Holomisa's battle to clean up defence – the general's one-year scorecard
Holomisa says the department of defence is still reeling from the effects of state capture.
He warns that the SANDF is not equipped to handle climate disasters or peacekeeping missions.
He calls on Parliament and the UDM to stop being passive and demand real consequences.
In a candid and comprehensive year-in-review report, Deputy Minister of Defence and Military Veterans General Bantu Holomisa, has laid bare the systemic challenges confronting the SA National Defence Force (SANDF) and the department of defence, ranging from the lingering effects of state capture to the country's limited response to natural disasters.
Addressed to UDM's parliamentary leader Nqabayomzi Kwankwa, the report, dated 24 June, reflects on the UDM's first year in the government of national unity (GNU), offering an unflinching account of the party's experience within the executive while calling for intensified parliamentary oversight and accountability.
Holomisa's reflection noted critical issues, including the SANDF's preparedness and budgetary constraints, and the fallout from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) deployment.
The report calls on Parliament, and especially the UDM, to take a stronger stand, drive meaningful reform and ensure accountability where it's long overdue.
According to Holomisa, the Auditor-General's report has been instrumental in guiding the new ministry, the joint standing committee on defence and the portfolio committee on defence, providing critical insight into the terrain we are expected to navigate.
He wrote:
It is clear that the department of defence did not escape the effects of state capture. The ongoing SIU [Special Investigating Unit] investigations initiated through proclamations signed by the president and the fact that the former minister is still before the courts highlight the depth of the challenges we face.
Bantu Holomisa
Former defence minister Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula is facing several counts of corruption and money laundering after being accused of soliciting and receiving bribes amounting to R4.5 million from a defence contractor.
'These realities point to a protracted process of restoring the integrity and capacity of the SANDF, a task further complicated by years of chronic underfunding,' Holomisa added.
He mentioned the DRC debacle, which placed the department of defence under intense scrutiny, a matter that garnered considerable public and institutional attention. There were concerns about the overall capacity, preparedness and logistical readiness of the SANDF to effectively carry out its continental peacekeeping and combat obligations.
He explained how this matter further brought into question the adequacy of the department's planning processes, resource allocation and strategic command structures in high-risk deployments.
'The DRC episode served as a stark reminder of the urgent need to review and strengthen our defence capabilities, particularly in the context of multinational operations under the auspices of Southern African Development Community or the AU,' read the report.
Adding to the ongoing concerns is the increasing impact of climate change, which continues to present new and evolving threats to the country's security and humanitarian stability.
According to the report, this changing climate landscape is testing the capacity of the SANDF to respond swiftly and effectively, particularly in the deployment of rescue equipment and disaster relief operations.
A case in point is the devastating floods in the Eastern Cape, which tragically claimed the lives of at least 100 people, though the final death toll is yet to be confirmed. Despite the scale of the disaster, only one Oryx of 12 helicopters was deployed for rescue and relief efforts days after the disaster had occurred, illustrating the severe limitations in the aerial response capabilities during emergencies.
In the report, Holomisa outlined how this highlights the urgent need to improve the SANDF's disaster response readiness in alignment with the growing frequency and intensity of climate-related events
The report was sent to Kwankwa to provide him, as the UDM's parliamentary leader, with a concise reflection on the oversight and executive work Holomisa has undertaken since taking office. It also aims to urge 'in the strongest terms' the reactivation and strengthening of Parliament's role in holding the executive accountable on several unresolved national issues, particularly those long championed by the UDM.
After Holomisa was appointed as the deputy minister of defence and military veterans, he faced criticism for allegedly softening his stance on corruption since his appointment to government.
Known for his fierce condemnation of the ANC, often calling them 'amasela (thieves)' in previous administrations, some questioned whether he had lost his edge.
However, in an interview with City Press, he explained that his strategy of calling out amasela had been effective, as evidenced by the fact that those who had been governing (the ANC) received only 40% in the recent election results.
Now that he is in government, his focus has shifted to addressing corruption from within, particularly in the defence department, which has been deeply affected by corruption – with even the minister facing allegations.
