David Frost: I suffer from face blindness. As a politician, being unable to identify people is agony
It was 2018. A European foreign minister was visiting Boris Johnson in the Foreign Office. As Boris's adviser, I was dispatched to talk to him and his team, including his London ambassador, in the waiting room for a few minutes and then return to update Boris. When he and his team were brought along to Boris's office, I introduced myself by name to the ambassador once again. He looked at me rather oddly, and said 'Yes, I know.' What he didn't realise was that he was entirely unfamiliar to me again: I hadn't forgotten the conversation, but had no idea which of the visiting group I'd had it with.
Something like this has been my experience, in a variety of contexts, all my life. That condition, the inability to remember faces, is called prosopagnosia, or more simply face blindness. Last week, Bournemouth University released a new report on it, showing it is a distinct condition, one from which many people may not realise they suffer, and maybe more widespread than has been thought.
My family first realised something was wrong when, aged seven, I walked past my mother at the school gates because she was wearing a new coat: the colour of the coat was the cue, not her face (it's improved since then). Later, at school, there was a boy in my year whom some people called by his first name, some his surname – it was that sort of school. For most of my time there I believed these were two different people.
I've learnt that most people find this kind of thing extraordinary, very hard to believe or understand. But for me it's just the way things are, somewhat complicating, but not disruptive to everyday life.
What is it like to suffer from face blindness? Well, first, it's nothing to do with actual blindness: I can see faces and features perfectly well. Tests show I have it in a milder form than many. I don't have that disabling complete inability to recognise faces that some unfortunate sufferers do. I do remember them if they are familiar and repeatedly reinforced: relatives, people I work with closely, and, mostly, famous people.
But faces are somehow hard to analyse. I can't remember faces day to day – I would be an absolutely terrible police witness – and I simply cannot reconstruct a face in my mind, even that of a close family member. I find it hard to see similarities and differences between faces and features, and therefore to have a reliable sense of who looks like someone else. So it can be hard to be sure whether I have seen someone before, even just a few minutes before, and I easily confuse people.
Obviously this creates difficulties in social interaction. And I have chosen careers which have a lot of it. As a diplomat, ambassador and politician, I have found the condition particularly painful given the amount of time each role has required me to spend on meeting, greeting, and trying to build rapport. So I have had to find ways to manage.
One technique is to identify people by what they are wearing: the colour of the jacket, earrings, a watch. That's all very well if people are wearing something distinctive, but it's a disaster if everyone is in uniform. Obviously, it also doesn't work if someone changes their clothing. It's pretty awkward when I welcome someone to a reception, they go inside and take their coat off, and then find me introducing myself to them again.
It's not just in real life either. I will struggle with films where there is a lot of rapid switching between scenes, or flashbacks, with the same characters in different outfits. Subtitles can help, but my family still become weary of me asking, 'Is this character the same one as in the last scene'?
Another technique is to try to recognise people by something other than their face: a distinguishing mark, hair colour, or very often posture or gait. Sometimes this is subliminal and I have come to realise I am picking up on cues that others can safely ignore. Very often I will say to my wife 'Mr X looks like Mr Y', only to be told: 'No he doesn't!' to which I might reply, 'Yes, but the way he walks does!'
All this means that context is very important. I'm much more likely to 'place' someone accurately if they are in their normal environment. If I see you, a casual work colleague, outside work, in casual clothes, I'm going to find it difficult to remember you unless I know you very well. I apologise to The Telegraph writer who greeted me in the street the other day and eventually had to introduce himself, realising I had no idea who he was. As the saying goes: 'It's not you, it's me.' So, if you accost me on my day off, expect a meandering conversation where I try desperately to extract some bit of personal information which will suddenly enable me to put two and two together.
Those of us with a degree of face blindness are very conscious of how all this can look to others. It's very easy to come across as rude or indifferent. After all, no one wants to think that someone has taken so little interest in a conversation with them that they have forgotten it 10 minutes later. And it changes our own behaviour too. It makes me reluctant to use names and cautious about introducing people to each other, in case I have misunderstood who they are. In groups, I stand back till I'm sure I know who everyone is. This can, of course, easily look like stand-offishness or indifference.
I'm writing this to explain, not to complain. Some people say that face blindness should be considered a recognised disability or that sufferers should be a protected group under the Equality Act. I have never thought of it like that and I certainly wouldn't claim any special status. I don't belong to any prosopagnosia support groups. It's just something I work around and, mostly, don't consciously think about, until I upset someone. So, to all those I've annoyed, disconcerted, or embarrassed over the years, I say sorry – and ask for understanding next time!

