
Nuclear plant shutdown leaves Taiwan facing energy crunch
Lack of long-term waste storage and Japan meltdown fuelled opposition to atomic power
by SING YEE ONG & CINDY WANG
IN 1996, a rust-streaked freighter carrying barrels of nuclear waste attempted to dock at Orchid Island off the south-east coast of Taiwan. It never made it to shore. Hundreds of residents, mostly from the island's indigenous community, blocked the vessel with fishing boats and rocks, forcing it to turn back. It was the last time nuclear waste was sent there.
'I told them, if they insisted on coming in, we would burn the ship that night,' recalled Kuo Chien-ping, one of the movement's leaders.
Onshore, residents armed with rocks and bottles they claimed were filled with gasoline — it was actually water — lined the pier prepared to defend their island, also known as Lanyu.
'It was the first time the government really listened to us,' said Syaman Lamuran, whose entire family joined the protest. 'Everyone was there. Even my mother, barely 5ft tall, was clutching a stone.'
That defiant moment — part resistance, part reckoning — helped shape Taiwan's decades-long retreat from nuclear energy. The island shut its last reactor on May 17, the culmination of a phaseout strategy that threatens Taiwan's energy-guzzling chip industry and its security as tensions with China rise. The move also runs counter to the growing global appetite for atomic power, especially in nations racing to fuel artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure and meet climate change emissions targets.
Taipower power plant on Orchid Island. The island derives energy from diesel and gets no electricity from nuclear plants
Costly Decision
Taiwan's decision comes with a steep price. The final reactor shutdown, the sixth since 2018, takes place just as power demand is projected to rise 13% by the end of the decade, largely driven by data centres and chipmakers. Each shuttered reactor adds about US$500 million (RM2.19 billion) in annual liquefied natural gas (LNG) import costs, according to Bloomberg calculations.
Taking into account energy demand growth, Taiwan may need to spend around US$2 billion more per year on LNG purchases by 2030, according to a BloombergNEF analysis. Already, companies like Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co, or TSMC, face soaring electricity bills, with rates on the island surpassing those at their overseas plants.
That's why nearly three decades since that standoff on Orchid Island, smaller and less hostile protests have been organised in downtown Taipei, this time in support of keeping the Maanshan nuclear plant on Taiwan's southern tip online. Over a hundred activists, including lawmakers and staff from state-utility Taiwan Power Co (Taipower), stationed themselves outside the Ministry of Economic Affairs early this month and raised red banners reading: 'The wrong policy will destroy Taipower.'
Rising fuel costs and renewable energy (RE) investments have weighed on the finances of Taipower, the island's primary power supplier. The state utility, which has absorbed higher costs to keep prices affordable, reported over NT$420 billion (RM61.18 billion) in accumulated losses by the end of last year. That's putting pressure on the government to increase power rates for businesses and households.
'Taipower can only stop having losses if it extends the life of nuclear plants', because those facilities don't operate at a loss, said Java Yang, a Taipower worker and organiser of the May 1 pro-nuclear demonstration. 'We lost lots of money because the price of natural gas has surged, and we paid too much for RE.'
There have been signs that the govern- ment is softening its stance. Taiwan's legislature revised a nuclear power bill on May 13 that effectively opens the door for a restart of the island's atomic plants by renewing or extending licences for up to 20 years, but it isn't clear if the central government will push forward with that strategy. For now, it's too late to halt the closure of Maanshan, which is hitting its 40-year operational limit. Premier Cho Jung-tai said it could take 3.5 years to safely restart a closed plant, citing an estimate from Taipower.
Nevertheless, one of Taiwan's opposition parties said it intends to hold a public referendum on resuming operations at the plant in August. A similar vote in 2021 narrowly cemented the closure of one nuclear plant. This time could be different.
'Taiwan's public opinions seem to indicate that this referendum will definitely pass,' said Chang Chi-kai, a lawmaker from the Opposition Taiwan People's Party. 'The Referendum Act stipulates that when a referendum passes, the government has the responsibility and duty to implement it.'