'Now, we are trying to clean from within. There are people who have been on suspension for a long time, some are in court, so we are busy addressing that set-up, as well as the procurement problems that were affected by corruption,' said Holomisa.
No, I won't be making a lot of noise now. I need to focus on my task. The amasela within the defence department – I'll deal with them, but action will be seen publicly, not through shouting.
Bantu Holomisa
He also explained that Kwankwa was the one who could continue to say amasela. If the GNU is not doing well, Kwankwa can call it out.
In the report, Holomisa said he believed that the UDM's 'principled, consistent and people-centred voice' must now take a more assertive role in ensuring that findings, commissions and legislative frameworks lead to real consequences and reform.
He detailed the scope of his official engagements since his appointment in July 2024. The report outlines a demanding schedule spanning parliamentary oversight, departmental coordination, Cabinet involvement and international diplomacy.
According to Holomisa, the meetings serve as a record of the work he has undertaken in the execution of his duties.
They include:
63 Department of defence-related meetings with entities such as Armscor, Denel and the Defence Secretariat, covering strategic areas such as Auditor-General compliance briefings, logistics planning, HR and command and management information systems oversight, and force design sessions.
42 engagements with SANDF service formations, including operational visits to SA Army HQ, Navy HQ, AFB Waterkloof, Military Police, Defence Intelligence, SA Military Health Service, Logistics HQ and the SF Brigade.
12 meetings with the Joint Standing Committee on Defence, focusing on oversight briefings, acquisition performance reviews, and coordination with Treasury and Armscor.
58 sessions with the portfolio committee on defence and military veterans, centred on oversight of military veterans, departmental annual reports and policy matters.
33 Cabinet and cluster meetings, including engagements in JCPS and ICTS Cabinet clusters, deputy minister forums, Cabinet lekgotla and executive caucuses.
51 international and diplomatic engagements involving countries such as Turkey, Italy, Pakistan, Spain, China, Cuba, India, the US, Japan, France and Russia. These included multilateral platforms such as Brics, AU Peace & Security Council sessions, arms control dialogues, and various conferences.
6 bilateral missions abroad, to Ethiopia, India, Pakistan, Cuba, Japan and France.
19 community and civic engagements, including veteran forums, traditional leadership sessions, Youth Day and Women's Month events, rural civic visits and meetings with local councillors.
Holomisa described these engagements as more than a schedule. 'Each meeting represented a deliberate effort to advance the priorities of our defence mandate, strengthen operational efficiency, and respond to the needs of our servicemen and women, veterans and broader society,' he wrote.
He emphasised that public office must be anchored in accountability and purpose-driven action and reiterated his commitment to upholding the integrity of the portfolio in a way that is informed, inclusive, and responsive to both national and global contexts.
Holomisa outlined how military diplomacy was prioritised to deepen international defence cooperation and open training opportunities for SANDF officers.
Holomisa also advocated greater collaboration between South Africa's defence industry and global partners in manufacturing and technology exchange. Far from ceremonial, some of these engagements helped defuse tensions and avoid diplomatic fallout.
