Indian Prairie District 204 board OKs applications to state board of education for funding waivers for three schools
Following school board approval on Monday, Indian Prairie School District 204 is applying to the Illinois State Board of Education to have three of its schools — Brookdale, Gombert and McCarty elementary schools — designated as Title I schoolwide, a designation for schools with high percentages of low-income students, next school year.
Title I funding helps schools pay for resources meant to improve students' education and help ensure they meet state academic standards, according to the state board.
Brookdale, Gombert and McCarty all have percentages of low-income students between 20% and 39%, per a memo from the district's Deputy Superintendent Louis Lee that was part of Monday's meeting agenda, so the district is going through a waiver process with the state to allow the schools to obtain schoolwide status, which allows them to use the funding they receive for all students in the building, regardless of income level.
Schools with low-income student populations above 40% qualify for the schoolwide designation automatically. But schools with at least 20% but less than 40% low-income students can also operate as schoolwide Title I programs if they apply for and receive a waiver from their state educational agency, in this case the Illinois State Board of Education, according to the 1965 Elementary and Secondary Education Act.
Two other elementary schools in the district, Georgetown and Longwood, have had the schoolwide designation, meaning their low-income student population was at or above 40%, since the 2018-19 school year, a district spokesperson said, and are being designated as such for the 2025-26 school year as well.
Title I, Part A is part of the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act, according to the National Center for Education Statistics. It provides additional financial assistance to school districts for children coming from low-income families, with the goal of closing 'educational achievement gaps by allocating federal funds for education programs and services.'
Title I allocations are based primarily on local education agencies' poverty estimates by the U.S. Census Bureau, according to the National Center for Education Statistics, and then are allocated within each local agency to schools based on their poverty rates, commonly measured by the number of students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch. Title I funding is provided by the federal government to the state, which then disburses it to the schools, Lee said.
But which schools qualify for Title I funding can change from year to year based on enrollment. Gombert and McCarty have received Title I funding since the 2018-19 school year, according to a district spokesperson. McCarty's percentage of low-income students used to be over 40%, but has recently decreased, Lee said. And the district is applying for a waiver for Brookdale for the first time this year.
In their applications, school districts need to provide rationale for why a school needs a schoolwide waiver.
For Brookdale, for example, the district noted that the school now qualifies for Title I funding because it is seeing rising numbers of low-income students.
Gombert was previously supported by targeted funds, but has had schoolwide status for several years, and the district said in its application that, since receiving Title funding, 'the growth of students has been significant due to the added layers of intervention across the school and support provided to families.'
McCarty previously had a schoolwide designation, and the district wrote that continued schoolwide status is still needed to improve academic achievement and support social-emotional learning.
Lee said there are a number of reasons low-income student populations in schools vary from year to year and are part of overall changes in the student body, like slight declines in district enrollment and increasing ethnic diversity.
But he sees supporting a diverse student body as part of the district's strength.
According to ISBE, last year Indian Prairie received just over $2.2 million districtwide in Title I, Part A funding and funding for neglected and delinquent children, which goes toward schools with high percentages of children from low-income families and to educational programs for children in state-operated institutions or community day programs, respectively.
The Title I funding is reimbursement-based, and the district files expense reports quarterly, according to a district spokesperson.
Title I funding provides the schools that receive it with additional funding on top of what they'd receive already, which can go toward things like arts and social-emotional learning programs or to pay for additional staff in a school to work with students in smaller groups, Lee said.
And they have flexibility in how they spend it, he said. A school's leadership can determine how they use the Title I funding, though Lee said at Indian Prairie all the Title I schools meet regularly to share ideas about what kind of programming is and isn't working.
