Attempt to remove fluoride from Louisiana drinking water goes flat
A bill to remove fluoride from public water systems failed Wednesday afternoon in the Louisiana legislature. (Elise Plunk/Louisiana Illuminator)
A proposal to end the addition of fluoride from public drinking water in Louisiana failed Wednesday in the legislature following passionate testimony from health care and dental professionals.
Senate Bill 2 by Sen. Michael 'Big Mike' Fesi, R-Houma, would have required localities that want fluoride added to their water to have their residents petition for an election and vote on the issue. It failed in the House Committee on Health and Welfare in a 10-5 vote.
Louisiana law currently mandates the addition of fluoride to drinking water systems with 5,000 or more service connections.
'Water fluoridation is a safe, effective and equitable public health intervention that has been proven for over eight decades to reduce dental decay significantly,' Dr. Kimberly Smith-Bibbins, chief dental officer for SWLA Center for Health Services, said during committee testimony.
'We can replace our teeth,' Fesi said in a text message after the bill was voted down, sharing his doubts about the ability for utilities to regulate the amount of fluoride people consume. 'I don't think we can replace our thyroid or pineal gland.'
There is not any firmly documented link between consuming fluoride and thyroid or endocrine issues, with many of the focused studies into it laced with methodology and bias concerns.
Fluoridated water systems serve about 38% of Louisianans, compared with a national rate of about 75%, according to the Louisiana Department of Health.
Smith-Bibbins said Louisiana, in particular, benefits from public water fluorination, especially 'where many communities face barriers to accessing regular dental care.'
'It has served our children very, very well without negative consequences to our adults,' Rep. Joseph Stagni, R-Kenner, said before voting against the bill. Removing fluoride requirements could cause a 'cataclysmic problem' in public health outcomes for Louisiana, he said.
Louisiana Surgeon General Dr. Ralph Abraham spoke in support of Fesi's bill in committee, citing claims that overfluorination can lower children's IQs. The validity of studies that have come to this conclusion has been called into question, with critics citing inadequate data and only loose connections between fluoride dosing and lower IQ scores.
Abraham argued that communities could opt in to fluoridation, to which Stagni responded that the option currently exists in state law for locals to remove it through a vote.
'If people want out, the people have a mechanism right now to take fluoride out of their water,' Stagni said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
From vouchers to a cellphone ban, this year's lawmaking session brought transformative changes to Texas schools
Texas' 2025 legislative session will likely be remembered for its education agenda. From private school vouchers to a public school funding boost, through a heavier emphasis on Christianity and student discipline, to bans on cellphones and diversity, equity and inclusion efforts, lawmakers advanced bills that will have a lasting impact on students, teachers and parents for years to come. One proposal that would have scrapped the state standardized test fell through in the final days of session, while the much-awaited school funding package changed drastically from an earlier version school officials favored more. When signed by Gov. Greg Abbott, much of the legislation approved by lawmakers will take effect in September, right around the time schools get going for the 2025-26 academic year. Here is a recap of the most significant legislative developments this session. A top priority for Abbott, Senate Bill 2 authorizes the creation of a program allowing families to use taxpayer dollars to pay for their children's private school education — one of the largest in the nation. The bill cruised to final passage with more than a month left in the legislative session and was signed into law shortly after. The voucher program will officially launch at the beginning of the 2026-27 school year. Almost any school-age child in Texas can apply and participate, including students already attending private schools. Up to 20% of the program's initial $1 billion budget could flow to wealthier families who earn 500% or more of the poverty rate — roughly $160,000 or above for a family of four. [School choice, vouchers and the future of Texas education] Most participating families will receive an amount equal to 85% of what public schools get for each student through state and local funding — roughly somewhere between $10,300 and $10,900 per year for each child, according to a legislative budget analysis that included financial projections for the next five years. The money will flow to families through education savings accounts, which essentially function as state-managed bank accounts. State budget experts predict that the program's cost to taxpayers could escalate to roughly $4.8 billion by 2030. Children with disabilities will be eligible for the same funding as other students, plus up to $30,000 in additional money, an amount based on what the state would spend on special education services for that child if they attended a public school. Home-schoolers can receive up to $2,000 per year. — Jaden Edison House Bill 2 represents an $8.5 billion boost to Texas public schools after years of stagnant funding. The bill establishes the following long-term teacher pay raise system: Teachers with three to four years of experience in school districts with 5,000 or fewer students will receive a $4,000 raise, while those with five or more years of teaching on their resume will earn $8,000. Teachers with three to four years of experience in school districts with more than 5,000 students will earn a $2,500 raise, while those with five or more years of experience will receive $5,000. [Texas officials' claim that school funding is at an all-time high ignores inflation and temporary federal money] The bill also includes funding for an expansion of the Teacher Incentive Allotment, a state program that awards raises to educators who demonstrate that they have improved their students' academic outcomes. Currently about 6% of Texas teachers benefit from