On the home front, he confirmed that the department of defence had met its deadline to submit the reviewed 2015 Defence Review to the presidency, which includes new strategic frameworks and long-term planning up to 2055. However, the release of the document to Parliament now rests with the president, pending formal clearance.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News24
3 hours ago
- News24
Capitec backs Schreiber; Court halts Lungu's funeral: Today's top 7 stories in 7 minutes
News24 brings you the top 7 stories of the day. Graphic: Sharlene Rood News24 brings you the top stories of the day, summarised into neat little packages. Read through quickly or listen to the articles via our customised text-to-speech feature. Gallo Images/Sharon Seretlo Joburg Mayor Dada Morero survives motion of no confidence - City of Johannesburg Mayor Dada Morero survived a motion of no confidence brought by the DA. - The DA claims Morero failed to address service delivery issues in the metro. - A motion against council Speaker Nobuhle Mthembu was also put forward by Al Jama-ah. Kidnapped Gqeberha woman dropped off by abductors, reunited with family - Lindsay Knowlden, a 65-year-old woman kidnapped in Gqeberha on Saturday, has been reunited with her family unharmed. - She was dropped off on a street in Bethelsdorp around midnight and taken in by a family who contacted her husband and the police. - A ransom was demanded, but the family declined to comment further as the Hawks are still investigating the case. DEFENCELESS | Security sinks, trade routes exposed as frigates, submarines out of action - The South African Navy is severely weakened, with only one operable submarine and one seagoing frigate remaining from a R10-billion arms deal. - Due to funding cuts and negligence, the navy has lost its fighting capability, leaving South Africa's vast maritime area vulnerable to various threats. - The lack of naval patrols also jeopardises South Africa's ability to protect its gas fields and fulfill international obligations for maritime rescue. High Court halts Lungu's funeral in SA after court challenge by Zambian government - The Zambian government sought to prevent former president Edgar Lungu's funeral from taking place in Johannesburg. - The Gauteng High Court in Pretoria ruled in favour of the Zambian government, interdicting the funeral pending an urgent court application. - The legal battle arose from disagreements between the Lungu family and the government regarding the planning of a state funeral in Zambia. Supplied/Capitec Capitec backs Schreiber's 6 500% fee hike for home affairs database checks - Capitec supports the Department of Home Affairs' fee hike for real-time identity checks, citing the need for upgrades to improve the stability of the online verification system. - Capitec will absorb the additional costs for the current financial year, ensuring no fee changes for its clients. - TymeBank criticised the fee increase, arguing it would negatively impact digital inclusion and compliance with anti-money laundering laws, leading to a sharp response from the home affairs minister. Supplied/VW Why the VW half-tonne bakkie doesn't happen for SA - VW will build the Tengo, a compact, front-wheel drive crossover, at its Eastern Cape plant, instead of the Saveiro bakkie. - The compact bakkie market in South Africa has declined due to security concerns and the rise of crossovers offering better features. - VW chose the Tengo because it believes it better responds to current market demand than the Saveiro, despite the latter's appeal. Daniel Hlongwane/Gallo Images Asenathi Ntlabakanye: How burly Bok newbie shed 20kg training on scrum guru Human's farm - Asenathi Ntlabakanye, a new Springbok prop, lost almost 20kg in weeks through rigorous training on Daan Human's farm. - This weight loss contributed to Ntlabakanye's selection for the match against the Barbarians in Cape Town. - Coach Rassie Erasmus compared Ntlabakanye's situation to Cheslin Kolbe, emphasising that skill and determination matter more than size.
Forbes
3 hours ago
- Forbes
Transparency Deferred: What The UK's Data Bill Means For Music, AI And Copyright
The government has passed a new law on data used to train AI models, despite backlash from music ... More stars including Elton John After months of political turbulence, the UK's Data (Use and Access) Bill has finally passed Parliament. Marketed as a major update to the country's data infrastructure and digital governance, the bill covers everything from NHS data interoperability to digital ID systems and AI-enabled decision-making. The text is broad in scope, modernizing the UK's GDPR, streamlining data subject access, and enabling more fluid data sharing across public services and smart infrastructure. However, it also weakens restrictions on automated decision-making and sidesteps key copyright issues raised by AI. Although the Data Bill does not legislate on copyright directly, creative industries had hoped it would include minimal safeguards for the use of copyrighted works in AI training. In parallel to the bill, the government has signaled, through its consultation on generative AI conducted by the UK Intellectual Property Office, support for a model that would allow AI developers to mine copyrighted content by default, unless rights holders