Now, after obtaining board approval on Monday, the applications for the three schools' waivers will be submitted to the Illinois State Board of Education. The United States Department of Education released Title I, Part A funding on May 14, according to a state board spokesperson, and the state agency is in the process of releasing its allocations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Black America Web
4 hours ago
- Black America Web
Education Secretary Linda McMahon Didn't Know About The Tulsa Race Massacre When Asked About ‘Illegal DEI' In Education
Source: The Washington Post / Getty Here's a question: Is there literally anyone in President Donald Trump's cabinet who is actually qualified for the position they have been appointed to? I ask because it appears that all of the highest offices in America (including the presidency) are being run by people who don't know things. We have a Homeland Security secretary who failed to correctly define habeas corpus; a Health and Human Services secretary who takes his grandchildren with him to swim in toxic sewage and has declared that people shouldn't take medical advice from him; a Secretary of Defense who has a remedial grasp on who our foreign allies are and can't seem to get it through his head that Signal group chats are not appropriate platforms to discuss confedential war plans on; a tech CEO who recently left the Department of Government Efficiency because it became more and more clear he didn't know what he was doing (Elon won't admit it, but that's why), and a host of other administrators who appear to be clueless when it comes to the thing they're supposed ot be experts in. This brings us to Education Secretary Linda McMahon, the former pro wrestling mogul who somehow got appointed as the highest educational authority in the nation, despite her apparent ignorance of American history, specifically Black history, and, even more specifically, the Tulsa Race Massacre of 1921. During a congressional hearing on Wednesday, McMahon was pressed by Rep. Summer Lee (D-Pa.) to clarify which history lessons would be considered 'illegal DEI' under the Trump administration, which has made it a top priority to do all it can to ban diversity initiatives into 'woke' oblivion under the guise of promoting meritocracy — despite being, observably, the most woefully underqualified federal administration in recent history. Lee's inquiry turned into an impromptu quiz on Black history, which McMahon embarrassingly failed. 'Would it be 'illegal DEI' for a lesson plan on the Tulsa Race Massacre?' Lee asked McMahon. 'I'd have to get back to you on that,' McMahon said. 'Do you know what the Tulsa Race Massacre is?' Lee asked. 'I'd like to look into it more and get back to you on it,' McMahon replied. The Tulsa Race Massacre — in which hundreds of residents in the affluent Black town of Tulsa, Oklahoma, were lynched and had their homes and businesses destroyed by a massive white mob — happened more than a century ago, but don't worry, guys, sooner or later the highest educational authority in the land will learn about it, and then she'll get back to us on wheter it should be illegal to teach it. Also, Ruby Bridges, we're going to have to give McMahon some time on her story, too. 'How about the book 'Through My Eyes,' by Ruby Bridges, for instance?' Lee asked. 'I haven't read that,' McMahon responded. 'Have you learned about Ruby Bridges?' Lee said. 'If you have specific examples, you'd like to…' McMahon responded before Lee cut her off to note, 'That was a specific example… I named a specific book.' Besides the fact that a federal education secretary should be more well-versed on these subjects, this is simply what happens when Trump has white people out here deciding how much Black history is too much Black history. McMahon didn't know anything about the most well-known race riot in American history, and she didn't appear to know much (if anything) about the first Black student to attend a desegregated school in Louisiana — but she's the authority on which Black history subjects constitute 'illegal DEI'? (Also, how TF would Black history, or any history for that matter, fall under the DEI label at all. It's almost as if this administration is so racist that any curriculum that doesn't center white historical figures and events needs to be spot-checked to see if it passes the white fragility smell test, or else it gets slapped with the label that has become white America's favorite new racial slur.) Anyway, Lee has been appropriately unkind while ripping McMahon and the Trump administration for their anti-DEI propaganda, which is only made worse through their glaring lack of historical knowledge (or knowledge about anything, honestly). 'Even if Secretary McMahon was better versed in American history, there is no doubt her department would further attempt to whitewash history and ensure students don't have access to the facts,' Lee told The Grio, adding that the Trump administration's 'lack of knowledge, denial of history, and open racism' doesn't mean students across the country 'should be deprived of learning opportunities or access to a quality education.' Lee had smoke for the Trump administration during Wednesday's congressional session, too. 'When [you] call for removing of equity and inclusion and diversity and accessibility from schools in favor of 'traditional American values,' it's indistinguishable from … post-Civil War South advocating to rewrite history with the Lost Cause narrative [and] to censor truths about slavery,' she said. 'This department's financial aid policies harken back to a time when higher education was reserved for affluent, well-connected and predominantly white students.' Exactly! SEE ALSO: Trump's Job Corps 'Pause' Is MAGA's Plan To Eliminate Poor Youth MIT Becomes Latest University To Back Away From DEI Initiatives SEE ALSO Education Secretary Linda McMahon Didn't Know About The Tulsa Race Massacre When Asked About 'Illegal DEI' In Education was originally published on Black America Web Featured Video CLOSE
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Family of the Boulder attack suspect is facing deportation. What happens next?
