Renewed calls to bring back shelved road dualling
The government has been urged to restore plans to dual the A66 road which runs across northern England.
Mike Starkie, the former Conservative Mayor of Copeland, in Cumbria, said the upgrade was needed to "support growth."
The project was put on hold indefinitely by the government in 2024 citing a "black hole" in public finances, but many want the chancellor to commit to the project as soon as possible in the spending review in June.
Labour North Yorkshire Mayor David Skaith said "we know the money wasn't there in the first place" for major schemes promised by the previous government.
The road is a key artery running east and west between Scotch Corner in North Yorkshire and Workington in Cumbria.
Before the 2024 general election, the Conservative government was moving ahead with plans for sections between the A1(M) and Penrith, but Labour swiftly put the project on hold alongside a number of others.
Explaining the decision, Skaith told BBC Politics North: "The government did inherit a terrible financial situation.
"We have lots of conversations with local leaders and MPs in North Yorkshire about such projects.
"We've invested heavily into our rural transport network and we're looking at active travel provision as well, and working with the rail operators to improve that connectivity as that's what I have power over."
However, Starkie accused Labour of unfairly leaving road users behind.
He said: "What we're seeing is a clear demonstration of this government's misguided priorities.
"They can find £84bn to surrender the Chagos Islands, but then we've got infrastructure in our country that, to support growth, needs updating."
"The projects that have actually got through the planning process - like the A66 - are getting shelved after already clearing the hurdles."
BBC Politics North airs Sundays on BBC One at 10:00. Watch now on the BBC Iplayer.
Follow BBC North East on X and Facebook and BBC Cumbria on X and Facebook and both on Nextdoor and Instagram.
Plea to dual road after 'chilling' deaths
A66 dualling finally gets government approval
A66 dualling legal challenge fails
Department for Transport
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Wildlife charities urge Labour to scrap ‘licence to kill nature' in planning bill
Leading wildlife charities are calling on Labour to scrap a significant section of the planning bill that they say is a 'licence to kill nature', as new data reveals bats and newts are not the main reason planning is delayed in England. The RSPB and the Wildlife Trusts, whose membership is more than 2 million, said Labour had broken its promises on nature. They called for part three of the bill, which allows developers to avoid environmental laws at a site by paying into a national nature recovery fund to pay for environmental improvements elsewhere, to be ditched. Beccy Speight, CEO of the RSPB, said: 'It's now clear that the bill in its current form will rip the heart out of environmental protections and risks sending nature further into freefall. 'The fate of our most important places for nature and the laws that protect them are all in the firing line. The wild spaces, ancient woodlands, babbling brooks and the beautiful melody of the dawn chorus – it's these natural wonders that delight people all over the country and support our physical and mental health that are under threat. That cannot be allowed to stand.' The charities released new research that suggested bats and newts were not the reason for delays in planning in 2024. The chancellor, Rachel Reeves; the prime minister, Keir Starmer; and the housing secretary, Angela Rayner; have repeatedly framed nature as a blocker to growth, blaming bats and newts for delays to infrastructure and housing projects. The data from analysis of 17,433 planning appeals in England in 2024 found that newts were relevant in just 140 (0.8%) planning appeals and bats in 432 (2.48%). Craig Bennett, chief executive of The Wildlife Trusts, said: 'Before the general election, Labour promised to restore nature. Under a year later, the chancellor is leading an ideological charge against the natural world despite it being the very foundation of the economy, society and people's health. Promises have been broken, and millions of people have been betrayed.' The leading British wildlife charities spoke out as more than 60 conservationists, including presenter Chris Packham, business leaders and legal experts signed a joint statement calling for the planning and infrastructure bill to be paused and for a meaningful consultation over part three of the draft legislation. Anger from environmental groups, ecologists and some economists has grown after Labour MPs and housing minister Matthew Pennycook rejected every amendment to strengthen protections for nature in the bill, which were put forward by MPs on the committee examining the draft legislation. These include a call for better protections for rare and vulnerable chalk streams and for all so called irreplaceable habitats which cannot by their very nature be recreated anywhere else in a compensatory scheme. British ecologist Sir John Lawton, who signed the joint statement, said the government should pause the bill for proper consultation: 'Legal changes of this magnitude should at least follow due process. A hurried competition for last-minute 'rescue' amendments to this dangerous bill helps no one, and will surely harm our environment, and our economy on which it depends,' he said. 'Normal, evidence-led, democratic due process is all we are asking for.' In a separate letter to Steve Reed, the environment secretary, the body representing ecologists said part three of the bill effectively allowed on-site habitats and species to be 'wantonly destroyed to make way for development' with the vague hope that it would be restored somewhere else at some future point in time. '[This] is quite evidently a catastrophically wrong approach,' said the Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management. Bennett said the so-called nature recovery part of the bill was a misnomer because in reality it was a licence to destroy nature. He said: 'The Wildlife Trusts and others have offered constructive solutions that would allow the bill to proceed and achieve its aim to accelerate development whilst maintaining strong environmental protections. We're appalled that these have all been spurned. Nature is in crisis and must not suffer further damage. Much loved places like the New Forest could now be at risk – that's why we're now saying the misleadingly named 'nature recovery' section must be removed.' A government spokesperson said: 'We completely reject these claims. The government has inherited a failing system that has delayed new homes and infrastructure while doing nothing for nature's recovery, and we are determined to fix this through our plan for change. That's why our planning and infrastructure bill will deliver a win-win for the economy and nature by unblocking building and economic growth, and delivering meaningful environmental improvements.'