explicitly opt out. This mirrors the EU's controversial text and data mining (TDM) exception, a proposal that many in the creative industries see as deeply problematic. Attempts to introduce a transparency duty for AI developers were proposed and passed repeatedly in the Lords, but were ultimately rejected in the Commons for the sixth and final time. For the UK's creative sectors, music, publishing, film, and visual arts, which collectively generate over £124 billion annually, the final version of the bill represents a missed opportunity and a potentially dangerous precedent. It leaves songwriters, recording artists, and rights holders unable to determine whether their work has been ingested into AI training datasets, with no clear obligation for companies to provide transparency or seek permission. Training Without Traceability The Lords amendment, proposed by Baroness Beeban Kidron, became the focal point of this battle. Her proposal was straightforward: require AI developers to disclose what datasets and copyrighted material they used to train generative AI systems. The amendment kept passing in the Lords with growing support, only to be killed repeatedly in the Commons. The government refused to accept it, claiming that it would stifle innovation and that copyright would be addressed in a separate AI-specific bill after a public consultation. But as Jane Clementson, a lawyer who advises media and creative businesses on the creation and exploitation of intellectual property, explains, the government had a ready excuse: "The DUA Bill was never intended to address copyright law, so amendments about AI training data were resisted. The Government's view was that this wasn't a copyright bill—wrong vehicle for such a complex issue." This reasoning allowed ministers to sidestep the core issue while promising to address it later in a separate AI bill. The current UK copyright framework under Section 29A of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act allows TDM only for non-commercial research purposes. This means AI developers may lawfully copy and analyze copyrighted content only if the use is non-commercial, and even then, only under specific conditions. The Data Bill does not change this legal provision. However, it fails to strengthen copyright protections or clarify enforcement, despite the rapid growth of commercial AI training models. 'Support for innovation shouldn't come at the cost of fairness,' explains Rick Gleaves, a music-tech strategist and founder of Music Foundry. 'The current trajectory risks building AI systems on the backs of unlicensed creative works, music, lyrics, performances, without attribution or compensation. That's not a sustainable model.' Because the law lacks meaningful enforcement and does not mandate dataset disclosure, AI developers can ingest massive libraries of music and argue that their use remains 'non-commercial' as long as they don't sell the original content directly. Instead, they train generative models that create synthetic outputs which compete directly with the original works, often replicating stylistic, lyrical, or sonic elements. And the value extracted at the training stage powers downstream applications and services generating vast profits. 'The refusal to amend the bill weakens the UK's standing as a defender of copyright and the creative industries,' argues Gleaves. 'We've traditionally prided ourselves on striking a fair balance between innovation and rights protection, but this bill tips the scales toward data access and AI development without adequate safeguards for creators.' The asymmetry is stark. Developers gain free rein to mine cultural data while creators remain in the dark. The proposed opt-out mechanism might sound like a compromise, but without mandatory transparency, it becomes meaningless in practice. Rights holders cannot opt out of training datasets they aren't even aware they're part of. Clear Law, Rampant Violations These concerns aren't theoretical. The International Confederation of Music Publishers (ICMP), the global trade body representing Majors, Indies and 80 different national trade associations across 6 continents has documented clear evidence that commercial AI systems, including Suno, Udio, Gemini, and DeepSeek, have been trained on unlicensed music. When prompted, despite claims of safeguards, these systems can generate synthetic outputs that replicate the sonic and lyrical fingerprints of songs despite no licensing agreements being in place. The legal requirement is clear: AI developers must license copyrighted material when using it for commercial purposes. The problem arises because enforcement has fallen behind and multiple lawsuits show just how blurred the lines have become. Yet the following examples collected by ICMP contradict government claims that enforcement is premature, showing that unlicensed reproduction is already widespread and increasingly sophisticated. - When prompted to analyze the lyrics of "Billie Jean" by Michael Jackson, Google's Gemini model outputs the full lyrics, despite no licensing agreement with rights holders. This directly contradicts claims made by some AI developers and policymakers that generative systems are trained only on "non-consumptive" data or that robust filters are in place to prevent reproduction of copyrighted