logo
Going out to eat is getting more expensive everywhere. It's worse in Boston.

Going out to eat is getting more expensive everywhere. It's worse in Boston.

Boston Globe4 days ago

Walking out of an oyster bar in the North End
last week, Allison Feeney, 35, said her meal — though 'fantastic'— was 'definitely more expensive than it should be.'
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
'The dining experience is a central and integral part of my life and something I love to do, so I'm happy to make the investment,' she said. 'But sometimes it's a little bit of a sticker shock.'
Advertisement
It's not just the oysters, which cost Feeney nearly $4 apiece that night (
The surge in prices is evident across the North End, where one restaurant's $33 bowl of rigatoni is up $5 in the past two years, and another's rack of lamb, which sold for $58 in 2022, has skyrocketed by $20. And it's a microcosm of the whole region, where the cost of eating away from home has outpaced the national average.
Advertisement
Restaurants said it's not that they're making more money; quite the opposite, they point to rising prices as a reflection of the high cost of buying food, paying staff, and keeping their doors open.
'It's
a really frightening time,' said Jen Ziskin, executive director of Massachusetts Restaurants United, a trade group for independent eateries. 'We're trying to figure out, how can we do this differently? How can we run our businesses differently? Because the numbers used to work, and they're just not working anymore.'
The steady increase comes amid rising labor costs and supply chain instabilities.
Last month,
Fitch Ratings
Nationwide, menu prices at full-service restaurants were up 4.3 percent over the past 12 months, according to April CPI data. Limited-service prices climbed 3.4 percent.
That hasn't stopped people from eating out. Last week, North End restaurants were bustling with tourists and families marking graduation season and enjoying the summer weather. But even with the festive air, some diners couldn't shake the notion their wallets were lighter than celebrations past.
'Even [at] the lower, middle-tier ones where you just go in and pick up something, it's gotten really expensive,' said Brad Davis, 56, celebrating his daughter's graduation from MIT.
The rising cost of eating out is
in part fueled by the uncertainty surrounding the Trump administration's wide-ranging tariffs on foreign imports. Though most of those tariffs have been put on pause, they have restaurateurs worrying about what will happen to the price of French cheese and Mexican tomatoes.
Advertisement
'Businesses that sell stereos or carpets, if they're buying from a different country, they might be able to hold on to that product until this all gets figured out,' said Will Gilson, executive chef and culinary director of the Cambridge Street Hospitality Group. 'Because it's nonperishable, it can sit in a warehouse ... But with restaurants, we can't stockpile meat or produce or fish — these are things that we are ordering almost every day."
Because restaurants are limited in what they can do to insulate themselves from tariffs — even those that haven't actually taken effect yet — they have to look at what they can control: the bill.
Customers entered Cafe Bonjour at Temple Place in Boston.
Barry Chin/Globe Staff
If restaurants have to pay more for their inventory — not just food items, but also items such as paper goods and to-go boxes — that's 'not going to make my rent cheaper, it's not going to make labor cheaper,' Gilson said.
The choice for many
restaurateurs is to either absorb the losses or pass the increases on to the consumer. That, Gilson stressed, is a last resort for any restaurant. Owners like himself are well aware of the consequences.
'Every time you raise your menu prices, we see people order less, spend less, and dine less,' he said. 'People oftentimes eat with their eyes first: looking at a menu and deciding if it's a place they want to go to, and if they can afford to get as many of the things on the menu as they want.'
Advertisement
That much is borne out by the data: a James Beard
The same survey found that 91 percent of respondents raised menu prices at some point last year, a jump from 81 percent in 2023.
Some restaurants have turned to alternative ways of recouping their margins. Sometimes, that means cutting back on portion sizes or meal offerings.
If the price of beef goes up, Gilson said, he might lower the price of a strip steak from $50 to $40 — but serve it 'a la carte,' with fries and asparagus as separate add-ons rather than sides.
That's changed the way that diners are looking at their meals.
'Things that are add-ons, like, truffles, no,' said Feeney. 'I kind of think the upsell on that is not worth it.'
Less often, that means a surcharge on all items using a particular ingredient. That's what Gilson said he did with
That method can't work with everything. If the wholesale price of poultry had been as affected by bird flu as the price of eggs, he mused, he would have had to make a difficult decision.
'We serve an amazing chicken here; we pay top dollar for it; it spends 24 hours in brine,' he said. 'But I can't compete with the grocery store selling it as a loss leader at 10 bucks.'
Advertisement
A whole rotisserie chicken with sides of spiced cauliflower and farmers' farro at Gilson's Amba Cafe in Cambridge.
Ken McGagh for The Boston Globe
That means that some dishes have to go by the wayside.
'I remember [early] in my career bringing in wild European turbot,' said chef Chris Coombs. 'That was a fish that was pricey then, but you could probably get it on the plate for $40 or $50. Now, I think I'd probably have to serve it at 120 bucks, 130 bucks. So it comes down to what people are willing to pay for their food.'
Coombs, who runs Deuxave, Boston Chops, and Bosse, among other restaurants, said price increases are gradually hollowing out the local dining scene.
'It's prohibitive for anyone who makes less than $200,000 a year to be able to go out to dinner regularly in the city of Boston,' Coombs said. 'All the people who make $125-to-$150,000 a year, that used to be able to go out three or four nights a week, now they can only afford to go out one night a week.'
As prices go up, more and more diners are 'trading down,' he said, opting for cheaper, fast casual options rather than mid-tier sit-down restaurants.
'People are finding other ways to still spend what they're comfortable spending,' he said. 'Whether it's drinking less alcohol, getting cocktails instead of wine, getting one appetizer instead of two.'
That's not to say that everyone is tightening their budget. There's still a reliable group of diners that are 'flush with cash, and they don't care what anything costs,' according to Coombs.
'But I can tell you for certain, there's a finite number of those people,' he added.
Camilo Fonseca can be reached at

