Indian Astronaut's 'Swan' Soft Toy And A Goddess Saraswati Connection
New Delhi:
When the Falcon-9 rocket lifts off from Florida's Kennedy Space Centre on June 10, it will carry more than four astronauts and research gear into low Earth orbit. With them will be a small, cuddly, soft toy - a swan.
At a pre-flight virtual press conference, the Axiom-4 crew unveiled the mission's zero-gravity indicator, a traditional token carried onboard by astronauts to visually signal the moment the spacecraft reaches orbit and enters weightlessness. This time, the indicator is a swan doll named 'Joy'. It broadly represents the vehicle on which the Hindu goddess of knowledge, Saraswati, travels. Joy is white in colour like a swan and has a black and yellow beak and is the size of one's palm.
Each member of the four-person international crew contributed to selecting the swan as a unifying cultural symbol. For Group Captain Shukla, it carries deep religious and philosophical significance.
"Swan is believed to have the rare ability to separate milk from water, representing purity, wisdom and grace. Carrying this symbol reminds me of the delicate balance between knowledge and pressure, and it keeps me grounded in the values I hold dear. I feel inspired, fully prepared and confident as I embark on this journey," Mr Shukla said.
Astronaut Peggy Whitson, the Commander of the Axiom Mission which is also referred to as Mission Akash Ganga said, "The doll will float freely inside the SpaceX Crew Dragon capsule as a marker of microgravity for cameras and the crew. More than just a companion, Joy will signal our arrival in microgravity shortly after launch. Joy represents the shared aspirations of three nations united in their return to human space flight. The swan is rich in cultural symbolism, stands for wisdom in India, resilience in Poland, and grace in Hungary. Through Joy, we'll celebrate our diversity and our unity in the shared journey of space exploration."
"I call upon every 'Bharatvasi' to join us, participate, engage and dream boldly about the future," Group Captain Shukla said at a press conference.
The Axiom-4 mission was originally scheduled for launch on May 29. It was subsequently rescheduled to June 8 and is now confirmed for June 10 at 5:52 pm IST. Axiom Space confirmed the new schedule during the virtual media briefing, citing readiness of the rocket being delayed due to weather conditions.
The mission, operated by Texas-based Axiom Space in partnership with SpaceX and NASA, will transport four astronauts, Mission Commander Peggy Whitson (US), Mission Pilot Shubhanshu Shukla (India), and mission specialists Slawosz Uznanski-Wisniewski (Poland) and Tibor Kapu (Hungary) to the International Space Station (ISS) for a two-week stay.
Group Captain Shukla becomes only the second Indian to fly into space, 41 years after Rakesh Sharma's 1984 mission aboard the Soviet Soyuz T-11. He also becomes the first Indian citizen to participate in an international, commercially funded human spaceflight mission involving scientific experiments co-developed with multiple Indian agencies.
