Vermont Electric Cooperative will use drones for June inspections
JOHNSON, Vt. (ABC22/FOX44) – People watching the skies in northern Vermont next month might see more than just birds and planes.
Vermont Electric Cooperative (VEC) announced Friday that they will be making use of a fleet of drones to help with inspections of overhead power lines in over half of the towns in their service area. VEC already uses drones in a limited capacity to perform tasks like assessing damage after natural disasters and keeping aerial photographs up to date. They estimate that the drones have saved them $50,000 to $60,000 a year already.
Driver arrested after car plows into celebrating Liverpool fans
The full list of towns where the drones will be used in inspections in June is on the VEC website. The cooperative has said that the drones will only take pictures of VEC property, and that they are 'committed to protection of privacy'.
'Instead of having to have a damage assessor and walk all those lines… we can cover a lot of ground in a very short amount of time,' said VEC chief operating officer Peter Rossi in a web presentation in March.
One disadvantage that the drones have, at least when it comes to responding to natural disaster conditions, is that they can't fly in extreme weather conditions, such as when it's very windy out. But they say that the technology is improving.
UVM nurses practice at state-of-the art 'virtual hospital'
'In a storm event, right, you're not going to fly them. In a 40 mile an hour wind or more,' said operations supervisor Shawn Juaire. But, VEC said, they wouldn't likely be able to send a helicopter out in those conditions either, if an aerial view were needed.
VEC is able to use the drones through a contract with 3D mapping company Firmatek. The use of drones is regulated by the Federal Aviation Administration.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Geek Wire
34 minutes ago
- Geek Wire
Tech Moves: Dating giants add Seattle tech vets to boards; SeekOut and Slalom name new leaders
Tech Moves covers notable hires, promotions and personnel changes in the Pacific NW tech community. Submissions: tips@ Bala Vishwanath. (LinkedIn Photo) — Bala Vishwanath is now chief marketing officer for SeekOut, a Bellevue, Wash., startup that sells recruiting software. Vishwanath, a computer and electrical engineer by training, has a held variety of leadership roles, including CMO for CoreStack; head of marketing at Edifecs and Roundglass Living; and CEO of Nimbic. He is also the author of 'First70: The B2B Go-to-Market Advantage.' Founded in 2017, SeekOut's software is used by more than 1,000 companies to help with recruiting. It pulls data on millions of potential candidates from a myriad of sources, including GitHub and published papers. 'My mission is simple: help every talent leader understand the incredible opportunities this transformation creates and how they can lead the way in their industry,' Vishwanath said on LinkedIn. SeekOut reached a billion-dollar valuation in 2022 but later went through layoffs in recent years as tech companies navigated the economic downturn — Chad Cohen, Zillow's former chief financial officer, joined the board of directors for Grindr and will also serve as chair of the audit committee for the social media and dating company, which bills itself as the 'global gayborhood in your pocket.' Cohen is also CEO and founding partner of Seattle's Scala Advisors. He was previously CFO for Adaptive Biotechnologies and held executive titles for Capella Space, a satellite-based earth observation company. '[Cohen's] broad experience and deep expertise in helping grow successful public companies will be an invaluable asset to Grindr,' said CEO George Arison, in a statement. — Another longtime Seattle tech vet, former Zulily CEO Darrell Cavens, recently joined the board of another dating giant: Match Group. Cavens was CTO at Blue Nile before leading online retailer Zulily for more than eight years. He's also on the board of Vouched, Brooks Running, Rad Power Bikes and Tapestry. In February, former Zillow CEO Spencer Rascoff was named CEO of Dallas-based Match Group, which oversees a portfolio of leading dating apps including Tinder, Hinge, OkCupid and Pairs. Don Rogers. (LinkedIn Photo) — Business and tech consulting company Slalom appointed Don Rogers to lead its manufacturing industry practice, which includes working with customers to develop strategies for improving manufacturing safety, efficiency and product quality. The Seattle company provides tech-related services to clients including Allstate, Hyatt, Microsoft, REI and others. It has 53 offices in 12 countries. Rogers, who is based in St. Louis, Miss., joins Slalom from the technology integration company World Wide Technology, where he founded and led its manufacturing industry practice. Garth Fort. (LinkedIn Photo) — Garth Fort has joined LogicMonitor as chief product officer. Fort was at Microsoft for more than two decades, ending in 2017. More recent past roles include general manager for Amazon Web Services; CPO at Splunk, which was acquired by Cisco; and he co-founded Fort5, which provided strategic advice to technology companies. LogicMonitor, which was last valued at more than $2.4 billion, provides technology for data center operations. 