Amid VA policy change row, employees receive 'wild' email and asked to report waste, abuse
At a time when new VA hospital bylaws regarding treatment offered to Democrats and unmarried veterans have sparked outrage, VA employees have received a email asking them to report waste and fraud. The email has also instructed them to provide a one-sentence description of the problem and their recommended solution.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
What does the email sent to VA employees read?
Employees at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) were instructed to report a single instance of "fraud, waste, or abuse," as the agency announced the discontinuation of its previous requirement for staff to submit weekly emails listing five work accomplishments. According to a leaked email from VA Chief of Staff Christopher Syrek , employees at VA were directed to identify a departmental problem and suggest a solution for it last week, reports NewsWeek. VA is the second-largest U.S. government department, which employs approximately 470,000 people.In March, tech billionaire Elon Musk who was spearheading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), formed to slash federal spending and downsizing agencies. He had asked government employees to send a detailed weekly email detailing their list of accomplishments achieved in the previous week. Failure to comply would be taken as a resignation, Musk said at the time.Ever since Musk has announced his departure from DOGE, some agencies have continued to demand these emails while others have put a halt to it, including the Department of Defense, reports suggest.The development comes after a report in The Guardian claimed that new Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals could refuse care to veterans based on factors like marital status and political affiliation due to an executive order by President Trump. The Guardian reported that 'doctors and other medical staff can also be barred from working at VA hospitals based on their marital status, political party affiliation or union activity."White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly adamantly denied The Guardian's reporting. Writing on social platform X, Kelly addressed the article's writer, Aaron Glantz, saying, 'Aaron, this is a totally FALSE story that The Guardian should retract immediately. Fearmongering with our Veterans to try to score clicks for your failing 'news outlet' is pathetic and shameful.'"Starting today, VA is ending the requirement for these weekly updates, but we are asking you to make a different, one-time submission. Please identify a VA issue that you consider to be a problem and an example of fraud, waste, or abuse and provide a one-sentence description of the problem and your recommended solution," the VA email sent on June 13 read. It added that staff were to email submissions to their direct supervisors by June 16.Greg Williams, director of the Center for Defense Information at the nonpartisan watchdog Project On Government Oversight, told Newsweek that the request needed to be managed carefully by VA leadership. While emphasizing the importance of addressing waste, fraud, and abuse, he cautioned that the email could be perceived as 'a threatening demand' for staff to 'rat on their colleagues.'Williams said: "I think the impact of this depends a lot on how individual line managers address it. As a professional watchdog, I believe we should all—government employees and private citizens alike—always be on the lookout for waste, fraud and abuse. I see setting an example and teaching others how to be better watchdogs as fundamental not only to my job, but also my identity as a citizen of a democracy. So, if VA employees are encouraged to treat this email as inspiration to be more careful with the public trust, I'm all for it.He continued: "I'm concerned that if VA employees receive this email from a Trump appointee, without reinforcement from their more immediate supervisors, they will wonder if the Trump administration trusts the VA chain of command, and they will receive it as a threatening demand that they rat on their colleagues. I'd expect this to be counterproductive."The email has stirred concern among VA employees. One staff member, speaking to Newsweek on the condition of anonymity due to fear of retaliation, described the message as "insulting." They noted that the government already has established mechanisms—such as the Government Accountability Office and the Office of Inspector General—for reporting waste."The email was wild, they said. "And it felt like once again a 'snitch on your co-workers' email."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
3 hours ago
- Mint
Minnesota murder case could mark rare return of death penalty; Vance Boelter faces possible federal execution
The man charged with killing a prominent Minnesota lawmaker and wounding another could face something that is a rarity for Minnesota but could become more common under the Trump administration: the death penalty. Minnesota abolished capital punishment in 1911, and the state's last execution was a botched hanging in 1906. But federal prosecutors announced charges against Vance Boelter on Monday that can carry the death penalty. It's not unheard of for state and federal prosecutors to both pursue criminal cases for the same offense, especially in high-profile matters. In this case federal authorities essentially grabbed the lead from the state prosecutor, Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty. Boelter had been scheduled to make his first court appearance on state charges Monday, but instead marshals took him from the county jail to the US courthouse in St Paul, where he appeared on the more serious federal charges. Boelter is accused of fatally shooting former Democratic House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, in their home early Saturday in the northern Minneapolis suburbs. Before that, authorities say, he also shot and wounded another Democrat, Sen. John Hoffman, and his wife, Yvette, who lived a few miles away. He surrendered Sunday night after what authorities have called the largest search in Minnesota history. Two of the six federal counts can carry the death penalty, something federal prosecutors have not sought in a Minnesota-based case since the Supreme Court reinstated capital punishment in 1976. 