While Mohamed Soliman occupies a cell in Boulder County Jail in Colorado, hundreds of miles away, his wife and five children are also in detention, at the hands of Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Soliman, the man charged with attempted murder following an antisemitic firebombing attack Sunday, told detectives that 'no one' knew about his attack plans and 'he never talked to his wife or family about it,' according to the affidavit for his arrest. But despite that admission from the Egyptian national, his family is now facing expedited removal from the United States. Soliman, 45, was born in Egypt but lived in Kuwait for 17 years. He first tried to come to the US in 2005 but was denied a visa, law enforcement sources told CNN. In 2022, he, his wife and their five children, entered the US as non-immigrant visitors and filed for asylum a month later in September 2022. His wife, a network engineer with a pending EB-2 visa, which is available to professionals with advanced degrees, and children were listed as dependents on the application filed in Denver, the Department of Homeland Security and court documents said. In 2023, Soliman received a two-year work authorization that expired in March, according to DHS. Soliman and his wife have two minor sons and three minor daughters ages 4, 4, 8, 15 and 17, family attorney Eric Lee told CNN. Lee is not representing Soliman. Soliman was booked into the Boulder County Jail after his arrest. His family was initially held in Florence, Colorado, about an hour away from their home in Colorado Springs, before they were transferred to a detention facility in Texas. Soliman's family was held 'incommunicado' and didn't have access to legal representation after they were in ICE custody on Tuesday, their lawyers said in court documents. At the time of their detention, their asylum application was still pending, and as a result, the Trump administration can't legally expedite their removal, the documents say. Soliman's family members have not been charged in the attack and on Wednesday evening, a federal judge ordered a halt to the deportation plans made for the family. 'Punishing individuals – including children as young as four-years-old – for the purported actions of their relatives is a feature of medieval justice systems or police state dictatorships, not democracies,' Lee said in a statement to CNN on Wednesday. The family's detention has experts questioning the legality of the family's detention and visa revocation, calling it unprecedented, even at a time where migrant detentions in courthouse hallways, college campuses, office buildings and during traffic stops across the country are increasing at an exponential rate under significant pressure from the Trump administration, which is tightening the reins on immigration. 'A permanent resident and a non-permanent resident, somebody on let's say an H-1B visa or some other type of temporary visa … has due process rights,' David Leopold, the former president and general counsel of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, said at a news briefing with immigrant rights advocates in mid-March. 'Everybody is covered by the United States Constitution. Everybody's protected by the United States Constitution inside the United States.' However, immigrants' presence in the US is generally considered a 'privilege' rather than a right and can be revoked for certain reasons laid out in federal law, such as a serious crime. Once an asylum application is submitted, it's not uncommon for processing to take years before reaching a decision, César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández, a law professor at Ohio State University told CNN, adding that Soliman and his family were within their rights to continue living in the US with a pending application. It is common however, for ICE to begin investigating one person and realize their family, friends or roommates may also have a questionable immigration status, García Hernández said. 'It's another matter entirely, to take the conduct of one individual and then ascribe responsibility on the family, on their family members by immediately detaining them and publicly saying that the goal is to deport them,' he said. Soliman's wife, who CNN is not naming at this time, was 'shocked' when she learned her husband had been arrested, her lawyers said in court records obtained by CNN. She said she and their five children should not be held responsible for her husband's crimes. 'Arrest first, investigate later, that is not the way that responsible law enforcement officers work,' Ben Johnson, executive director of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, told CNN. The burden of proof on ICE and DHS is to assess whether the family is a security risk or a threat to the community, Johnson said, and that should be done through meticulous investigation. During the attack, Soliman shouted 'Free Palestine,' according to the FBI and later told authorities that 'he wanted to kill all Zionist people and wished they were all dead,' an affidavit said. 