'The team is building something powerful at the intersection of agentic AI and IT observability,' Fort said on LinkedIn, 'and I'm thrilled to help lead that charge.' — Dave Goto is now chief marketing officer for Ozlo, an audio technology and manufacturing company selling 'sleepbuds' to aid with sleep. Goto, who is based in Seattle, previously worked at Oura, lululemon and Red Bull. — Seattle data storage company Qumulo announced that Kelly Battles and Bob Gleichauf have joined its board of directors. Battles has served as chief financial officer for multiple companies, including Quora and Bracket Computing. Gleichauf was chief technologist for In-Q-Tel and CTO of the Security Business Group at Cisco, among other roles. — Kestra Medical Technologies elected Conor Hanley to its board. The Kirkland, Wash., company sells wearable devices to detect and respond to sudden cardiac arrest. It went public in March. Hanley is CEO of FIRE1 (Foundry Innovation & Research 1), which is developing technology that monitors for heart failure. — Tyler Phillipi, former chief product officer for Seattle-area EV startup FlexCharging, is now CEO of OptiGrid. The company is building battery-integrated DC fast chargers, which allows for energy to be stored onsite, reducing the need for electrical grid upgrades. FlexCharging was acquired by Accurant International and now operates as FlexEnergi. — Lainie del Rosario has been promoted to the role of chief information officer for Sound Physicians. Del Rosario has been with the Federal Way, Wash., healthcare company for more than 16 years. Sound Physicians is a medical group including physicians, nurses and other providers practicing in more than 400 hospitals nationwide.
Gizmodo
38 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Beats Studio Buds From Apple Are at Their Lowest Price and Cheaper Than AirPods, but Stock Is Limited
Music is one of the greatest pleasures that you can enjoy for free, for the most part. When you hear your favorite song, you come alive. And it's one of the most universal ways to communicate. So you should have a pair of earbuds or headphones that make listening to music as special as it can possibly be. But there are tons of different options out there. How do you know which one works the best for you, and which headphones won't make you go broke? The Beats line is well worth trying out, especially if you haven't before, and it's as easy as heading to Amazon to get a pair. See at Amazon Head over to Amazon right now to get the Beats Studio Buds for just under $100, down from their usual price of $150. That's $50 off and a discount of 33%. An improved audio experience for a great price Whether you're taking calls on the go, zoning out with a podcast during your commute, or getting in the zone for a workout, earbuds have become an everyday staple. And while there are more choices than ever, it's not always easy to find a pair that strikes the right balance between sound quality, comfort, and cost. The Beats Studio Buds manage to deliver on all three fronts. They've got solid bass, strong active noise cancellation, and a surprisingly lightweight fit that doesn't feel fatiguing after long stretches of listening. These earbuds are also designed to work both iOS and Android devices, too. That way you don't have to make a choice about which device you want to use at any given time. Features like one-touch pairing, hands-free Siri access, and built-in controls add to the overall convenience, while the included charging case gives you up to 24 hours of total playback time (8 hours per charge, with the case offering a couple of top-ups before you'll need a plug). There's so much to love about these earbuds, most of which are features that make them fun and easy to use without weighing them down with choice or boring options. They're not overstuffed with gimmicks, and that's part of the appeal. Just a clean, polished audio experience that does exactly what you want it to do. This discount makes the Beats Studio Buds one of the best midrange earbud deals around. If you're in the market for a new pair or need a reliable backup set that won't leave you disappointed, this is an easy yes. Plus, consider the fact that you're paying just $100 and they become an even better deal. See at Amazon
Forbes
43 minutes ago
- Forbes
FinOps Foundation Adds To Balance Sheet To Encompass Cloud+ Costs
Cloud is cheaper, but expensive. Cloud computing has always been positioned as a route for businesses to grasp greater flexibility over their IT services expenditure across compute, analytics, storage as well as related data management tasks and now AI services. The promise of being able to 'spin up or spin down' a cloud service still holds, but convoluted contracts, complex observability challenges and miscellaneous misconfiguration migraines mean organizations often suffer from over-provisioning and under-utilization. As a codified industry practice designed to combat and control cloud costs, FinOps has been defined as, 'An operational framework and cultural practice which maximizes the business value of cloud and technology, enables timely data-driven decision making and creates financial accountability through collaboration between engineering, finance and business teams.' The mission statement here is one designed to empower both software development and business teams to make trade-offs