logo
Going out to eat is getting more expensive everywhere. It's worse in Boston.

Going out to eat is getting more expensive everywhere. It's worse in Boston.

Boston Globe10 hours ago

Walking out of an oyster bar in the North End
last week, Allison Feeney, 35, said her meal — though 'fantastic'— was 'definitely more expensive than it should be.'
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
'The dining experience is a central and integral part of my life and something I love to do, so I'm happy to make the investment,' she said. 'But sometimes it's a little bit of a sticker shock.'
Advertisement
It's not just the oysters, which cost Feeney nearly $4 apiece that night (
The surge in prices is evident across the North End, where one restaurant's $33 bowl of rigatoni is up $5 in the past two years, and another's rack of lamb, which sold for $58 in 2022, has skyrocketed by $20. And it's a microcosm of the whole region, where the cost of eating away from home has outpaced the national average.
Advertisement
Restaurants said it's not that they're making more money; quite the opposite, they point to rising prices as a reflection of the high cost of buying food, paying staff, and keeping their doors open.
'It's
a really frightening time,' said Jen Ziskin, executive director of Massachusetts Restaurants United, a trade group for independent eateries. 'We're trying to figure out, how can we do this differently? How can we run our businesses differently? Because the numbers used to work, and they're just not working anymore.'
The steady increase comes amid rising labor costs and supply chain instabilities.
Last month,
Fitch Ratings
Nationwide, menu prices at full-service restaurants were up 4.3 percent over the past 12 months, according to April CPI data. Limited-service prices climbed 3.4 percent.
That hasn't stopped people from eating out. Last week, North End restaurants were bustling with tourists and families marking graduation season and enjoying the summer weather. But even with the festive air, some diners couldn't shake the notion their wallets were lighter than celebrations past.
'Even [at] the lower, middle-tier ones where you just go in and pick up something, it's gotten really expensive,' said Brad Davis, 56, celebrating his daughter's graduation from MIT.
The rising cost of eating out is
in part fueled by the uncertainty surrounding the Trump administration's wide-ranging tariffs on foreign imports. Though most of those tariffs have been put on pause, they have restaurateurs worrying about what will happen to the price of French cheese and Mexican tomatoes.
Advertisement
'Businesses that sell stereos or carpets, if they're buying from a different country, they might be able to hold on to that product until this all gets figured out,' said Will Gilson, executive chef and culinary director of the Cambridge Street Hospitality Group. 'Because it's nonperishable, it can sit in a warehouse ... But with restaurants, we can't stockpile meat or produce or fish — these are things that we are ordering almost every day."
Because restaurants are limited in what they can do to insulate themselves from tariffs — even those that haven't actually taken effect yet — they have to look at what they can control: the bill.
Customers entered Cafe Bonjour at Temple Place in Boston.
Barry Chin/Globe Staff
If restaurants have to pay more for their inventory — not just food items, but also items such as paper goods and to-go boxes — that's 'not going to make my rent cheaper, it's not going to make labor cheaper,' Gilson said.
The choice for many
restaurateurs is to either absorb the losses or pass the increases on to the consumer. That, Gilson stressed, is a last resort for any restaurant. Owners like himself are well aware of the consequences.
'Every time you raise your menu prices, we see people order less, spend less, and dine less,' he said. 'People oftentimes eat with their eyes first: looking at a menu and deciding if it's a place they want to go to, and if they can afford to get as many of the things on the menu as they want.'
Advertisement
That much is borne out by the data: a James Beard
The same survey found that 91 percent of respondents raised menu prices at some point last year, a jump from 81 percent in 2023.
Some restaurants have turned to alternative ways of recouping their margins. Sometimes, that means cutting back on portion sizes or meal offerings.
If the price of beef goes up, Gilson said, he might lower the price of a strip steak from $50 to $40 — but serve it 'a la carte,' with fries and asparagus as separate add-ons rather than sides.
That's changed the way that diners are looking at their meals.
'Things that are add-ons, like, truffles, no,' said Feeney. 'I kind of think the upsell on that is not worth it.'
Less often, that means a surcharge on all items using a particular ingredient. That's what Gilson said he did with
That method can't work with everything. If the wholesale price of poultry had been as affected by bird flu as the price of eggs, he mused, he would have had to make a difficult decision.
'We serve an amazing chicken here; we pay top dollar for it; it spends 24 hours in brine,' he said. 'But I can't compete with the grocery store selling it as a loss leader at 10 bucks.'
Advertisement
A whole rotisserie chicken with sides of spiced cauliflower and farmers' farro at Gilson's Amba Cafe in Cambridge.
Ken McGagh for The Boston Globe
That means that some dishes have to go by the wayside.
'I remember [early] in my career bringing in wild European turbot,' said chef Chris Coombs. 'That was a fish that was pricey then, but you could probably get it on the plate for $40 or $50. Now, I think I'd probably have to serve it at 120 bucks, 130 bucks. So it comes down to what people are willing to pay for their food.'
Coombs, who runs Deuxave, Boston Chops, and Bosse, among other restaurants, said price increases are gradually hollowing out the local dining scene.
'It's prohibitive for anyone who makes less than $200,000 a year to be able to go out to dinner regularly in the city of Boston,' Coombs said. 'All the people who make $125-to-$150,000 a year, that used to be able to go out three or four nights a week, now they can only afford to go out one night a week.'
As prices go up, more and more diners are 'trading down,' he said, opting for cheaper, fast casual options rather than mid-tier sit-down restaurants.
'People are finding other ways to still spend what they're comfortable spending,' he said. 'Whether it's drinking less alcohol, getting cocktails instead of wine, getting one appetizer instead of two.'
That's not to say that everyone is tightening their budget. There's still a reliable group of diners that are 'flush with cash, and they don't care what anything costs,' according to Coombs.
'But I can tell you for certain, there's a finite number of those people,' he added.
Camilo Fonseca can be reached at

