
Gov. Josh Shapiro details arson attack on his home and if he believes it was a hate crime in ABC interview
Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro recounted the arson attack on his home, which occurred after a Passover celebration last weekend, in an exclusive interview with ABC News' George Stephanopoulos on Friday.
Cody Balmer, 38, was arrested after allegedly setting fire to the residence while Shapiro and his family slept inside. Shapiro, who is Jewish, said he and his family were forced to evacuate their home after celebrating the first night of Passover.
Shapiro gave Stephanopoulos a tour of the residence after the attack and detailed how the attacker allegedly evaded security and was able to throw a Molotov cocktail through a window of the home.
The governor began by showing Stephanopoulos where the intruder was allegedly able to gain access to the property.
"He scaled the fence somewhere right around here," Shapiro said while standing in front of the fence.
He said the intruder "had a bag that contained some Molotov cocktails and had a metal type of hammer," and hid in the bushes near the fence before eventually tripping the home's security sensors.
Shapiro said the security sensor prompted a Pennsylvania State Trooper to arrive at their home, but according to the governor, "it was dark, and the trooper was unable to spot him."
After evading the trooper, Shapiro said the suspect was able to make his way through a backyard walkway, broke a window with a hammer, and threw a Molotov cocktail into the home.
"That immediately set off a fire and explosion," the governor said.
Shapiro then brought Stephanopoulos inside and emotionally described the family's Passover celebration that took place shortly before the attack.
"Just hours before, Lori and I were seated probably right about here, at a long table, conducting our Passover Seder," Shapiro detailed. "Three of our four kids were here, the other was in college."
He continued: "I'm getting emotional just thinking about it — we had our family, we had guests from the community from across Pennsylvania. It was just a really beautiful night."
The governor said his family and guests were celebrating until about midnight, before the family headed to bed around 1 a.m. The attack took place about an hour later around 2 a.m.
Shapiro and Stephanopoulos then began their sit-down portion of the interview in one of the scorched rooms of the home.
"I was in here at about maybe 3 o'clock in the morning with the fire chief, when it became immediately apparent to me this wasn't just an accidental fire, a candle being left on or something," Shapiro told the ABC host.
Stephanopoulos asked Shapiro if he believes this attack was a hate crime.
"I think that's a question for the prosecutors to determine. They're going to determine motive," he told Stephanopoulos.
The ABC host then asked Shapiro, "What does your gut tell you? This man was talking about Gaza, talking about Palestine, talking about his hatred for you."
The governor replied that he recognizes "when you're in these positions of power, there are people out there that want to do you harm," but he tries not to be "captive to the fear."
Stephanopoulos argued that while he recognizes Shapiro doesn't want to be "captive to the fear," that homeland security has been warning of the rise of these kinds of attacks for years.
"It's real," Shapiro replied. "I mean, this is sadly a real part of our society today, and it needs to be universally condemned, George. I don't care if it's coming from the left, from the right. I don't care if it's coming from someone you voted for, or someone who you didn't vote for. Someone on your team, or someone on the other team. I think every single leader has the responsibility to speak and act with moral clarity and condemn this kind of violence."
Shapiro was later asked if President Donald Trump, or anyone from his administration, had reached out to him following the attack.
The governor told Stephanopoulos that while Trump had not reached out yet, he heard from F.B.I director Kash Patel "immediately" following the attack that day, as well as Attorney General Pam Bondi.
When asked why he believed A.G. Bondi had not yet labeled this attack as an "act of domestic terrorism," and whether he personally believed it was, Shapiro replied: "I think that's a question for the prosecutors, both the local district attorney and the Department of Justice."
Stephanopoulos questioned why the governor didn't want to answer whether he believed the attack was a hate crime, considering figures such as Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., had called on the attorney general to label the attack as such.
"I'm not sure it's helpful for people on the outside to be weighing in with their opinions here, George. No matter who they are," Shapiro replied. "You've asked me a couple of times why I haven't given you the kind of answer that you're seeking. I want to explain why."
The governor continued: "I know, as a former prosecutor, how important it is to follow the evidence and apply the law, and to do so without fear or favor. In this case I'm the victim of the crime; I'm not the prosecutor. The prosecutors will weigh all of the different evidence and determine what the motive is. I think for me to dwell on that, for me to focus on that, is not my job."
Stephanopoulos then asked Shapiro what can be done to "combat this kind of hate," speaking about the rise in antisemitism across the country.
