
The Parallels Of Leadership And Keynote Speaking
getty
There's no shortage of people calling themselves speakers these days. Between TEDx inflation, social media influencers on lecture circuits, and AI-generated speaker pitch decks, the barrier to entry into the keynote world seems practically nonexistent. But as world-leading speaker bureau agent and author Maria Franzoni reminded me, booking stages—repeatedly and profitably—requires something much more rigorous.
Franzoni would know. She's spent over 25 years in the business, booking the likes of Neil Armstrong and Liza Minnelli, while mentoring hundreds of speakers across the globe. 'Everybody's a speaker,' she said, 'but not everybody gets booked.'
Her new book, The Bookability Formula, is poised to become a manual for anyone serious about the speaking business. But underneath the tactics lies a deeper truth: leadership in the keynote industry requires more than a polished story or viral content. It calls for a grounded, practical commitment to relevance, value, and humility.
What sets apart the sustainable speaker from the one-time sensation? Franzoni offers a few blunt truths that apply not only to the stage but to leadership itself.
Be Relevant, Not Just Resonant
The myth of the keynote as a 60-minute stage monologue has been eroding for years. 'It used to be you'd come in, deliver, and go out. Now, clients want partners,' Franzoni explained. 'They want someone who helps move the audience from point A to B. That hasn't changed, but the way speakers get there has.' It's precisely what also sets good leaders apart. They're there to help their team members shift from one level to another.
Furthermore, Franzoni's research at both the London Speaker Bureau and her own agency revealed a shared characteristic among the top 1% of booked speakers: they consistently upheld relevance. They didn't adopt a trendy or generic approach. They were relevant to a specific, pressing problem a client was trying to solve. And they could articulate that relevance quickly and clearly.
'Many speakers can talk for half an hour and still leave you wondering what they actually do,' she said. 'The best? You know exactly what they solve, for whom, and why it matters within minutes.'
That point is reinforced by a survey from global events company Freeman, which found only 1% of attendees preferred celebrity speakers, while 37% favored industry leaders and subject-matter experts. The results underscore the point that relevance and credibility consistently outweigh fame when attendees engage and apply what they've heard
Make Yourself Easy to Work With
In a world of contracting attention spans and increasing complexity, frictionless experiences win. 'Easy beats everything,' Franzoni said. 'Easy to find. Easy to book. Easy to work with. Easy to listen to.' While it may sound simple, this principle is more often violated than upheld.
Franzoni has seen contracts botched, client briefings skipped, and speakers show up without knowing the audience. The result? No return bookings and reputations lost in the backchannels of speaker bureau conversations. 'People don't have time for stress," she pointed out. 'Meeting planners want a safe pair of hands.'
I am reminded of the purpose statement that helps guide TELUS' Chief Communications & Brand Officer, Jill Schnarr: "Be easy to." Schnarr argues that trust is built through a leadership style of being easy to work with, do business with, have a meeting with, and so on, but is lost when that reliability and "easy factor" disappear. Being dependable and easy to work with in leadership is not optional; it's foundational.
According to Franzoni, the best speakers act like leaders in any business context. The most effective speakers prioritize listening before offering advice, respect the client's context, and never prioritize their reputation.
Focus on Value, Not Volume
Maria Franzoni
In the digital era, it's tempting to equate reach with reputation. Franzoni rejects that outright. 'It's not about being known by everyone. It's about being known by the right people.' Being bookable, as she puts it, is not about popularity but about value.
She sees the shift playing out on social platforms as well. While some speakers plaster LinkedIn with "humblebrags" and selfies, Franzoni recommends a subtler approach. 'Start conversations, not a pitch,' she told me. 'If your content is valuable, they'll look you up. You don't have to sell in every post.'
The ability to build rapport without resorting to theatrics is increasingly rare. 'We're all a bit tired of 'icky' selling,' she said. 'Talk about your topic. Share outcomes. Make your clients the heroes. You're not the star of the show.'
That idea aligns with the broader trend of audience-first content design. A report from Edelman's 2024 Trust Barometer showed that people crave utility and transparency from thought leaders, not self-congratulatory noise. In speaking, as in leadership, generosity is the real differentiator.
In addition, Edelman's 2024 Thought Leadership Impact Report (in partnership with LinkedIn) surveyed more than 3,500 B2B decision-makers and found that 73% of people believed that thoughtfully empathetic content is a more trustworthy basis for assessing organizational competence than marketing materials alone.
Celebrate Contribution, Not Celebrity
There's a final point Franzoni makes that deserves amplification. While celebrity speakers serve their purpose—bums in seats, as she puts it—they're often not the ones delivering the most value. 'Not one of the most-booked speakers we studied was a celebrity,' she said. 'They were celebrated, yes, but for the contributions they made.'
