What sparked the Los Angeles protests and is Trump allowed to deploy the National Guard?
Protests have rocked Los Angeles since last Friday (Jun 6) as federal agents faced off against hundreds of demonstrators following immigration raids.
Over the weekend, US President Donald Trump ordered 2,000 National Guard troops to the city, a rare deployment that goes against the wishes of California Governor Gavin Newsom, who has called it "purposely inflammatory" and unlawful.
This is what we know so far about the clashes in the United States' second-largest city.
HOW THE PROTESTS STARTED AND GREW
Trump has made clamping down on illegal migration a key goal for his second term in office.
Officers from the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency executed search warrants at multiple locations in Los Angeles on Jun 9, and arrested immigrants in LA's fashion district, in a Home Depot parking lot and at several other locations.
The weeklong tally of immigrant arrests in the LA area has climbed above 100.
By Friday night, protests had kicked off in the city. More than 100 demonstrators gathered at the immigration services building and detention centre in downtown Los Angeles.
On Friday night, the Los Angeles Police Department declared it an unlawful assembly and ordered the crowds to leave.
Multiple police vehicles and officers in riot gear arrived, and flashbangs were used to disperse the crowd.
The Department of Homeland Security said that there were about "1,000 rioters" at the protests on Friday.
On Saturday, federal security agents faced off against a few hundred protesters in southeast Los Angeles, while a second demonstration broke out in downtown Los Angeles, drawing about 60 people.
Los Angeles police said in a post on X that multiple people were detained for failing to disperse despite multiple warnings.
Trump on Saturday signed a presidential memorandum to deploy the National Guard to "address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester", said the White House in a statement.
These troops were deployed on Sunday, guarding federal government buildings as further clashes broke out between police and protesters.
The police declared several rallies in the city to be "unlawful assemblies", accusing some protesters of throwing concrete projectiles, bottles and other items at officers.
While ICE raids in other US cities have triggered small-scale protests in recent months, the Los Angeles unrest is the biggest and most sustained against the president's immigration policies so far.
CAN TRUMP CALL IN THE NATIONAL GUARD?
The National Guard serves both the state and federal interests. It is a state-based force that is part of the US Armed Forces Reserve, and is usually activated by the governor.
But Trump has circumvented this and said the protests interfered with federal law enforcement and framed them as a possible "form of rebellion" against the authority of the government.
He cited Title 10 of the US Code – a federal law that outlines the role of the US Armed Forces – in his order to call members of the California National Guard into federal service.
A provision of Title 10 allows the president to deploy National Guard units into federal service if the US is invaded, if there is a 'rebellion or danger of rebellion', or if the president is 'unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States'.
An 1878 law generally forbids the US military, including the National Guard, from taking part in civilian law enforcement.
But the troops are allowed to protect federal agents who are carrying out law enforcement duties and to protect federal property.
For example, National Guard troops cannot arrest protesters, but they can protect ICE officers.
Legal experts have cast doubt on Trump's use of Title 10, calling it "inflammatory and reckless", especially without Newsom's support.
The protests in California do not rise to the level of 'rebellion' and do not prevent the federal government from executing the laws of the US, they added.
Trump on Sunday said that there were 'violent people' in Los Angeles, "and they're not gonna get away with it'.
He could take a more far-reaching step and invoke the Insurrection Act, which allows troops to directly participate in civilian law enforcement, but there is little recent precedent.
That law was last invoked by President George H W Bush in 1992, when the governor of California requested military aid to suppress unrest in Los Angeles following the Rodney King trial.
TRUMP VS NEWSOM
Newsom has denounced Trump's move to call in the National Guard, formally requesting that the administration rescind "its unlawful deployment of troops" and return them to his command.
He also called the deployment a 'serious breach of state sovereignty' and has said that California authorities had the situation under control.
The last time a president deployed the National Guard in a state without a request from that state's governor was 1965, when President Lyndon Johnson sent troops to protect civil rights demonstrators in Montgomery, Alabama.
Newsom mocked Trump for posting a congratulatory message to the National Guard on social media before troops had arrived in Los Angeles, and said that Trump never floated deploying the National Guard during a Friday phone call.
