logo
Shocking moment fishermen dad and his topless son scrap with officials after they were caught angling without licence

Shocking moment fishermen dad and his topless son scrap with officials after they were caught angling without licence

Scottish Sun23-05-2025

DISTURBING footage shows a father and son violently attacking environment agency officers who asked for their fishing licences.
The duo, who verbally and physically assaulted two officers, fists flying have been whacked with a hefty £12,000 court bill.
3
Andrew assaulting an Environmental Agency Officer
3
His Dad Sidney getting involved in the fray and struggling with the other officer
Anglers Sidney Bowman, 75, and a topless Andrew Bowman, 44, assaulted two Environment Agency officers who had asked for their names and addresses after they caught them fishing without a licence.
Despite being informed that they were on camera, Sidney poked an officer in the eye after his son hit his colleague in the face.
Only after police arrived on the scene did Sidney and Andrew confirm their identities.
The anglers were punished for the assault at Poole Hall Fishery, Alverley, Shropshire, on September 6 2023 at Telford Magistrates' Court last month on April 25.
The punch up started when Andrew refused to give his details to the officers and told his Dad not to either.
The Environment Agency officers started issuing a caution at this point, but then Andrew started to become verbally and physically abusive, threatening officers and moving his equipment.
Spooked, the officers moved a fishing knife away from the aggressors at which point Andrew thwacked one officer in the face.
The other officer warned Andrew's Dad, 'don't do it,' but Sidney then tried to grab the officer's chest and 'poked him in the eye with flailing arms.'
The court heard how Andrew had to be taken to the ground after refusing to be handcuffed.
He decided it was a good idea to claim he was called David Wilkes and lie about his address.
Only after the police were called did the duo fess up to the correct details.
3
Sidney had to be held down to the ground because he refused to be cuffed
Sidney pled guilty to two counts of assaulting an emergency worker and one count of fishing without a licence.
He was ordered to pay an £806 fine, a £322 victim surcharge and £4,000 costs.
Andrew admitted two counts of assaulting an emergency worker, two counts of obstructing a water bailiff and one count of fishing without a licence.
He was handed a £634 fine, a £253 victim surcharge, £50 compensation and £6,000 costs.
Environment Agency water bailiffs are considered constables 'for the purposes of enforcing fisheries legislation' and are protected under the Assaults on Emergency Workers (Offences) Act 2018.
A spokesperson for the Environment Agency said: "These sentences handed out show that the courts will not allow assault of public servants to go unpunished.
"It sends out a strong message to other people trying to stop our officers from performing their duties.
"Our officers do endure abuse and threats of violence in carrying out important work to protect people and the environment.
"The Environment Agency will not hesitate to prosecute those that obstruct or assault its staff.
"If people suspect illegal fishing incidents they should call our 24/7 hotline on 0800 807060."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Conference to discuss fly-tipping problem across South East
Conference to discuss fly-tipping problem across South East

BBC News

time16 hours ago

  • BBC News

Conference to discuss fly-tipping problem across South East

Police and crime commissioners (PCCs) across the South East have been invited to attend a conference to discuss tackling organised criminal waste dumping. According to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, during 2023/24 there were 101,694 cases of fly-tipping in the South East National Audit Office estimates that illegal waste dumping, much of it organised, costs the economy more than £900m a year. Kent PCC Matthew Scott has invited colleagues Katy Bourne and Lisa Townsend - from Sussex and Surrey respectively - to discuss a problem he has called "the new county lines". Tuesday's event will also see representatives from regional organised crime units and the Environment Agency (EA) Scott said: "What this summit is about is bringing together those who have the powers like the Environment Agency and local councils to see how we can work better to tackle this criminality because, tragically, the outcomes for fly-tipping and waste crime are very low."In the two years up until December, the EA received 3,407 incident reports of suspected criminal activity, such as dumping and burning waste, in the South East scale fly tipping is punishable with a fine of up to £50,000 or 12 months imprisonment if convicted in a magistrates' court, or an unlimited fine and up to five years' imprisonment if convicted in a crown court. The conference will be held at the Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council building in Kings Hill, Kent.

A hate crime on Arran? No, just a sign of where we are now
A hate crime on Arran? No, just a sign of where we are now