That small semantic shift—from celebrity to celebrated—speaks volumes. The best speakers don't posture, and the same is true for the best leaders. They solve problems and prepare ahead of time. They build enduring partnerships because their content (and ideas) help their clients become better at what they do.
Think of it not as a formula for fame but as a long-term strategy for impact.
Franzoni puts it this way: 'Most people will pay more to solve a problem than to achieve a goal.' Whether you're on stage, in a boardroom, or running a team, the question is the same: what problem are you solving, and for whom?
If you can address that with clarity, humility, purpose, and substance, you won't need to pursue the bookings. You don't need to chase the leadership accolades.
But you already know that.
Watch the full interview with Maria Franzoni and Dan Pontefract on the Leadership NOW program below, or listen to it on your favorite podcast.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Four Days Left Until ecotel communication ag (ETR:E4C) Trades Ex-Dividend
Regular readers will know that we love our dividends at Simply Wall St, which is why it's exciting to see ecotel communication ag (ETR:E4C) is about to trade ex-dividend in the next four days. The ex-dividend date is usually set to be two business days before the record date, which is the cut-off date on which you must be present on the company's books as a shareholder in order to receive the dividend. The ex-dividend date is important because any transaction on a stock needs to have been settled before the record date in order to be eligible for a dividend. This means that investors who purchase ecotel communication ag's shares on or after the 30th of June will not receive the dividend, which will be paid on the 2nd of July. The company's upcoming dividend is €0.29 a share, following on from the last 12 months, when the company distributed a total of €0.29 per share to shareholders. Calculating the last year's worth of payments shows that ecotel communication ag has a trailing yield of 2.2% on the current share price of €12.90. Dividends are an important source of income to many shareholders, but the health of the business is crucial to maintaining those dividends. So we need to check whether the dividend payments are covered, and if earnings are growing. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. Dividends are usually paid out of company profits, so if a company pays out more than it earned then its dividend is usually at greater risk of being cut. ecotel communication ag is paying out an acceptable 51% of its profit, a common payout level among most companies. Yet cash flow is typically more important than profit for assessing dividend sustainability, so we should always check if the company generated enough cash to afford its dividend. ecotel communication ag paid a dividend despite reporting negative free cash flow last year. That's typically a bad combination and - if this were more than a one-off - not sustainable. View our latest analysis for ecotel communication ag Click here to see how much of its profit ecotel communication ag paid out over the last 12 months. Stocks in companies that generate sustainable earnings growth often make the best dividend prospects, as it is easier to lift the dividend when earnings are rising. If business enters a downturn and the dividend is cut, the company could see its value fall precipitously. For this reason, we're glad to see ecotel communication ag's earnings per share have risen 20% per annum over the last five years. Many investors will assess a company's dividend performance by evaluating how much the dividend payments have changed over time. ecotel communication ag has delivered an average of 6.1% per year annual increase in its dividend, based on the past 10 years of dividend payments. We're glad to see dividends rising alongside earnings over a number of years, which may be a sign the company intends to share the growth with shareholders. From a dividend perspective, should investors buy or avoid ecotel communication ag? Earnings per share growth is a positive, and the company's payout ratio looks normal. However, we note ecotel communication ag paid out a much higher percentage of its free cash flow, which makes us uncomfortable. Overall we're not hugely bearish on the stock, but there are likely better dividend investments out there. If you're not too concerned about ecotel communication ag's ability to pay dividends, you should still be mindful of some of the other risks that this business faces. For example, we've found 3 warning signs for ecotel communication ag (1 doesn't sit too well with us!) that deserve your attention before investing in the shares. If you're in the market for strong dividend payers, we recommend checking our selection of top dividend stocks. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


New York Times
29 minutes ago
- New York Times
Manchester United want to sell before they buy this summer. Will it work?
