Inside 'Pickaxe Mountain': Iran's underground fortress — that may be stashing uranium
An under construction hidden fortress in Iran — known as 'Pickaxe Mountain' — may potentially be housing any uranium stockpiles that Tehran managed to smuggle out before the US bombed its nuclear sites.
The deeply buried installation, which is just minutes from the Natanz nuclear facility — one of the three sites struck over the weekend, has been quietly reinforced in recent years.
Multiple reports have now suggested that Pickaxe could be the perfect hiding place for uranium — as speculation mounted that Iran may have been able to remove its cache before the attacks unfolded over the weekend.
Advertisement
3 Satellite image of the Natanz uranium enrichment site construction area in Iran.
DigitalGlobe/Getty Images
Open-source satellite images taken Thursday and Friday showed scores of cargo-style trucks lined up outside of Fordow, arousing suspicion that the theocratic regime could have moved its stockpile of enriched uranium.
Almost 900 pounds of uranium enriched to 60% purity has been unaccounted for since the Israeli airstrikes began on June 13.
Meanwhile, Iran has been cagey about the Pickaxe Mountain site after satellite imagery emerged earlier this year showing a new deeply buried tunnel and security perimeter close to the existing Natanz site.
Advertisement
The director general of the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency asked Tehran in April about what was going on there — but got a blunt response.
'Since it is obvious it is in a place where numerous and important activities related to the program are taking place, we're asking them, what is this for? They are telling us, it's none of your business,' Rafael Grossi, the director general, said at the time.
He added that it 'cannot be excluded' the tunnels would store undeclared material but said he didn't want to speculate on intentions.
Advertisement
3 Images released by US defense contractor Maxar Technologies showed more than a dozen trucks lined up outside Iran's Fordow nuclear facility just days before the US carried out its large-scale airstrikes.
Satellite image ©2025 Maxar Technologies/AFP via Getty Images
'I've been raising this issue repeatedly, and I will continue to do so,' Grossi said.
It wasn't immediately clear if Pickaxe suffered any damage during the latest strikes that targeted Natanz, as well as the Fordow and Isfahan nuclear facilities.
President Trump, for his part, has insisted Iran wouldn't have been able to remove any uranium being enriched at the sites before the attacks.
Advertisement
3 The deeply buried installation is just minutes from the Natanz nuclear facility.
DigitalGlobe/Getty Images
'They didn't have a chance to get anything out because we acted fast,' Trump said Wednesday.
'It would have taken two weeks, maybe. But it's very hard to remove that kind of material, very hard and very dangerous for them to remove it.'
Trump, too, has insisted his attacks 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear program and the White House has dismissed a leaked preliminary intelligence assessment suggesting Tehran could salvage it within months.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
36 minutes ago
- The Hill
Democratic-led states sue Trump administration over funding cuts
A group of 21 Democratic-led states filed a Tuesday lawsuit against the Trump administration for arbitrarily cutting grants allegedly misaligned with an agency's goals. Plaintiffs, which include New York, Illinois and California, said federal agencies have taken on a nationwide 'slash-and-burn campaign' to unlawfully revoke previously awarded funds through a subclause in federal regulations. States' attorneys general allege a clause permitting federal agencies to terminate grants 'pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Federal award, including, to the extent authorized by law, if an award no longer effectuates the program goals or agency priorities' is being misused by the Trump administration. The states said congressionally mandated funds cannot be 'stripped away' to punish jurisdictions that enforce policies disliked by the current administration. States with sanctuary cities, research projects related to environmental protection standards and other measures have lost federal dollars in recent months. 'With the stroke of a pen, federal agencies have deprived States of critical funding they rely on to combat violent crime and protect public safety, equip law enforcement, educate students, safeguard public health, protect clean drinking water, conduct life-saving medical and scientific research, address food insecurity experienced by students in school, ensure access to unemployment benefits for workers who lose their jobs, and much more,' plaintiffs wrote in the lawsuit. 'Federal agencies have done all of this without any advance notice, without any explanation to the State recipients, and in direct contravention of the will of Congress,' they added. 'The State recipients' sole offense has been that they used the grant funding precisely how they had promised in the grant applications—and as they were instructed by the agencies at the time of the grant award.' 'Leftist AGs and governors who would rather spend their days drafting toothless letters in an attempt to 'stick it to Trump' continue to miss the mark while failing to address real issues impacting their states,' White House principal deputy press secretary Harrison Fields told The Hill. 'Every one of these elected officials should focus on serving their constituents, not their party bosses, and work with the President and this administration to enact the agenda the American people overwhelmingly supported.' The lawsuit follows a federal judge's Thursday ruling rejecting the Department of Transportation's attempts to tie state funding to immigration enforcement operations.
