Judge Extends Order Suspending Trump's Block on Harvard's Incoming Foreign Students
President Donald Trump's order to block incoming foreign students from attending Harvard University will remain on hold temporarily following a hearing Monday when a lawyer for the Ivy League school said its students were being used as 'pawns.'
US District Judge Allison Burroughs in Boston extended a temporary restraining order on Trump's proclamation until June 23 while she weighs Harvard's request for a preliminary injunction. Burroughs made the decision at a hearing over Harvard's request, which Trump's Republican administration opposed. Burroughs granted the initial restraining order June 5, and it had been set to expire Thursday. Trump moved to block foreign students from entering the US to attend Harvard earlier this month, citing concerns over national security. It followed a previous attempt by the Department of Homeland Security to revoke Harvard's ability to host foreign students on its campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Burroughs has temporarily blocked that action too and is weighing whether it should remain on hold until the case is decided.
Ian Gershengorn, a lawyer for Harvard, told Burroughs on Monday that Trump was using Harvard's international students as 'pawns' while arguing the administration has exceeded its authority in an attempt to retaliate against the school for not agreeing to the president's demands.
Trump has been warring with Harvard for months after it rejected a series of government demands meant to address conservative complaints that the school has become 'too liberal' and has tolerated antisemitic harassment. Trump officials have cut more than $2.6 billion in research grants, ended federal contracts, and threatened to revoke its tax-exempt status. Foreign students were brought into the battle in April when Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem demanded that Harvard turn over a trove of records related to any 'dangerous' or 'illegal' activity by foreign students. Harvard says it complied, but Noem said the response 'fell short,' and on May 22 she revoked Harvard's certification in the Student and Exchange Visitor Program. The sanction immediately put Harvard at a disadvantage as it competed for the world's top students and harmed Harvard's reputation as a global research hub, the school said in its lawsuit. 'Without its international students, Harvard is not Harvard,' the suit said. The action would have upended some graduate schools that recruit heavily from abroad. Some schools overseas quickly offered invitations to Harvard's students, including two universities in Hong Kong.
Harvard President Alan Garber previously said the university has made changes to combat antisemitism. 'But Harvard,' he said, 'will not stray from its core legally-protected principles even after receiving federal ultimatums.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
13 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
Lawmakers on edge as statehouse security tightens after Minnesota shootings
Anxious lawmakers convened Wednesday under heightened security in Wisconsin's state Capitol – one of the most publicly accessible statehouses in the country – days after a legislator and her husband in neighboring Minnesota were shot and killed at their home and others were targeted. The tension playing out in Wisconsin and other states after the Minnesota killings pits those who want to keep state capitols as open and accessible as possible against those concerned about increasing threats and acts of violence against officeholders. Other states took action. Numerous states took action this week to protect personal information of lawmakers after the targeted shootings of two Minnesota state lawmakers. The second legislator and his wife sustained serious injuries in the shootings early Saturday. A suspect, Vance Boelter, surrendered to police on Sunday. Prosecutors say Boelter had dozens of additional potential targets. They included state and federal officeholders in Wisconsin. Legislatures in most states are done meeting for the year, but those like Wisconsin that are still in session are taking emergency action to bolster security. The police chief at the North Carolina General Assembly said Monday in an email to legislators that 'we are working on enhanced security plans and are doing our best to keep everyone safe.' But further details haven't been released, and there's been no significant change seen in security on the surface. In Arizona, more state troopers were assigned to the state Senate building, said Senate GOP spokesperson Kim Quintero. Security bolstered in Wisconsin. Security changes for Wednesday's meeting of the Wisconsin Legislature were mostly out of sight. Visitors to the Capitol could still enter the building without going through a metal detector, but anyone wanting to watch in the Senate's public gallery had to go through an additional security check. Those wishing to watch the Assembly session from the gallery could do so, but they were encouraged to instead view it from another room. In a more visible sign of force, there were state patrol officers in the building and around both legislative chambers in addition to the usual Capitol Police. There were new security screenings for reporters attending a news conference in the Senate parlor, and the Democratic Assembly leader's door that is typically open was locked with a sign saying anyone with an appointment could knock to gain entry. 'I feel safe in our Capitol building,' Democratic Senate Minority Leader Dianne Hesselbein said before session began Wednesday. Not everyone felt the same way. 'We need to have a higher level of security,' Republican Sen. Chris Kapenga told WISN-TV. He supports adding metal detectors and banning guns for anyone in the building except for lawmakers. He said he always carries a gun in the Capitol. 