the program. HB 2 provides a $55 increase to the base amount of money per student schools receive from the state, a large portion of which must continue to go toward salaries for full-time employees. The rest can address operational costs as schools see fit. The legislation will give districts $45 per student that they can only use to increase the salaries of school counselors, librarians, nurses and other support staff. It also grants schools $106 per student to pay costs associated with transportation, insurance, utilities and hiring retired educators, which has become more common as schools struggle to fill teacher vacancies. Additionally, the bill overhauls Texas' special education funding system, which will no longer give money to districts based on the classroom setting where a child with a disability receives instruction. The funding will now go to districts based on the individual needs of that student, an approach lawmakers and public education advocates consider more equitable. Districts will receive $1,000 for each evaluation they conduct assessing a student for a disability. HB 2 also establishes a compensation system for educator preparation and mentorship programs while setting a 2030 deadline for districts to stop using untrained educators to teach core subjects. The bill sets aside money for schools to better identify learning difficulties among the state's youngest students. And it raises the amount of money districts receive for school safety upgrades to $20 per student and $33,540 per campus. — Jaden Edison Hopes were high that the Legislature would scrap the widely unpopular STAAR test when state Rep. Diego Bernal gave an impassioned speech on the Texas House floor last month. 'Most of us campaigned on this. And session after session, we talk about it, and we don't do it,' the San Antonio Democrat said. 'We're sort of like the divorced dad that keeps promising his kid that he'll pick them up, but the kid is waiting on the steps in front of the house, and we never show up.' Lawmakers did come close to swapping out STAAR for three shorter tests with House Bill 4, but ultimately failed to hammer out their differences in the final days of this year's legislative session. Despite momentum and widespread bipartisan support, the session ended with the kid still waiting on the steps. [Bill to scrap STAAR test dies in the Texas Legislature] For more than a decade, Texas students have sat for hours at the end of the school year to take the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness test. Some students get so anxious about the high-stakes exam — which is used to track student, teacher and school performance — that they report not wanting to go to school. Educators say weeks of preparing children to take the test mean losing valuable instructional time. The two chambers could not close the gulf over what they wanted to see out of the new test and from the state's A-F school accountability rating system, which largely uses standardized test results to grade schools' performance. Their biggest difference was over how much power districts should have to push back in courts when they disagree with their accountability ratings. — Sneha Dey As teachers struggle to manage the rise in student violence since the COVID-19 pandemic, Texas lawmakers said their solution was in giving schools more flexibility to punish students. A sweeping package, House Bill 6 expands when schools can dole out out-of-school suspensions to Texas' youngest and homeless students. It does this by undoing state laws from 2017 and 2019 that put limitations on when and how those students could be disciplined. The legislation also extends how long students can face in-school suspensions — from three days to as long as schools see fit, so long as the placement is reviewed every 10 days. Students facing in-school suspension still complete schoolwork in a different classroom on school grounds. HB 6 also wades into when schools can send students to alternative education settings, strict environments that often remove children from their regular school buildings and lean on computer-based work. While students caught vaping were previously required to go to alternative education settings, schools can now discipline those students less severely if it is their first offense. Schools can also teach students in alternative education programs remotely — a mode of instruction that was shown to contribute to learning loss during the COVID-19 pandemic. [Classroom violence went up in Texas after the pandemic. Is more discipline the answer?] Lawmakers shepherding the legislation emphasized that removing students from the classroom is a way to protect other students and allow learning to continue. But critics of HB 6 worry more discipline won't change the behavior of the student acting out, which can often signal underlying emotional needs. They worry heavy-handed discipline will derail students' education at a time when they need individualized attention and mental health support. — Sneha Dey The Legislature's school finance package, House Bill 2, included extra learning support for children as early as kindergarten, before learning gaps compound. More than half of third graders in the state are not at grade level in reading or math, meaning they lack the key foundational skills they need to thrive as learners. Research shows that students who are behind in third grade rarely catch up, which can lead to serious consequences later in life. The legislation requires districts to use literacy and numeracy screeners to identify students who are struggling early on. The screeners would allow students to be assessed three times a year between pre-K and third grade on skills like phonics, vocabulary and spelling. Those who are furthest behind would get extra tutoring in small group settings. Currently, the state doesn't track literacy development until the third-grade STAAR test, with two dyslexia screenings acting as the only formal checkpoints after students first enter kindergarten. — Sneha Dey Senate Bill 10 requires public schools under certain circumstances to display a poster or framed copy of the Ten Commandments in each classroom. The legislation does not require districts to purchase the materials but mandates that schools accept and hang them up if they are privately donated. The American Civil