Nuclear waste treatment plant on Orchid Island. Lacking permanent disposal site, govt faces pressure to cut nuclear reliance
Economic and Security Risks
Starting in the early 1980s, shipping nuclear waste for storage on Orchid Island was standard practice, though most local residents weren't initially told what was happening. But following the highly-publicised protests nearly three decades ago, no other Taiwanese town was willing to accept the shipments. High-level waste, like spent fuel from reactors, was just stored on site at nuclear plants.
With no permanent waste disposal site, the government was under increasing pressure to reduce atomic generation. Then came the 2011 Fukushima disaster in Japan — a magnitude 9.0 earthquake off the coast severely damaged the Fukushima Dai-ichi power plant, leading to a partial meltdown that released radiation into the surrounding air, water and soil. It was the worst nuclear accident since Chernobyl.
That calamity — accompanied by a devastating tsunami — was the final nail in the coffin for Taiwan's nuclear industry.
'Taiwan has many geographical faults and we have a lot of earthquakes, so the risk of an accident happening here is higher,' said Tsai Ya-ying, a lawyer at Wild at Heart Legal Defence Association. 'One nuclear accident can be considered the end of Taiwan.'
Following a decisive 2016 election victory, the Democratic Progressive Party cemented a complete nuclear phaseout into law.
At the time, the goal was for Taiwan to accelerate the deployment of wind and solar to replace nuclear. But the island has fallen short on those goals. Initially targeting 20% renewables by mid-decade, the government downgraded its goal to 15% by 2025. As of late 2024, renewables made up less than 12% of the energy mix, according to Taiwan's energy administration.
To maintain a stable power supply, Taipower is adding nearly five gigawatts (GW) worth of gas-fired capacity to the grid this year, equal to roughly five nuclear reactors. Taiwan's power supply will be stable through at least 2032, Premier Cho said last month.
'New electricity consumption has been taken into consideration, and the addition of new units is larger than decommissioning to ensure a stable power supply,' Taiwan's energy administration added.
Removing nuclear from the energy mix will raise power generation costs by NT$100 billion annually, according to Chang, the Opposition lawmaker. Also at risk are green goals: Taiwan aims to reduce its emissions
by about 38% in 2035 from 2005 levels. TSMC expects to hit peak carbon emissions this year.
Following the reactor shutdown on May 17, Taiwan will derive roughly 84% of its electricity from fossil fuels — up slightly from 2024. Nuclear contributed about 5% of electricity generation in 2024, down from 20% in the early 2000s. While nuclear generates toxic long-term waste, it produces almost no greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, unlike coal and gas.
Global Trend
'If we phase out nuclear, our carbon emissions will spike,' warned Eugene Chien, a government advisor who heads the Taiwan Institute for Sustainable Energy, or TAISE. He noted that environmental concerns are pushing more citizens to reconsider nuclear energy. In November, a TAISE poll showed 58% of respondents supported nuclear power, while 23% opposed it.
That's an increasingly global trend. Even Japan has moved away from its decision to shut down nuclear plants — last month its atomic watchdog approved the first nuclear restart since 2021. Nations from the US to Belgium are taking similar steps.
Moreover, Taiwan's reliance on seaborne LNG shipments to fill the gap doesn't just heighten environmental concerns — it creates a strategic vulnerability amid rising tensions with China, which considers the self-governing island to be part of its territory. A Chinese blockade could prevent deliveries and quickly drain gas reserves. With just 11 days of gas storage, Taiwan faces a serious risk if shipments are disrupted by conflict or disaster, Chien said.
Even with pockets of support for nuclear emerging on Orchid Island, many of its roughly 5,000 residents remain wary, fearing links between the waste and health issues, including cancer and deformities in local fish. While earlier protests succeeded in halting new waste shipments, efforts to move the existing waste have largely stalled.