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

McDonald's shutters 6 locations around Chicago's iconic Loop area — why it may be pulling back on its presence
McDonald's shutters 6 locations around Chicago's iconic Loop area — why it may be pulling back on its presence

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

McDonald's shutters 6 locations around Chicago's iconic Loop area — why it may be pulling back on its presence

Those looking for a quick bite of McDonald's in the heart of downtown Chicago might have to look elsewhere. Six locations in close proximity within and around the city's iconic downtown neighborhood — the Loop — have closed, according to CBS News Chicago. Now, there are only four left in the central business district. And they're not the only commercial spaces to shut down. Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10) However, Michael Edwards, President and CEO of the Chicago Loop Alliance, doesn't view the closures as a bad omen. In fact, he believes the area is seeing an economic rebound. 'First quarter of this year, a million people came down,' Edwards told the local broadcaster in a story published May 19, '$280 million in economic impact.' He added: 'Every day, there's something new and improved.' Downtown foot traffic on weekends is higher than pre-pandemic levels, reports CBS News Chicago. So, why are some businesses not seeing the economic benefits of staying in the area? High rent may be a hindrance for local businesses. Many commercial spaces in the Loop currently rent between $23 and $50 per square foot each year, LoopNet shows, which can translate into paying hundreds of thousands of dollars annually for the space alone. Sprinkle in additional costs like renovations, utilities, hiring staff and other overhead expenses, and it becomes a pricey venture to run a business in the Loop. Edwards says the area tends to attract large national retailers, but he notes many seem to be downsizing. When asked about the restaurant closures, CBS News Chicago says McDonald's didn't give a definitive reason why they shut down. An 'outside source' told the news outlet one of the locations may have closed because of crime and tensions with homeless people. Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says — and that 'anyone' can do it According to the National Restaurant Association, food and labor costs for the average restaurant have risen 35% in the last five years. Rising costs are eating into pre-tax margins, which is around 5% for a typical restaurant. But the price of doing business in the Loop isn't scaring off everybody. A Mexican restaurant, Momento, recently opened its doors, per CBS News Chicago, and Amorino, a gelato joint, is set to open a second location in the area. All are owned by Christopher Roldan, who expressed a lot of faith in the district. 'From all of the 300 [Amorino] locations, 19 countries, this one in Chicago is the number one in sales,' Roldan told the broadcaster. 'We have proof that this area works.' A survey published by LendingTree last year found that while 3-in-4 Americans would typically munch on fast food at least once a week, 62% reported eating it less often due to rising prices. In fact, 78% of survey respondents viewed fast food as a luxury because it has become more expensive. Half also said they view it as a luxury because they're struggling financially. Same-store sales in the U.S. fell around 3.6% in the first quarter of 2025 at McDonald's, which is the lowest for the restaurant chain since 2020, according to multiple news outlets. McDonald's CEO Christopher Kempczinski said visits to fast food restaurants were down 'nearly double digits' among low- and middle-income consumers so far this year compared to early 2024. Despite this, McDonald's announced on May 12 it plans to hire 375,000 workers across the country this summer, and seeks to add 900 new locations by 2027. It's not known if any new locations will be brought back to the Loop. In the meantime, residents, workers and visitors in the Loop may have to reach for different meal options in the area. Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead How much cash do you plan to keep on hand after you retire? Here are 3 of the biggest reasons you'll need a substantial stash of savings in retirement Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

