U.K. police slammed for not arresting U.S. diplomat's wife in fatal crash
An independent review in Britain criticised police on Wednesday (June 18, 2025) for failing to arrest a U.S. diplomat's wife after she killed a British teenager in a car accident before fleeing the country in 2019.
The accident in which Harry Dunn, 19, died became a diplomatic issue between the U.K. and the United States, leading to his family meeting U.S. President Donald Trump at the White House.
Anne Sacoolas, who was driving on the wrong side of the road outside the U.S. military base at RAF Croughton in Northamptonshire, claimed in the ensuing days to have diplomatic immunity.
Ms. Sacoolas, whose husband was an intelligence official and has herself been reported to have been a CIA operative, left Britain soon after hitting Dunn on his motorbike in the August 2019 accident.
The review, commissioned by Northamptonshire's chief constable, Ivan Balhatchet, said the decision not to arrest her was partly based on "information received that Anne Sacoolas was in shock".
"While the welfare of any person is a concern for officers, this should not have prevented the arrest of Anne Sacoolas," it said.
The review said officers made the decision believing Dunn's injuries to be survivable and that had this not been the case they would have made an arrest.
But it found that after his death there was no further discussion documented of whether Ms. Sacoolas should be detained.
"The review has potentially highlighted a culture of not arresting... which could lead to evidence not being obtained and influencing a charging decision or a sentence on conviction," it said.
The review also criticised the Northamptonshire force's former chief Nick Adderley.
After relations with Dunn's family broke down there were "multiple areas of direct involvement from CC (Chief Constable) Adderley which had a detrimental impact" on the senior investigating officer and their team as they tried to "rebuild trust", it added.
After her return to the United States, Ms. Sacoolas refused to go back to the U.K. to face court proceedings.
She eventually pleaded guilty to causing death by careless driving via video link from the U.S. to a London court.
She was handed an eight-month prison sentence in December 2022, suspended for 12 months, meaning she would not serve jail time unless she committed another offence in that time.
Reacting to the review, Dunn's mother Charlotte Charles said it "confirms what we have known for years -- that we were failed by the very people we should have been able to trust".
"Harry was left to die on the roadside. Sacoolas was not arrested, even though the police had every power to do so," she said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Man held for passport info fraud at Mumbai airport
Mumbai: A 37-year-old man was detained at the Mumbai international airport for alleged fraud related to his passport. He was handed over to the Sahar police who registered an FIR against him. According to the police, the accused had applied for a passport at the Mumbai passport office in 2015 where he submitted fake information about himself and his mother. Based on the Indian passport obtained with fake information, he later secured a Portuguese passport. Eventually, he used the Portuguese passport to secure a British passport. Police said he travelled twice using the Portuguese passport between India and UK. On June 17, he used the British passport to travel from London to Mumbai when he was intercepted.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
UK repeals 19th century law, votes to decriminalise abortion in England, Wales
The UK parliament has taken its first major step towards reproductive rights for women in 60 years and voted to decriminalise abortion. The amendment, which called for the decriminalisation of abortion beyond the 24-week mark, was put forward by Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi. In a landslide vote, British MPs voted 379 in favour of decriminalising abortion, while 137 voted against the bill. Based on this historic passing, women who terminate their pregnancy outside the rules (24 week mark), will no longer be at risk of being investigated by the police or be subject to a life sentence. However, medical professionals who assist women in obtaining an abortion outside the 24-week limit could still face prosecution. While presenting the amendment, Antoniazzi highlighted the recent cases of Nicola Packet, Carla Foster, Bethany Cox and other women who had been penalised and sentenced to prison for terminating their pregnancies. In the amendment passed by British MPs, parts of the 1861 law will be revoked. The bill was originally passed by an all-male parliament that deemed that ending a pregnancy was a crime. In 1967, this law was amended and permitted abortion in certain circumstances. However, the potential life sentence for women who terminated their pregnancy beyond the 24-week limit remained vulnerable. The Labour MP added that the 19th century law had resulted in investigations being launched against 100 women in the past five years. The MP added that the majority of the cases were against women who had given birth prematurely or were forced into abortions by abusive partners. "Each one of these cases is a travesty enabled by our outdated abortion law. This is not justice, it is cruelty, and it has got to end," she was quoted as saying. The bill will now move to the House of Commons and then the House of Lords to be implemented into a law. (With agency inputs)
