
Airlines voice significant concerns about Heathrow third runway amid ‘service issues'
Airlines have voiced significant concerns about Heathrow's proposed third runway, questioning its effectiveness given the airport's current operational model.
A recent survey of 50 airlines operating at the west London airport revealed that 90 per cent believe Heathrow 's functionality as a hub is being hampered.
Among the key issues raised were the standard of services provided and a perceived lack of engagement with airlines.
Heathrow's Airline Operators Committee (AOC), representing the airport's airlines and the body that commissioned the research, argues that these shortcomings render a third runway "unaffordable" under the existing system.
Heathrow, in response, acknowledged the need for "adjustments to the regulatory model," while maintaining that both airlines and passengers currently "get good value for money."
More than two out of three (67 per cent) airlines agreed that the airport's operation stifles their ability to increase investment.
Some 60 per cent of respondents believe Heathrow's service levels inside terminals is worse than at other major airports, with claims of long security lines, baggage system failures and poor treatment of passengers with restricted mobility.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves gave her backing for Heathrow's third runway project in a speech on growth in January.
The airport responded by saying it would submit detailed plans to the Government in the summer.
The cost of the project was estimated at £14 billion in 2014, but this is likely to have risen sharply.
Heathrow's AOC is part of the Heathrow Reimagined campaign, which is calling on the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) to reform how the airport is regulated.
Among the other organisations represented by the body are British Airways' owner International Airlines Group (IAG), Virgin Atlantic and tycoon Surinder Arora, who operates a number of hotels serving the airport.
The campaign claims Heathrow is the world's most expensive airport for charges, with airlines paying £1.1 billion more each year than if fees were in line with equivalent major European airports.
Airlines typically pass charges on to passengers through fares.
Nigel Wicking, chief executive of Heathrow's AOC, told the PA news agency the results of the survey reflect 'the performance challenges airlines have day to day at Heathrow'.
He said: 'When you when you look at that relative to the amount we spend at Heathrow, something's going wrong.
'We're spending a lot of money, it is the most expensive airport for charges, and yet the quality of service keeps on dropping, whether that's loss of bags, congestion or lack of availability of check-in space.'
He said New York's JFK airport offers a 'far better experience' because it has refreshed all its terminals within a 27-year period, whereas at Heathrow, Terminal 3 is more than 60 years old and Terminal 4 is nearly 40 years old.
The regulatory asset base (Rab) model used at Heathrow allows it to charge fees to airlines based on infrastructure improvement plans agreed with the CAA and permitted rates of return for investors.
Mr Wicking said: 'They've realised what they're sitting on in terms of the asset that is Heathrow, and with the regulatory model they've worked out how to make really good money.
'If they can get money onto the Rab – if they get capital spend – they will have a really good return on that capital spend, which is obviously very attractive to their shareholders but it doesn't drive efficiency.
'Whenever I see an another capital plan coming across my table for Heathrow to invest in, I just look to the skies and think 'where do you get these numbers from' because some of them are absolutely ludicrous.'
He added: 'The (airlines) do want expansion but it cannot be at any price.
'The current price is already too much.
'If you extrapolate that to the kind of spend we're talking about for a third runway and terminals, it would just make it unaffordable.'
Heathrow reported pre-tax profits of £917 million for 2024, up 31 per cent from £701 million in 2023.
In December 2024, French company Ardian completed a deal to become Heathrow's largest shareholder with a 23% stake, while Saudi Arabia's sovereign wealth fund purchased a 15 per cent share.
Mr Arora claimed Heathrow bosses 'take advantage of the monopoly' position as the UK's only major hub airport.
He gave examples – disputed by Heathrow – of the airport charging airlines £76,000 to remove three trees, spending £1.1 million on a smoking shelter at Terminal 4, and charging more than half a million each for two disabled toilets.
He said: 'We are 110 per cent behind the Chancellor and the Government for expansion, for growth, except just a couple of caveats.
'We must do it for the right reasons, and we must do it for the benefit of the nation, and not for the benefit of lining the shareholders' pockets.
'We must make sure that we get value for money.'
A spokesperson for Heathrow said: 'Every penny invested in infrastructure at Heathrow is approved by airlines and our regulator.
'We agree adjustments to the regulatory model are needed to deliver a third runway, but airlines and passengers get good value for money at Heathrow.
'Our operational performance is good and improving, and the value we provide to airlines and passengers is easily seen by how many airlines want to include Heathrow in their network.
'Expanding Heathrow will drive a further step change and address many of the challenges identified with operating an airport that is already at full capacity.'