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Revealed: 5,000 English nature sites at risk under Labour's planning proposals
More than 5,000 of England's most sensitive, rare and protected natural habitats are at high risk of being destroyed by development under Labour's new planning bill, according to legal analysis of the legislation. The Guardian has examined the threat the bill poses to 5,251 areas known as nature's 'jewels in the crown', as some of the country's most respected wildlife charities call for a key part of the bill to be scrapped. The areas at risk from Labour's planning changes include cherished landscapes such as the New Forest, the Surrey heaths, the Peak District moors, and the Forest of Bowland. Rivers such as the Itchen in Hampshire and the Wensum in Norfolk are also threatened by the bill. The thousands of protected habitats are locations for threatened British wildlife such as nightingales, badgers, dormice, otters, butterflies, dragonflies, kingfishers, tufted ducks and egrets. The bill is the product of the government's promise to build 1.5m homes to help address the UK's housing affordability crisis, and approve 150 major infrastructure projects, in this parliament. The pledge is key to Labour's plan to boost economic growth; however, a recent study suggests the government is likely to miss its new homes target. The government says the bill does not weaken environmental protections. But according to three separate legal opinions on the planning and infrastructure bill currently going through parliament, legal protections will be rolled back by the legislation, making it easier for developers to build on areas that have historically been protected under UK and international law. The Guardian has identified 10 protected sites that are under particular threat from development under the new legislation amid growing criticism of Labour's bill. Related: Ten jewels of English nature at risk from development and Labour's planning bill They include one of the last strongholds for nightingales in England at Lodge Hill in Kent; a wetland dating back 2,600 years in south Devon; an internationally important tidal wetland at Tipner west in Portsmouth; and woods dating back as far as the 17th century at Sittingbourne, Kent, part of the 2.5% of the UK's ancient woodland that still remains. These areas represent just a handful of the most protected environmental gems across England which include 4,100 sites of special scientific interest (SSSIs), all currently protected by the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981; 71 wetlands protected under the internationally-binding Ramsar convention; 256 special areas of conservation (SACs) and 824 special protection areas, (SPAs) all protected under UK and international law in the habitats directive. Though numerous, these protected areas in total only cover just under 8% of land in England. Critics of the bill say ensuring they continue to be protected does not amount to a block on building new houses. In a legal opinion, Alex Goodman KC said the consequences of the planning and infrastructure bill as drafted were that any adverse impacts a development inflicted on the most protected natural areas in England, including SSSIs, SACs and Ramsar sites, must be 'disregarded'. '[The bill] thereby withdraws the principal legal safeguard for protected sites,' he said. 'This amounts to a very significant change.' Goodman has provided one of three separate legal opinions on the bill since it was presented by Angela Rayner, secretary of state for housing, communities and local government. All, including that of the government's own watchdog, the Office for Environmental Protection (OEP), challenge Rayner's assertion to parliament that the bill is not a rollback of environmental law. Rayner has been threatened with a judicial review brought by nature groups if she does not 'correct' her comments. Goodman said: 'The only possible reading is that the bill will have the effect of reducing the level of environmental protection provided.' Glenys Stacey, chair of the OEP, said: 'The bill would have the effect of reducing the level of environmental protection provided for by existing environmental law. As drafted, the provisions are a regression.' Key concerns focus on part three of the bill, which provides a mechanism for developers to sidestep current environmental obligations by paying into a nature restoration fund, which will be used at a later date to create environmental improvements elsewhere. Once the fee is paid, the development can go ahead even if it 'inflicts adverse effects on the integrity of a protected site'. Dubbed a mechanism to pay 'cash to trash', the bill contains no requirement for developers to measure what harms are taking place during the planning process. Irreplaceable habitats have no extra protection from development. Leading charities have called for this section to be scrapped entirely. Dr Ruth Tingay, co-director of Wild Justice, said the government seemed intent on causing unrecoverable damage. 