He also called the president a "stone cold liar".
Trump's administration hit back, with a spokesperson saying: "It's a bald-faced lie for Newsom to claim there was no problem in Los Angeles before President Trump got involved.
"Everyone saw the chaos, violence and lawlessness."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
31 minutes ago
- Straits Times
What are the 'less lethal' weapons used by law enforcement in Los Angeles protests?
FILE PHOTO: The 101 Freeway is reopened and littered with debris from yesterday's protest, including 40mm Flash Bang canisters, after it was closed down yesterday by protesters, after the California National Guard was deployed by U.S. President Donald Trump as a response to protests against federal immigration sweeps, in downtown Los Angeles, California, U.S., June 9, 2025. REUTERS/Jill Connelly/File Photo What are the 'less lethal' weapons used by law enforcement in Los Angeles protests? WASHINGTON - Law enforcement officials in Los Angeles began deploying "less lethal" munitions on Sunday as they clashed with crowds protesting federal immigration raids. "Less lethal" or "less-than-lethal" weapons are designed to cause pain and discomfort, normally to disperse hostile crowds, but have caused serious injury and death in the past. Here is a list of the less lethal weapons that have been deployed in Los Angeles in recent days, according to Reuters witnesses and the Los Angeles Police Department. SPONGE ROUNDS Media outlets, and a reporter hit in the leg by a projectile on Sunday, have said LAPD officers have been firing rubber bullets, a metal casing covered in rubber. In fact, the LAPD do not use rubber bullets, the department told Reuters. Instead, the LAPD uses foam rounds, a condensed sponge projectile that resembles a hard Nerf ball. One version, which has a plastic body with a hard foam nose, is fired from a 40mm launcher and usually aimed directly at a target. A second version, fired from a 37mm launcher, disperses five foam baton rounds toward the ground in front of a hostile crowd once an unlawful assembly has been declared, before bouncing up into the crowd. It is not to be fired directly at individuals, the LAPD said. Both are designed to cause pain on impact without penetrating the skin. Police are forbidden from aiming sponge rounds at the head, neck, groin, and spine. BEAN BAG ROUNDS Bean bag rounds are normally 37mm cloth bags filled with 1.4 oz of lead or rubber pellets. They are fired from shotguns and spread out as they fly toward the intended target. They are designed not to penetrate the skin but to cause an impact hard enough to render a target temporarily immobile. FLASH BANGS Flash bangs, otherwise known as "distraction devices" or "noise flash diversionary devices," produce an ear-piercing bang and bright light to disorient targets by temporarily disrupting their sight and hearing. They are often used to target protesters who have become violent in a section of a crowd, and also to allow police to enter a section of a crowd to extract offenders. One type of flash bang device that has been used in Los Angeles is the 40mm aerial flash bang. These are launched into the air and ignite above the heads of protesters. TEAR GAS Tear gas, one of the most common riot control tools, is designed to temporarily incapacitate people by causing excessive irritation to the eyes, nose, lungs, and skin. It can cause temporary blindness, streaming eyes and nose, coughing, chest tightness, and difficulty breathing. Tear gas canisters usually contain CS gas, a chemical compound, or OC gas, which stands for oleoresin capsicum, the active ingredient in pepper spray. PEPPER SPRAY Pepper spray, which has similar impacts as tear gas, is sprayed from a handheld canister and is often used when police come into close quarters with rioters or are engaged in hand-to-hand encounters. It mainly irritates the eyes, causing temporary blindness. PEPPER BALLS Pepper balls mirror the effects of pepper spray, but are delivered in a projectile similar to a paintball. On impact, it bursts open, releasing powdered OC into the air. Police often do not fire pepper balls directly at a person, but at street signs, onto buildings or into the ground to cause them to burst open. BATON Known as the oldest less lethal weapon, the baton has been used for crowd control for decades. Police officers have been using batons to push and strike protesters in recent days. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Judge rejects class action for Google privacy lawsuit