"By speaking and acting with moral clarity, let me explain," Shapiro said. "Immediately following the assassination attempt on the former president, now-president, in Butler, Pennsylvania, I condemned that in the strongest of terms. I spoke to the victims, I went to Butler. When the assassin who killed the U.S. healthcare CEO was caught in Altoona, Pennsylvania, I immediately went there and condemned that kind of violence in clear terms."
Shapiro expressed that he feels it's important "to be leading every day in a way that brings people together and doesn't just continually divide us," even when the country isn't currently dealing with a traumatic event like what happened in Butler or at the governor's home last weekend.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - Progressives push anti-Israel activism, are surprised by antisemitic violence that follows
Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) is running for cover. After the horrific attack on Jews in Boulder, Colo., the Minnesota representative issued the kind of bland statement meant to deflect blame, posting this on X: 'I'm holding the victims and families in Boulder, Colorado in my heart. Violence against anyone is never acceptable. We must reject hatred and harm in all its forms.' As some noted, it took nearly 24 hours for Omar to issue even that statement, which notably failed to mention that the victims were Jews and the suspect is an Egyptian Muslim who attacked them while shouting 'Free Palestine.' A video has now surfaced in which the accused assailant ranted about his faith, saying 'Allahu Akbar.' After he firebombed a group of Jews, he told investigators he wanted to 'kill all Zionist people.' One of the victims, an 88-year-old Holocaust survivor, asked NBC News, 'What the hell is going on in our country?' It's a question everyone should be asking. Here's part of the answer: It is a very easy hop from college students intimidating Jewish students and chanting about Intifada and a Muslim man trying to murder Jews. It is similarly but a short leap from Omar, who applauded anti-Israel student protesters at Columbia University for being 'brave and patriotic,' voted against an antisemitism resolution in the U.S. House and suggested to aggrieved people acting out of anger that some Jewish students are just 'pro-genocide.' It is also easy to connect student demonstrations with terrorism. For the first time, a protester at Columbia University — an outsider arrested for hate crimes against Jews — has been linked to Hamas. He won't be the last. In recent months we have witnessed not only the hideous attempt to burn Jews alive in Boulder, but also the firebombing of Jewish Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro's home and the cold-blooded murder of two young Jewish people at the Jewish Capital Museum in Washington. All three suspects expressed anti-Israel sentiments, with the alleged perpetrator of the latter killings shouting 'free, free Palestine' after he shot the victims 21 times. The Anti-Defamation League reports that 2024 saw a record number of antisemitic attacks, up 344 percent over the past five years. This is intolerable. Radicalized students at some of our top schools are part of the problem. Recently, MIT's graduation was marred by a student speaker, Megha Vemuri, who donned the politically symbolic keffiyeh and told the commencement audience, 'We are watching Israel try to wipe out Palestine off the face of the earth, and it is a shame that MIT is a part of it.' She also accused MIT of complicity 'in the ongoing genocide of the Palestinian people.' Writing in the Times of Israel, one alum panned the speech as a 'trite, TikTok-depth graduation speech on a tragic issue of devastating complexity'; she condemned the administration for not informing the audience of myriad programs funded by MIT that improves the lives and futures of Palestinians. MIT's president, Sally Kornbluth, did not defend the university or refute Vemuri's incendiary language; instead, she stepped to the podium and said, 'At MIT, we believe in freedom of expression. But today is about the graduates.' Not, apparently, about the Jewish graduates. A Jew graduating with a Ph.D in cryptography posted on X: 'I finally got my PhD from @MIT, with my 5-year-old twins, my 2-year-old and my parents (children of Holocaust survivors) traveling halfway around the world just to be there. Instead, MIT's student commencement speaker decided it was appropriate to use the moment for hate-filled rhetoric against Israelis and Jews … too many in the crowd erupted with cheers and anger. My kids might not have understood every word, but they felt the fear and hostility. … How could @MIT let this happen? How, indeed. It is not only schools that are allowing anti-Jewish and anti-Israel hatred to spiral out of control; because the fever is being staunchly condemned by the Trump White House, the media has gone mushy. After the Boulder incident, USA Today ran a sob-sister piece about the offspring of the Egyptian man who tried to burn Jews alive with the headline: 'Boulder suspect's daughter dreamed of studying medicine. Now she faces deportation.' After receiving massive blowback, USA Today quietly revised the offensive piece. Increasingly, it is progressives like Omar who are responsible for surging