logo
What sparked the Los Angeles protests and is Trump allowed to deploy the National Guard?

What sparked the Los Angeles protests and is Trump allowed to deploy the National Guard?

CNA3 days ago

Protests have rocked Los Angeles since last Friday (Jun 6) as federal agents faced off against hundreds of demonstrators following immigration raids.
Over the weekend, US President Donald Trump ordered 2,000 National Guard troops to the city, a rare deployment that goes against the wishes of California Governor Gavin Newsom, who has called it "purposely inflammatory" and unlawful.
This is what we know so far about the clashes in the United States' second-largest city.
HOW THE PROTESTS STARTED AND GREW
Trump has made clamping down on illegal migration a key goal for his second term in office.
Officers from the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency executed search warrants at multiple locations in Los Angeles on Jun 9, and arrested immigrants in LA's fashion district, in a Home Depot parking lot and at several other locations.
The weeklong tally of immigrant arrests in the LA area has climbed above 100.
By Friday night, protests had kicked off in the city. More than 100 demonstrators gathered at the immigration services building and detention centre in downtown Los Angeles.
On Friday night, the Los Angeles Police Department declared it an unlawful assembly and ordered the crowds to leave.
Multiple police vehicles and officers in riot gear arrived, and flashbangs were used to disperse the crowd.
The Department of Homeland Security said that there were about "1,000 rioters" at the protests on Friday.
On Saturday, federal security agents faced off against a few hundred protesters in southeast Los Angeles, while a second demonstration broke out in downtown Los Angeles, drawing about 60 people.
Los Angeles police said in a post on X that multiple people were detained for failing to disperse despite multiple warnings.
Trump on Saturday signed a presidential memorandum to deploy the National Guard to "address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester", said the White House in a statement.
These troops were deployed on Sunday, guarding federal government buildings as further clashes broke out between police and protesters.
The police declared several rallies in the city to be "unlawful assemblies", accusing some protesters of throwing concrete projectiles, bottles and other items at officers.
While ICE raids in other US cities have triggered small-scale protests in recent months, the Los Angeles unrest is the biggest and most sustained against the president's immigration policies so far.
CAN TRUMP CALL IN THE NATIONAL GUARD?
The National Guard serves both the state and federal interests. It is a state-based force that is part of the US Armed Forces Reserve, and is usually activated by the governor.
But Trump has circumvented this and said the protests interfered with federal law enforcement and framed them as a possible "form of rebellion" against the authority of the government.
He cited Title 10 of the US Code – a federal law that outlines the role of the US Armed Forces – in his order to call members of the California National Guard into federal service.
A provision of Title 10 allows the president to deploy National Guard units into federal service if the US is invaded, if there is a 'rebellion or danger of rebellion', or if the president is 'unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States'.
An 1878 law generally forbids the US military, including the National Guard, from taking part in civilian law enforcement.
But the troops are allowed to protect federal agents who are carrying out law enforcement duties and to protect federal property.
For example, National Guard troops cannot arrest protesters, but they can protect ICE officers.
Legal experts have cast doubt on Trump's use of Title 10, calling it "inflammatory and reckless", especially without Newsom's support.
The protests in California do not rise to the level of 'rebellion' and do not prevent the federal government from executing the laws of the US, they added.
Trump on Sunday said that there were 'violent people' in Los Angeles, "and they're not gonna get away with it'.
He could take a more far-reaching step and invoke the Insurrection Act, which allows troops to directly participate in civilian law enforcement, but there is little recent precedent.
That law was last invoked by President George H W Bush in 1992, when the governor of California requested military aid to suppress unrest in Los Angeles following the Rodney King trial.
TRUMP VS NEWSOM
Newsom has denounced Trump's move to call in the National Guard, formally requesting that the administration rescind "its unlawful deployment of troops" and return them to his command.
He also called the deployment a 'serious breach of state sovereignty' and has said that California authorities had the situation under control.
The last time a president deployed the National Guard in a state without a request from that state's governor was 1965, when President Lyndon Johnson sent troops to protect civil rights demonstrators in Montgomery, Alabama.
Newsom mocked Trump for posting a congratulatory message to the National Guard on social media before troops had arrived in Los Angeles, and said that Trump never floated deploying the National Guard during a Friday phone call.
He also called the president a "stone cold liar".
Trump's administration hit back, with a spokesperson saying: "It's a bald-faced lie for Newsom to claim there was no problem in Los Angeles before President Trump got involved.
"Everyone saw the chaos, violence and lawlessness."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Google sues LATAM Airlines in US over Brazilian YouTube video dispute
Google sues LATAM Airlines in US over Brazilian YouTube video dispute

