Eight held in Lancaster and Morecambe illegal working crackdown
Eight men suspected of working illegally have been arrested following a crackdown on nail bars and restaurants in Lancashire.Four businesses in Lancaster and Morecambe were visited on Friday in a joint operation between police, immigration enforcement and trading standards officers.Following concerns about modern slavery and suspected illegal working, five Vietnamese men were arrested at three different nail bars, one in Morecambe and two in Lancaster.Three Bangladeshi men were later detained at an Indian restaurant in Lancaster.
'Flout the law'
Businesses which employ illegal workers and fail to conduct relevant pre-employment checks risk substantial fines, the Home Office said.Three of the men who were detained at the nail bars either had outstanding asylum claims or appeals, said a Home Office spokesman, meaning that they did not have permission to work in the UK.The two other men were found to have entered the UK illegally and were placed on strict immigration bail, pending travel documents being issued to facilitate their removal. No modern slavery concerns were discovered.Of the three men arrested at the restaurant in Lancaster, two were detained pending their removal from the UK for breaching their visa conditions.The third man was bailed pending travel documents being issued.Alan Bushnell, the north-west of England's immigration compliance and enforcement lead, said: "We will continue to target those who flout the law - both individuals and the businesses that exploit them."
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Lancashire on BBC Sounds and follow BBC Lancashire on Facebook, X and Instagram and watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Labour accused of 'cover up' over 'rampant' abuse of asylum system by foreign students
Labour has been accused of covering up the full extent of a 'backdoor to Britain' which allows foreign students to claim asylum here. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said there is 'rampant' abuse by those granted a temporary student visas who then go on to claim they are a refugee in a bid to stay in the UK permanently. The Conservative frontbencher asked the Home Office to reveal new figures on the numbers making such claims, after the Mail revealed last year that nearly 5,000 foreign students claimed asylum in the year to March 2023. But the Home Office has so far refused to disclose the latest numbers. Mr Philp said: 'The Labour Government is covering up the rampant abuse of the system and refusing to publish the information regarding the number of asylum claims coming from international students registered at UK institutions. 'This is not good enough – they must come clean and start revoking sponsoring licences from non-compliant organisations. 'High-quality international students are welcome in the UK but too many institutions are selling immigration, not education.' Mr Philp asked the Home Secretary in a parliamentary question 'if she will publish the number people who came to the UK on a study visa and later claimed asylum for each sponsoring institution'. In a written reply, immigration minister Seema Malhotra said: 'The Immigration White Paper, published on May 12, sets out proposals for reform in a wide range of areas, including student visas, further details of which will be set out in due course.' In April last year the Mail exclusively revealed how leaked documents – covering the year to March 2023 – showed a record 21,525 asylum claims were made by visa holders, a 154 per cent annual rise. Of those, 4,965 arrived as students, 5,648 applications came on a visitor's visa and another 2,240 were made by seasonal workers. It also emerged at the time that education agency Study Group UK had sponsored visas for 804 foreign students who later claimed asylum. Study Group's website describes it as a 'leading international education specialist and a trusted strategic partner to more than 50 universities around the world'. The company was placed on a 'compliance action plan' by the Home Office in late 2024, which is understood to have been designed to address the high levels of non-compliance among its students. But it was taken off the special measures at the end of March this year. The firm remains licensed to sponsor student visas and is recruiting for new students ahead of the start of the academic year in the autumn. The university and higher education sector has raised concerns that poor compliance by some firms poses a risk to their businesses. One higher education executive said: 'There are regulations in place, but they are not being enforced. 'One bad actor is risking the credibility of the entire student visa system.' A Study Group spokesman said: 'The continued media focus on Study Group is disappointing, not least when we have consistently rebutted any claims and investigations into various areas of compliance. 'The Daily Mail article in April 2024 referenced historic asylum data from the year to March 2022-2023. 'As clarified with you last year, immediate measures were taken to address the anomalous spike in asylum applications from one particular country. This action was effective, and the following year claims fell by 90 per cent. 'We do not support any intent to use education as a route to asylum and take our commitment to compliance with UK immigration and asylum policy extremely seriously.' He said details of the action plan 'remain confidential', but added that 'no reference was made to asylum claims, hence no specific steps were required to be taken in that regard'. 'We continuously review and improve our processes, driving enhancements to ensure we continue to meet the highest standards of compliance,' the spokesman said. A Home Office spokesman said: 'Under successive governments we have seen a growing trend of the UK's student visa system being undermined, both by individuals from overseas seeking to exploit it, and by education providers in this country failing to protect it. 'We have acted quickly to tackle it, building intelligence on the profile of these individuals to identify them earlier and faster. This intelligence will help us stamp out this abuse and protect the integrity of our immigration system.'