antisemitism. Apologists claim that supporting Palestine and opposing Israel do not constitute antisemitism. Perhaps they would not in in isolation, but the protesters have taken pains to muddy the waters as much as possible. As the New York Times recently noted, 'the sprawling protest movement against the war in Gaza has scrambled efforts to distinguish opposition to the actions of the Israeli government, or even to the state of Israel itself, from hostility to Jews. Critics of the protesters have argued that slogans like 'globalize the Intifada' are thinly veiled calls for violence in any Jewish space.' A rabbi in Boulder was quoted by the Times writing, 'Jews in America have mostly felt the threats of antisemitism from the far right in the form of White Supremacy, yet now many of us have experienced hatred, bigotry and intolerance from progressives, those who many of us have considered friends and allies.' In City Journal, Charles Fain Lehman writes, 'The American radical anti-Israel movement has built the intellectual scaffolding for—and in many cases all but invited—the violence now playing out in places like Boulder. When you call for 'Intifada,' you cannot feign surprise when someone takes that call literally. Whatever your legal right to speak, that is the outcome you invoked.' Lehman is correct: The Intifada is here and must be confronted. Our government must protect free speech criticizing Israel or supporting Palestine, but it must also deploy all resources to punish acts of violence — including on college campuses — before more people get hurt. If it were blacks or Asians under attack, we would not have to defend efforts to stave off hate crimes. Jews should be afforded the same protections. Liz Peek is a former partner of major bracket Wall Street firm Wertheim and Company. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Was the Boulder attack terrorism or a hate crime? 2 experts unpack the complexities
Twelve people in Boulder, Colorado, were injured by a man wielding a makeshift flamethrower and Molotov cocktails on June 1, 2025. Those burned in the attack were taking part in a peaceful, silent walk on Pearl Street, a pedestrian mall, with the aim of raising awareness about Israeli hostages held by Hamas in Gaza. The suspect, Mohamed Sabry Soliman, 45, yelled, 'Free Palestine,' according to local news reports. Soliman is an Egyptian immigrant who was living in the U.S. illegally after his tourist visa and work authorization both expired. On June 3, Soliman's family, who lived with him in Colorado Springs, were detained by federal immigration authorities. Soliman's wife and five children were placed in expedited removal proceedings. The FBI and local authorities initially said they were investigating a 'targeted terror attack'. But Soliman was later charged with hate crimes in federal court. He also faces attempted murder and other charges in state court. We study terrorism and hate crimes. Whether an attack like the one in Boulder is considered an act of terrorism or a hate crime changes the way a suspect is charged and sentenced. Let's look at how these two terms differ. Hate crimes are crimes motivated by bias on the basis of race, religion, sexual orientation or ethnicity. In some states, gender, age and gender identity are also included. Hate crime laws have been passed by 47 states and the federal government since the 1980s, when activists first began to press state legislatures to recognize the role of bias in violence against minority groups. Today, only Arkansas, South Carolina and Wyoming do not have hate crime laws. Colorado's 2024 statute prohibits bias-motivated attacks based on a wide variety of categories, from ancestry to gender identity. In order to be charged as a hate crime, attacks – whether vandalism, assault or killings – must be directed at individuals because of the prohibited biases. Hate crimes, in other words, punish motive; the prosecutor must convince the judge or jury that the victim was targeted because of their race, religion, sexual orientation or other protected characteristic. If the defendant is found to have acted with bias motivation, hate crimes often add an additional penalty to the underlying charge. Charging people with a hate crime, then, presents additional layers of complexity to what may otherwise be a straightforward case for prosecutors. Bias motivation can be hard to prove, and prosecutors can be reluctant to take cases that they may not win in court. Terrorism is a violent tactic – a strategy used to achieve a specific end. This strategy is often used in asymmetric power struggles when a weaker person, or group, is fighting against a powerful nation-state. The violence is aimed at creating fear in the targeted population. Terrorists often justify their bloody acts on the basis of perceived social, economic and political unfairness. Or they take inspiration from religious beliefs or spiritual principles. Many forms of terrorism were inspired by struggle between races, the rich and poor, or political outcasts and elites. How different terrorist groups act is informed by what they are trying to achieve. Some adopt a reactionary perspective aimed at stopping or resisting social, economic and political changes. Others adopt a revolutionary doctrine and want to provoke change. In