The Hill
37 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump border czar Homan, wife ‘living separately' because of death threats
President Trump's border czar Tom Homan said in a new interview that he and his wife are not currently living together because of death threats he has received for enforcing Trump's immigration crackdown and the amount of time he spends working. 'My wife's living separately from me right now, mainly because I worked for many hours, but mostly because of the death threats against me,' Homan told New York Post columnist Miranda Devine on Wednesday's episode of her 'Pod Force One' podcast. 'I see her as much as I can, but the death threats against me and my family are outrageous.' Homan, who holds the formal title White House executive associate director of enforcement and removal operations, was a top immigration aide to Trump during his first presidency but moved to the private sector and worked as an immigration policy pundit over the past four years. 'Even my wife said, 'You know, it's a huge pay cut,' because I'm doing good in the private sector,' he said of receiving Trump's call to join the new administration while the couple was having dinner one night. 'She's in the middle of remodeling — months of stuff — and all that stopped because I'm leaving the private sector, going back to a government paycheck.' He said she urged him to do it anyway. 'She said, 'You need to go back or we'll get divorced … because if you don't go back, you'll be waking up every day, pissed off that you didn't go back, and I've gotta live with four more years of you being pissed off, so go back and do the job,'' Homan recalled, chuckling. Homan told Devine he didn't hesitate at the chance to join Trump's second administration this year and doesn't regret the decision, despite personal sacrifices. 'I'm not going anywhere,' he said. 'I mean, I had a thousand protestors at my house in Upstate New York, my lake house.' 'I'm not going away, 'cause I know how important it is to secure our border,' he added. Homan defended Immigrations and Customs Enforcement activity in Los Angeles, which sparked mass anti-ICE protests that prompted Trump to deploy thousands of National Guardsmen and Marines to guard federal buildings and workers. 'We were serving three criminal arrest warrants … it was a criminal investigation that happened to deal with money laundering, tax evasion and customs fraud,' Homan said. 'We know that in the Garment District, there is strong suspicion that some of that funding is sent to Mexico and Colombia to fund cartel activity, so it was a criminal investigation.' 'Right away, the left went nuts, saying 'ICE is doing an immigration raid,' and they came out in force,' he added. Over the course of the nearly hourlong interview with Devine, Homan praised New York Mayor Eric Adams (D), saying he believes Adams cares about public safety, and derided other Democrats whom he accused of using immigration as a political ploy. 'Every Democrat I ask these questions to, they can't answer me: What's the downside of less drugs coming across? What's the downside of less sex trafficking of women and children? What's the downside of less people in terrorist organizations coming across? What's the downside of less gang members and criminals coming across?' Homan said. 'What's the downside of a secure border?' 'They'll never admit it, but they know that they see a future political benefit,' he added.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
China Vows ‘Forceful Measures' After Taiwan's Huawei Export Curb
(Bloomberg) — Beijing vowed to respond to Taiwan's 'technological blockades' after the self-ruled island blacklisted Chinese companies including Huawei Technologies Co., limiting their ability to develop cutting-edge artificial intelligence. Bezos Wedding Draws Protests, Soul-Searching Over Tourism in Venice US Renters Face Storm of Rising Costs US State Budget Wounds Intensify From Trump, DOGE Policy Shifts Commuters Are Caught in Johannesburg's Taxi Feuds as Transit Lags 'We will take forceful measures to resolutely safeguard the normal order of cross-strait economic and trade exchange,' Taiwan Affairs Office spokeswoman Zhu Fenglian said Wednesday at a regular briefing in Beijing. She was responding to a question about Taiwan' recent curbs on Chinese companies, and didn't elaborate on how Beijing would respond. Taiwan last week joined a yearslong US campaign to curtail China's technological ascent by adding the country's AI and chipmaking champions — Huawei and Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp. — to its entity list. That bars the island's firms from doing business with the pair without a license, the first time Taipei has used the blacklist on major Chinese companies. The new restrictions are likely to, at least partially, cut off Huawei and SMIC's ( access to Taiwan's plant construction technologies, materials and equipment essential to build AI chips, like those made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSM) for the likes of Nvidia Corp. (NVDA). Zhu condemned Taiwan's decision as 'despicable' and claimed it displayed President Lai Ching-te's loyalty to the US government. President Donald Trump's administration has urged Taipei to take more ownership over chip restrictions on China, Bloomberg News previously reported. 'Attempts to decouple will not delay the progress of industrial upgrading on the mainland,' Zhu said, adding that such actions will only damage the competitiveness of Taiwanese enterprises and the island's economy. Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? Can 'MAMUWT' Be to Musk What 'TACO' Is to Trump? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. By subscribing, you are agreeing to Yahoo's Terms and Privacy Policy Sign in to access your portfolio