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Migrant can stay in UK because he does not want to shave
An asylum seeker from Tajikistan has been allowed to stay in the UK because he would have had to shave his beard off if he was deported. The unnamed man won an appeal after arguing that he could be tortured and have his facial hair forcibly removed if he was sent back home. The Home Office tried to deport him back to the Central Asian state, but an asylum court has now ruled that he may be entitled to international protection in the UK because of his beard. In Tajikistan, beards are unofficially banned by the Government and hundreds of thousands of men have been arrested for having one in the last decade. Men in the country with beards are arrested, shaved against their will and have their fingerprints taken by police. It is part of a government campaign to try to prevent men from becoming radicalised and joining Islamic extremist terror groups. The man's claim was initially dismissed but he appealed and secured a further hearing of his case after it was ruled that being forced to have his hair removed amounted to persecution rather than being the result of social pressures. The case, disclosed in court papers, is the latest example uncovered by The Telegraph where illegal migrants or convicted foreign criminals have used human rights laws to try to halt their deportations. Ministers are proposing to raise the threshold to make it harder for judges to grant the right to remain based on Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights, which protects the right to a family life, and Article 3, which protects against torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. After his claim was initially rejected, the Tajik man, who was granted anonymity, appealed on the basis that the judge at the first-tier tribunal made 'contradictory' findings about his fear of persecution. He claimed that the tribunal had not properly assessed whether he would shave his beard because of 'social pressures' or because of a 'fear of being persecuted'. The Tajik man said he would shave off his beard if he was sent back but only because he would have 'no option' as he would be at risk of persecution. Parminder Saini, the Deputy Judge of the Upper Tribunal, said: 'The [First-tier Tribunal] judge has failed to assess whether the [Tajik man] is shaving off his beard because of 'social pressures' or due to a 'fear of being persecuted'. 'We find that this represents inadequate and incomplete reasoning in relation to the key issue of why the [Tajik man] is willing to shave his beard on return to Tajikistan. 'If he wears a beard out of religious conviction but will conform for reasons of securing his safety, he may be entitled to international protection. 'If, however, he would conform because of social or other pressures, or simply because wearing a beard is not an act of faith for him, and not because of the risk of persecution, then he may not be a refugee.' He added: 'We also note that the judge has failed to consider the objective risk to the [Tajik man] by reference to the background material before him. '[His lawyer] took us to several examples... which pointed to torture and mistreatment remaining widespread, arbitrary arrest being commonplace, thousands of Tajik men having their beards forcibly shaved and being fingerprinted and recorded by the authorities etc. 'Thus, these examples of background material before the judge were relevant to, and should have informed, his assessment of whether the [Tajik man] was at risk on return as well as the likelihood of whether [he] would feel compelled to shave due to fear, but they find no mention in the decision.' Judge Saini ruled that the previous decision was set aside and that his case must be heard again at the First-tier Tribunal.