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Liberals under fire for rushing bill through Parliament to speed up resource projects
Liberals under fire for rushing bill through Parliament to speed up resource projects

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Liberals under fire for rushing bill through Parliament to speed up resource projects

OTTAWA — Prime Minister Mark Carney's government is coming under fire for seeking to rush through a major piece of legislation that grants cabinet sweeping powers to quickly approve major projects. Government House leader Steven MacKinnon put a motion on notice Thursday that would push Bill C-5 through the House of Commons by the end of next week — leaving just one day to hear from civil society groups, stakeholders and experts. Critics charge the move is anti-democratic. In a fiery exchange in question period, Bloc Québécois House Leader Christine Normandin accused Prime Minister Mark Carney of trying to "steamroll" a bill through the House that would greatly expand his own powers. "The prime minister has no right to impose C-5 under closure when the bill gives him exceptional powers unlike anything that we've seen before," she said in French. "Is that the prime minister's intention, to bypass Parliament and govern by decree like Donald Trump?' MacKinnon pushed back by saying "Canadians and Quebecers spoke loud and clear" in the last election for action to shore up the economy, in part due to the illegal trade war initiated by U.S. President Donald Trump. "We are acting in a democratic way," he said, noting the bill delivers on election promises laid out clearly in the Liberal platform. The bill includes controversial provisions that could allow cabinet to skirt existing processes and laws to fast-track approvals for projects the government deems to be in the national interest. The government aims to streamline disparate processes to limit approval timelines for big projects to a maximum of two years, boosting investor confidence. When asked about the timeline at a press conference Thursday, Energy Minister Tim Hodgson said the legislation needs to pass quickly to shore up an economy being undermined by Trump's tariffs. "We have a trade war that is affecting sector after sector after sector. Canadians' jobs are at risk. Canadians' livelihoods are at risk. And quite frankly, the prosperity of the country is at risk," Hodgson said. But NDP MP Leah Gazan said in the House of Commons foyer Thursday that the bill isn't going to build the economy out because it will trigger a series of court challenges. She called on the government to extend the time frame of the public study and do more to consult with Indigenous Peoples — something she said got shortchanged in the bill. "I'm calling on the prime minister to slow it down, to not rush a bill that has this much consequence through in five days," she said. Hodgson pointed to support for the bill from the First Nations Major Projects Coalition, which represents more than 100 First Nations seeking to have their own projects advanced, and said he is consulting privately with stakeholders. "I can tell you I've got multiple conversations going on with different rights holders and business leaders as part of my department's efforts to ensure that consultation is robust," he said. Indigenous Services Minister Mandy Gull-Masty said there will be a meeting between the Prime Minister's Office and First Nations leaders, citing the wildfires as one reason it has been delayed. "I also want to acknowledge that because there are many communities in a critical state of wildfire and evacuation, that time will be taken to have that dialog," she said. "I know that it is the intention of the Prime Minister's Office to sit down with First Nation's leadership directly and to have the economic discussion and hear from them." But Anna Johnston, staff lawyer at West Coast Environmental Law, said the drive to push the bill through quickly is "incredibly concerning" because the government has done "very little engagement" so far on such a major piece of legislation. "The biggest concern is that it's going to give cabinet the power to approve projects before they have any information about them beyond what the proponent has decided to give the government," she said. "There's a reason why we have decisions at the end of environmental assessments and regulatory processes. It's so that governments can make informed decisions about projects that have the potential to harm Canadians and to harm the environment." Stuart Trew, a senior researcher with the left-leaning think tank Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, said the bill is "destined to end up in court" and "really bump up against the government's commitments to reconciliation with First Nations." "It seems geared to let the government ram projects through, without adequate study, without all the usual considerations about the impacts on endangered species," he said. "We should raise our eyebrows any time a government claims a national emergency in order to rush through legislation with implications as significant as this does." The legislation also looks to break down internal trade barriers and make it easier for workers to take jobs in other provinces. MacKinnon rejected a call from the Bloc Québécois this week to split the landmark legislation in two. That would have allowed the House to speed through the less contentious internal trade provisions while putting the controversial major projects portion under the microscope. Carney has vowed repeatedly to eliminate interprovincial trade barriers by Canada Day, 19 days from now. The House has been sitting for just three weeks and is currently scheduled to rise next week on June 20. MacKinnon said in a scrum on Wednesday that he has not tried to get consensus from the other parties to have the House sit any later. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 12, 2025. Kyle Duggan, The Canadian Press