The Herald Scotland

time2 days ago

  • The Herald Scotland

A hate crime on Arran? No, just a sign of where we are now

My second thought about the flags was more complicated however. For a start, flags have never been my favourite form of expression, an aversion made worse by the referendums of 2014 and 2016. And by 2023, I was also struggling – still am – with how I feel about LGBTQ+, trans, gender, and self-ID, and Pride flags in particular. There was a time, in the 90s, when I would've felt overwhelmingly positive about the flag, but in 2023, it was starting to change. The fact that my views have changed was underlined at the weekend when I heard that the police on Arran are investigating an incident with this year's Pride flags. The flags were on the main street in Brodick, as they were in 2023, but they were taken down some time overnight before the main Pride event on Saturday. There were reports on social media that some of the flags were later found dumped on the beach. The Pride event itself was not affected and went ahead as planned, but Police Scotland announced they were investigating what happened. 'Between 2am and 7am on Saturday, 31 May, flags and banners for the island's LGBTQ parade were pulled down,' they said. 'This is being investigated as a hate crime.' There are a few things that should worry us about that statement. First of all, the police should have said they were investigating a possible hate crime as they can't be sure who took the flags down and why. Secondly, it looks like the police still haven't realised that the idea of a hate crime defined and enforced by government is highly contested, thanks in part to the debacle of the SNP's law on the subject. And thirdly, even though we cannot know for sure what the motivation was, there's an implication in the statement that anyone who'd remove an LGBTQ Pride flag must be motivated by hate rather than just opposition to what the flag represents. All of this need to be challenged. Read more The best building in Glasgow, and what we can learn from its tragedy I walked Glasgow streets with a 'heritage detective' and found clues to city's future The Argyle Street Gap – what does it say about Glasgow? One man who has challenged the concepts behind Pride and hate crime is the writer and broadcaster Andrew Doyle, who has a rather good new book out, The End of Woke. Andrew admits there will be some who object to the word 'woke' and/or deny it exists, but his working definition – a cultural revolution that seeks equity according to group identity by authoritarian means – is supported by 550 pages of evidence on the beliefs that form the core of 'woke' and the individuals whose careers have been damaged or ended because they do not subscribe to them. He also outlines his evidence that the end is coming, including the Supreme Court ruling on the word woman, the ban on puberty blockers, and leftist politicians, including the beloved AOC, quietly removing pronouns from their social media profiles. I hope he's right. The critique Andrew offers of modern LGBTQ Pride and the concept of hate crime in the book is particularly applicable to the Arran situation. As Andrew points out, many conservatives have always opposed same-sex relations on moral or religious grounds, and it may be that the person or persons who took the flags down in Brodick were just old-school conservatives who don't much like the gays. Such people haven't gone away just because the Pride flag is ubiquitous. However, it's equally possible that the flags on Arran were removed by someone who supports gay equality but objects to the particular beliefs with which the modern flag has become associated: gender-affirming care for example, or trans self-ID; as Andrew says in his book, this group of people includes many gay people. Andrew also points out that by flying the Progress Pride flag as it's known, corporations and government bodies are taking a side in a highly contentious cultural debate that alienates as many gay people as it attracts. A Pride flag in Brodick (Image: Newsquest) The point about Arran is that the response of the police – the portentous announcement that the removal of the flags is being investigated as a hate crime – indicates they do not understand, or are even aware of, the case Andrew is making. The Pride flag is contentious and someone disliking it, or even removing it as they did on Arran, may be driven not by hate but by opposition to what the flag represents. The police are perfectly free to pursue the person for theft or damage, but by using the term hate crime, they are suggesting that objecting to, or removing, or damaging the flag is more than that: it's hateful. They have taken a side. Andrew Doyle's case is that the wider points in the debate are also poorly understood. In a free society, he says, we are entitled to think and feel as we see fit and so long as that does not interfere with the liberties of others, it includes the right to hate. He also points out that the European Court of Human Rights has admitted there's no universally accepted definition of the expression hate speech and as we saw with the SNP's attempt at a hate law, the lack of clarity renders the law useless or dangerous or both. We do not know the motivation of the person or persons who removed the flags on Arran. But no evidence of hatred is required for it to be seen or recorded as such, and a legal system that requires no evidence is a legal system we should be worried about. I suspect the police investigation on Arran will come to nothing in the end, as so much of the furore around hate crime does. But I also fear we'll take the wrong messages from the fact that someone took the flags down. Some people, including the police it would seem, will believe it's evidence of hatred for LGBTQ people, but it's much more likely to be evidence of how divisive and contentious the debate over the T in LGBTQ has become, including for many gay people. So the question in the end is: was it a hate crime we saw on Arran at the weekend? No: just a sign of where we are now.

Yorkshire Water fined over sewage leak in Foss Dike near York
Yorkshire Water fined over sewage leak in Foss Dike near York

BBC News

time4 days ago

  • BBC News

Yorkshire Water fined over sewage leak in Foss Dike near York

Yorkshire Water has been fined £350,000 after a watercourse was polluted with spill happened at Foss Dike, near York, in March 2018 close to a faulty pumping station the company knew was broken, the Environment Agency Water was fined at York Magistrates' Court on Friday, having previously pleaded guilty to two offences related to the incident last November. In a statement to the BBC, Yorkshire Water apologised for the incident and said it was investing more than £8bn into its infrastructure. The Environment Agency said Yorkshire Water had been aware Fossbridge Sewage Pumping Station's backup pump had not been working for five months prior to the issue had been repeatedly flagged during maintenance checks and should have been fixed within 24 hours, the authority said. 'Mistakes were made' The Environment Agency said that high rainfall was not a valid reason for the spillage, as sewage could only be discharged into the watercourse in an emergency. Martin Christmas, area environment manager for the Environment Agency, said: "Water companies have a responsibility to ensure their assets are maintained and in working order to protect the environment."Yorkshire Water failed to take action despite being aware of the risks posed by one of its pumps being out of action, which led to a sewage spill."A spokesperson for Yorkshire Water said the pump was subsequently fixed after the incident and had remained functional said: "We take our responsibility to protect the environment very seriously and we apologise that in this instance; mistakes were made that meant we fell below our usual standards on our systems and processes. "We acknowledged these with the Environment Agency and cooperated fully with their investigation."We have conducted a full review and addressed the issues that had been identified." Listen to highlights from North Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store