, which make up around 60-70% of the oceans. The High Seas Protection Agreement, adopted by the United Nations two years ago aims to regulate international waters. More than a dozen states ratified the agreement at the conference, meaning the target of 60 states ratifying should be reached by September, according to France, which co-hosted the conference with Costa Rica. The event also built momentum to address plastic waste, with some 95 countries calling for the production of primary plastics to be limited. They also want an obligation for countries to report on their production, import and export, and to see a commitment in the agreement to phase out the most problematic plastic products and chemicals in plastics. "What is outlined here is a good start and, at the same time, the absolute minimum required to effectively combat plastic pollution," said Florian Titze from WWF Germany. Progress was also made on numerous other topics in Nice, including a French and German initiative to identify the exact location of munitions dumps in the Baltic and North Seas. A group of states also wants to push ahead with the fight against noise pollution in the ocean, while UNESCO wants to do more to promote marine education. However, the executive director of the OceanCare organization, Fabienne McLellan warned that UN Ocean Conferences serve as litmus tests for whether the international community can achieve the goals it has set itself for protecting the oceans by 2030. She said countries around the world are still a long way from these goals. The next UN Ocean Conference is planned for 2028 and will be hosted by South Korea and Chile. Two previous editions took place in New York in 2017 and Lisbon in 2022.