What Makes a Good Violin for Advanced Players? Quality and Performance Explored
There are lots of violins ranging from different models, sizes, and qualities. Even if you're an advanced player, it's still hard to choose the right one for you. One important thing to take note of is that there is no perfect instrument, but there is one out there suited to your style, preferences, and skills. So, if you're an advanced player, what makes a good violin? Let's explore the details here! The Importance of Tone and Sound Quality
Regardless if you're a beginner or an advanced player, it's a must to have a violin that sounds good . Typically, the sound production quality depends on how it's built and the materials it has.
For instance, a violin made of spruce and maple has better sound quality than one made from laminated wood. Since you're an advanced player, you need and you demand an instrument with a high-quality tone and sound since it'll reflect your skills when playing. Craftsmanship and Materials A. Fine Craftsmanship
A good violin requires fine and meticulous craftsmanship, like one made by a professional luthier. There are mass-produced violins, but these don't have proper setups and fittings, which is a bad deal. What makes a good violin is one that is handcrafted and cared for by a luthier. B. Wood Selection
A quality violin is made with premium or seasoned wood like maple and spruce, as we said earlier. These woods can project sound better than laminated woods. Only experienced luthiers can identify seasoned woods perfect for violins. They know if a wood will make great sound quality or not. Handmade vs. Factory-Made
Aside from the wood, it's also important to take note of how the violins are made. Handmade violins are made with care, attention to detail, and exquisite techniques of a luthier. They also ensure proper setup and exact fittings, which are not present on factory-made violins. Since these instruments are mass-produced, there is no individual attention given, which can degrade the quality. Playability and Comfort
As an advanced player, what I am after aside from quality is the playability and comfort. Although I believe that if the violin has quality materials, playability and comfort surely follow. It won't be hard to play, plus very comfortable even with long hours of practice sessions. Projection and Power
Concert soloists require instruments that project clearly over orchestral accompaniment. Good violins for advanced players have this natural projection. The instrument should play nicely in the back of concert halls, with focused sound that maintains clarity across large venues. This projection comes from optimal resonance patterns within the violin's body and effective energy transfer from strings through the bridge to the soundboard. Durability and Longevity
Professional instruments are a type of investment that should maintain their quality for years and even decades. There are superior construction methods promoting structural integrity despite frequent use and travel. Likewise, the varnish should protect the wood while enhancing acoustic properties. Cost and Value for Advanced Players
When it comes to cost, a professional violin often ranges from $10,000 to hundreds of thousands. What makes a good violin worth this investment is its ability to grow with the player through years of artistic development. Conclusion
What makes a good violin for advanced players is the great combination of craftsmanship, materials, playability, and acoustic properties. Remember, your instrument should motivate you to express yourself without limitations.
If you're an advanced player, you should seek instruments that not only meet your needs right now but also offer room for continued growth. While finding such an instrument requires patience and careful evaluation, the right violin becomes an irreplaceable partner in musical expression.
5 Great Books About Libraries and Librarians
RELATED: Five retellings of classic stories you need to read!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News24
an hour ago
- News24
New Gauteng number plate finally unveiled
Be among those who shape the future with knowledge. Uncover exclusive stories that captivate your mind and heart with our FREE 14-day subscription trial. Dive into a world of inspiration, learning, and empowerment. You can only trial once. Start your FREE trial now Show Comments ()
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
I Was Enrolled In A 'Gifted' Program As A Kid. Years Later, I Discovered A Dark Side I Never Knew About.
I don't remember precisely when I first heard the word 'gifted,' but it must have been in early elementary school. I do remember being pulled out of my first-grade class and led to the fifth-grade classroom, where a teacher told me to choose a chapter book that was 'more at my level.' I appreciated the chance to choose from all sorts of new books, but it marked an early example of what would eventually be both a privilege and a curse: my foray into being 'set apart' academically from my fellow classmates. By the time I reached middle school, the gifted and talented program in my district had taken wing. The timing makes sense: In 1998, many American schools were provided with official K-12 standards for so-called 'gifted education' by the National Association of Gifted Children. While the NAGC first promoted advanced academic programming in the 1950s, its work in the late '80s and '90s represented a more structured approach to educating students who were found to be gifted. K-12 gifted education standards were preceded by the passage of the Jacob Javits Gifted and Talented Act in 1988, which secured funding to 'orchestrate a coordinated program of scientifically based research, demonstration projects, innovative strategies, and similar activities that build and enhance the ability of elementary and secondary schools to meet the special educational needs of gifted and talented students.' In those early days, my experience with Gifted & Talented (or G/T, as we fondly called it) was almost entirely positive. Our G/T class was tucked away in a windowless classroom whose walls we decorated with silly drawings and posters. Several of my close friends were also in the program, and there was nothing better than getting to hang out with them for an hour or two per day while working on our largely self-assigned curriculum. Our teacher was warm and encouraging, always pushing each of us to incorporate our individual interests and skills into projects. In fact, nearly all the teachers I worked with in G/T were engaged educators who genuinely wanted their students to thrive. I'm forever grateful for their personal guidance, regardless of my later reflections on the program. In so many ways, G/T was a safe place at school — a place where I could be my true (weird) self and engage in more self-directed learning. But there was a troubling flip side to the G/T experience that took me years to