the United States, terrorism attacks were in sharp decline from 1970 to 2011, decreasing from approximately 475 incidents a year to fewer than 20. The U.S. government began to take more note of domestic terrorism after the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995. And the number of domestic terrorism incidents began to rise after 2011, with notable increases in the mid-to-late 2010s and early 2020s. Data compiled by the Center for Strategic and International Studies shows right-wing terrorist attacks and plots grew substantially during the past decade, with right-wing extremists being responsible for the majority of attacks and plots each year since 2011, except for 2013. There were 44 incidents in 2019 alone. The Department of Homeland Security's 2025 Homeland Threat Assessment indicates that the terrorism threat environment in the United States remains high, driven largely by domestic violent extremists motivated by a mix of racial, religious and anti-government grievances. Terrorism is not a successful tactic. American University professor Audrey Cronin studied 457 terrorist groups worldwide going back to 1968. The groups lasted an average of eight years before they lost support or were dismantled. No terrorist organizations that she studied were able to conquer a state, and 94% were unable to achieve even one of their strategic goals. Portions of this article originally appeared in articles published on March 19, 2021, and May 23, 2017. Read more of our stories about Colorado. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Frederic Lemieux, Georgetown University and Jeannine Bell, Loyola University Chicago Read more: Reducing American antisemitism requires more than condemning opposition to Israel and targeting elite universities For many American Jews protesting for Palestinians, activism is a journey rooted in their Jewish values When is criticism of Israel antisemitic? A scholar of modern Jewish history explains The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Donald Trump Lets News Outlets Know He's Got No Plans To Talk To Elon Musk: 'The Poor Guy Has Got A Problem'
Donald Trump spent part of Friday morning letting some news outlets know that he has no plans to talk to Elon Musk, even amid talk of a potential truce in their messy fallout. On CNN, Dana Bash said that she got off the phone with Trump, and the president told her, 'I'm not even thinking about Elon. He's got a problem. The poor guy has got a problem.' More from Deadline U.S. Job Growth Stays In Line With Expectations At 139,000 In May Even Amid Federal Workforce Cuts Trump Vs Musk Gets BBC 'Have I Got News For You' Treatment After Meltdown Occurs During Recording Late Night Hosts Take On Trump-Musk Feud: "Vader Turns On The Emperor Again" 'He says he won't be speaking to him for a while, but he wishes Elon Musk well,' Bash said, as Trump turned to the economy. She said that Trump didn't sound angry but 'I guess more resigned.' ABC News' Jonathan Karl also spoke to Trump, and said the president told him that he was 'not particularly' interested in talking to him. Karl had asked him about reports that there would be a call with Musk some time on Friday. 'You mean the man who has lost his mind?' Trump said. Trump also spoke to CBS News' Robert Costa, and insisted that he was 'totally' focused on policy matters. On his social media platform Truth Social, Trump retirned to attacking the Federal Reserve for not lowering interest rates. Meanwhile, Fox News and other outlets reported that Trump plans to give away or sell the red Tesla that he purchased from Musk earlier this year. The two had appeared on the White House lawn in March for what essentially was a sales pitch for Musk's cars, amid reports of declining sales due in part to the negative image many potential buyers had of the billionaire in his chainsaw-like approach to the federal government. As the feud between Musk and Trump escalated on Thursday, White House reporter posted photos of the Tesla, parked near the West Wing. Musk had given some indication later on Thursday that he would tone it down. After one X user suggested that Musk and Trump 'cool off and take a step back for a couple days,' Musk wrote, 'Good advice.' He also appeared to back off his threat to decommission Dragon, the program to supply NASA with spacecraft to resupply and send astronauts to the space station. The White House has tried to shift attention to the economy, amid a rather static jobs report on Friday. But the soap opera, reality show- like feud has dominated cable news coverage, podcasts, primetime opinion programming and late night. Musk reportedly poured $277 million into the 2024 election to help Trump and other Republicans, and there was expectation that he would invest heavily in next year's midterms. But as the Trump-Musk relationship fizzled this week, the billionaire, who is the world's richest man, threatened to work to defeat GOP candidates who voted for the signature piece of Trump's agenda, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Musk also talked of a third party and supported the idea of impeaching Trump. Best of Deadline 2025 TV Cancellations: Photo Gallery 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery 'Stick' Soundtrack: All The Songs You'll Hear In The Apple TV+ Golf Series