People who accused Google of illegally collecting their personal information, after they chose not to synchronize their Google Chrome browsers with their Google accounts, cannot sue the Alphabet unit as a group in a class action, a U.S. judge ruled. In a decision on Monday, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Oakland, California agreed with Google that it was appropriate to address case-by-case whether millions of Chrome users understood and agreed to its data collection policies. "Inquiries relating to Google's implied consent defense will overwhelm the damages claims for all causes of action," Rogers wrote. She dismissed the proposed damages class action with prejudice, meaning it cannot be brought again. The judge also said Chrome users cannot seek policy changes as a group. David Straite, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, declined to comment on Tuesday. Sandi Knight, vice president of litigation at Google, in a statement said the company appreciated the decision, and that Chrome Sync has "clear privacy controls." Class actions let plaintiffs seek potentially greater recoveries at lower cost than they could in individual lawsuits. The decision followed a ruling last August by the federal appeals court in San Francisco, which said Rogers should consider whether reasonable Chrome users consented to letting Google collect their data when they browsed online. Chrome users pointed to Chrome's privacy notice, which said they "don't need to provide any personal information to use Chrome" and Google would not collect such information unless they turned on the "sync" function. Rogers had dismissed the case in December 2022. She said she oversees two other privacy cases against Mountain View, California-based Google, but the claims in those cases differed "significantly." The appeals court ruling followed Google's 2023 agreement to destroy billions of records to settle a lawsuit claiming it tracked people who thought they were browsing privately, including in Chrome's "Incognito" mode. The case is Calhoun et al v Google LLC, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 22-16993.
CNA
3 hours ago
- CNA
Trump deploys Marines, raising tensions in Los Angeles protests
LOS ANGELES: Hundreds of Marines were due to arrive in Los Angeles (LA) on Tuesday (Jun 10) after United States President Donald Trump ordered their deployment in response to protests against immigration arrests and despite objections by state officials. The 700 crack troops will join National Guard soldiers, amping up the militarisation of the tense situation in the sprawling city, which is home to millions of foreign-born and Latino residents. The largely peaceful demonstrations - marred by sporadic but violent clashes between police and protesters - were entering their fifth day. The unrest was sparked by a sudden intensification of Trump's signature campaign to deport illegal migrants, with raids conducted on workplaces. In downtown LA's Little Tokyo neighbourhood at night on Monday, scores of protesters faced off with security officials in riot gear, some shooting fireworks at officers who fired back volleys of tear gas. Earlier, demonstrators marching with banners and handmade signs yelled "ICE out of LA" and "National Guard go away" - a reference to immigration agents and Guard soldiers. California officials have stressed that the majority of protesters have been peaceful, and that they were capable of maintaining law and order themselves. Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom wrote on X that US Marines "shouldn't be deployed on American soil facing their own countrymen to fulfil the deranged fantasy of a dictatorial President. This is un-American". Trump, meanwhile, has branded the LA protesters "professional agitators and insurrectionists". "If I didn't 'SEND IN THE TROOPS' to Los Angeles the last three nights, that once beautiful and great City would be burning to the ground right now," he wrote on Truth Social on Tuesday. One small business owner in the city, whose property was graffitied during the protests, was supportive of Trump's strong-arm tactics. "I think it's needed to stop the vandalism," she told AFP, declining to give her name. Others were horrified. "They're meant to be protecting us, but instead, they're like, being sent to attack us," Kelly Diemer, 47, told AFP. "This is not a democracy anymore." Police have detained dozens of protesters in LA in recent days, while authorities in San Francisco and other US cities have also made arrests. "INCREDIBLY RARE" Trump's use of the military is an "incredibly rare" move for a US president, Rachel VanLandingham, a professor at Southwestern Law School in Los Angeles and a former lieutenant colonel in the US Air Force, told AFP. The National Guard, a fully equipped reserve armed forces, is usually controlled by state governors and used typically on US soil in response to natural disasters. The Guard has not been deployed by a president over the objections of a state governor since 1965, at the height of the civil rights movement. Deployment of regular troops, such as the Marines, on US soil is even more unusual. US law largely prevents the use of the military as a policing force, absent an insurrection. Speculation is growing that Trump could invoke the Insurrection Act, giving him a free hand to use regular troops for law enforcement around the country. The Pentagon said late on Monday that Trump had authorised an extra 2,000 state guardsmen to LA.