between speed, cost and quality in the decisions they take on their cloud architecture investments. New developments in this space now see the FinOps Foundation extend its definition of core cloud cost considerations to also encompass IT asset management and its associated practice of software asset management. This is a coming together intended to merge and align cost optimization and compliance disciplines in so-called Cloud+ environments. The term is being used to explain FinOps that span not just public cloud expenditure, but also SaaS spending that extends outwards across cloud licensing, datacenter charges and other variable technology costs from big data analytics to AI and large language model costs… and everything in between. According to JR Storment, executive director and founder of the FinOps Foundation, the 2025 expansion of the FinOps Framework sees the scope of FinOps grow from public cloud cost management to a wider purview. He says that Cloud+ is an umbrella label for managing spend across SaaS, software licenses, hybrid infrastructure etc. Storment and team explain the progression by saying that traditionally, ITAM and SAM have focused on aspects of IT and cloud management that include software inventory, license compliance, renewal governance and software discoverability. The rationale for Cloud+ comes from the fact that while practices have historically operated in parallel, they are increasingly converging into unified teams and workflows. The 2025 State of FinOps report suggests that organizations are merging FinOps and ITAM/SAM efforts under shared leadership or cross-functional programs. Analyst house Gartner agrees with this proposition, it thinks that by 2026, the 'majority of enterprises with mature cloud strategies' will unify their FinOps and ITAM capabilities. Businesses will do this for a number of reasons, but primary objectives will include a need to streamline software tooling and avoid duplicate efforts to drive better business outcomes. Key areas where FinOps is thought to need to progress next is an appreciation for the ITAM/SAM intersect, which spans so-called SaaS rationalization. This involves combining FinOps usage and cost telemetry with ITAM 'discoverability' and license controls to optimize SaaS portfolios. This discipline also crosses into cloud license compliance i.e. applying SAM principles to public cloud 'bring your own license' models and usage-based billing scenarios. While it's hard to provide a like-for-like competitive analysis of the FinOps Foundation as a nonprofit project under the Linux Foundation (there is no other Linux, essentially), we can balance a few weights and measures here and provide some external perspectives. Even nonprofits make revenue, some of which goes to pay for glitzy conference venue budgets, some of which covers expenses and hotel bills, some of which goes to pay executive salaries… but (in fairness) most of which goes to advancing the codification, development and exchange of best practices and education. Walk the halls of the most enterprise open source exhibitions and you'll often hear member organizations telling you how much they've shelled out on stand space and travel expenses. There's still no such thing as a free lunch… and if an organization wants to be part of the industry's widest body of standards for a practice like FinOps, then it needs to put the financial-factor into its operations operandus. The global market for FinOps services has been forecast to grow from $13.5 billion in 2024 to $23.3 billion by 2029, so, there is money at stake here, even if it's nonprofit money. In terms of this whole Cloud+ demarcation that the FinOps Foundation is now detailing, can we question whether this is a plus-grade akin to an airline Comfort Plus seat (actually more functional, sometimes with a cocktail) or merely an attempt to peddle plus size clothing (same product, a bit of extra yarn) across the cloud costing cosmos? 'Cloud+ has been generally well-received in the market. The inclusion of SaaS and on-premises private cloud investments is a natural extension of FinOps' scope at large. IDC has long advocated for SaaS to be part of the scope and processes of FinOps teams, as enterprises typically spend as much on SaaS as they do on public cloud providers. The difference is that the cost is spread across multiple SaaS providers and departments. A big public cloud bill typically gets the attention of the CFO, while wider SaaS spending goes under the radar. As AI investments increase in both public cloud and private enterprise-owned datacenters, the need to track return on investment and provide transparency into all cloud spending will be essential,' explained Jevin S. Jensen, research vice president for Intelligent CloudOps Market at technology analyst house IDC. The FinOps Open Cost and Usage Specification (also known as FOCUS), is a standardized framework for cloud billing data and has been adopted by cloud hyperscalers including AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud and (if skip to fifth place after Alibaba) Oracle Cloud. FOCUS joins the foundation's FinOps Certified Practitioner and FinOps Certified Enterprise program. IDC's Jensen thinks that FOCUS will benefit FinOps tool vendors immediately (he himself has just completed the FOCUS Analyst certification to increase