'He's confessed to a horrible crime, and he is obviously a threat to public safety,' Johnson said. 'Taking action against him makes all the sense in the world.' After his arrest, Soliman's wife brought an iPhone 14 she said belonged to him to the Colorado Springs police office, the affidavit said. 'I don't know where this allegation or belief that somehow this man's family is responsible or guilty of the crimes of their father or husband (comes from),' Johnson said. 'To arrest children without having done a thorough investigation, this feels much more like a publicity stunt than a law enforcement action.' As Soliman's wife and children wait for more information about their future, their attorneys are fighting to keep the family in the US. In his order, Judge Gordon P. Gallagher of the US District Court in Colorado wrote, 'Defendants SHALL NOT REMOVE,' Soliman's wife and her children from the District of Colorado or the United States 'unless or until this Court or the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit vacates this order.' Soliman appeared in state court Monday and is expected to appear in state court again Thursday and in federal court Friday. CNN has reached out to his attorney for comment. Aside from investigating Soliman for any potential mental health issues, investigators are reviewing a notebook he left behind that contains a manifesto written in English with certain lines written in Arabic, according to a law enforcement source, noting police recovered the notebook after Soliman told them where to find it. Investigators are also reviewing videos Soliman recorded of himself on his phone, both in English and Arabic, the source said. On the heels of Soliman's actions, the White House announced a new travel ban on citizens from a dozen nations as part of the first Trump administration's promise to clamp down on entries from certain countries and visa overstays — which have garnered renewed scrutiny in the attack's aftermath. President Donald Trump made the final call after the antisemitic attack, according to a White House official. The president said in a video posted Wednesday that new countries could be added to the travel ban as 'threats emerge around the world,' although Egypt, where the Soliman family is from, was not on the list. CNN's Priscilla Alvarez, Eric Levenson and Danya Gainor contributed to this report.
CNN
15 hours ago
- CNN
Family of the Boulder attack suspect is facing deportation. What happens next?
ImmigrationFacebookTweetLink Follow While Mohamed Soliman occupies a cell in Boulder County Jail in Colorado, hundreds of miles away, his wife and five children are also in detention, at the hands of Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Soliman, the man charged with attempted murder following an antisemitic firebombing attack Sunday, told detectives that 'no one' knew about his attack plans and 'he never talked to his wife or family about it,' according to the affidavit for his arrest. But despite that admission from the Egyptian national, his family is now facing expedited removal from the United States. Soliman, 45, was born in Egypt but lived in Kuwait for 17 years. He first tried to come to the US in 2005 but was denied a visa, law enforcement sources told CNN. In 2022, he, his wife and their five children, entered the US as non-immigrant visitors and filed for asylum a month later in September 2022. His wife, a network engineer with a pending EB-2 visa, which is available to professionals with advanced degrees, and children were listed as dependents on the application filed in Denver, the Department of Homeland Security and court documents said. In 2023, Soliman received a two-year work authorization that expired in March, according to DHS. Soliman and his wife have two minor sons and three minor daughters ages 4, 4, 8, 15 and 17, family attorney Eric Lee told CNN. Lee is not representing Soliman. Soliman was booked into the Boulder County Jail after his arrest. His family was initially held in Florence, Colorado, about an hour away from their home in Colorado Springs, before they were transferred to a detention facility in Texas. Soliman's family was held 'incommunicado' and didn't have access to legal representation after they were in ICE custody on Tuesday, their lawyers said in court documents. At the time of their detention, their asylum application was still pending, and as a result, the Trump administration can't legally expedite their removal, the documents say. Soliman's family members have not been charged in the attack and on Wednesday evening, a federal judge ordered a halt to the deportation plans made for the family. 