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
When women kill: Inside the minds of India's killer brides - love, rage and murder
This is a representational AI image They were brides, girlfriends, influencers, wives — now, they are accused killers. Sonam. Muskan. Shivani. Ravina. Radhika. A string of young women from small-town India who, until recently, were navigating their own quiet corners of life. Today, they are front-page headlines and viral hashtags, painted in dual strokes — as women and as alleged husband-killers. Their names have become shorthand for both fascination and fury. They've forced a reckoning, one uncomfortable and controversial: what does it mean when a woman kills? These cases, each gruesome in its own way, have lit up national media and exploded across social platforms — often not with empathy or nuance, but with mockery, memes, and a healthy dose of misogyny. 'Sonam Bewafa Hai' memes made a grim comeback. Instagram reels made villains of wives and martyrs of husbands. But behind the noise is a deeper truth, experts say — a story of gender, power, suppression, and a society in denial. Breaking the mold — with blood Let's start with Sonam Raghuvanshi — now a household name. The Indore woman allegedly plotted her husband Raja's murder during their honeymoon in Meghalaya, in cahoots with her ex-boyfriend and three hired assassins. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Unlock The Benefits of Membrane Bioreactors with Solutions in Luxembourg (See The List) Membrane Bioreactor | Search Ads Undo Raja's body was discovered in a gorge. Before that came Muskan Rastogi of Meerut, who allegedly killed her husband with the help of her lover, hid the body in a cement-filled drum, and tried to disappear. Shivani from Bijnor faked a heart attack as her husband's cause of death, only for police to find ligature marks. YouTuber Ravina, too, allegedly conspired to kill her husband over his disapproval of her online persona. And Radhika, barely weeks into marriage, reportedly killed her husband in Sangli. All of them — except Ravina, who is 32 — are women in their 20s. Doubly deviant, doubly punished "Women aren't expected to do this. When they do, society doesn't just see a criminal — it sees a woman who's 'failed' at being a woman," says Professor G S Bajpai, vice chancellor at National Law University, Delhi. He references British criminologist Frances Heidensohn's 'double deviance' theory: a woman criminal not only breaks the law, but breaks gender norms. And that makes society recoil harder. "She is doubly deviant and hence must be doubly punished," Bajpai explains to PTI. Unlike men, who are often painted as impulsive or power-driven, women who kill are branded unnatural, even monstrous. They're dissected under a harsher spotlight — their outfits, lovers, social media habits, even smiles are scrutinised. Not just the act — but the reaction India recorded over 4.45 lakh crimes against women in 2022, according to the National Crime Records Bureau. But crimes by women? There's no standalone category, mainly because they're statistically rare. Yet rare doesn't mean irrelevant. 'Crimes committed by women make a disproportionate impact precisely because they upset our cultural expectations,' says Deepti Puranik, a criminal psychologist. 'We've taught women to suppress, sacrifice, and stay silent. But pressure creates cracks. Sometimes, it erupts.' She believes early marriage, emotional immaturity, lack of agency, and forced relationships can all brew a psychological storm. Activist Yogita Bhayana agrees: 'It became easier for Sonam to plan a murder than to admit she loved someone else. That says a lot more about our society than about her alone.' Are these crimes of power — or powerlessness? Here lies the paradox: are these women demonstrating a twisted form of empowerment — or are these acts born of deep disempowerment? For Bajpai, the answer is layered. 'Men often kill for power. Women's motivations are frequently rooted in victimisation, manipulation, or emotional trauma. When a caregiver turns killer, the world doesn't know how to compute it.' He adds, 'Let's not forget — intimate partner violence largely moves in the opposite direction. Husbands killing wives is far more common. But those cases don't dominate headlines in the same way.' Data backs him. Globally and in India, over half of all female homicides are committed by current or former partners. Criminal, yes — but still a woman The portrayal of these accused women has followed a familiar pattern: the "wife with a lover", the "influencer who went too far", the "manipulative seductress". It's not just lazy — it's dangerous. Kulpreet Yadav, co-author of Queens of Crime, points out that policing, criminology, and media coverage have always been male-focused. 'We don't truly understand how women with criminal intent think. And that gap leads to oversimplified narratives.' So, should justice be gender-neutral? Bajpai disagrees. 'A blind, one-size-fits-all approach will fail. Context matters. Gender, power dynamics, emotional and social triggers — all of it must be weighed to arrive at fair justice.' The women behind the headlines Beneath the lurid details, under the trending hashtags, there are still human stories — shaped by broken relationships, desperation, suppressed rage, or maybe something darker. No one is defending murder. But understanding it? That's a societal responsibility. These women didn't just defy the law. They defied expectations. And that's what makes their crimes not just shocking — but revelatory.