The last time Manchester United agreed the sale of a first-team squad member this early in a summer was more than a decade ago, when Dynamo Moscow signed Alexander Buttner for £4.4million ($6m at current rates) back in 2014. That should comfort any supporters concerned United are waiting to find buyers for the class of 2025's bomb squad. These are early days. We've got another 10 weeks of this. Advertisement However, this summer is different to Buttner's last at Old Trafford when the window officially opened on July 1. Now, the pre-Club World Cup mini-window and the Premier League's decision to allow for deals to be done from June 16 has made this a busier month than usual. There is another important difference this summer too, and it's more United-specific. Beyond the deals for Matheus Cunha and Bryan Mbeumo, it is likely United will need to fund further signings through exits. After years of spending Champions League money on a Europa League budget, there is recognition at Old Trafford that, as chief executive Omar Berrada recently told United We Stand: 'We're going to have to balance the books.' This is not a club known for selling well, though. Chelsea and Manchester City have recorded £508.6m and £435.8m in profit from the sale of intangible assets — in other words, players — over the last five years respectively. Compare that to United's £105.5m over the same period. Those with knowledge of the club's previous transfer dealings, who spoke anonymously to protect relationships, put that down to departures typically being an afterthought. United never needed to worry about maximising fees for unwanted players because the budget was always there to sign replacements. Progress has been made. United's most recent financial results show until the end of March last season, they had recorded a £38.7m profit through player sales — a nine-month figure that surpasses every full-year total since Cristiano Ronaldo's £80m move to Real Madrid in 2009. Profit and loss is not the problem right now, though. As The Athletic demonstrated earlier this month, United have little to be concerned about under the Premier League's spending rules. To do more business this summer, they need cold, hard cash. At last count, United's cash reserves stood at £73.2m. Up until the end of March, a net £196m had flowed out of Old Trafford in cash on payments related to transfers, with much of that going on instalments for players signed in previous seasons. The club's third-quarter results revealed another £195.2m is due to be paid over the next year, including the cheque for £89m Sir Jim Ratcliffe said the club would write this summer even if they bought nobody. Neither of those figures reflect the instalments now owed for Cunha. United have access to more cash if required, with capacity to borrow £140m on their revolving credit facility. That could, theoretically, finance further spending without sales. But it would need to be paid back eventually, and would jar with Berrada's insistence on balance and restraint. Advertisement So it is easy to see why sales are preferred. Big ones, ideally, with as much paid up front as possible. Losing Bruno Fernandes in a mega-money move to Al Hilal would have left a gaping hole in Amorim's squad for next season, but from a financial perspective, it would have fit that criteria perfectly. If United were willing to consider a bid for their best player, imagine the relish with which they would greet firm offers for those out of favour: namely Marcus Rashford, Alejandro Garnacho, Jadon Sancho and Antony. Rashford wants to play Champions League football and has made no secret of his desire to join Barcelona, with his brother Dwaine Maynard holding talks in the Spanish city last month, but Camp Nou officials are pursuing a deal for Athletic Club winger Nico Williams. That Rashford's future may only be resolved later in the window, as The Athletic reported in this week's DealSheet, makes sense given his ambitions, his status as one of United's best-paid players and his exile under Amorim. Loan interest outweighs permanent options for the moment. Garnacho's salary is more modest, but he could command a higher fee. A price of £70m has been communicated to suitors, reasonable for a young talent with potential. But as with Rashford, if Garnacho has no way back under his current manager and has to be sold, then why should buyers rush to meet United's demand this early in the window? Sancho's wages are an obstacle, as they were in attempts to move him on permanently before his loans to Borussia Dortmund and Chelsea. Another temporary move away is not as easy an option this time if United want to recoup a fee, a year out from the end of his contract. Antony is thought to be the closest to an exit, yet the question has always been how high Real Betis, with whom he has been on loan, can afford to go. Denilson became the most expensive player of all time when joining Betis for £21.5m in 1998. He remains the Spanish club's record signing. United are also struggling to drum up suitors for Tyrell Malacia, who also spent the second half of last season on loan. Despite ending the campaign as a Eredivisie winner at PSV, there is no firm interest in the left-back. Navigating all of this is Jason Wilcox, who sold heavily during his single summer window at Southampton, but it is easier to maximise fees for young, talented prodigies with Premier League experience like Romeo Lavia and Tino Livramento. Wilcox is in a much tighter spot, needing to move on more than one high-profile or well-compensated player who is clearly outside of the manager or club's plans, with little room for reconciliation. United have at least two, arguably three such cases. Advertisement That is not a position rich in leverage, especially at this early stage of the window. Circumstances could push buyers to raise bids or players to soften their own expectations and demands. But if United are to insist on sales before spending, the clock is against them more than it is against the field. And in the case of the two highest-earners on the chopping block, United need only think back to the last time they shifted them out the door to realise how long it can take. Sancho's loan to Chelsea was only completed after last summer's deadline had passed, following the submission of a Premier League deal sheet. Rashford was unveiled as an Aston Villa player on the eve of the January deadline, with talks only accelerating a few days prior. Such is the nature of negotiations. When deadlines appear, red lines disappear. Compromises are sought, solutions are found. But if selling unwanted players is the starting point for a wider rebuild, it cannot be delayed until the end of the window. If United are to both remain disciplined and invest beyond Cunha and Mbeumo, those solutions will have to be found sooner rather than later. These may still be early days in the window but time is already of the essence.


Bloomberg
29 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Slovenia Ties Debt Interest to Emissions in First for Europe
Slovenia became the first European government to link its bond interest payments to environmental targets, providing a template for other countries in the region. The Alpine nation sold €1 billion ($1.2 billion) of a 10-year note where the coupon hinges on meeting greenhouse gas emission goals, according to a person with knowledge of the matter. The rare sovereign sustainability-linked bond attracted orders of over €6.5 billion, with such debt only sold by a few countries so far.