'Will we seek the death penalty? It's too early to tell. That is one of the options,' Acting US Attorney Joseph Thompson said Monday at a news conference where he revealed new details of what he described as a meticulously planned attack. They included allegations that Boelter also stopped at the homes of two other lawmakers that night and had dozens of other Democrats as potential targets, including officials in other states. Boelter's federal defenders have declined to comment on the case, and he has not entered a plea. On her first day in office in February, Attorney General Pam Bondi lifted a moratorium on federal executions that was imposed under the Biden administration in 2021. Only three defendants remain on federal death row after Biden converted 37 of their sentences to life in prison. Bondi has since authorized federal prosecutors to seek the death penalty in at least three cases, including against Luigi Mangione for the killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson. In the other two cases, the Justice Department has said it is seeking the death penalty against defendants charged with killing fellow prison inmates. President Donald Trump's first administration carried out 13 federal executions, more than the administration of any other president in modern history. The federal intervention in Boelter's case appeared to irritate Moriarty, the county's former chief public defender, who was elected on a police reform and racial justice platform in 2022 after the police killing of George Floyd. At a news conference Monday to announce the state charges, Moriarty gave only vague answers in response to questions about the interplay between the federal and state investigations. But she acknowledged 'there's a tension' and said federal officials 'can speak for themselves.' Moriarty said she intends to press forward in state court regardless and to seek an indictment for first-degree murder for the killings of the Hortmans, which would carry a mandatory sentence of life without parole. Her office did not immediately respond to a request for further comment Tuesday. As evidence of the tensions, the county attorney refused to clarify how Boelter' first hearings would play out. Court records show that Boelter was called for a first appearance in Hennepin County on Monday and that because he was not there as he was in federal custody, the judge issued a bench warrant as a formality, as requested by prosecutors. 'Usually murder cases are overwhelmingly handled in state courts,' said Mark Osler, a death penalty expert at the University of St. Thomas School of Law in Minneapolis. 'Clearly this is something of national interest. And that seemed to play a role in the decision that the Justice Department is making here.' Osler, who formerly served as Moriarty's deputy county attorney and head of her criminal division, as well as assistant U.S. attorney in Detroit, acknowledged that there are often tensions between state and federal prosecutors. 'There's no doubt that it's complicated,' Osler said. 'And it's hard to avoid the sense of the older sibling grabbing something away from the younger sibling.' If federal officials do pursue the death penalty, Osler said, they will face an unusual challenge: 'a jury pool drawn from the citizens of a state that has rejected the death penalty for over 100 years. It's not the same as choosing people in a state where there's a history of support for the death penalty, such as Texas.' After his federal court appearance, Boelter was taken to the Sherburne County Jail in suburban Elk River, where federal prisoners are often held. Thompson told reporters that the federal case 'does not nullify the state charges. They remain in place. ... My expectation based on prior cases is the federal case, the federal charges, will be litigated first, but the state charges won't necessarily go anywhere.' Boelter's next federal court appearance is June 27. He does not have any further appearances scheduled in state court. 'There's a natural competitiveness that occurs sometimes between jurisdictions, but you have to hope that in the end, they're all facing the same way where there's something as important to public safety as this case is,' Osler said.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Republican political strategist Gavin Wax wants Silicon Valley jobs to be legally reserved for Americans; says: it's a matter of ….
Republican political strategist Gavin Wax has sparked fierce online debate after declaring that Silicon Valley jobs should be "legally reserved for US citizens," calling the tech hub a "strategic national asset" whose workforce poses potential national security risks when dominated by foreign workers. Wax, former president of the New York Young Republicans and recently appointed chief of staff to FCC Commissioner Nathan Simington, made the controversial statement amid ongoing tensions over the H-1B visa program that allows skilled foreign workers to take American jobs . The debate reflects broader tensions within conservative circles over immigration policy . While national-security-focused conservatives like Wax advocate for restricting foreign workers, tech advocates including Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy have defended H-1B visas as essential for maintaining America's competitive edge. Critics question Wax's understanding of Silicon Valley demographics Social media users quickly challenged Wax's proposal, pointing out that foreign-born workers comprise 60-70% of Silicon Valley's tech workforce . "Tell me you've never stepped foot in the valley without telling me you've never stepped foot in the valley," one user commented. Another quipped, "If that would be the case, Silicon Valley would be called a Stupid Valley." Users countered Wax's argument by listing prominent immigrant entrepreneurs: "Steve Jobs: son of a Syrian immigrant. Jeff Bezos: father is a Cuban immigrant. Sergey Brin: Soviet immigrant, born in Moscow. Jensen Huang: Taiwanese immigrant. Elon Musk: South African immigrant." One commenter noted the irony that such a policy "would have kept Canadian Elon Musk