BPCE Is Nearing an Almost €7 Billion Deal for Novo Banco
BPCE Is Nearing an Almost €7 Billion Deal for Novo Banco

Bloomberg

time14 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

BPCE Is Nearing an Almost €7 Billion Deal for Novo Banco

Lone Star Funds has decided to pursue a sale of Portuguese lender Novo Banco SA and has entered into exclusive discussions with French banking group BPCE, according to people familiar with the matter. The US private equity firm and BPCE are working on finalizing terms of a deal, which could value Novo Banco at almost €7 billion ($8.1 billion), the people said. The move means an initial public offering of Novo Banco is likely off the table, the people said. An agreement may be announced as soon as Friday, though talks could still drag on longer, the people said.

Lead EU lawmaker on sustainability laws proposes more cuts
Lead EU lawmaker on sustainability laws proposes more cuts

Business of Fashion

time20 minutes ago

  • Business of Fashion

Lead EU lawmaker on sustainability laws proposes more cuts

The European Union should further slash the number of companies subject to its environmental and corporate sustainability rules, the European Parliament member leading negotiations on the policies said on Thursday. The European Commission proposed a 'simplification omnibus' in February that it said would help European firms compete with foreign rivals by cutting back on sustainability reporting rules and obligations intended to root out abuses in their supply chains. Those proposals did not go far enough, according to Swedish centre-right lawmaker Jörgen Warborn, who has drafted amendments to scale back the laws further to only cover companies with 3,000 employees or more and over 450 million euros ($521 million) in turnover. The Commission proposal would exempt companies with fewer than 1,000 employees - already, cutting out more than 80 percent of the roughly 50,000 companies currently covered by the green reporting rules. The EU counts around 6,000 companies with more than 1,000 employees. 'Europe is falling behind the US and China in the global race for competitiveness. I'm entering this process with a clear ambition: to cut costs for businesses and go further than the Commission on simplification,' Warborn said in a statement on Thursday. His draft proposal must be negotiated in the European Parliament where other lawmakers can propose their own amendments. The Parliament will agree the final changes with EU member countries in the coming months. Warborn, a member of the centre-right European People's Party lawmaker group, is facing competing calls from some right-wing lawmakers to scrap the policies entirely, and Socialist and Green lawmakers vowing to preserve them. French president Emmanuel Macron and German chancellor Friedrich Merz have both demanded the EU scrap the supply chain law. But the walk-back on ESG rules has met resistance from some investors and campaigners, who have warned it weakens corporate accountability and hurts the bloc's ability to attract more investments towards meeting climate goals. Warborn said his proposed changes will not weaken Europe's sustainability standards, but rather free up resources that companies can instead invest in innovation. By Kate Abnett; Editor: Joe Bavier Learn more: Op-Ed | Dear Fashion CEOs, Stop Undermining Climate Action Too many brands have set ambitious emissions goals while their trade associations quietly work to block the regulations needed to achieve them, argues Maxine Bédat.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store