'I've fought for 30 years,' said Kuo from Orchid Island. 'How many 30 years do we have in life? I am still fighting.' — Bloomberg
This article first appeared in The Malaysian Reserve weekly print edition

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Malaysiakini
an hour ago
- Malaysiakini
Asean-GCC-China summit: Forging strategic trilateral future
LETTER | On May 27, Kuala Lumpur became the epicentre of a historic diplomatic convergence as the leaders of Asean, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) and the People's Republic of China gathered for the first-ever Asean-GCC-China Summit. This unprecedented trilateral engagement, held under the chairmanship of Malaysia, marked a milestone in international diplomacy, economic cooperation and strategic alignment among three of the world's most dynamic regions. The summit was more than a mere multilateral meeting. It symbolised the coming together of regions connected by centuries of trade, civilisation, and cooperation from the ancient Silk Road and the maritime powerhouses of Melaka to the energy corridors of the Gulf and the technological advances of modern China. Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, as host and chair, reflected this spirit by emphasising the deep historical linkages and shared aspirations that bind these blocs together. Anwar described the summit as a 'new chapter in Asean's journey of outward-looking engagement,' underscoring the trilateral potential of a combined population exceeding 2.15 billion and a gross domestic product (GDP) of US$24.87 trillion. He stressed that such a scale presents immense opportunities to synergise markets, deepen innovation, and foster cross-regional investments. Global dynamics The 2025 summit took place against a backdrop of shifting global dynamics, notably the rise in U.S. protectionism under President Donald Trump's second term. As the United States imposed new rounds of tariffs on Asean exports - reaching up to 49 percent for some member states - there was a clear impetus for regional blocs to assert strategic autonomy. The Asean-GCC-China alignment thus appeared not as a defiance of global order, but as a recalibration of priorities towards multipolarity, cooperation and balanced engagement. While Anwar was careful to reiterate that the US remains an important trade partner, he also reaffirmed Asean's intention to maintain a policy of 'constructive, balanced engagement' with all major powers. This was echoed in the summit's joint statement, which pledged to uphold international law, multilateralism and mutual respect. The summit produced a far-reaching Joint Statement, outlining commitments in six primary domains: economic integration, energy and sustainability, digital transformation, food and agriculture, connectivity and people-to-people exchanges. These areas form the backbone of what the leaders termed a 'unified and collective path toward a peaceful, prosperous, and just future.' The summit reaffirmed the centrality of trade as the cornerstone of trilateral relations. Leaders committed to finalising and signing the Asean-China Free Trade Area (ACFTA) 3.0 Upgrade and looked forward to the early conclusion of the China-GCC Free Trade Agreement. Furthermore, they proposed the establishment of a trilateral regional business council to facilitate dialogue between companies across the three regions, with a special focus on digital trade, fintech, supply chains and empowering micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs). There was also a strong push for de-dollarisation strategies, with an emphasis on local currency usage and cross-border payment systems to shield regional trade from external volatility. Infrastructure development was positioned as both an economic and symbolic enabler of regional unity. The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) was endorsed as a platform to enhance seamless regional connectivity, particularly through digital infrastructure, maritime security cooperation and the development of logistics corridors. These initiatives are expected to diversify economic access and deepen inter-regional trade links between the Asean archipelago, the Gulf and mainland China. On energy Energy featured prominently, reflecting the Gulf's strength as an energy powerhouse and China's and Asean's increasing drive toward clean energy transitions. The summit participants agreed to collaborate on an inclusive, affordable energy transition aligned with the Paris Agreement. Joint efforts will focus on clean hydrogen, low-carbon ammonia, carbon capture and nuclear energy guided by International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) standards. The parties also committed to strengthening energy market stability, investing in cross-border energy infrastructure such as LNG terminals and undersea power cables and promoting innovation in emerging green technologies. The leaders acknowledged digital innovation as a strategic priority. There was consensus on exploring cross-regional frameworks for cooperation in digital trade, fintech, artificial intelligence (AI), quantum computing, blockchain and smart city development. To ensure inclusivity in the digital age, the summit endorsed skills development, digital literacy programs, and inclusive platform