Donald Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill' faces rocky ride in Senate
Agencies
US senators have kicked off weeks of talks that are certain to be fierce as they take on the mammoth policy package President Donald Trump hopes will seal his legacy, headlined by tax cuts slated to add up to $3 trillion to the nation's debt.
The Republican leader celebrated when the House passed his 'big, beautiful bill,' which partially covers an extension of his 2017 tax relief through budget cuts projected to strip health care from millions of low-income Americans.
The Senate now gets to make its own changes, and the upper chamber's version could make or break Republicans' 2026 midterm election prospects – and define Trump's second term.
But the 1,116-page blueprint faces an uphill climb, with moderate Republicans balking at $1.5 trillion in spending cuts while fiscal hawks are blasting the bill as a ticking debt bomb.
'We have enough (holdouts) to stop the process until the president gets serious about spending reduction and reducing the deficit,' Senator Ron Johnson, one of half a dozen Republican opponents to the bill, told CNN.
Democrats – whose support is not required if Republicans can maintain a united front – have focused on the tax cuts, mostly benefiting the rich on the backs of a working class already struggling with high prices.
The White House says the legislation will spur robust economic growth to neutralize its potential to blow up America's already burgeoning debt pile, which has ballooned to $36.9 trillion.
But several independent aalyses have found that – even considering growth – it will add between $2.5 trillion and $3.1 trillion to deficits over the next decade.
Meanwhile, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found that the combined effects of tax cuts and cost savings would be a giant transfer of wealth from the poorest 10% to the richest 10%.
Republicans muscled the measure through the House by a single vote on May 22 by a combination of bargaining vote holdouts on policies and deploying Trump himself to twist arms.House Speaker Mike Johnson is now pleading with the Senate not to alter the bill too much, as any tweaks will need to go back to the lower chamber.
The Senate wants to get the bill to Trump's desk by U.S. Independence Day on July 4 – an ambitious timeline given Republicans' narrow three-vote majority and wide faultlines that have opened over the proposed specifics.
Independent analysts expect that around seven million beneficiaries of the Medicaid health insurance program will be deprived of coverage due to new proposed eligibility restrictions and workrequirements.
Polling shows that the vast majority of Americans oppose cutting Medicaid – including Trump himself, as well as some Republicans in poorer states that rely heavily on federalwelfare.
Senate moderates are also worried about proposed changes to funding food aid that could deprive up to 3.2 million people of vital nutritionsupport.
One thing is almost certain – Trump himself will get involved at some point, though his negotiation tactics may be more subtle than they were when he threatened 'grandstanders' holding up the tax bill in the House.
Trump took to his Truth Social website on Monday to decry 'so many false statements (that) are being made about 'THE ONE, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL''and to falsely claim that it would not cut Medicaid.
'The only 'cutting' we will do is for Waste, Fraud and Abuse, something that should have been done by the Incompetent, Radical Left Democrats for the last four years, but wasn't,' he said.
One more wrinkle for Trump: tech billionaire Elon Musk, no longer one of his closest aides but still an influential commentator, has already broken with the president to criticize the mega-bill.
'A bill can be big or it can be beautiful. But I don't know if it can be both,' Musk said in a CBS interview criticizing itseffect on debt.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
2 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
World reacts to Trump's travel ban, hits several nations mired in conflict
Donald Trump has signed an executive order banning citizens from 12 countries from entering the country in a move he said was to protect the US from 'foreign terrorists', mirroring a contentious policy from his first term as United States president. As part of Trump's intensified crackdown on immigration, a cornerstone of his previous time in the White House and on the campaign trail, he announced on Wednesday that nationals from 12 countries – Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen – will be banned. Seven countries will also be subject to partial restrictions, which will mean they will no longer be able to apply for immigrant or non-immigrant temporary visas. However, some temporary work visas will still be allowed. Trump cited an attack in Boulder, Colorado, where a man threw a petrol bomb into a crowd of pro-Israel demonstrators, as proof of the need for immigration curbs. 'The recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, has underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted,' Trump said in a video message from the Oval Office posted on X. 'We don't want them,' he added. This latest travel ban follows Trump's executive order during his first term, in which he banned nationals from seven Muslim-majority countries, also known as the 'Muslim ban,' in 2017. Seven of the countries on the new list of those banned also have Muslim-majority populations and several are beset by ongoing conflicts. Despite the new suspensions, the ban will not apply to existing visa holders, foreign diplomats, athletes and their teams, among other exemptions. The ban is expected to come into effect on June 9 at 12:01 am EDT (04:01 GMT). Here's how the world has reacted to the ban. The AU, which has seven of the 12 nations on the travel ban list, said the ban would harm 'people-to-people ties, educational exchange, commercial engagement, and broader diplomatic relations' that were built with the US over past decades. 'The African Union Commission respectfully calls upon the US administration to consider adopting a more consultative approach and to engage in constructive dialogue with the countries concerned,' the bloc said in a statement. President of Oxfam America, Abby Maxman, said the decision was not about 'national security'. 'It is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States,' Maxman said. The Somali ambassador to the US, Dahir Hassan Abdi, said in a statement that Mogadishu 'values its longstanding relationship with the United States'. '[Somalia] stands ready to engage in dialogue to address the concerns raised,' Abdi said. Interior minister Diosdado Cabello described the ban as a 'great risk for anyone, not just Venezuelans'. 'They persecute our countrymen, our people, for no reason,' he said. Venezuelan migrants in the US have been targeted by the Trump administration for deportation to El Salvador, many on unproven allegations of being gang members.