content. Evidence of Gemini lyrics display of Billie Jean - DeepSeek, a Chinese-developed model, goes even further. It can reproduce full copyrighted lyrics, including recent songs, formatted and tagged with metadata scraped from platforms like Spotify. This suggests an intentional bypass of standard licensing practices and highlights how easily some developers evade rights protections. Lyric access directly on spotify - In Germany, the collection society GEMA has flagged a Suno-generated track for strong similarities to Alphaville's 1984 hit "Big in Japan." According to GEMA, the AI-generated version reproduces the lyrics almost verbatim, with matching phrasing and structure, despite no licensing deal existing between Suno and Alphaville's rights holders. GEMA has filed a lawsuit against Suno for copyright infringement, further alleging that the company has reproduced protected works without permission across jurisdictions. The suit also cites additional tracks allegedly copied from Alphaville (Forever Young), Kristina Bach (Atemlos durch die Nacht), Lou Bega (Mambo No. 5), Frank Farian (Daddy Cool), and Modern Talking (Cheri Cheri Lady). - Similarly, Udio, a fast-growing AI music generator, has been shown to produce songs that closely imitate the Beatles' musical style, lyrical tone, and even vocal timbre. Prompts like 'write a Beatles-style ballad about longing' yield tracks that mirror the harmonic structure, instrumentation, and production techniques of Lennon–McCartney compositions. While not replicating lyrics verbatim, the outputs often share thematic content, rhyming patterns, and arrangements, effectively creating derivative works. Udio has no licensing agreement with Apple Corps, Sony/ATV, or any entity managing the Beatles' catalog, making these outputs clear examples of unlicensed stylistic appropriation. (This example is drawn from the ICMP evidence submission). "It actually doesn't need to work this way," says John Phelan, CEO of ICMP. "Ours is an industry built on exclusive rights, and what that literally means is not so much that we want to restrict use, some other creative sectors are much less willing to license works, but rather that commercial users need prior authorization to be legal." The irony runs deeper. ICMP's analysis of tech company contracts reveals a telling double standard. Google, Microsoft, Meta, OpenAI, Suno, Udio and others all include clauses demanding "no use of our content without express prior written permission." Calling out the contradiction, Phelan says: "We in the music industry should not be reluctant to point out this commercial hypocrisy and demand total respect for our songwriters' property rights.' Effectively, the UK's copyright landscape has no lack of clarity; rights holders already have control and licensing training data for commercial gen AI is required by law. But Science and technology secretary Peter Kyle mentioned several times that his preferred outcome on AI and copyright is a new copyright exception allowing unlicensed training and that UK copyright law is currently uncertain, suggesting protesting artists are just 'people who resist change'. The Politics of AI-First Growth To understand how Britain reached this point, look beyond the legislation to the political backdrop. Labour won a commanding 403 out of 650 MPs but with only 33% of the national vote, strong legislative control built on fragile public support. Desperate for economic wins, the Starmer government has bet heavily on positioning the UK as a global AI hub. The Data Bill serves that agenda: deregulate, incentivize, and let innovation flourish. 'By rejecting the Lords' transparency amendments and deferring copyright enforcement to a vague future bill, the government has effectively given AI developers free fuel in the form of unlicensed cultural content' observes Jake Beaumont Nesbitt, Consulting Artist Manager and advisor on entertainment tech, director of Innovation at International Music Managers Forum. But he also notes that the UK Government just backed the music industry with a £30 million investment package and adds 'One could see this as a bunch of flowers offered to the creative industries after the Government ran off with the Tech Sector.' Ministers frame the bill as a growth engine, freeing NHS staff from admin and energizing fintech services. Copyright, they argue, is too complex to address in legislation aimed at "improving people's lives." But peers openly accused the government of bowing to Big Tech lobbying. New figures obtained by Democracy for Sale reveal that Labour ministers and senior civil servants met with tech industry executives and lobbyists an average of six times a week during the government's first six months in office. Peter Kyle asked Google's head of AI, Demis Hassabis to 'sense check' AI policy and Hassabis is now a formal advisor on the government's AI plan. The Technology Secretary also said he would 'advocate' for Amazon at the UK's competition regulator and their case against Amazon was then dropped. As Baroness Kidron put it: "Silicon Valley has persuaded the government that it's easier to redefine theft than make them pay for what they have stolen.' And Phelan confirmed 'Artificial Intelligence covers a multitude of different services. It's as specific as using the word technology. But suffice to say