work protections. Food security was highlighted as an urgent issue, especially amid ongoing conflicts and supply chain disruptions. The leaders agreed to enhance sustainable agricultural practices, promote halal food trade through mutual recognition of standards and diversify food sources to strengthen regional nutrition and food resilience. Cultural diplomacy was also a core theme. The summit committed to boosting educational exchange, scholarship programs, mutual tourism marketing, and cross-cultural initiatives through art, music and literature. A special focus was placed on youth engagement and intercultural dialogue to build mutual trust and long-term friendship among the peoples of the three regions. In addition to development priorities, the summit tackled pressing global humanitarian and security concerns. The plight of Palestinians was addressed comprehensively, with the leaders jointly condemning attacks on civilians in Gaza and calling for a durable ceasefire and full humanitarian access. The summit cited the International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion (July 19, 2024) and UN resolutions supporting the two-state solution based on pre-1967 borders. Qatar's mediation and China's role in facilitating Palestinian unity through the Beijing Declaration (July 2024) were acknowledged and praised. The leaders also endorsed Saudi Arabia's initiative to co-host a High-Level International Conference for Peace in Palestine with France in June 2025. Myanmar crisis In addressing the Myanmar crisis, the summit called for extending the ceasefire initiated after the March earthquake, although concerns were raised about the military regime's sincerity. Nonetheless, Asean reaffirmed its commitment to a peaceful solution through regional consensus and diplomacy. Anwar delivered multiple keynotes during the summit and the accompanying Asean-GCC-China Economic Forum. He celebrated the event as a landmark demonstration of Asean's capacity to convene and lead amidst complexity. Anwar highlighted the rapid economic rise of the GCC, particularly in energy transition and AI development, and reaffirmed China as a vital partner for regional stability, justice, and development. He praised the summit for achieving concrete consensus on governance, economic policy, and human rights advocacy, stating that this summit proves that open dialogue and collective spirit can overcome differences. Chinese Premier Li Qiang echoed similar sentiments, emphasising China's readiness to align development strategies with Asean and GCC partners, and expressing optimism that trilateral synergies would multiply benefits across all regions. GCC leaders, including Kuwait's Crown Prince Sheikh Sabah Khalid Al Sabah, stressed the importance of building resilient partnerships to withstand global crises, while advancing negotiations on a free trade area with Asean. The summit concluded with a collective pledge to implement the joint statement through agreed mechanisms and to build on existing frameworks such as the Asean-GCC and Asean-China platforms. The leaders also looked ahead to future summits, including the Asia Cooperation Dialogue in Doha (October 2025) and the Palestine Peace Conference (June 2025). In short, the Asean-GCC-China Summit represents a bold reimagining of global governance. It demonstrated that in a fragmented international order, regional blocs can lead with purpose, foster inclusivity and champion cooperation over conflict. With Malaysia at the helm, the summit has set a precedent for strategic trilateralism that could shape Asia and the Middle East for decades to come. NURUL AMELLYA AZHAR is a doctorate student in International Political Economy at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.


Sinar Daily
4 hours ago
- Sinar Daily
Pineapple is the new potato: Imported fruits back in Syria
Fruits that were once designated luxury items, meaning they were accessible only to Syria's wealthiest, are now as common as potatoes or onions, cooking staples for many of the country's population. 01 Jun 2025 08:00pm A man holds two pineapples at a stall that sells fruits, some of which were not available while deposed president Bashar al-Assad was in power, like kiwi, mango and pineapple, in the Shalaan Market in the Syrian capital Damascus on May 26, 2025. Fruits that were once designated luxury items, meaning they were accessible only by Syria's wealthiest, are now as common as potatoes or onions, cooking staples for many of the country's population. (Photo by LOUAI BESHARA / AFP) DAMASCUS - After decades of poverty and isolation under the Assad dynasty, imported fruits like pineapples, kiwis and mangoes are available again in Syria's bustling markets, making mouths water and eyes twinkle. Fruits that were once designated luxury items, meaning they were accessible only to Syria's wealthiest, are now as common as potatoes or onions, cooking staples for many of the country's population. A boy walks past a produce merchant's stall selling previously unavailable items during the reign of deposed president Bashar al-Assa, such as kiwi, mango, and pineapple,in the Shalaan Market of Damascus on May 26, 2025. (Photo by LOUAI BESHARA / AFP) "We used to smuggle them in," said 46-year-old fruit vendor Marwan Abu Hayla with a big smile