Al Jazeera
5 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Which countries are on Trump's travel ban list, and who will be affected?
United States President Donald Trump signed a presidential proclamation on Wednesday banning citizens of 12 countries from entering the US. Heightened restrictions on entering the US have been put in place for nationals of seven more countries. The travel ban is Trump's latest move in the immigration crackdown that he promised on the campaign trail before last year's presidential election. Trump said the measures would help to 'protect Americans from dangerous foreign actors'. Here is what we know about the travel ban so far: The 12 countries whose nationals are fully restricted from travelling to the US under Trump's travel ban are:The seven countries subject to partial restrictions are: Citizens from the 12 countries subject to a full ban on travel to the US will face a complete suspension of immigrant and non-immigrant visas. Citizens from the seven countries which have been placed under partial restrictions will no longer be able to apply for immigrant visas or non-immigrant temporary visas covering permanent immigration, student visas and tourism visas including B-1, B-2, B-1/B-2, F, M and J. They will still be able to apply for some temporary visas, however. Unlike an executive order, a presidential proclamation is not legally binding but generally signals a policy shift. The new rules apply only to people outside the US at the time of the proclamation and who did not yet hold a valid visa at the time of the proclamation. Yes. The new suspension and restrictions will not apply to: A total of 363,549 people from the 19 listed countries entered the US in the fiscal year 2022 – the most recent year on record for arrivals – according to data from the Department of Homeland Security. Some 250,234 of these people were from Venezuela, which is subject to partial restrictions only. A further 66,563 of these people were from Haiti, which now faces a complete travel cited security threats and 'foreign terrorists' as grounds for the ban. In a video posted on Wednesday on his social media platform, Truth Social, Trump said the recent attack in Boulder, Colorado 'has underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come here as temporary visitors and overstay their visas'. On June 1, police arrested a man who threw incendiary devices towards a group of people attending a rally for the release of captives taken from Israel on October 7, 2023 and held in Gaza. The FBI said it was investigating the incident as 'an act of terror'. Suspect Mohamed Sabry Soliman was charged with a federal hate crime, as well as an array of state charges, according to an affidavit by the US Department of Justice. Soliman is an Egyptian national who has also lived in Kuwait. Neither of these countries is on Trump's list of banned countries. In a Truth Social post, Trump blamed '[former US President Joe] Biden's ridiculous Open Border Policy' for allowing Soliman into the country. Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff for policy, said the suspect in the Boulder incident had overstayed a tourist visa, without naming Soliman. A fact sheet published by the White House stated a specific justification for the exclusion of each country on the new travel ban list. These justifications included that large numbers of citizens had overstayed their visas, that the countries had a poor record of cooperating with the US to receive their citizens back if they had overstayed in the US, or that the countries were affected by war. According to the most recent figures from the US Department of Homeland Security, nationals of Chad had the highest overstay rate, at 49.5 percent of those arriving in the US on a visa. Others with high overstay rates were Equatorial Guinea (22 percent), Eritrea (20 percent) and Yemen (19.8 percent). On his first day in office, Trump signed an executive order, calling on his state department to identify countries 'for which vetting and screening information is so deficient as to warrant a partial or full suspension on the admission of nationals from those countries'. He referred to this order in his video announcement of the travel ban. The travel ban will take effect on June 9 at 12:01am EDT (04:01 GMT). Yes, Trump enacted a travel ban – dubbed the 'Muslim ban' as all but one of the countries on the list at that time were Muslim-majority – during his first term in 2017. In his Wednesday Truth Social video, Trump said: 'In my first term, my powerful travel restrictions were one of our most successful policies and they were a key part of preventing major foreign terror attacks on American soil.' That earlier ban went through several revisions. It was upheld by the US Supreme Court in 2018. In 2021, Biden repealed this ban, calling it 'a stain on our national conscience'. Yes. In his Truth Social video announcement, Trump said 'the list is subject to revision based on whether material improvements are made. 'Likewise, new countries can be added as threats emerge around the world.' Dahir Hassan Abdi, the Somali ambassador to the US, said in a statement that Somalia is ready to work with the US. 'Somalia values its longstanding relationship with the United States and stands ready to engage in dialogue to address the concerns raised,' he said. Trump's proclamation described Somalia as 'a terrorist safe haven' and stated: 'Somalia lacks a competent or cooperative central authority for issuing passports or civil documents and it does not have appropriate screening and vetting measures.' Diosdado Cabello, Venezuelan interior minister and close aide of President Nicolas Maduro, said: 'The truth is being in the United States is a big risk for anybody, not just for Venezuelans … They persecute our countrymen, our people for no reason.' Trump's proclamation stated: 'Venezuela has historically refused to accept back its removable nationals.'