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Keir Starmer reiterates need to ‘de-escalate' Israel-Iran conflict
Sir Keir Starmer has reiterated the need to 'de-escalate' the conflict between Israel and Iran as the diplomatic push to calm tensions continues. The Prime Minister spoke to the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia, Mohammed bin Salman, on Saturday afternoon, and Foreign Secretary David Lammy was expected to spend the day in talks with counterparts across the Middle East and elsewhere. It comes after Iran launched retaliatory attacks against Israel overnight. A Downing Street spokesperson said Sir Keir and the Crown Prince spoke on Saturday afternoon. According to a read-out of the conversation issued by Number 10, 'they discussed the gravely concerning situation in the Middle East and agreed on the need to de-escalate'. 'The Prime Minister updated on his conversations with partners so far, and reiterated that the UK is poised to work closely with its allies in the coming days to support a diplomatic resolution.' The Foreign Secretary was due to be briefed by officials on Saturday on the developments overnight, and was expected to speak to figures in the Middle East and elsewhere through the day. It comes after Mr Lammy had conversations with representatives from Iran, Jordan and Saudi Arabia as well as European foreign ministers on Friday. Iranian state media said Tehran has warned the US, the UK and France not to help Israel stop Iran's strikes, according to reports on Saturday. Iran launched missile and drone strikes on Israel overnight after a series of Israeli attacks on the heart of Tehran's nuclear programme and armed forces. Tehran's UN ambassador said 78 people had been killed and more than 320 wounded in Israel's attacks, while Tehran's response was said to have killed at least three and wounded dozens. Speaking to broadcasters on Friday evening, Mr Lammy said: 'I spoke to my Iranian counterpart today to urge restraint at this time and calm. I recognise that this is a moment of grave peril in the Middle East.' Sir Keir and US President Donald Trump called for 'diplomacy and dialogue' in a call on Friday, amid a diplomatic flurry from western nations to try to calm the conflict. Sir Keir had earlier urged his Israeli counterpart Benjamin Netanyahu to de-escalate and work towards a 'diplomatic resolution'. A Cobra meeting of high-level ministers was convened on Friday afternoon to discuss the situation. The same is not expected on Saturday but Whitehall officials were expected to be meeting. The conflict was ignited by early morning Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear bases on Friday. Israel said the barrage was necessary before Iran got any closer to building a nuclear weapon, although experts and the US government have assessed that Tehran was not actively working on such a weapon. Iran retaliated with waves of drones and ballistic missiles, with explosions lighting up the skies over Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. Sir Keir is set for discussions with other world leaders at the G7 summit in Canada next week. Tensions between Israel, the US and Iran have escalated in recent weeks, amid negotiations over the Iranian nuclear deal, which is aimed at preventing the country from developing nuclear weapons.

3 hours ago
As Trump goes to G7 summit, other world leaders aim to show they're not intimidated
WASHINGTON -- WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump has long bet that he can scare allies into submission — a gamble that is increasingly being tested ahead of the Group of Seven summit beginning Monday in Canada. He's threatened stiff tariffs in the belief that other nations would crumple. He's mused about taking over Canada and Greenland. He's suggested he will not honor NATO's obligations to defend partners under attack. And he's used Oval Office meetings to try to intimidate the leaders of Ukraine and South Africa. But many world leaders see fewer reasons to be cowed by Trump, even as they recognize the risks if he followed through on his threats. They believe he will ultimately back down — since many of his plans could inflict harm on the U.S. — or that he can simply be charmed and flattered into cooperating. 'Many leaders still seem intimidated by Trump, but increasingly they are catching on to his pattern of bullying,' said Jeremy Shapiro, research director at the European Council on Foreign Relations. 'In places as diverse as Canada, Iran, China and the EU, we are seeing increasing signs that leaders now recognize that Trump is afraid of anything resembling a fair fight. And so they are increasingly willing to stand up to him.' In the 22 instances in which Trump has publicly threatened military action since his first term, the U.S. only used force twice, according to a May analysis by Shapiro. Ahead of the G7 summit, there are already signs of subtle pushback against Trump from fellow leaders in the group. French President Emanuel Macron planned to visit Greenland over the weekend in a show of European solidarity. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has said the U.S. is no longer the 'predominant' force in the world after Trump's tariffs created fissures in a decades-long partnership between the U.S. and its northern neighbor. 'We stood shoulder to shoulder with the Americans throughout the Cold War and in the decades that followed, as the United States played a predominant role on the world stage," Carney said this past week in French. "Today, that predominance is a thing of the past.' The new prime minister added that with the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, the U.S. became the global hegemon, a position of authority undermined by Trump's transactional nature that puts little emphasis on defending democratic values or the rule of law. 