What sparked the Los Angeles protests and is Trump allowed to deploy the National Guard?
Protests have rocked Los Angeles since last Friday (Jun 6) as federal agents faced off against hundreds of demonstrators following immigration raids.
Over the weekend, US President Donald Trump ordered 2,000 National Guard troops to the city, a rare deployment that goes against the wishes of California Governor Gavin Newsom, who has called it "purposely inflammatory" and unlawful.
This is what we know so far about the clashes in the United States' second-largest city.
HOW THE PROTESTS STARTED AND GREW
Trump has made clamping down on illegal migration a key goal for his second term in office.
Officers from the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency executed search warrants at multiple locations in Los Angeles on Jun 9, and arrested immigrants in LA's fashion district, in a Home Depot parking lot and at several other locations.
The weeklong tally of immigrant arrests in the LA area has climbed above 100.
By Friday night, protests had kicked off in the city. More than 100 demonstrators gathered at the immigration services building and detention centre in downtown Los Angeles.
On Friday night, the Los Angeles Police Department declared it an unlawful assembly and ordered the crowds to leave.
Multiple police vehicles and officers in riot gear arrived, and flashbangs were used to disperse the crowd.
The Department of Homeland Security said that there were about "1,000 rioters" at the protests on Friday.
On Saturday, federal security agents faced off against a few hundred protesters in southeast Los Angeles, while a second demonstration broke out in downtown Los Angeles, drawing about 60 people.
Los Angeles police said in a post on X that multiple people were detained for failing to disperse despite multiple warnings.
Trump on Saturday signed a presidential memorandum to deploy the National Guard to "address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester", said the White House in a statement.
These troops were deployed on Sunday, guarding federal government buildings as further clashes broke out between police and protesters.
The police declared several rallies in the city to be "unlawful assemblies", accusing some protesters of throwing concrete projectiles, bottles and other items at officers.
While ICE raids in other US cities have triggered small-scale protests in recent months, the Los Angeles unrest is the biggest and most sustained against the president's immigration policies so far.
CAN TRUMP CALL IN THE NATIONAL GUARD?
The National Guard serves both the state and federal interests. It is a state-based force that is part of the US Armed Forces Reserve, and is usually activated by the governor.
But Trump has circumvented this and said the protests interfered with federal law enforcement and framed them as a possible "form of rebellion" against the authority of the government.
He cited Title 10 of the US Code – a federal law that outlines the role of the US Armed Forces – in his order to call members of the California National Guard into federal service.
A provision of Title 10 allows the president to deploy National Guard units into federal service if the US is invaded, if there is a 'rebellion or danger of rebellion', or if the president is 'unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States'.
An 1878 law generally forbids the US military, including the National Guard, from taking part in civilian law enforcement.
But the troops are allowed to protect federal agents who are carrying out law enforcement duties and to protect federal property.
For example, National Guard troops cannot arrest protesters, but they can protect ICE officers.
Legal experts have cast doubt on Trump's use of Title 10, calling it "inflammatory and reckless", especially without Newsom's support.
The protests in California do not rise to the level of 'rebellion' and do not prevent the federal government from executing the laws of the US, they added.
Trump on Sunday said that there were 'violent people' in Los Angeles, "and they're not gonna get away with it'.
He could take a more far-reaching step and invoke the Insurrection Act, which allows troops to directly participate in civilian law enforcement, but there is little recent precedent.
That law was last invoked by President George H W Bush in 1992, when the governor of California requested military aid to suppress unrest in Los Angeles following the Rodney King trial.
TRUMP VS NEWSOM
Newsom has denounced Trump's move to call in the National Guard, formally requesting that the administration rescind "its unlawful deployment of troops" and return them to his command.
He also called the deployment a 'serious breach of state sovereignty' and has said that California authorities had the situation under control.
The last time a president deployed the National Guard in a state without a request from that state's governor was 1965, when President Lyndon Johnson sent troops to protect civil rights demonstrators in Montgomery, Alabama.
Newsom mocked Trump for posting a congratulatory message to the National Guard on social media before troops had arrived in Los Angeles, and said that Trump never floated deploying the National Guard during a Friday phone call.
He also called the president a "stone cold liar".
Trump's administration hit back, with a spokesperson saying: "It's a bald-faced lie for Newsom to claim there was no problem in Los Angeles before President Trump got involved.
"Everyone saw the chaos, violence and lawlessness."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
Trump sends 700 Marines to quell immigration protests in Los Angeles
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says he has contacted the US administration after an Australian journalist was shot in the leg with a rubber bullet while covering the immigration protests in Los Angeles. Meanwhile, a convoy of buses transporting about 700 Marines has departed for Los Angeles. US President Donald Trump earlier doubled the number of National Guard troops in the city, on top of the 2,000 he deployed over the weekend. Clashes between demonstrators and federal military forces have entered their fourth day. Nick Harper reports from Washington DC.