Al Jazeera
5 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump is letting Putin win
Russian and Ukrainian delegations met in Istanbul for the second time in a month on June 2 to explore the possibility of a ceasefire. The talks lasted just over an hour and, once again, produced no meaningful progress. As with the May 16 negotiations, both sides claimed they had laid the groundwork for prisoner exchanges. But despite Ukraine's offer to hold another meeting before the end of June, a deep and unbridgeable divide remains between Kyiv and Moscow. More meetings are unlikely to change that. Russia continues to demand Kyiv's capitulation to the full list of conditions President Vladimir Putin set at the war's outset: Ukrainian neutrality, a government reshaped to suit Moscow's interests, and the surrender of the Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhia and Kherson regions. Between the two rounds of talks, Putin even raised the stakes, adding a demand for a 'buffer zone' in northern Ukraine. Kyiv, meanwhile, remains resolute. It refuses to cede any territory and maintains that a full ceasefire along all fronts is a non-negotiable precondition for serious negotiations. Still, both sides appear prepared to continue the diplomatic charade. That's because these talks are not truly about achieving peace or securing a lasting bilateral agreement. Neither side is genuinely negotiating with the other. Instead, both are using the forum to send messages to the United States – and to Donald Trump, in particular. This dynamic persists despite Trump's recent efforts to distance himself from the war he once claimed he could end within 24 hours of returning to the White House. That shift in rhetoric has been echoed by key figures in his administration. Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who just six months ago represented opposite ends of the Republican spectrum on Ukraine – with Vance nearly endorsing surrender to Putin, and Rubio among the Senate's most vocal Ukraine hawks – have both signalled that Trump's White House is no longer interested in mediating the conflict. Reflecting that disengagement, there was no high-level prenegotiation meeting between US and Ukrainian officials in Turkiye ahead of the latest talks, unlike those held in May. Yet despite Rubio's apparent reversal – likely intended to align with Trump – Ukraine still enjoys broad support in the US Senate, including from senior Republicans. A bipartisan bill aimed at codifying existing sanctions on Russia and imposing new ones – thereby limiting Trump's power to roll them back – has garnered 81 Senate co-sponsors. The bill's authors, Senators Lindsey Graham (R–South Carolina) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Connecticut), recently travelled to Kyiv to reaffirm their backing. Graham has suggested the bill could move forward in the coming weeks. Still, Ukraine knows the bill stands little chance in the House of Representatives without Trump's blessing. Despite Trump's enduring animosity towards Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Kyiv has recently adopted a more deferential posture, particularly after their disastrous February meeting in Washington. The Ukrainian government quickly signed and ratified the so-called 'minerals deal' that Trump demanded last month. A subsequent meeting between the two leaders – held on the sidelines of Pope Francis's funeral – was notably more productive. So far, Kyiv's strategy of appeasement has yielded little change in Trump's approach. While Trump has occasionally hinted at taking a tougher stance on Putin – usually in response to particularly egregious Russian attacks on Ukrainian civilians – he consistently deflects when asked for specifics. For months, he has promised to reveal his plan for Ukraine 'in about two weeks,' a vague assurance that remains unfulfilled. A new sanctions package reportedly prepared by his own team over a month ago still sits untouched. Hoping that mounting battlefield violence or bipartisan pressure from the US Senate might force Trump to act, Kyiv presses on with negotiations. Just one day before the Istanbul talks, Russia launched a record-setting overnight assault on Ukraine, firing more than 430 missiles and drones. Ukraine responded forcefully: on June 1, it conducted a large-scale drone strike deep inside Russia, destroying dozens of military aircraft, including airborne command platforms and nuclear-capable bombers. Yet these high-profile losses have done little to shift Putin's strategy. He continues to use the negotiation process as a smokescreen, providing Trump with political cover for his inaction. Meanwhile, Russian forces are advancing, making incremental gains in northern Ukraine's Sumy region – where they hope to establish a 'buffer zone' – and pushing forward on the southwestern Donetsk front. Ultimately, Ukraine's ability to strike deep inside Russian territory, including potentially vulnerable targets like oil infrastructure, may have more bearing on the war's trajectory than any outcome from the Istanbul talks. Yet neither military escalation nor stalled diplomacy seems likely to bring a swift end to the conflict. Trump says he abhors the civilian toll of this war, even if he stops short of blaming Putin for starting it. But it is Trump's lack of strategy – his hesitation, his mixed signals, his refusal to lead – that is prolonging the conflict, escalating its brutality and compounding its risks for global stability. Trump's advisers may call it 'peace through strength,' but what we are witnessing is paralysis through posturing. Russia's delegation in Istanbul was never a step towards resolution – it was a diplomatic decoy, shielding a brutal military advance. If Trump refuses to back a serious escalation in pressure on Moscow – through expanded sanctions and renewed military aid to Kyiv – he won't just fail to end the war. He will become complicit in prolonging it. The choice before him is clear: lead with resolve, or let history record that under his watch, weakness spoke louder than peace. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.