'Now the United States is beginning to monetize its hegemony: charging for access to its markets and reducing its relative contributions to our collective security,' Carney said. Israel's attack on Iran has added a new wrinkle to the global picture as the summit leaders gather to tackle some of the world's thorniest problems A senior Canadian official said it was decided early on that the G7 won't be issuing a joint communiqué as it has at past summits — an indication of how hard it can be to get Trump on the same page with other world leaders. The White House said individual leader statements will be issued on the issues being discussed. Speaking last month at a conference in Singapore, Macron called France a 'friend and an ally of the United States' but pushed back against Trump's desire to dominate what other countries do. Macron said efforts to force other nations to choose between the U.S. and China would lead to the breakdown of the global order put in place after World War II. 'We want to cooperate, but we do not want to be instructed on a daily basis what is allowed, what is not allowed, and how our life will change because of the decision of a single person,' Macron said. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba pushed back against Trump's agenda of levying higher tariffs on imported goods, arguing it would hurt economic growth. The Japanese leader specifically called Trump ahead of the summit to confirm their plans to talk on the sidelines, which is a greater focus for Japan than the summit itself. 'I called him as I also wanted to congratulate his birthday, though one day earlier,' Ishiba said. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., the ranking member of the Foreign Relations Committee, said the summit was an opportunity for Trump to 'mend' relationships with other countries so China would be unable to exploit differences among the G7. She said other foreign leaders are 'not intimidated' by Trump's actions, which could be driving them away from tighter commitments with the U.S. 'The conversations that I've had with those leaders suggest that they think that the partnership with the United States has been really important, but they also understand that there are other opportunities,' Shaheen said. The White House did not respond to emailed questions for this story. Having originally made his reputation in real estate and hospitality, Trump has taken kindly to certain foreign visitors, such as U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni. Starmer has sought to keep Trump in line with Europe in supporting Ukraine and NATO instead of brokering any truces that would favor Russia. He has echoed the president's language about NATO members spending more on defense. But in his Oval Office visit, Starmer also pleased Trump by delivering an invite for a state visit from King Charles III. The German government said it, too, wanted to send a public signal of unity, saying that while Trump's recent meeting with Merz at the White House went harmoniously, the next test is how the relationship plays out in a team setting. There will also be other world leaders outside of the G7 nations attending the summit in mountainous Kananaskis, including Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, whom Trump dressed down in the Oval Office. Italy's Meloni has positioned herself as a 'bridge' between the Trump administration and the rest of Europe. But Italy's strong support of Ukraine and Trump's threatened tariffs on European goods have put Meloni, the only European leader to attend Trump's inauguration, in a difficult position. Mark Sobel, U.S. chair of the Official Monetary and Financial Institutions Forum, an independent think tank, said Trump's 'trade policies, backing for right wing European movements, seeming preference for dealing with authoritarians and many of his other actions are alienating our G7 allies,' even if the U.S. president is correct that Europe needs to do more on defense. But even as other G7 leaders defuse any public disputes with Trump, the U.S. president's vision for the world remains largely incompatible with they want. 'In short, behind the curtains, and notwithstanding whatever theater, the Kananaskis summit will highlight a more fragmented G7 and an adrift global economy," Sobel said.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Starmer's latest freebie: British sovereignty in exchange for nothing
While we can't rely on the French to help police the Channel – despite paying them £500 million for the privilege, we can always trust our Gallic cousins to bear a grudge. We already knew that the Prime Minister's great EU 'reset' was a sham; that much was clear when all we got in return was the use of e-gates that were already operational in many European countries. Now, we learn that we may not even be granted access to the bloc's industrial defence programme, despite Sir Keir Starmer's insistence that defence and security was a central tenet of the deal. As he boasted last month after selling us out to Brussels: 'We've also struck a new defence and security partnership to strengthen our cooperation and strengthen our security – which is vital in this dangerous new era. 'And it will open the door to working with the EU's new defence fund – providing new opportunities for our defence industry, supporting British jobs and livelihoods.' Except, of course, the French have other ideas. In yet another example of just how bad Labour is at negotiating anything (see also the Chagos surrender and, more recently, the 'deal' to allow Spanish border guards to check passports on Gibraltar) we now learn that Emmanuel Macron is trying to shut out British arms firms from the European Defence Industry Programme (EDIP). While different to the defence fund, which is known as SAFE (Security Action for Europe), EDIP will see cash pumped into joint procurement projects and the production of weapons, ammunition and other military hardware. It was created for the benefit of the EU and 'allies' but French diplomats have insisted the tool should be solely used to boost firms based inside the EU, as well as Norway and Ukraine – shutting out the UK. So much for Starmer's boast that the reset deal would put Britain 'back on the world stage' and give us 'unprecedented access to the EU market, the best of any country.' Labour is yet to reveal how many billions is being squandered on a reset that has already prompted another big fat 'non' from Paris. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.