out," adding that "American policy is to hire the best." One critic drew parallels to diversity policies, arguing, "If you're only allowing US citizens, that's no better than DEI and fast tracking mediocrity," suggesting that merit-based hiring regardless of origin should be the priority. Another user questioned whether limiting talent pools would "cripple your strategic assets," noting that America appeared "currently good at that." Elon Musk came in support of H-1B visa earlier, said its important for the US Musk, who himself migrated from South Africa on an H-1B visa, recently called the system "broken" but argued it could be "easily fixed" by raising minimum salaries and adding yearly costs to make overseas hiring more expensive than domestic recruitment. Ramaswamy echoed support for elite talent importation, arguing that American culture has celebrated "mediocrity over excellence." The internal MAGA dispute escalated when Musk warned of a " MAGA civil war " and vowed to "go to war" on the H-1B issue, while Trump ultimately sided with the tech leaders, telling The New York Post he was "a believer in H-1B" and had "used it many times." Recent USCIS data shows 2026 H-1B applications at their lowest levels, though MAGA activists remain disappointed that the Trump administration hasn't completely halted the program. Trump himself has recently expressed support for allowing foreign students to work in America after graduation, including those from China. Wax's appointment to the FCC earlier this year marked a significant shift toward more aggressive conservative policy positions within the commission, aligning with Chairman Brendan Carr's combative approach to tech regulation and content moderation issues. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Tweet that cost a life: After Jamal Khashoggi, Saudi journalist's online dissent ends in execution
Saudi journalist Turki al-Jasser was executed for criticizing the government on social media, drawing comparisons to the Jamal Khashoggi case. Al-Jasser's execution, the first high-profile case since Khashoggi's murder, highlights the severe consequences of dissent in Saudi Arabia. Saudi authorities tracked him down through infiltrated Twitter accounts, leading to his arrest, imprisonment, and eventual execution for treason. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Was the Saudi's journalist really executed just for tweeting? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Why was Turki al-Jasser arrested? How did Saudi authorities track anonymous Twitter users? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Could the Crown Prince have stopped the execution? Why is this being compared to the Jamal Khashoggi case? FAQs Another Saudi journalist has paid the ultimate price for challenging the kingdom. In yet another barbarous case, a journalist died, just like Jamal Khashoggi Turki al-Jasser , once a vocal critic on social media, has been executed after years in prison. His story is a horrific reminder of how dissent can turn deadly in authoritarian the criticism of the government apparently came at a humongous cost of life. Since the 2018 murder of Jamal Khashoggi, Turki al-Jasser's passing represents the first high-profile journalistic assassination. This gut-wrenching story underscores the peril of defying overly strict to a report by The Guardian, the chillingly prophetic tweet from Saudi journalist Turki al-Jasser in 2014 read, "The Arab writer can be easily killed by their government under the pretext of 'national security.''Turki Al-Jasser was executed in Riyadh on Saturday, according to the Saudi interior ministry, for charges that included "high treason by communicating with and conspiring against the security of the Kingdom with external individuals,' as quoted in a report by The who is believed to have been in his 40s, was executed after seven years of imprisonment. He was also tortured while he was detained, as per a Al-Jasser was likely arrested by Saudi authorities in 2018 after being identified as the author of a well-known anonymous Twitter account that accused the Saudi royal family of corruption and human rights abuses, according to a number of dissidents and analysts keeping tabs on his press freedom group Reporters Without Borders claims that al-Jasser founded the news website Al-Mashhad Al-Saudi (The Saudi Scene), which regularly covered topics like Palestine and women's it was the account on X, that is believed to have incited Saudi authorities and led to his detention as part of a broader crackdown on dissent. The administration believed that his and other anonymous Twitter accounts were part of an illogical plot to topple the Saudi has two accounts on Twitter. According to Abdullah Alaoudh, senior director for countering authoritarianism at the Middle East Democracy Center, "he was even more satirical and vocal with the other account, which was targeted by the Saudi government, even though he was outspoken under his real name."After Saudi agents infiltrated the company in 2014-2015, the Saudi government was able to access the true identities and IP addresses behind thousands of anonymous Twitter accounts. In connection with the conspiracy, the Department of Justice charged a Saudi national and two former Twitter was the first journalist to be sentenced to death and executed in Saudi Arabia under Mohammed bin Salman's rule, according to Reporters Without Borders. He was also the second journalist to be executed globally since crown prince had the legal right to step in and stop al-Jasser's execution, according to legal experts. Every execution is subject to king or crown prince approval under Saudi al-Jasser's execution was the first high-profile Saudi murder of a journalist since Saudi agents in 2018 assassinated Jamal Khashoggi, a critic of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and a Washington Post columnist, in the Saudi consulate in Istanbul. According to a 2020 intelligence assessment by then-President Joe Biden, MBS approved the was reportedly identified as the creator of a critical anonymous Twitter account and later executed for "high treason."Saudi agents infiltrated Twitter and obtained user data, allowing them to identify anonymous dissidents such as al-Jasser.