'Imagine flattening an irreplaceable grade I listed building like the Royal Albert Hall, replacing it with karaoke machines in various towns and then telling the public this is a 'win-win' for architecture and music. Swap the Royal Albert Hall for any one of the UK's nationally important and protected habitats, swap the karaoke machines for a few pathetic tree-planting schemes, then tell people this is a 'win-win' for the environment and the public, and the analogy is brutally clear.' David Elvin KC, in a third legal opinion, said part three of the bill was regressive and potentially in breach of international law. Ellie Chowns, a Green MP, said there was a serious legal question with the bill because although the secretary of state asserted to MPs there was no reduction in environmental protections, the reality of the legislation was that the bill was in fact a rollback of environmental protections. 'We have a responsibility to protect the most important, the rarest and most in need habitats, like chalk streams, ancient woodlands, peat bogs; these jewels in the crown of our ecological heritage have their protections weakened in this bill,' she said. 'These are irreplaceable habitats, which by their very nature cannot be created anywhere else in some kind of compensation schedule.' A government spokesperson said: 'We completely reject these claims, and have been clear that our planning and infrastructure will not weaken environmental protections. 'The government has inherited a failing system that has delayed new homes and infrastructure while doing nothing for nature's recovery. 'That's why we will deliver a win-win for the economy and nature as part of our Plan for Change, unblocking building and economic growth while delivering meaningful environmental improvements.'
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Wednesday briefing: What three deadly days for civilians in Rafah reveal about the food distribution system backed by Israel
Good morning. On Sunday, at least 31 Palestinians were killed after Israeli forces opened fire at a food distribution centre in Rafah, Gaza. On Monday, another three Palestinians were killed by Israeli fire at the same site. And yesterday, 27 people were killed after Israeli forces opened fire again. If there was any doubt at all about the inadequacy of the new system for distributing supplies in Gaza, run by an Israeli-backed foundation rather than the UN or aid organisations, it has surely been dispelled. Last night, the foundation said that all of its sites would be closed today – and appointed a new executive chairman: an evangelical Christian pastor and loyal ally of Donald Trump. Palestinians – or those who are able to get to the sites – now face an impossible choice, as the UN's human rights chief, Volker Türk, said on Tuesday: 'Die from starvation or risk being killed while trying to access the meagre food that is being made available.' The attacks on civilians, he added, constitute a war crime. Today's newsletter, with Amjad Al-Shawa, director of the Palestinian Non-Governmental Organisations Network in Gaza City, explains what we know about these incidents – and why Palestinians are bound to keep coming back. Here are the headlines. UK politics | Rachel Reeves is announcing £15bn for trams, trains and buses outside London as she launches a charm offensive to persuade fractious Labour MPs that her spending review will not be a return to austerity. The move is part of a strategy to focus on major capital expenditure plans rather than expected cuts to day-to-day spending. US politics | Elon Musk has opened a new rift with Donald Trump by denouncing the US president's tax and spending bill as a 'disgusting abomination'. Musk said of the bill, which is expected to add $2.5-5 trillion to the US budget deficit over the next ten years: 'Congress is making America bankrupt.' Ukraine | Ukraine has detonated a massive underwater blast targeting the Kerch road and rail bridge connecting the Russian-occupied Crimean peninsula to Russia, damaging its underwater supports. The operation follows a sophisticated drone raid on Moscow's strategic bomber fleet on Sunday. Environment | More than 5,000 of England's rare natural habitats are at high risk of being destroyed by development under Labour's new planning bill. The bill, designed to help address the UK's housing affordability crisis, allows developers to pay into a nature restoration fund to sidestep environmental regulations. Netherlands | The Dutch government has collapsed after the far-right leader Geert Wilders pulled his party out of the ruling coalition in a row over immigration and asylum policy. Elections are likely in October. Last week, a food point run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) opened for the first time. As crowds broke through fencing around the site, Israeli forces started firing what were described as 'warning shots'. At least one person died. You can read more about the genesis of the GHF and how it compares with the normal aid model in last Thursday's First Edition. What is now clear is that the chaos on the first day was not an artefact of how new the scheme was – but a warning of much worse to come. *** What do we know about the incidents in recent days? All three incidents unfolded in the same area, near the Al-Alam roundabout, about a kilometre from the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation distribution centre in Rafah. The Israeli military is not present on the GHF site itself – where armed American contractors are in charge – but it controls the surrounding areas. On Sunday, rescuers and witnesses said Israeli forces opened fire as people congregated before going to pick up food parcels. Israel denied firing 'near or