his understanding of the specification) and he envisages FinOps vendors needing to engage in rapid short-term investment to support the standard. Looking for additional measures in this space, it's worth saying that major (and more moderately-sized) vendors have of course produced FinOps-related technologies. But even if we look at services such as Microsoft Azure Cost Management and Microsoft Azure AI Metric Advisor, we have to remind ourselves that Microsoft joined the FinOps Foundation as a member in February 2023. Membership fees for individuals are free and the FinOps Foundation gives away hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of scholarship fees every year to individuals who can not afford to pay for certification exam costs. Enterprise membership is not free and nor should it be, but it's hard to track exactly how much any given organization needs to pay. Applicant organizations are 'invited to inquire' from a number of different web links. If the foundation does currently offer one flat membership for enterprises, this may substantiate the calls on some social streams for a more tiered membership model appropriate to different-sized organizations. In the pursuit of understanding where FinOps goes next, IDC's Jensen reminds us that there is 'more overlap' happening now as this discipline widens to straddle public cloud, private on-premises cloud, AI and SaaS management. He highlights the natural confusion that will still arise in some organizations between FinOps Cloud+ and (traditional) technology business management (widely shortened to TBM) as it has been known to date. Joining Jensen among the most experienced and widely quoted technology analysts currently dedicated to deconstructing the FinOps space is Tracy Woo, principal analyst at Forrester. While she has plenty of positive views detailing the efforts of industry bodies in this space, she also has reason to call out areas where she sees a shortfall in functionalities, breadth and specific tools. 'The FinOps Foundation has built the FinOps movement. It defines industry standards and thought leadership that the rest of the industry follows - point blank. There aren't others that are more aware, more in touch, more knowledgeable about the space than the foundation. For me and for other end users out there, the bringing together of end users to discuss the challenges in their practices is invaluable to analysts like me who study the space… and to end users who are looking for support and best practices to follow,' said Woo. Woo points out that the FinOps Foundation has also done what many thought was impossible i.e. gathering the biggest cloud vendors on one stage, in one room to standardize billing constructs. 'That being said, the foundation could be better in vendor inclusiveness. It has put a lot of effort into making sure end users are extremely well-protected from being 'sold to', while providing more access to consultancies who have something productive to offer,' she added. She says that there continues to be an increasing number of vendors jumping into the FinOps arena and the biggest problem with the market is instability, especially among the smaller players. Forrester's Woo highlights the fact that consolidation is common and points to the fact that product pricing and offering changes have created buyer weariness of working with smaller players. For Woo, there are 'big gaps' right now with tooling capabilities. She says the first point to focus on is AI cost management, because it is still a largely unknown entity. But, she warns, it is a growing concern that will 'hit end users like a freight train' in the next two to three years. 'Business visualization is also key,' explained Woo. 'Most vizualisation in a FinOps tool is found at the engineering layer. For a low to medium-spending organisation, this can work ok. But as cloud spend goes up, the need to justify cost efforts and demonstrate cost avoidance to execs will increase. At this point, the business intelligence and visualization layers aren't there. That being said, I don't think they [the FinOps vendors] should necessarily be the ones reinventing the wheel, but rather they should look to close integration with tools like Quicksight, PowerBI and Tableau.' On the topic of infrastructure automation within the FinOps realm as a whole, Woo says that 'much of this is weak', especially when compared to Terraform, Jenkins, Ansible. 'This is another area where reinventing the wheel isn't necessary. Some deeper infrastructure automation capabilities should exist in FinOps tools, but also deeper integrations with traditional automation players,' she concluded. Perhaps the most important (and obvious) factor when it comes to FinOps is the financial bottom line. Organizations will want to know whether they get more sales leads as a result of being certified and branded with affiliation to an industry body. They will want to know how many more sales conversions they get… aand they will want to be able to accurately quantify the value of any FinOps savings they have helped customers deliver in order for them to underpin and validate their own worth. Not all these variables are necessarily easy to measure at the time of writing, but they will very likely improve given the size of this industry body and the penetration it already wields.