'Diarra would be an ambitious signing'
'Diarra would be an ambitious signing'

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

'Diarra would be an ambitious signing'

[Getty Images] Leeds fans will get perhaps their first glimpse of potential new signing Habib Diarra when England play his Senegal side at Wembley on Tuesday. The White's £22m bid was reported by L'Equipe over the weekend, and is the first concrete offer that has come to light since this summer's window began. Advertisement The 21-year-old Diarra is a box-to-box midfielder who is strong in-and-out of possession and he progresses the ball with trickery in transition. Despite his age, the Senegalese international has three years of Ligue 1 experience; while he captained Strasbourg last season and his four goals and five assists was the biggest contribution of his young career. United's owners, 49ers Enterprises, are known for going about their transfer business very quietly. Signings like Ethan Ampadu and Largie Ramazani happened with very few rumours before those transfers were completed. The 49ers see this strategy as crucial to securing the best deals they can for the club. Advertisement Midfield was arguably the Whites strongest area in last year's record-breaking 100 point season. Club-captain Ampadu, instant fan favourite Ao Tanaka, Illia Gruev and loanee Joe Rothwell formed a brick wall in the Leeds engine room. But United have lost Rothwell and with the Premier League being a huge step up, it is vital the team is strengthened in all areas of the pitch. Diarra would be an ambitious signing and it is a measure of what the club think of him with the size of their opening bid. Having risen through the French team's academy to captain the club into Europe, Diarra may need convincing. But the Peacocks proved with May's parade what a sleeping giant they are, and Leeds in the Premier League will be a proposition for anyone. Find more from Adonis Storr at The Roaring Peacock

Aldi's 8 Biggest Scandals Of All Time
Aldi's 8 Biggest Scandals Of All Time

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Aldi's 8 Biggest Scandals Of All Time