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
US wants Rwandan troops out of Congo before peace deal signed, sources say
FILE PHOTO: Congolese civilians who fled from Goma, eastern Democratic Republic of Congo following fighting between M23 rebels and the Armed Forces of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (FARDC), wash their feet after arriving at a reception centre in Rugerero near Gisenyi, in Rubavu district, Rwanda, January 28, 2025. REUTERS/Thomas Mukoya/File Photo FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump's Senior Advisor for Africa Massad Boulos addresses a press conference at the U.S. Embassy in Kigali, Rwanda April 8, 2025. REUTERS/Jean Bizimana/File Photo FILE PHOTO: A labourer carries a sack of ore at the Rubaya coltan mine, in the town of Rubaya, which is controlled by M23 rebels, in the Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo March 24, 2025. REUTERS/Zohra Bensemra/File Photo US wants Rwandan troops out of Congo before peace deal signed, sources say The United States is promoting a deal that would require Rwanda to pull troops from eastern Congo before the two sides sign a peace agreement, sources say, a condition that is sure to rankle Kigali, which describes Congo-based armed groups as an existential threat. U.S. President Donald Trump's administration is holding talks to end fighting in eastern Congo and bring billions of dollars of Western investment to the region, which is rich in minerals including tantalum, gold, cobalt, copper and lithium. Massad Boulos, Trump's senior adviser for Africa, told Reuters in May that Washington wanted a peace agreement finalised "within about two months", an ambitious timeline for resolving a conflict with roots in the Rwandan genocide more than three decades ago. A draft peace agreement seen by Reuters says a condition for signature is that Rwanda withdraws troops, weapons and equipment from Congo. The authenticity of the document, which is undated, was confirmed by four diplomatic sources, who said it was written by U.S. officials. The draft goes beyond a declaration of principles that the two countries' foreign ministers signed at a ceremony in Washington in April with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio. That document said the two sides would address any security concerns in a manner that respected each other's territorial integrity and sovereignty. LIGHTNING ADVANCE Rwanda has sent between 7,000 and 12,000 soldiers to eastern Congo to support M23 rebels, analysts and diplomats told Reuters earlier this year, after the rebel group seized the region's two largest cities in a lightning advance. Rwanda has long denied providing arms and troops to M23, saying its forces are acting in self-defence against Congo's army and ethnic Hutu militiamen linked to the 1994 genocide that killed around 1 million people, mostly ethnic Tutsis. Rwanda had not responded to the U.S.-produced draft agreement as of last week, two sources told Reuters. Rwandan Foreign Minister Olivier Nduhungirehe told Reuters that experts from Congo and Rwanda would meet this week in Washington to discuss the agreement. The State Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. A senior official in the office of Congolese President Felix Tshisekedi accused Rwanda of "dragging their feet" on the draft and said Rwanda's withdrawal was necessary for the peace process to move forward. "We demand the total withdrawal of Rwandan troops as a precondition for signing the agreement, and we will not compromise," the source said. QATAR-HOSTED TALKS The U.S.-produced draft agreement also calls for a "Joint Security Coordination Mechanism" that could include Rwandan and "foreign military observer personnel" to deal with security issues, including the continued presence in Congo of Rwandan Hutu militias. Analysts say the most commonly cited group, the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda, no longer poses much of a threat to Rwanda, though President Paul Kagame's government still describes it as a serious threat. The draft agreement also says Congo would commit to allowing M23 to participate in a national dialogue "on equal footing with other DRC non-state armed groups" - a major concession for Kinshasa, which sees M23 as a terrorist group and Rwandan proxy. Congo is engaged in separate direct talks with M23 over a possible deal to end the latest cycle of fighting. The draft agreement says Rwanda "shall take all possible measures to ensure" M23 withdraws from territory it controls, in line with terms agreed in Doha. A source briefed on that process told Reuters last week that Qatar had presented a draft proposal to both delegations which would consult their leaders before resuming talks. A rebel official, though, said there had been little progress towards a final deal that would see M23 cede territory. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
CNA
3 hours ago
- CNA
Tariff war: US, Chinese officials meet in London for second round of trade negotiations
American and Chinese officials are meeting for a second day of trade talks in London to shore up a fragile truce over tariffs. Negotiations are expected to focus on Beijing's shipments of rare earths and Washington's restrictions on chip exports. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said discussions are going well, while US President Donald Trump has also expressed optimism. Tan Si Hui reports.