within' the site, but an Israeli military source later acknowledged that 'warning shots were fired towards several suspects' about a kilometre away. The GHF denied that there were any 'injuries, fatalities or incidents' during its operations. Gaza's civil defence agency reported that 31 people were killed, with another 176 wounded. On Monday, the military again acknowledged firing warning shots towards 'suspects who advanced toward the troops and posed a threat to them'. Three people were killed, said the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), and dozens more injured. On Tuesday, eyewitnesses said that the shooting started at about 4am local time, as crowds started to gather in the hope of getting food before the centre ran out for the day. Mohammed al-Shaer told AFP that 'the Israeli army fired shots into the air, then began shooting directly at the people', with a helicopter and drones present as the crowd approached a barrier separating them from the Israeli forces. Another witness, Neima al-Aaraj, told the Associated Press that the shooting was 'indiscriminate'. The IDF said 'suspects' failed to retreat after warning fire and 'additional shots were directed near a few individual suspects who advanced towards the troops'. A statement claimed that they were not following 'designated access routes' to the GHF site. The GHF says civilians should arrive via a single coastal road, a route that one expert told the BBC was neither 'safe nor effective'. Local health officials put the death toll at 27 so far, including at least three children. Mohammed Saqr, the head of nursing at Nasser hospital, which received the bodies, told the Guardian that they had shrapnel wounds which appeared consistent with being targeted by tanks or artillery. Given the very large numbers of desperate people seeking food, it is not surprising if order breaks down around the centre. But the implication of Israel's stance – that its forces were in serious danger if they did not act – is hard to credit given their authority around the site, Amjad Al-Shawa said. 'This is happening in an area entirely under the control of the Israeli military. They have troops, they have quadcopters, they have intelligence. In these circumstances there is no justification for the killing.' *** What do these events suggest about how the GHF system is working? Accounts from the scene suggest that besides the conduct of the Israeli forces, there are a number of factors exacerbating the situation. Food is reportedly running out very early each day, adding to the chaos as people desperately try to secure supplies for themselves and their families. Even if all of the GHF sites were opened, large numbers of people needing support would be congregating in a very few places; with only one site up and running since Friday and only one access route allowed, that effect is exacerbated. Then there is the sheer physical difficulty of the journey for those living further away. 'It takes three or four hours to reach the distribution point from here,' said Al-Shawa, who is in Gaza City, in the north of Gaza. 'Most people are going on foot, or paying a lot of money to use a donkey cart. And when you get there it is not an easy mission. There are tens of thousands of people waiting to get a very limited amount of food parcels, and so there is a rush. There is no system – they just open the gate and tell people to go. The mechanism excludes older people, women with children, the sick, people with disabilities.' Images from the site show that most of those who have been waiting are young men – perhaps more likely to be deemed 'suspects' by the IDF if the crowd gets out of control. *** Is the amount of food being distributed adequate to the task? GHF says it has distributed just over 7m meals so far. It says that it will continue to ramp up its operations in the days ahead. But last night it said that all of its distribution centres would be closed today for 'update, organisation, and efficiency improvement work'. The Israeli military said that while the sites are closed, the areas leading to them will be considered 'combat zones'. The fact that food is running out so early each day is testament to how badly supply is outstripped by desperate demand. As of 12 May, almost all of the population of about 2.1 million were facing acute hunger, according to Unicef; one in five were facing starvation, and about 71,000 children and 17,000 mothers needed urgent treatment for acute malnutrition. Al-Shawa says he is relatively fortunate, because he can afford the extortionate price of basic provisions, at least for now. 'But I'm part of this community,' he said. 'There is almost nothing available. My wife bought 250g of sugar yesterday for about $18. A kilo of flour, to make some bread, for $16. You need cash to pay for it, and you pay 35 or 40% commission. So for me to eat a salad will cost $40 or $50.' Nor, he emphasised, was Gaza facing a hunger crisis – or even Israel's continuing military onslaught – in isolation. 