Despite winning over consumers all over the world with its affordable products and hidden gem snacks, Aldi has made some not-so-popular choices, like its infamously controversial grocery cart system, and the company is also no stranger to scandal. Whether you're a loyal shopper or just here for the tea, you may want to check out the wild reasons Aldi has made headlines that have nothing to do with its deals and low prices. The company has faced a number of lawsuits, ranging from wage disputes with former employees to food safety concerns for undisclosed ingredients in its products; in 2023, it found itself in the middle of a $10 million class action lawsuit for mislabeling its products. Not to mention, it found itself at the center of a drug smuggling operation more than once. Who knew a grocery store that boasts such a scaled-back shopping experience could be involved in so much drama? From contaminated food to exploding turkey burgers, here are some of the most fascinating scandals that Aldi has been involved in over the years. Read more: 11 Foods You Might Want To Avoid Buying At Aldi One of Aldi's most viral scandals occurred in early 2013 when it was revealed that some of its beef products actually contained undisclosed horse meat. The grocer discovered as much as 100% horse meat in some of its frozen beef products during routine random testing. The impacted products were frozen lasagna and frozen spaghetti bolognese from the brand Today's Special, and the company quickly pulled them from the shelves as a food safety precaution. Aldi traced the supply chain and connected the contamination issue to French supplier Comigel, a large French food processing company that also supplied contaminated beef products to other popular brands like Findus. The horse meat products were delivered to grocery stores in France, Britain, and Sweden. A spokesperson for Aldi explained that they were equally as disappointed in the contamination from the French supplier as their consumers. Unfortunately, it was unclear whether the "meat mixup" was purposeful or negligent on the part of the supplier. In 2019, Aldi faced another shocking food scandal when hundreds of kilograms of cocaine were found hidden in banana crates delivered to 6 Aldi store locations in Germany, as well as a warehouse. Aldi employees discovered the haul and notified local officials, who separated and secured the crates for a full investigation. State police indicated that the stash was likely from Latin America and amounted to a value of about $28 million, making it potentially the largest haul of cocaine ever found in northern Germany. However, this was not the first time, or even the second time that cocaine had been smuggled into Aldi grocery stores. There were actually two other incidents in which millions of dollars worth of drugs had been stashed in fruit and other products. In one case in 2015, about $12.5 million worth of cocaine was found in banana crates that had been shipped to Berlin as well. Police speculated that these shipments arrived at Aldi grocery stores by mistake. In 2019, the discount grocery store was accused of not paying California employees their earned wages. Former Aldi grocery store employees Jeree Gant and Jennifer Lacey-Salas each filed a class action lawsuit against the company, alleging that they (along with other employees) were not granted full payment for all the hours they worked during their employment. Specifically, the company did not pay the employees overtime or compensate for business-related expenses, despite them having been earned. The California class action suit also alleged that the company broke several other laws based on the California labor code, including not giving sufficient meal and rest breaks. Jeree Gant and Jennifer Lacey-Salas filed the suits on behalf of more than 2,000 Aldi employees who worked across various California store locations. Aldi quickly offered a $2 million settlement in response to the lawsuit. In a tragic incident just before Christmas in 2017, an Aldi employee was fatally stabbed in a revenge act during her shift at the grocery store. 30-year-old Jodie Willsher was stabbed by 44-year-old Neville John Hord in front of shoppers and fellow employees at the Aldi store where she worked in the U.K.'s North Yorkshire Hord was a former boyfriend of Willsher's mother, and the murder was an act of revenge, according to prosecutor Peter Moulston QC. Hord was detained by a few shoppers and employees, and was arrested and later sentenced to a minimum of 30 years in prison for the gruesome act. Police later discovered that Hord had placed a GPS tracking device on Willsher's car as well. Willsher's husband, 4-year-old daughter, colleagues, and the small town of Skipton were left horrified by the public act of violence. According to the manager of the Aldi store, Willsher was a well-liked and popular employee, and her friends and colleagues were devastated by the tragic event. Aldi landed in hot water again when it was accused of spying on employees and customers. A former store detective claimed that he was instructed by his branch manager to install hidden cameras and gather information on employees, including their private financial information. The cameras were installed without the staff's knowledge, leading to further suspicion of bad intent. Some cameras even focused on the cash registers, where card readers with customer's credit card information were displayed. Aldi denied the claims that it was attempting to spy on employees, insisting that any cameras in the store are used strictly to protect customers and staff. It also insisted that no customer PIN numbers or credit card information could be seen from the positioning of the cameras. However, Peter Schaar, the German commissioner for privacy protection, explained that if it is possible for thefts to be prevented in other ways, surveillance may not be used. In addition to its impressive supply of groceries, Aldi also sells home goods and kitchen appliances. One product that was particularly popular in Australia was the Spiral Spring Mixer Tap. Aldi came under fire when the Queensland Building and Construction Commission (QBCC) performed tests on the water from these kitchen faucets and found unsafe levels of lead. Prolonged exposure to lead can lead to an array of health issues, including high blood pressure, heart disease, and kidney damage. Aldi removed the product so the company could perform a thorough internal investigation, though the spiral tap had already been sold to an estimated 12,000 homes. Aldi's personal testing revealed that the water levels were well within the acceptable range provided by the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines and the taps were in fact safe for use. Aldi Australia's CEO Tom Daunt explained that the tests completed by the QBCC were not conducted appropriately and Aldi's internal investigation confirmed that the product was perfectly safe for use. Gloria Besley filed a lawsuit against the grocery store in August 2018 after a turkey burger she purchased from her local Aldi exploded and left her with extensive injuries. According to Besley, she cooked the frozen turkey burgers per the "fry" instructions on the box: Preheat the skillet on medium heat, add a small amount of vegetable oil, and cook burgers on each side for 7 to 9 minutes. After placing the burgers in the oil as instructed, one exploded leaving her with second-degree burns on her hands and forearms, as well as permanent scarring. The Pennsylvania woman sought $35,000 in damages from the grocery store due to the burn injuries she endured. She filed the suit in Allegheny County in January 2019 and the case was settled about a year later, although the settlement information was not shared publicly. UC Davis researchers launched an investigation into private-label avocado oils from 19 retailers, including Aldi, and found that about 70% of them that were labeled as "pure" actually contained additional oils and additives. The study landed Aldi in trouble with consumers who were none too happy to discover that the healthier oil alternative they were purchasing was not, in fact, as healthy as advertised. The product in question was the Aldi brand Simply Nature product, which was advertised as being 100% pure avocado oil. Maggie Frost, on behalf of herself and other misled consumers, filed a class action lawsuit against the company for the misrepresentation of the ingredients in the Simply Nature Avocado Oil. While other Simply Nature products, like its veggie-packed broccoli bites, are a hit with customers, the science suggests you might want to skip Aldi's olive oil. Hungry for more? Sign up for the free Daily Meal newsletter for delicious recipes, cooking tips, kitchen hacks, and more, delivered straight to your inbox. Read the original article on The Daily Meal.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store