Liberties Union and other civil rights organizations have said they will sue Texas if Abbott signs SB 10 into law, just like they did when Louisiana approved a similar Ten Commandments law. Abbott responded to that threat on social media, telling the groups to 'bring it.' The Legislature also approved Senate Bill 11, a measure that will allow school districts to adopt a policy providing students and staff a daily period of prayer or time to read a religious text. The bill bans any prayer or religious reading over a loudspeaker or in the presence of any student who does not have a signed consent form. Both bills arrive as conservative Christians continue pushing to infuse more religion into public schools and daily life. Lawmakers this session also considered Senate Bill 2617, a proposal that would have blocked districts from purchasing instructional materials that do not use the terms 'Before Christ' (B.C.) and 'Anno Domini' (A.D.) when referring to historical time periods, but the legislation died in a House committee. — Jaden Edison Texas GOP lawmakers have made parental control a central issue in public education. Legislators this session aimed to give parents greater authority over what their children are taught and which extracurricular activities they join. A key focus was eliminating diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) practices in K-12 schools. Lawmakers accused some schools of promoting ideological agendas in the classroom instead of prioritizing high-quality instruction. They also claimed that school districts focused too heavily on diversity hiring rather than selecting the most qualified educators. Senate Bill 12, authored by Sen. Brandon Creighton, R-Conroe, prohibits school districts from considering race, ethnicity, gender identity or sexual orientation in hiring and training practices. Under the bill, if parents believe a school is violating the DEI ban, they can file a complaint with the school principal. If parents are unsatisfied with the school's response, they can appeal to the Texas education commissioner, who can investigate the complaint and conduct a hearing. 'The legislation further upholds parental authority by giving them the ability to opt their child in or out of specific programs, such as the requirement in this bill that a parent must opt in to a child's sex education curriculum, and this is so that parents can make informed choices that align with their family's values,' said Rep. Jeff Leach, a Republican from Plano and the bill's sponsor, in May. [Democrats lash out as Legislature bans school clubs that support gay teens] In addition, schools will be banned from authorizing or sponsoring student clubs based on sexual orientation or gender identity. Parents will also be required to provide written consent for their children to participate in any extracurricular club. Critics argue that the bill targets marginalized groups, especially LGBTQ+ students, and could harm students' mental health by limiting their sense of belonging. They also warn that the legislation may lead to self-censorship among teachers and administrators, who might over-interpret the law out of fear of violating it. — Sofia Sorochinskaia Lawmakers also aimed to give parents and school boards more authority over which books students can access in school libraries. Senate Bill 13, by Sen. Angela Paxton, R-McKinney, will allow parents and school boards to challenge any school library material. The bill grants school boards the authority to decide which books should be approved or removed from school libraries. They also have the option to delegate this responsibility to local school advisory councils if 50 parents or 10% of parents in the district, whichever is less, sign a petition calling for their creation. In addition, the bill will prohibit schools from keeping library materials that contain 'indecent content or profane content.' 'No child should pick up a book in their school library of all places and be exposed to inappropriate, harmful material within its pages,' Paxton said in March. 'These young brains cannot unsee what they see.' Opponents of the bill argue the legislation will lead to the banning of books that discuss topics like sexuality and gender identity, and that reflect the experiences of marginalized students. They warn that such policies could undermine representation and limit access to diverse perspectives. Critics also point out that most Texas school districts already have processes in place for parents to challenge library books. They argue that SB 13 will promote censorship and the unnecessary removal of books from school libraries. — Sofia Sorochinskaia Texas will join several other states across the country in banning cellphones in schools. House Bill 1481, introduced by Rep. Caroline Fairly, a Republican from Amarillo, aims to limit the use of 'personal wireless communication devices' in K-12 classrooms. The bill received strong bipartisan support: It passed unanimously in the Senate and by a 136-10 vote in the House. Supporters of the bill argue that cellphones distract students, hurting their focus, participation and overall academic performance. Many also hope the legislation will help reduce bullying and improve students' mental health. The bill was authored by the only Gen Z member of the Texas House. She said she understands firsthand how harmful social media can be for students. 'When you see what is being pushed on social media and the distraction it causes in the classroom, there is a need for our government to support our educators,' she told The Texas Tribune in March. Opponents of the bill worry it could make it harder for students to contact parents or emergency services. They also raised concerns about parents being unable to track their children's whereabouts. To address these issues, the bill allows students to keep their phones nearby but restricts their use during the school day. — Sofia Sorochinskaia First round of TribFest speakers announced! Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Maureen Dowd; U.S. Rep. Tony Gonzales, R-San Antonio; Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker; U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff, D-California; and U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Dallas are taking the stage Nov. 13–15 in Austin. Get your tickets today!