as he displayed his produce at Damascus's Shaalan market. Grocers used to face fines and even imprisonment for importing exotic fruits. But now "we do not hide pineapples any more -- we can put them on display", Abu Hayla told AFP, adding: "The era of pineapple-phobia is over." One kilogram of pineapple used to cost around 300,000 Syrian pounds (around US$23) before an Islamist-led offensive ousted leader Bashar al-Assad in December after nearly 14 years of civil war. That has now plummeted to a much sweeter price of around 40,000 pounds, about $4. "We used to smuggle (the fruit) with the help of taxi drivers -- just like petrol and diesel," Abu Hayla said of other commodities which Syrians used to bring in illicitly from neighbouring Lebanon when supplies were scarce under Assad. Now "pineapples are like potatoes and onions", he added, as potential customers eyed the ripe fruit. Bananas Buyers and sellers linked the fruits' newfound presence to developments including the free availability of the US dollar since Assad's ousting. Trading in the currency was previously punishable by law. Other signs of change include new cars on the streets and more abundant fuel supplies. The late Syrian president Hafez al-Assad imposed heavy state control over the economic system, which isolated the country from global trade. His son and successor Bashar kept up the system to maintain the clan's iron-fisted rule until he was overthrown in December. Fruit seller Ahmed al-Hareth, 45, said tropical fruit -- even bananas -- used to cost the equivalent of a public employee's monthly salary. Customs authorities and security forces would raid stores, further fuelling a limited black-market fruit trade. Medical student Nour Abed al-Jabbar, 24, said she "used to see tropical fruit on screens more often than in markets". One problem with that: some Syrians who have never had a pineapple before just don't know how to cut it. "Pineapple is for everyone -- even if some people don't know how to peel it," Jabbar said. However, many people still struggle to buy the fruit in a country whose economy has been ravaged by years of conflict and sanctions, and where 90 percent of the people live in poverty. Housewife Ilham Amin, 50, said she had noticed grocery stores becoming more colourful, which "tempts customers to buy". But she steers her children away from the tantalising new fruit as she cannot afford it. "Living conditions are tough, and pineapple is a luxury for a family like ours," she said. - AFP


The Star
4 hours ago
- The Star
AirAsia MOVE faces economic sabotage case for alleged overcharging in the Philippines
MANILA: The Department of Transportation (DOTr) is preparing an economic sabotage case against the online travel agent platform of aviation group AirAsia for allegedly selling plane tickets to Tacloban at 'unreasonably' high prices. In a press briefing on Monday (June 2), Transportation Secretary Vince Dizon (pic) said they were finalising the complaints against AirAsia MOVE with the target of filing the case this week. Prior to this, the government agency issued a cease and desist order against the company headquartered in Malaysia on May 26. Dizon said the case stemmed from the complaint by Leyte 4th District Rep. Richard Gomez and Ormoc Mayor Lucy Torres-Gomez, who booked Philippine Airlines (PAL) flights from Tacloban to Manila via AirAsia MOVE that cost them about P77,704 (US$1392) – or almost P40,000 each. Had they booked through the PAL website, the plane tickets would have only cost them P49,507, Dizon noted. 'I have asked them (Philippine National Police – Anti-Cybercrime Group) to take this website down today, so this AirAsia MOVE can no longer scam others. I'm sure Congressman Richard Gomez is not the only victim here,' Dizon announced in a press conference on Monday. 'I also asked the CAB (Civil Aeronautics Board) and DOTr aviation group to immediately file a criminal economic sabotage case against AirAsia MOVE because this is really economic sabotage,' Dizon added. Dizon stressed that AirAsia MOVE's one-way plane tickets are three times higher compared to the tickets sold by other airlines at around P12,000. Aside from Gomez, Dizon said he had also received a letter from the Office of the Civil Defence executive director, Undersecretary Ariel Nepomuceno, detailing similar complaints about the selling of unreasonably high-priced plane tickets to Tacloban. Dizon also said that the overcharging might have stemmed from the limited access to the 53-year-old San Juanico Bridge, whose load limit has been limited to three tonnes starting May 15, barring trucks and buses from crossing the 2.16-km. bridge. 'Clearly there is a crisis there because the movements of goods and people were affected by the partial closure of the San Juanico Bridge to heavy vehicles, such as buses and trucks. They are taking advantage of the situation,' he lamented. The DOTr chief also instructed CAB to investigate other online platforms suspected of overcharging plane tickets not only in Tacloban but also in other destinations. Asked if Dizon had already asked AirAsia about this, he said that the multinational airline 'has nothing to do with' the issue surrounding the online travel booking platform and is only 'affiliated' with it. - Philippine Daily Inquirer/ANN