BBC News
8 hours ago
- BBC News
'The stranger who raped me shouldn't be deported early'
On a summer's night in July 2019, Kate was out with one of her best friends. They had cocktails and went dancing. That evening, she was taken to a stranger's flat and man responsible, Albanian national Miridon Bera, was convicted and jailed in March 2023, but may now be transferred to prison in his home country after serving a little over two years of his eight-and-a-half-year sentence in the - who has waived her anonymity, but whose name we have changed - was told at the point of conviction that Bera would be deported at the end of his she has since been shocked to discover he could be deported even Home Office has told the BBC "foreign national offenders who commit serious sexual crimes face deportation at the earliest opportunity".However, Kate feels strongly that Bera should serve the rest of his sentence in the UK before being Readers may find some details in this story distressing It had all started as a typical twentysomething night out for the two close friends in their home town of Colchester: drinks at Wetherspoon's and Turtle Bay, followed by was at the final bar, Walkabout, that Kate's memory "went dark"."I then remember having a few lightning flashes of what I then came to realise quite quickly was being raped," she says."I couldn't hold myself up at the time, and I had to have people carry me out of his flat."It was the next morning when I had that sinking feeling. The pain between my thighs confirmed what I already knew. I took my blood- and vomit-stained clothes home and told my parents I had been raped."After going to police, and being examined by officers at a specialist facility, Kate was given a multitude of treatments to protect her from sexually-transmitted diseases, as well as the morning-after pill. Police quickly arrested Bera. In September 2020, more than a year after the attack, he was charged with rape, which he denied, and Kate, the wait for a trial was crushing."It took more than three years - through multiple jobs, through moving house, through multiple other milestones," she says."I had therapy, medication - which I'm still on to this day - and turned to suicide support services to help. I've had depression, night terrors, symptoms of PTSD and flashbacks."At one point they said in September the trial would be in January - and I thought, 'That's only a few months', but it was the January after that."At that point, being told it's completely out of my control, and I have to sit and wait - that broke me again."I became suicidal again and I realised there was nothing I could do - he was just out there."The BBC asked the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) for a response to Kate's experience of court said it was trying to address the wider issue through funding extra Crown Court sessions, increasing magistrates' powers, commissioning an independent review and recruiting more staff. The trial eventually took place in February 2023, and Kate describes her "huge sense of closure" when Bera was convicted of raping her."It then felt like, 'I can live my life now,' and all of that time and effort that I'd put in - watching back the CCTV of that night, watching back the interview I did the day after the rape - it all made it worth it in the end, getting that result."Bera was jailed for eight and a half years, and Kate was told he would serve his sentence in the UK before being deported to in April, Kate received an email "out of the blue" from the victim services arm of HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS), asking how she would feel about her attacker's potential deportation. "My heart dropped reading the emails, and getting the responses and lack of clarity that I did," she says."I did say I wanted to be contacted if there was a huge update around him being released, but I think receiving an email with one or two lines without any context around what this means was misleading."Further email exchanges brought little clarity, and it was not until Kate's MP Pam Cox (Labour, Colchester) managed to get an update that she started to understand what was likely to happen has yet to receive official confirmation said: "It's clear from the way [Kate] feels about this that it's not been handled well."She's immensely brave now to speak out about this latest development."The challenge for the government is that there are many thousands of foreign national offenders in our overcrowded prisons, but, of course, for every foreign offender removed, there is a victim with questions."My job, as her MP, is to support her as best I can to get the answers that she needs." The Home Office says it has Prison Transfer Agreements (PTAs) in place with 110 countries - meaning offenders serving sentences in UK jails can be transferred back to their home nations to continue serving their terms MoJ confirmed the UK did have a PTA with Albania, meaning if the justice system there agrees his transfer, Bera will continue his sentence in an Albanian BBC understands an application has been made for Bera's repatriation through a PTA - something Kate has you are affected by any of the issues in this story, details of help and support are available at BBC Action LineThe MoJ says PTAs are used for prisoners serving longer sentences; and for those on shorter fixed terms, an early removal scheme is in place for the sole purpose of removal or deportation from the BBC asked both the Home Office and the MoJ if the decision to transfer Bera two years into his sentence, rather than at its conclusion, was related to prison overcrowding, but neither addressed this in their both pointed out 4,436 foreign national offenders were returned to their countries between July 2024 and May 2025, an increase of 14% on the previous 12-month government also says the deportation of foreign national offenders is a priority. Kate still feels strongly that Bera should remain in the UK until the conclusion of his sentence."Other countries don't necessarily take sexual violence as seriously in the justice system as we do in the UK, rightfully," she says."He committed the crime here, a jury found him guilty here, a judge sentenced him here - he should have to serve that sentence here."Put simply, it's been retraumatising. It's hugely emotionally draining, and physically as well, to be put into a position to have to relive and re-think through not just the rape and what happened to me that night, but all of the subsequent trial and conviction."It's a huge demand for victims to even go through a trial, let alone have months and years of delays with this hanging over my head to then have it brought up again, with the potential to undo that moment of certainty we had in 2023." In a statement to the BBC, the Home Office said sexual violence was "a devastating crime"."We recognise the immense bravery shown by victims throughout their pursuit of justice," a spokesperson said."Protecting victims remains central to our mission to halve violence against women and girls in a decade."Foreign national offenders who commit serious sexual crimes face deportation at the earliest opportunity." Follow Essex news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