For Poland and Hungary, the flight marks the first time either nation has sent an astronaut to the ISS.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
British Sikh MPs call for independent probe into UK role in Op Bluestar
British Sikh members of parliament Warinder Juss and Jas Athwal on Thursday reiterated their demand in the UK Parliament for an independent investigation into the involvement of the then Margaret Thatcher-led Conservative government in India's Operation Bluestar in June 1984. Juss, who represents the governing Labour Party in Wolverhampton West in northern England, and Athwal, who is the Labour MP for Ilford South in the east of the country, raised the matter during the 'Business of the House' session with the Leader of the House of Commons, Lucy Powell. They highlighted the 41st anniversary of the operation at Golden Temple and pointed to Powell's assurance to their fellow Sikh Labour MP, Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi, earlier this year of the 'need to get to the bottom of what happened'. 'Documents revealed in 2014 showed that the Thatcher government had helped their Indian counterpart by providing advice for Operation Bluestar,' said Juss. 'Since 2014, there have been many calls to establish the extent of the British government's involvement, and many assurances have been given. Will the Leader of the House give a statement to the House announcing an independent, judge-led public inquiry to, in her own words, get to the bottom of what happened,' he asked. Powell responded by acknowledging the concerns of members of the country's Sikh community but said she did not have an update since the last time the matter was raised in Parliament in early January. 'When I was asked about this issue previously, I did follow up, and I am sorry to say that I am still waiting,' she said. Athwal intervened later during the session to highlight that this week coincides with the anniversary of Operation Bluestar. He said: 'Some 41 years later, questions about British involvement remain unanswered. Labour promised in its 2017 and 2019 manifestos to hold an inquiry, and the Prime Minister [Keir Starmer] and the Deputy Prime Minister [Angela Rayner] pledged to do so before the last election. 'Will the Leader of the House allow time for an update from the Foreign Secretary on the progress of implementing that inquiry and ensure that promises made in opposition are fulfilled in government?' Powell reiterated that she understood how important it was for the British Sikh community to see 'progress on this issue'. 'That is the second time that it has been raised with me this morning. I will ensure that the Foreign Secretary [David Lammy] is aware of the concerns being raised again on the Floor of the House and that the update I previously asked for is made available to Members and this House,' she said. The first demand for an independent inquiry arose a few years ago when it emerged that British military advice was given to Indian forces prior to Operation Bluestar. The then British Prime Minister, David Cameron, had ordered an internal review into this discovery, which led to a statement in Parliament declaring that Britain's role had been purely 'advisory' and the Special Air Service (SAS) advice had 'limited impact' on Operation Bluestar in June 1984.
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Donald Trump vs Elon Musk Fight: From bromance to breakup
FILE - Elon Musk jumps on the stage as Republican presidential nominee former President Donald Trump speaks at a campaign rally at the Butler Farm Show, Oct. 5, 2024, in Butler, Pa. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File) One of the problems with watching the Star Wars prequel is that one knows what happens. For example, it's inevitable that Anakin Skywalker would eventually become Darth Vader, turning on his great friend and mentor Obi-Wan Kenobi. The same was apparent to anyone who saw the bromance between Elon Musk and Donald Trump : two oversized egos who forged an unlikely partnership to destroy wokeism and Make America Great Again. And yet, behind the bromance, with Trump loving Elon's rocket landings and Elon praising Trump, the fallout was always coming. The trigger? T rump's Big Beautiful Bill. The Breakout Power Couple If the American republic is a reality show, then Donald Trump and Elon Musk were its breakout power couple. One sold steaks and slogans, the other sold flamethrowers and tunnels. For a moment, they were the tech-and-tantrum axis, the double helix of power and platform. But like all primetime pairings, their arc had a third-act twist—less redemption, more Game of Thrones firestorm. Read: A timeline of the meltdown Act I: From Paris to Palm Beach There was a time, not long ago, when Elon Musk and Donald Trump were on different planets—ideologically, intellectually, and ecologically. Musk publicly distanced himself from Trump during his first term, even resigning from the White House advisory councils in 2017 after Trump pulled the US out of the Paris Climate Agreement. Musk was more Silicon Valley libertarian than nationalist firebrand; Trump, more Rust Belt messiah than Martian coloniser. But politics, like spaceflight, is about trajectory. And in July 2024, after an attempt on Trump's life during the campaign trail, Musk's compass shifted. He endorsed Trump. Loudly. Repeatedly. He became the single largest donor to the Republican campaign with nearly $300 million in funding. SpaceX's Starlink was praised during the campaign, particularly for its potential to provide reliable internet access in rural areas—an area of focus for Trump's second-term infrastructure promises. Behind the scenes, Musk enabled the tech bros to go with Trump, helping to realise the intellectual blueprint associated with Curtis Yarvin. Curtis Yarvin, a Silicon Valley-based political theorist and blogger also known by his pen name 'Mencius Moldbug,' is often credited as a founding intellectual figure of the New