the music industry has been longstanding adopters of and innovators in AI, from licensing admin to searching song databases, copyright infringement prevention to amazing new visual effects to enhance the concert experience. Any characterisation of AI and the music industry as antiphonal is way wide of the mark." The Promise of Tomorrow Technology Secretary Peter Kyle has promised a "comprehensive" AI bill that will revisit transparency and opt-out mechanisms, potentially arriving by May 2026. The government committed to publishing reports on copyright and AI within nine months, including analysis of economic impacts on creators and developers. Jane Clementson explains: 'The Secretary of State is obliged, within nine months of Royal Assent being given, to publish an impact assessment of the economic impact of each of the four policy options described in the government's recent Copyright & AI consultation paper — including the impact on copyright owners and development users.' 'They must also present a report to Parliament on how copyrighted works are being used to develop AI systems,' she adds. But creative industries worry this delay is strategic. And as Beaumont Nesbitt points out: 'Rather than a well-thought-out long-term strategy, this hands-off approach is a short-term political gamble. The Government believes it's too soon to regulate, and is giving these (mostly ex-UK) companies not only a green light, but free fuel.' Each month of delay invites further ingestion of Britain's cultural catalogue, expanding AI libraries at zero cost while eroding the scarcity on which copyright economics rests. As Nick Breen, Partner at the global law firm Reed Smith LLP, explains, here's what to expect next: 'Now that the government has committed to providing a report, we can expect intense lobbying from both sides—on everything from transparency and copyright exceptions for training, to international interoperability, protection of AI outputs, and image rights. Given the UK's hesitation to legislate prematurely, it now faces pressure to offer clarity and show how it has balanced competing interests. In the meantime, ongoing litigation—such as Getty's case against Stability AI in the High Court—will continue to shape the landscape.' But by the time comprehensive legislation arrives, the market may have already normalized unlicensed training. John Phelan makes clear that: 'To date, I have still not seen any provable pathway to becoming more economically competitive by way of a government reducing copyright standards. There is no credible evidence that if you make that industrial policy choice, an increased influx of foreign direct investment or bolstering of the start-up economy follows suit.' A Cultural Reckoning The Data Bill represents more than policy, it's a cultural turning point. In 1710, Westminster Parliament passed the Statute of Anne, establishing copyright terms that protected authors' rights for 14 years. That principle has served the UK's economy and culture for over 300 years, evolving through numerous updates, including international agreements, and adapting to new technologies while preserving its core spirit. Now, as Beaumont Nesbitt warns, Parliament risks "strangling the new model for creators at birth." In an era where an artist's Name, Image, Likeness, and Voice increasingly drive value, allowing unlicensed use threatens not just revenue but the entire incentive structure for creativity.' The Stakes Couldn't Be Higher UK Music CEO Tom Kiehl described the bill's passage as a "pyrrhic victory at best." The music industry has made its position clear: this isn't just about revenue, but about agency, authorship, and fairness in a rapidly changing technological landscape. The creative sector generates £124 billion annually for the UK economy. The government's gamble is that AI growth will more than compensate for any damage to traditional creative industries. Whether the UK can remain both a world leader in culture and a hub for trustworthy AI depends on closing the transparency gap fast. Without action, Britain risks trading a short-term AI lead for the long-term erosion of its most iconic export: creativity. The Data Bill aimed to modernize infrastructure but instead ignited one of the most urgent cultural fights of the AI age. By rejecting transparency, despite wide support across sectors, the government has given generative AI firms a powerful advantage: access without accountability. The next legislative chapter will define not just the future of British music, but the country's reputation as a place that values creativity in the age of artificial intelligence. The question remains: is the UK willing to sacrifice its own cultural industries for a marginal advantage in the global AI race?
Washington Post
4 hours ago
- Washington Post
Anti-government protests rock Kenya: ‘We are fighting for our rights'
NAIROBI — Protests over corruption and police brutality rocked the Kenyan capital on Wednesday, a year to the day after police opened fire on young, unarmed demonstrators outside the nation's burning Parliament building. Thousands of protesters barricaded roads, tore down concrete barriers topped with razor wire and hurled back tear gas canisters fired by police. Traffic stalled on major highways as Nairobi's central business district filled with smoke.