'Punishing individuals – including children as young as four-years-old – for the purported actions of their relatives is a feature of medieval justice systems or police state dictatorships, not democracies,' Lee said in a statement to CNN on Wednesday. The family's detention has experts questioning the legality of the family's detention and visa revocation, calling it unprecedented, even at a time where migrant detentions in courthouse hallways, college campuses, office buildings and during traffic stops across the country are increasing at an exponential rate under significant pressure from the Trump administration, which is tightening the reins on immigration. 'A permanent resident and a non-permanent resident, somebody on let's say an H-1B visa or some other type of temporary visa … has due process rights,' David Leopold, the former president and general counsel of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, said at a news briefing with immigrant rights advocates in mid-March. 'Everybody is covered by the United States Constitution. Everybody's protected by the United States Constitution inside the United States.' However, immigrants' presence in the US is generally considered a 'privilege' rather than a right and can be revoked for certain reasons laid out in federal law, such as a serious crime. Once an asylum application is submitted, it's not uncommon for processing to take years before reaching a decision, César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández, a law professor at Ohio State University told CNN, adding that Soliman and his family were within their rights to continue living in the US with a pending application. It is common however, for ICE to begin investigating one person and realize their family, friends or roommates may also have a questionable immigration status, García Hernández said. 'It's another matter entirely, to take the conduct of one individual and then ascribe responsibility on the family, on their family members by immediately detaining them and publicly saying that the goal is to deport them,' he said. Soliman's wife, who CNN is not naming at this time, was 'shocked' when she learned her husband had been arrested, her lawyers said in court records obtained by CNN. She said she and their five children should not be held responsible for her husband's crimes. 'Arrest first, investigate later, that is not the way that responsible law enforcement officers work,' Ben Johnson, executive director of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, told CNN. The burden of proof on ICE and DHS is to assess whether the family is a security risk or a threat to the community, Johnson said, and that should be done through meticulous investigation. During the attack, Soliman shouted 'Free Palestine,' according to the FBI and later told authorities that 'he wanted to kill all Zionist people and wished they were all dead,' an affidavit said. 'He's confessed to a horrible crime, and he is obviously a threat to public safety,' Johnson said. 'Taking action against him makes all the sense in the world.' After his arrest, Soliman's wife brought an iPhone 14 she said belonged to him to the Colorado Springs police office, the affidavit said. 'I don't know where this allegation or belief that somehow this man's family is responsible or guilty of the crimes of their father or husband (comes from),' Johnson said. 'To arrest children without having done a thorough investigation, this feels much more like a publicity stunt than a law enforcement action.' As Soliman's wife and children wait for more information about their future, their attorneys are fighting to keep the family in the US. In his order, Judge Gordon P. Gallagher of the US District Court in Colorado wrote, 'Defendants SHALL NOT REMOVE,' Soliman's wife and her children from the District of Colorado or the United States 'unless or until this Court or the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit vacates this order.' Soliman appeared in state court Monday and is expected to appear in state court again Thursday and in federal court Friday. CNN has reached out to his attorney for comment. Aside from investigating Soliman for any potential mental health issues, investigators are reviewing a notebook he left behind that contains a manifesto written in English with certain lines written in Arabic, according to a law enforcement source, noting police recovered the notebook after Soliman told them where to find it. Investigators are also reviewing videos Soliman recorded of himself on his phone, both in English and Arabic, the source said. On the heels of Soliman's actions, the White House announced a new travel ban on citizens from a dozen nations as part of the first Trump administration's promise to clamp down on entries from certain countries and visa overstays — which have garnered renewed scrutiny in the attack's aftermath. President Donald Trump made the final call after the antisemitic attack, according to a White House official. The president said in a video posted Wednesday that new countries could be added to the travel ban as 'threats emerge around the world,' although Egypt, where the Soliman family is from, was not on the list. CNN's Priscilla Alvarez, Eric Levenson and Danya Gainor contributed to this report.