'We should not be worried about our lives walking into that building,' Kapenga said. Prior security concerns. Wisconsin is a presidential battleground state used to high-stakes political fights and frequent large protests both inside and outside of the Capitol. Two years ago, a man armed with a loaded handgun came into the Wisconsin Capitol looking for Gov. Tony Evers, who was not there at the time. Wisconsin is one of seven states where concealed weapons are allowed in the Capitol, according to a 2021 report by the Council of State Governments. Thirty-six states ban concealed weapons in their capitol buildings. There have been some visible security increases at the Wisconsin Capitol in recent months. Anyone attending oral arguments of the state Supreme Court, which meets in a room just around the corner from the legislative chambers, must go through a metal detector. That was added after a retired judge was shot and killed in a targeted attack at his home in 2022 and amid increasing threats to members of the judiciary. Evers and other lawmakers were also on a list that gunman had. No metal detectors. The Wisconsin Capitol has its own police force housed in the basement, but the building is not protected by metal detectors, screening checkpoints, or X-rays. Anyone can walk in off the street between 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. during the week and go straight to the offices of state lawmakers and others. The Wisconsin Capitol is one of 11 state capitols that does not have metal detectors, a state audit found last year. It is one of 19 states without X-ray machines to scan items people bring into the building, the audit found. Metal detectors were installed at the Capitol in late February 2011 at the height of protests over then-Gov. Scott Walker's proposal, later signed into law, that effectively ended collective bargaining for most public workers. They were removed four months later under an agreement reached between Walker's administration and the state employees' union, which sued to get the Capitol reopened without metal detectors. State Capitol security concerns were raised again after the riot at the US Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. But at the time the Wisconsin Capitol was closed to the general public due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Wisconsin Republican Assembly Speaker Robin Vos said Wednesday that it was important to take a breath and not have a knee-jerk reaction to the Minnesota shootings. 'Trying to make the Capitol into a fortress is not the answer,' he said. 'The thing that's most scary is this didn't occur in a Capitol,' Vos said. 'It occurred in someone's home.'
Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
Trump tells Putin to end Ukraine war before mediating Iran-Israel
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump appeared Wednesday to rebuff Vladimir Putin's offer to mediate in the Israel-Iran conflict, saying the Russian president should end his own war in Ukraine first. 'He actually offered to help mediate. I said, 'Do me a favor, mediate your own. Let's mediate Russia first, okay?'' Trump told reporters at the White House. 'I said 'Vladimir, let's mediate Russia first, you can worry about this later.'' But Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov appeared to suggest the pair had not even spoken, telling Russian state news agency TASS: 'He was speaking figuratively. Life is so eventful right now that looking back a few days is like looking back to yesterday.' Later Wednesday Trump said a change in Iran's government 'could happen,' and also indicated that negotiations could be in the offing, without giving details. 'They want to meet, they want to come to the White House — I may do that,' Trump told reporters.
Leaders
an hour ago
- Leaders
US Military Preparations at its Peak: Col. Abbas Dahouk
Over the past few days, Trump has made several posts that suggest a direct US military involvement in the Iran-Israel conflict, which erupted on Friday, June 13, 2025. His remarks included that the US has a 'total control of the skies over Iran' and that Tehran should submit to an 'unconditional surrender.' Then, he said about the US striking Iran 'I may do it, I may not do it.' In this context, the Former Senior Military Advisor to US Department of State and Member of the Board of Directors of the National Council on US-Arab Relations, Colonel (Ret.) Abbas Dahouk, said that the Trump administration is preparing for a military operation while using coercive diplomacy. Military Operation Coming Speaking to BBC Arabic, Dahouk said: 'It seems that the Trump administration tries to gather all these elements to launch a military operation against the most fortified nuclear facility in Iran, which is Fordo.' 'But at the same time, the US continues to use coercive diplomacy to try to put pressure on the Iranian regime through the above-mentioned remarks, that the US is serious about the unconditional surrender,' he added. The Former Senior Military Advisor to US Department of State also suggested that the fact that Israel is dropping bombs on Tehran 'disappoints the Iranians and may push them to take a position on this war and take an action.' So, 'Trump's coercive diplomacy continues and at the same time, preparations go on,' he noted. Moving US Assets American officials told Israeli counterparts that the next 48 hours will be decisive, raising questions about what may happen. In the light of this, Col. Dahouk said: 'The military preparations seem to be at its peak. All these strategic assets have been moved.' These assets include refueling aircraft, US Navy destroyers and warships that have moved to the Middle East. Targeting Fordo All these elements come together to 'prepare for what could be a major strike on specific targets inside Iran,' Dahouk said. In case of US involvement, 'this engagement will be very specific and will target certain nuclear facilities, namely the Fordo nuclear compound, which requires US assets to destroy it,' he said. Moreover, US assets are needed to destroy 'the infrastructure related to Iran's nuclear program, an advanced infrastructure that contributes to building a nuclear bomb,' Dahouk added. Geopolitical Dilemma 'This requires a political decision. Trump has not decided yet on this operation, some elements in his administration want to destroy Iran's nuclear program once and for all, and topple the Iranian regime,' Dahouk noted. On the other hand, he said that other elements want Trump to fulfill his 'America First' promises and to not engage in new wars in the Middle East. Thus, it is a 'geopolitical dilemma' that Trump is trying to decide. But militarily, everything seems ready, according to Dahouk. Short link : Post Views: 75