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
LSU board member accused of harassment, retaliation
Clouds pass over Tiger Stadium on Monday, March 20, 2023, on LSU's campus in Baton Rouge, La. (Matthew Perschall for Louisiana Illuminator) One of Gov. Jeff Landry's appointees to the LSU Board of Supervisors flew into a rage at LSU Health Shreveport when its staff would not perform a house call for her husband, threatening to fire multiple employees, according to a whistleblower complaint. She's also the subject of other complaints that allege she harassed several employees and meddled in the day-to-day operations of the medical school. Esperanza Moran, who openly rallied for the dismissal of former LSU Health Shreveport Chancellor David Guzick, is the subject of an anonymous whistleblower complaint, at least one Equal Employment Opportunity Commission complaint filed by top LSU Health Shreveport employees and a separate complaint filed to Landry by a top administrator. The Illuminator obtained documents cited in this report through a series of public records requests to LSU and the governor's office. According to an anonymous whistleblower complaint filed with LSU, Moran went to LSU Health Shreveport just days after being appointed to the board and '[caused] a public scene in outrage' that an employee was not permitted to treat her husband at Moran's private residence. 'This incident has caused significant distress within the LSU Health Shreveport community, affecting the staff's health, morale and productivity,' the complaint reads. 'While causing the disturbance, Ms. Moran threatened to terminate staff and said she was the new chancellor and in charge of LSU Health Shreveport.' The complaint goes on to say that Moran threatened to have Guzick, Sammy Wyatt, LSU Health Shreveport's chief compliance and investigation officer, and Sharon Dunn, vice chancellor for academic administration, fired from the university. Guzick resigned from his position in April after Moran's months-long pressure campaign and has since accepted a position with the LSU System office. Dunn and Wyatt are still employed at LSU Health Shreveport. Wyatt asked the governor to intervene, adding Moran's alleged actions are damaging to his personal and professional reputation, disrupting his ability to do his job as well as damaging LSU Health Shreveport's public trust. 'I am writing to request your assistance in resolving an ongoing issue with Ms. Esperanza Moran,' Wyatt wrote to Landry in December. 'She has been consciously, intentionally, and maliciously defaming, harassing, targeting, and retaliating against me, utilizing Power-Based Violence and creating a hostile working environment.' Power-based violence is a term found in a 2021 Louisiana law approved in the wake of a Title IX scandal at LSU. It is defined as 'any form of interpersonal violence intended to control or intimidate another person through the assertion of power over the person.' When a reporter asked her about the complaints after her Senate confirmation hearing at the State Capitol last week, Moran requested questions be sent to her via email. She has not responded to the emailed questions. Landry spokeswoman Kate Kelly and LSU spokesman Todd Woodward have not responded to requests for comment. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX In its public records request to the governor's office, the Illuminator asked for any documents containing Landry's response to Wyatt's letter. No documents were provided. Moran has not yet received state Senate confirmation. Senators typically vote to confirm governor's appointees in batches and are expected to endorse Moran by the time the legislative session adjourns June 12. Sen. Alan Seabaugh, R-Shreveport, who represents Moran's district, said he would support Moran despite the complaints, noting that she has Landry's support. Esperanza Moran lives in Shreveport and is married to wealthy businessman Scott Moran. The couple own several businesses, including Moran Oil Co., and give generously to Republican political campaigns, including Landry's. The Morans also donate significant sums to LSU athletics, culminating in a plaza outside Tiger Stadium being named after Scott Moran when he gave money toward the 2012 remodel of the facility. Wyatt referred questions about his complaint to his attorney, Steve Soileau, adding that he is considering suing over Moran's conduct. 'Due to the status of the investigations and referred investigations and possibilities of litigation, we do not feel it would be appropriate to comment on specific items at this time,' Soileau said in response to questions about Wyatt's letter to Landry. 