Right and the 'neoreactionary' movement. His ideology favours strong executive power and a technocratic elite over liberal democracy—an outlook that resonated with Musk's growing contempt for traditional institutions and love for systems engineering. And with his typical flair for drama, Musk turned what was once quiet admiration into full-throttle political support. Trump responded with the one currency he deals in best: spectacle. I love Donald Trump, as much as a straight man can. Elon Musk Act II: DOGE Days and Rocket Praise Donald Trump and Elon Musk By early 2025, the bromance had been institutionalised. Trump appointed Musk to head the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency—DOGE. If the name sounded like a meme, it was because it was one. Musk, now a cabinet-level bureaucrat with budgetary scissors, had free rein to slash overhead and theoretically save the American taxpayer trillions. Within weeks, he was livestreaming audits, tweeting cost-cutting charts, and posting memes of bureaucrats turned into 'NPCs. ' Meanwhile, Trump basked in the Musk glow. At a Mar-a-Lago fundraiser, he reportedly insisted the band play Space Oddity as a tribute to Musk and mused to guests about how 'those rockets, they're just incredible—beautiful machines.' It wasn't policy. It was pageantry. They travelled together. They went to UFC fights. Musk's son, X Æ A-12, appeared at White House events. For a while, Musk was "First Buddy"—unofficial, unfiltered, and ever online. Act III: Policy Static and Musk's Exit Cracks had begun to show even earlier. One major source of tension was the so-called MAGA Civil War over H-1B visas. In early 2025, Trump's base erupted over what they perceived as a betrayal of the America First doctrine, particularly as Trump's administration floated limited reforms to streamline high-skilled immigration. Musk, a vocal advocate for retaining and attracting top engineering talent from abroad, defended the H-1B program, calling it essential for innovation in AI, automotive tech, and aerospace. This did not sit well with the populist flank of the GOP. Hardline Trump allies began to attack Musk, accusing him of putting corporate interests above American workers. Right-wing influencers branded him a 'globalist Trojan horse,' and social media became a battleground where MAGA's nationalist rhetoric clashed with Musk's techno-libertarianism. Around the same time, the Trump administration introduced a tariff framework designed to penalise countries that subsidised exports into the US—raising concerns among tech companies. Musk, who had publicly criticised similar tariffs in the past, warned they would increase domestic production costs for high-tech manufacturers like Tesla. It made importing components more expensive, while offering no meaningful relief for US-based innovation. undefined The online vitriol was an early signal that Musk's ideological alignment with Trump's base was more fragile than it appeared. But alliances built on mutual flattery have the shelf life of a Tesla's steering wheel. Trouble emerged with Trump's signature 'One Big Beautiful Bill'—a sprawling tax and spending plan. While MAGA world cheered its middle-class tax cuts and deficit reduction promises, Musk bristled at its axe-swinging on clean energy incentives, particularly EV subsidies. Musk wasn't subtle about it. In public posts, he attacked the bill as irresponsible. In private meetings, he warned Republican allies it would hurt American innovation. But most significantly, he realised the bill—and its supporters—no longer needed him. He had gone from insider to inconvenience. In May 2025, Musk stepped down from DOGE. Officially, it was to 'refocus on private ventures.' Unofficially, the writing was on the wall. Act IV: June 5 and the Flameout The final straw came in June, with the subtlety of a SpaceX booster detonation. At a closed-door White House meeting, Trump reportedly voiced his disappointment with Musk's public criticisms. Musk, mid-meeting, fired off posts on X denouncing the bill and reminding the world he had "bankrolled the campaign." He reposted content calling for Trump's impeachment. It was no longer dissent—it was defiance. Trump hit back. He publicly threatened to terminate federal contracts and subsidies for Tesla, SpaceX, and Starlink, claiming it would save "Billions and Billions of Dollars." By day's end, Tesla had lost 14.3% in market value. Musk, in turn, stoked conspiracy fires by suggesting Trump's name might be in the unreleased Epstein files. No evidence. Just thermonuclear innuendo. Act V: Fallout and the Fractured GOP The markets shook. SpaceX's NASA contracts went into limbo. Musk's loyalists cried betrayal. Some Republicans—Thomas Massie, Warren Davidson—sided with him. Most stayed with Trump. Trump pulled Jared Isaacman's NASA nomination, Musk's close friend, just days after the feud began. Peter Navarro and Musk reignited their mutual loathing over tariffs, with Musk publicly calling Navarro "a moron." Then came the money. Musk withheld the final $100 million of his $300 million donation, citing "fiscal betrayal." Trump responded by saying Musk had 'Trump Derangement Syndrome'. The digital divorce was final. Postscript: The Gospel of Ego FILE - Elon Musk jumps on the stage as Republican presidential nominee former President Donald Trump speaks at a campaign rally at the Butler Farm Show, Oct. 5, 2024, in Butler, Pa. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File) In the end, this wasn't just about electric vehicles or deficits. It was about two men who see themselves as the singular protagonists of American destiny—and couldn't tolerate a shared spotlight. Trump wanted a loyal industrialist. Musk wanted a blank cheque. Neither got what they wanted. Now, one controls the levers of state. The other commands the timeline. One speaks from a podium. The other from a rocket. And the rest of America is left scrolling through a billionaire breakup, meme by meme, post by post.