Heathrow recorded a 6 per cent rise in the number of passengers travelling through its four terminals last year, to 83.9 million.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Rhyl Journal
an hour ago
- Rhyl Journal
Geologists unveil UK ‘super regions' with best potential for transition projects
The findings, published by the British Geological Survey (BGS), show the UK has an incredibly diverse subsurface, which can play a key role in supporting efforts to reach the country's legally binding climate goals. Many areas have geology that is well suited to certain net zero technologies, including shallow geothermal installations or critical minerals occurrences. But BGS scientists say eight super regions contain subsurface formations and conditions that are favourable to multiple different technologies within a relatively small area. These are Northern Ireland, the Scottish Central Belt, north-east England, north-west England, the South Yorkshire and Humber region, the East Midlands and East Anglia, South Wales and south-west England. Here, the subsurfaces can provide a sustainable heat source for geothermal energy, geological formations for secure storage of energy and carbon dioxide (CO2), rocks containing important resources for mineral extraction, and suitable geological foundation conditions for onshore and offshore wind infrastructure projects, the scientists said. For example, south-west England has significant deep geothermal resources offering opportunities for sustainable heat and power generation while its sedimentary basins provide potential sites for CCS and energy storage, they added. Meanwhile, the Scottish Central Belt boasts a complex geology, including sedimentary reservoir rocks and significant igneous intrusions, abundant geothermal resources, abandoned coal mines and a legacy of subsurface data, they said. The BGS said its findings offer crucial insights and a road map for decision makers, ministers and land managers looking to maximise return on investment in the energy transition. The geologists assessed that strategic spatial planning for such technologies in these areas can help unlock an estimated £40 billion of annual investment and support the Government's target of creating 650,000 jobs through renewable energy by 2030. But they added that further investigation will be required to fully establish each of the super region's true potential, ensure safe deployment of each technology, and understand environmental impact. Michelle Bentham, BGS chief scientist for decarbonisation and resource management, said: 'The UK is incredibly diverse in its geology. 'Because it's out of sight, geology gets a little bit forgotten about. 'And I don't think people realise how blessed we are in the UK, if you like, in terms of the geology that could really help us have a sustainable future. 'But you can really see the difference that geology could make to reaching Government goals in terms of net zero, energy provision, clean energy.' Ms Bentham said funding and the policy landscape may have been barriers to rolling out technologies such as CCS and geothermal energy across the UK. 'In Europe, geothermal energy is used much more widely. In the UK, we don't use it as widely and it's always been a bit of a Cinderella of clean energy technologies,' she said. 'And in the North Sea, we could potentially become a hub for carbon storage in Europe for countries that don't have the right geology who are trying to decarbonise,' she added. The BGS contributed to the consultation on the Government's upcoming land use framework, which looks at how England's finite land can meet the escalating demands of food security, clean energy, nature restoration and new homes. But the framework is focusing more on surface demands, with some scope for shallow subsurface areas such as geothermal infrastructure. Ms Bentham said strategic spatial planning for the subsurface could also help optimise the UK's resources for the energy transition. For example, it could stop decision makers from locking into one technology – such as wind farms or CCS – in one area where another could have yielded more benefits, or where multiple technologies could have been deployed. 'Like the map, it's not one technology that's going to be the answer,' she said. 'That's why we need this combination to give us flexibility.' The BGS highlighted that the data underpinning its research has been shaped by geologists' current understanding of the subsurface, adding that a few parts of the country have been less extensively surveyed than others, and more research is required to fully assess their potential.


Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Four European countries 'outraged' over new airline luggage rules passed by EU
Last week, the Council of Europe made two major decisions on the future of commercial air travel. The first was on compensation rights, and the second related to free hand luggage Four European countries are outraged at new rules that could limit how much delayed passengers can claim in compensation and when airlines can charge passengers for carrying hand luggage. Last week, the Council of Europe made two major decisions on the future of commercial air travel. The first was on compensation rights. The Council decided that passengers on short-haul flights would have to be delayed by four hours or more before they could claim compensation, rather than the current three. For long-haul flights, delays will have to be six or more hours. The good news for passengers is that compensation for those delayed on short-haul flights will increase from €250 (£211) to €300. However, compensation for long-haul flights will be cut from €600 to €500. The changes were first tabled 13 years ago and must still be approved by the European Parliament before they become law. The European Consumer Organisation, the BEUC, has argued that the changes will be a huge blow for consumers and deprive 'the majority of passengers from their compensation rights". The BEUC claims that most delays are between two and four hours. While the UK now sets its own compensation rules following Brexit, the changes will impact Brits if they come into force, as it will apply to passengers taking flights with an EU carrier. This means it could affect a passenger travelling to and from an EU country on an EU airline. The second decision relates to baggage allowance. Under the new rules, the concept to free luggage will be limited to 'personal items' that can be placed under the front seat. That will leave other stowed cabin bags exposed to charges. Spain, Germany, Slovenia, and Portugal voted against the changes, warning that they could mean passengers end up paying extra for almost any cabin bag. The Spanish government criticised the new rules as 'too restrictive.' Spain's Minister for Social Rights, Consumer Affairs and the 2030 Agenda, Pablo Bustinduy, described the changes as an 'outrage'. The political agreement, adopted by a qualified majority in the EU Council, was voted against by Spain, Germany, Slovenia and Portugal. Minister Bustinduy argued that the new rules would violate consumer rights and "only strengthen the power and profits of airlines." If the rules are accepted, then Ryanair would have to change its free hand luggage policy. Right now, the budget Irish airline require customers to have a bag no larger than 40x20x25 centimetres, which must fit under the seat in front. Under the new rules, the dimensions will be changed to 40x30x15 centimetres. That means Ryanair would be obliged to allow a bag 10 centimetres wider, but could also reduce the depth currently allowed by 10 centimetres.

Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Trump: China talks ‘doing well', getting 'good reports'
U.S. President Donald Trump said on Monday (June 9) that his administration was doing well and that he was getting good reports as U.S. officials hold trade talks with China in London.