CNA

time33 minutes ago

  • CNA

Google sues LATAM Airlines in US over Brazilian YouTube video dispute

Alphabet's Google sued Chile-based LATAM Airlines in U.S. federal court in San Jose, California on Thursday, seeking a declaration that Brazilian courts cannot force the tech giant to take down a YouTube video in the United States that accused a LATAM employee of sexually abusing a child. Google in the lawsuit said that LATAM was attempting to "make an end-run" around protections for free speech under the U.S. Constitution by suing in Brazil to force the video's removal worldwide. Spokespeople for LATAM did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Google's allegations. Google spokesperson Jose Castaneda said in a statement that the company has "long supported the legal principle that courts in a country have jurisdiction over content available in that country, but not over what content should be available in other countries." Right-wing social media companies Trump Media and Rumble filed a similar lawsuit in Florida in February against a Brazilian judge who had ordered them to remove the U.S.-based accounts of a leading supporter of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro. A federal judge decided in the case that the companies were not required to comply with the order in the United States. According to Google's lawsuit, U.S. citizen and Florida resident Raymond Moreira posted two YouTube videos in 2018 of his 6-year-old son outlining allegations of sexual abuse that the child said he experienced from a LATAM employee while traveling as an unaccompanied minor. Moreira sued LATAM in Florida in 2020 over the alleged abuse, which led to a confidential settlement. LATAM sued Google in Brazil in 2018 seeking an order to remove the video from YouTube, which Google owns. Brazil's highest court is set to consider next week whether it has the authority to order Google to take down the video worldwide. Google asked the court in California on Thursday to declare that LATAM cannot force the tech giant to remove the video in the United States. Canada's Supreme Court upheld an order for Google to remove some search results worldwide in a separate case in 2018. A California judge halted that order's U.S. enforcement in 2017.

Zelensky to urge Trump for stronger Russia sanctions at G7 summit
Zelensky to urge Trump for stronger Russia sanctions at G7 summit

CNA

time4 hours ago

  • CNA

Zelensky to urge Trump for stronger Russia sanctions at G7 summit

KYIV: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said on Thursday (Jun 12) that he hoped to press US President Donald Trump at the upcoming G7 summit to introduce tougher sanctions against Russia, as peace talks between the two sides remain stalled. Speaking at a press conference in Kyiv, Zelensky said: 'I count on having a conversation with President Trump at the G7. This sanctions package is very important... the final decision is still in the White House.' Zelensky's comments come as Moscow and Kyiv continue negotiations, most recently in Istanbul, that have so far yielded little beyond large-scale prisoner swaps. Russia has rejected calls for a ceasefire in its three-year invasion of Ukraine. TRUMP EXPRESSES FRUSTRATION US President Donald Trump said on Thursday he was 'very disappointed in Russia' but also in Ukraine, for failing to reach a peace agreement. 'I think deals could have been made,' Trump told reporters at the White House. He estimated that up to 6,000 people were dying each week in the conflict, including civilians 'getting hit by missiles.' Trump has previously urged both sides to reach a settlement, but while he has threatened new sanctions on Moscow, these have yet to materialise. His return to the White House has also cast uncertainty over Washington's military and financial support for Kyiv. US Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, a close Trump ally, is currently backing a bipartisan 'bone-breaking' sanctions bill, proposing a 500 per cent tariff on countries that continue to import Russian oil and gas, particularly targeting China and India. EUROPEAN CAUTION AND NEW PLEDGES Germany, Ukraine's second-largest defence backer after the US, signalled it would not send Taurus long-range missiles, a setback to Kyiv's ambitions. 'Asked whether we are considering this, my answer is no,' said German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius during a visit to Kyiv. He did, however, announce a new €1.9 billion (US$2.2 billion) military aid package. Zelensky appeared with Pistorius at the joint press conference and noted the urgency of maintaining and increasing military support. 'We want to end this war this year,' he said. Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiga, speaking separately at a conference in Rome, warned against appeasement in dealing with Russia. 'The diplomacy of appeasement does not work with Russia,' he said in what was widely seen as a veiled critique of Trump's approach. CASUALTIES AND ONGOING ATTACKS Russia has intensified drone and missile strikes in recent days, with two civilians killed in Donetsk on Thursday, according to Ukrainian officials. Ukrainian forces have responded with drone attacks of their own. In Russia's Belgorod region, a two-year-old child was killed during one such Ukrainian strike, regional governor Vyacheslav Gladkov said. Tens of thousands have died since Russia invaded in February 2022. Millions more have been displaced, with large swathes of eastern Ukraine heavily damaged by continuous bombardment. PRISONER SWAP OFFERS RARE BREAKTHROUGH Amid the ongoing conflict, the warring sides completed another large prisoner swap on Thursday. Under an agreement reached in Istanbul, each side released more than 1,000 detainees, focusing on wounded soldiers and troops under the age of 25. 'Today, warriors of our Armed Forces, National Guard, and Border Guard Service are back home,' Zelensky wrote on social media. He added that many of the returnees were seriously injured and in need of medical attention. Images published by Kyiv showed the Ukrainian servicemen smiling, wrapped in national flags, and calling loved ones. AFP reporters at the scene noted that many families gathered at the exchange site, hoping to learn about the fate of their missing relatives. Russian state media broadcast images of Moscow's returned prisoners chanting 'Russia, Russia' and draped in national colours.

Trump says US has a "golden share" in US Steel
Trump says US has a "golden share" in US Steel

CNA

time5 hours ago

  • CNA

Trump says US has a "golden share" in US Steel

WASHINGTON :U.S. President Donald Trump on Thursday said the United States has a "golden share" in U.S. Steel, as part of a deal for Nippon Steel to buy the iconic American company. It was not immediately clear what structural element of the deal Trump was referring to, but he said the share meant that Americans would have a 51 per cent ownership in the American steelmaker. "We have a golden share, which I control, the President controls," he told reporters at the White House. "If that gives you total control, it's 51 per cent ownership by Americans," he added. Nippon Steel and U.S. Steel did not immediately respond to requests for comment. At a rally in Pennsylvania on May 30, Trump lauded an agreement between the companies and said Nippon Steel would make a "great partner" for U.S. Steel. But he later told reporters the deal still lacked his final approval, leaving unresolved whether he would allow Nippon Steel to take ownership.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store