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Portfolio valued at 5X of invested capital; ranks among top VC funds globally, says Artha Venture Fund
Live Events Artha Ventures says it was founded with a clear belief in the power of lean capital and operational discipline. It was an early champion of India's microVC model - writing smaller cheques into scalable, high-potential sectors such as D2C, SaaS, EV infrastructure, and agritech. In a conversation with ET Digital, Anirudh A. Damani, Managing Partner, Artha Venture Fund talks about the investment thesis of the fund, what makes them different, how the Indian startup ecosystem is maturing and some common misconceptions that investors have about India . Edited our investment strategy may resemble that of a typical early-stage VC, backing high-potential seed-stage companies, our approach is fundamentally different. Artha Venture Fund has intentionally built a concentrated, high-conviction portfolio. This unique approach, rather than adopting a 'spray and pray' model, involves selective capital deployment and reserving over 70% of our funds for follow-on rounds. This means our alignment with founders extends well beyond the initial investment. We support them through multiple stages as long as they deliver on key milestones. This level of commitment also gives founders visibility into their future funding potential, which enhances decision-making and long-term we have built a lean yet high-leverage team structure: for every 4–5 portfolio companies, we assign a full-time analyst (either a CA or an MBA in Finance), an associate, a principal, and a partner. This layered support system ensures that founders receive attention and operational help that would be hard to find in most funds at our stage. That structure, supported by a robust backend in legal, compliance, IR, and administration (which together comprise nearly 33% of our team), enables us to go deep rather than wide, something that has paid off in terms of portfolio quality, ownership, and of the core global best practices we adopted early was a post-investment operating model. Globally, hands-on fund support often kicks in only after Series A or B—but in India, founders need it from day one. We localized that approach to suit the high-friction realities of building in India. Our team doesn't just help companies scale; we help thembetter, navigating GST, ROC filings, tax authority queries, founder compliance, and even structuring cap tables or navigating co-founder have engineered our fund architecture to reflect the high-touch Indian environment. While Western founders may enjoy plug-and-play ecosystems, India is a country of edge cases from the variability of state laws to linguistic and cultural nuances even within metro cities. By building a team that includes full-time legal and compliance professionals and maintaining disciplined, recurring touchpoints with founders, we've created a playbook that feels global in design but is deeply rooted in India's India, I believe smaller, nimble funds are structurally better positioned to outperform. This market is not the U.S. or Europe—it's more fragmented, less homogeneous, and far more cost-efficient when it comes to building. Larger funds that rely on massive outlays to chase scale often struggle to generate the returns Indian investors demand. In contrast, a smaller fund with strong ownership, capital efficiency, and a clear return discipline can not only outperform the public markets but also build meaningful FY19 and FY25, the NIFTY has nearly doubled, even accounting for the COVID years. In the same period, our fund has returned close to 5x on invested capital, and our IRR is nearly 3x that of the NIFTY. This success is not a happy accident. It's the outcome of strategic patience and deal-by-deal discipline. In India, scale does not always come from ticket size; it comes from precision, timing, and knowing whento invest. Our decision to pause deployments during the overheated 2021–2022 period and resume investing heavily in 2023–2024 is a prime example. Large funds, with pressure to deploy, often do not have that attractiveness to global LPs comes down to a few sharp metrics: a high IRR of 61%, a TVPI of 3.75x in INR terms (3.40x in USD), and a DPI nearing 20% with several more exits in active diligence. But beyond