'It's not just the denial of aid. It's not just sanitation. It's not just the lack of water. It's not just the denial of vaccines. It's not just displacement. It's not just chronic patients without medicine. It's not just 80% of hospitals destroyed. It's all of those things together.' *** Is there any reason to hope that the process will improve? While the GHF has sought to emphasise the amount of food it has distributed so far, there are reasons to be sceptical that it will soon be able to start running the sites in a more orderly way. Its founding executive director, Jake Wood, quit last week, saying that it could not operate in a way that followed 'humanitarian principles'; yesterday, he was replaced by Reverend Dr Johnnie Moore - who was appointed as a commissioner for international religious freedom by Donald Trump, but has no apparent experience of complex aid operations. Meanwhile, the Washington Post reported that Boston Consulting Group, which helped design the programme, had withdrawn its team working in Tel Aviv. Sources close to the operation told the Post that 'it would be difficult for the foundation to continue to function without the consultants who helped create it'. As the situation worsens, Israel is facing growing diplomatic pressure from Europe, the UK, and Canada. But there has not yet been the kind of concrete action that might force Israel to reconsider – while the Trump administration continues to offer its unflagging support, and will likely veto a UN security council resolution demanding unfettered access for aid operations today. In those circumstances, it is difficult to see how the situation on the ground will improve. 'People have no option but to keep coming,' Al-Shawa said. 'They will be back tomorrow in search of food. But they will pay a price to get it, and the price is in lives.' Society is sleepwalking into a nightmare, warns Laura Bates, as AI is used to create virtual 'brothels' featuring underage girls. This is just one of thousands of tech-driven tools re-embedding misogyny deep into the foundations of our future. Aamna Quite a lot of establishment Democrats are now wondering if a Bernie Sanders presidential candidacy would have been such a horrifying thing after all. In this interview with Zoe Williams, he urges them to set out a positive vision for the future: 'They don't have much of a message for working people, other than to say Trump is dangerous. I think that's just not enough.' Archie Video jockeys, who translate and narrate western films for local audiences, have become a cultural staple in rural and low-income Ugandan communities. Carlos Mureithi explores the rise of this booming trade. Aamna Laila Soueif is 247 days into a hunger strike for her jailed activist son Alaa Abd el-Fattah, imprisoned in Egypt for 'spreading false news'. Now very frail, she nonetheless gives Patrick Wintour a remarkable interview: 'My message is: use my death as leverage to get Alaa out. Don't let my death be in vain.' Archie A new point in history has been reached, entomologists say, as trees once teeming with insects now stand eerily still. Tess McClure speaks to experts warning of rapid extinctions in remote regions with little human contact. Aamna Football | Spain demonstrated why they are the favourites to win the Women's European Championship in Switzerland as they came from behind to beat England in Barcelona and top their Nations League group. Alessia Russo gave England the half-time lead before two goals from substitute Claudia Pina (above) took Spain to victory. Cricket | England coasted to victory in the third one-day international against the West Indies, giving them a clean sweep in the series. Three wickets for Adil Rashid and 64 off 28 balls for Jamie Smith led the way for the hosts. Tennis | Iga Swiatek sunk Elina Svitolina to set up a semi-final clash with Aryna Sabalenka, who powered past Jelena Ostapenko in straight sets. In the men's draw, Lorenzo Musetti beat Frances Tiafoe and Carlos Alcaraz cruised past Tommy Paul in straight sets. 'Reeves in £15bn spending pledge to placate fractious Labour MPs' is the Guardian's lead story. The Metro splashes on the 'Maddie search' in Portugal. 'Trump attacks BBC over Hamas coverage' says the Telegraph while the i paper reports 'UK to stockpile military medical supplies for nuclear attacks'. 'The evidence Rwanda plan DID deter small boats' is what the Mail is writing up today and the Express has 'Now it's good weather to blame for boat surge!'. 'Police cuts 'mean some crimes must be ignored'' – that's the Times while there's a plea about benefits in the Mirror: 'I lost my girl … think again on cuts'. Leading the Financial Times is 'Thames Water on brink as KKR scraps £4bn rescue effort amid political fears'. A trip to Musk city Guardian US southern bureau chief Oliver Laughland heads to Starbase, Texas, to visit the home of Elon Musk's company SpaceX as it votes on whether to become its own city. A bit of good news to remind you that the world's not all bad Forest officials in India are enlisting sankirtan mandalis, traditional devotional song-and-dance troupes, to spread awareness about forest fires in Odisha. These groups were once male-only, but that changed two years ago when the women in Murgapahadi village revived the tradition after a record number of men left their rural villages and headed to the cities in search of work. The women now sing climate messages like, 'Don't set fire to the forest. If the forest survives, we survive.' Officials credit their efforts for the minimal forest fires recorded this summer, highlighting the power of cultural traditions in climate action. And finally, the Guardian's puzzles are here to keep you entertained throughout the day. Until tomorrow. Quick crossword Cryptic crossword Wordiply