'Mr. Wyatt's letter speaks for itself and he stands by it. His EEOC complaint is still pending.' The 'referred investigations' involve Wyatt's work as the medical school's chief investigation officer. According to Wyatt's letter to the governor, some of these probes have been into Moran's personal friends, and one has been referred to the FBI, which Wyatt said in his complaint is looking into the incident along with state law enforcement. It's unusual for a university board member to be the subject of an EEOC complaint, according to several longtime higher education observers. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is a federal entity responsible for investigating workplace discrimination. 'I've seen a lot of supervisors come and go over the years, but I have never encountered anything quite like that,' said Kevin Cope, an LSU professor that has been involved in faculty governance at LSU for multiple decades. He was contacted for reaction to Moran's alleged actions. 'In fact, although the supervisors and I have disagreed, I will say the supervisors usually behave themselves pretty well. So this I will characterize as highly unusual, not only for LSU, but indeed for the nation and for higher education.' Politically appointed board members are not meant to be involved in the day-to-day running of a university, as it could threaten a school's accreditation. But the complaints allege Moran did just that. LSU closed its investigation into the anonymous complaint just days after it was filed, according to the case file the Illuminator obtained. A reporter reached out to every individual named in the complaint as possibly involved. Some did not respond, but others confirmed they were not contacted for the investigation. Woodward did not respond when asked why not all of the people named were contacted. During her Senate confirmation hearing, Moran was asked about the leadership of LSU Health Shreveport. 'There still needs to be some things cleared up,' Moran said. 'When you get the leadership working right, then everything trickles down, so I'm still working on that. I still have a little bit of work left to do.' Board members do not have sole authority to decide who staffs administrative positions in a university. Though sometimes they are involved in search committees to hire a top administrator, their influence is weighted by faculty, staff, students and community members. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Associated Press
16 hours ago
- Associated Press
"Don't Criminalize Me" Rally at Louisiana Capitol Asks Governor Landry to Veto Senate Bill 154
Help give voice to over 325K Louisianans who will be criminalized by SB154 On June 3, 2025, the 'Don't Criminalize Me' rally gathers at the Louisiana State Capitol to ask Governor Landry to veto Senate Bill 154. What: Louisiana kratom advocates, veterans, small business owners, and concerned citizens will gather on the Capitol steps for the 'Don't Criminalize Me' Rally to urge Governor Jeff Landry to veto Senate Bill 154, which would criminalize the possession and use of kratom by over 325,000 Louisianans. Louisiana and national media is strongly encouraged to attend and contact for details. When: Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 2:00 PM Central Time Where: Louisiana State Capitol, located at 900 North 3rd Street, Baton Rouge, LA 70802 Why: Senate Bill 154 threatens to unjustly criminalize law-abiding citizens—including many veterans—who responsibly use kratom as part of their health and wellness routines. The rally will call on the Governor to veto SB154 and instead establish a Louisiana Kratom Commission to: Advocates will share personal stories and expert perspectives supporting appropriate regulations and age restriction evidence-based policy—not fear-driven bans. Visuals: Signs, banners, personal testimonials, and a peaceful crowd demanding consumer protection—not criminalization. Media Inquiries: Contact Mac Haddow, Senior Fellow on Public Policy for the American Kratom Association, at 571-294-5978 or [email protected]. About American Kratom Association (AKA) American Kratom Association (AKA) is a consumer-based, nonprofit organization, focused on furthering the latest science as guidance for kratom public policy. AKA works to give a voice to millions of Americans by fighting to protect their rights to access safe and natural kratom. For more information, visit and learn more at Media Contact Mac Haddow [email protected] ### SOURCE: American Kratom Association (AKA) Copyright 2025 EZ Newswire