performance, what appeals to family offices and global LPs is our discipline. We do not chase hype cycles. We did not draw down capital during the 2021–22 valuation bubble, which protected our portfolio vintage. A large portion of our seed capital was deployed in the last 12–18 months. We view that window as one of the best investing vintages in recent also maintain a high average ownership (over 15%) in our top 10 companies, and our top portfolio companies are profitable, with strong institutional follow-on participation. This reflects a model where capital efficiency and governance matter as much as growth, which deeply resonates with LPs seeking long-term, sustainable value ecosystem is maturing rapidly—but it's doing so in its own way, not by mirroring the West. There's a growing realization among founders that fundraising isn't the business model—profitability is. The 'growth at all costs' era is fading. Startups are now considering their unit economics, sustainability, and scaling revenue, not just burn transition from VC to PE also shows where maturity is kicking in. Only about 2% of companies that raise a seed round go on to raise a Series C. That inflection point separates venture-backed promise from private equity-backed performance. Founders who cross that threshold are building real businesses, not just pitch the mindset is shifting from 'blitzscaling' to 'grease-scaling'—building on your own positive cashflow rather than investor capital. We strongly believe in that model, and so do the best founders of the biggest misconceptions global investors holds is that India is a 1.5 billion-person monolith. It's not. India is a collection of highly fragmented, diverse micro-markets. Language, lifestyle, income bands, and purchasing behavior. Each region is a different country in itself. Applying a western scale lens to this market has lost many funds a lot of Artha, we have built our thesis around finding and dominating micro-markets. As my father often says, '1% of India is still 15 million people,' and that's often where the real opportunities lie. If you can serve the top 6% of Indian consumers effectively, you're already targeting a market that makes up 70–80% of consumer spending. That is where our founders thrive: solving sharp, localized problems at scale, without pretending the entire country behaves like a homogenous consumer global ranking likely stems from a mix of hard numbers: high IRR, strong TVPI, early DPI, and operational discipline. We built our fund to be capital-efficient, avoided overpaying during peak vintages, and invested deeply in governance and founder support. We were active when the market was quiet and paused when valuations were irrational. That's the kind of asymmetric behavior that leads to outlier outcomes. In fact, we were ranked third globally among all private funds in the 2019 vintage, per PitchBook we do recognize that global rankings often favor funds with large DPI or USD-denominated returns, which can disadvantage India-focused INR funds. Currency depreciation alone can mute impressive domestic returns when measured in dollar terms. Moreover, softer elements, such as market friction, regulatory complexity, or founder handholding, are often not captured in these models. But they're essential for performance in markets like global downturn has hit private markets harder than public ones. We're emerging from a period of irrational exuberance, where capital was nearly free, and many portfolios are feeling the hangover. The correction, however, is healthy. Valuations are more rational, founders are more focused, and LPs are once again asking the right markets globally are on fire, but many of them are already overpriced. In contrast, early-stage private deals in India today are trading at a discount to what one would pay for small- or micro-cap companies in the public markets, or those entering the SME IPO window. That makes private markets here particularly attractive for long-term investors right see this as one of the best vintages to invest in. But we're also cautious that bubbles still exist, especially around AI. Our job is to find enduring companies with strong moats and disciplined execution, rather than chasing the narrative of the month. That mindset, we believe, will differentiate winners from the rest over the next decade.