unpack. From what I could gather, most students qualified for the program based on standardized test scores. While the NAGC defines gifted pupils as 'those who demonstrate outstanding levels of aptitude (defined as an exceptional ability to reason and learn) or competence (documented performance or achievement in top 10% or rarer) in one or more domains,' it seems inevitable that many kids would be excluded from gifted education for factors beyond their control. In her 2016 book 'Engaging and Challenging Gifted Students: Tips for Supporting Extraordinary Minds in Your Classroom,' Jenny Grant Rankin, Ph.D., outlines gaps in gifted education. Nonwhite students, socioeconomically disadvantaged kids, girls, and those classified as English language learners are disproportionately excluded from gifted and talented programming, Rankin reports. She also cites a 2016 study by Jason A. Grissom and Christopher Redding that found that Black students were 50% less likely to be considered for gifted and talented programs than their white counterparts, even when both groups recorded similar standardized test scores. What's more, students of color were less likely to be labeled gifted when their teachers were white. In G/T, I learned quickly that much of my self-esteem came from academic praise and approval from adults. The 'gifted' label seeped into everything I did and was a stumbling block at times — if I struggled to master a concept in math class or didn't understand a question on a social studies test, I'd avoid asking for help. After all, I was gifted. I shouldn't need help with anything, right? It felt like my so-called 'natural' giftedness should pre-qualify me to succeed in any endeavor, which led me to prematurely give up on new hobbies later in life when I didn't immediately feel like a master. And when a project in a non-G/T class earned anything less than an A, I often found myself in tears and seeking reassurance from my family and friends that I was 'still smart.' The question of 'potential' was another overwhelming aspect of G/T. Gifted kids at my school were encouraged to pursue all sorts of fields — with the unspoken message that no matter what we pursued, we were expected to be excellent. Most of us went on to take as many Advanced Placement classes in high school as our schedules would allow, driven by the sense that we simply had to be high achievers. Academic excellence would translate directly to excellence in career and life in general, many of us thought. It wasn't until college that I first experienced the lingering impacts of the gifted education experience. Suddenly, I was a very small fish in the massive pond that is the University of Michigan. I wasn't the 'smart kid' anymore— I was one of thousands of 'smart kids,' all of whom had ambitions on par with or beyond my own. College instructors rarely offered direct praise, and the occasional B in a class became commonplace. When I couldn't maintain perfection, I felt like I was failing the version of myself I was supposed to become. Unsurprisingly, college was also when my mental health took its first major nosedive. Alongside a handful of personal issues, my sudden sense of academic invisibility had triggered a crisis. My path felt unclear. Wasn't I supposed to get to college, breeze through with perfect grades, and immediately jump into an impressive career? When graduation rolled around, I got a dose of validation by heading off on a Fulbright teaching grant to Malaysia, but my life beyond that looked so blurry. It took a long time to admit that I didn't want to go to grad school, which felt shameful. Without academic validation or 'high achievement' on the table, would I be untethered forever? In the decade since, I've drawn connections between my most plaguing anxieties and my early education. It's taken practice to feel more comfortable with accepting professional criticism or admitting when I'm not sure how to do something at work. I see how my G/T years merged self-worth with accolades and grades, and I feel sad for the younger version of myself — along with other 'formerly gifted' peers — who internalized so many false measures of success. At times, adulthood feels like an ongoing battle to remind myself that I'm a valuable, worthy person, regardless of outward achievements. I'm not alone: In recent years, the 'formerly gifted kid' trope has become something of a meme, with TikTokers cracking dark jokes about their lingering sense of anxiety, perfectionism and perceived failure to live up to parents' and teachers' expectations. It's funny because it's true. Data shows that while gifted programs can result in better long-term academic outcomes and college success for some students, these benefits still reflect inequities. A 2021 study by Grissom and Redding found that small associations existed between participation in gifted programming and long-term achievement in math and reading, but there was no evidence to support a correlation between gifted kids and their general engagement with school. Most glaringly, even these small positive associations were skewed toward higher-income white pupils, with low-income or Black gifted students excluded from long-term academic gains. What's more, this research doesn't begin to explore gifted education's extended impact on social and emotional development for all participants. I don't regret my time as a gifted kid, but I do wish G/T had offered more care for students' mental health and more inclusivity for children who didn't fit the program's relatively narrow mold of exceptionalism. I wish I could unlearn the idea that outward praise equals true success, and measure excellence in the form of learning for learning's sake. Above all, I wish we'd had an environment where every single student was reminded how smart and talented they were, and given the tools to explore their gifts — no matter what form they took. Do you have a compelling personal story you'd like to see published on HuffPost? Find out what we're looking for here and send us a pitch at pitch@
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
These Deep-Rooted Behaviors Show Your Childhood Left You With Serious Abandonment Issues
Abandonment wounds don't always show up as dramatic breakdowns or needy texts. Sometimes, they're buried inside the habits you've normalized—behaviors that seem 'independent' or 'low-maintenance' but are really protective armor. If you've ever wondered why connection feels exhausting or why you keep choosing unavailable people, the answer may lie in your earliest emotional blueprint. Here are 13 quietly damaging behaviors that reveal unresolved abandonment issues from childhood—most of them hiding in plain sight. You talk yourself out of opportunities before anyone else has a chance to. Whether it's love, jobs, or friendships, you assume you're not wanted and withdraw before rejection can occur. It feels like self-protection, but it's actually self-erasure. This isn't humility—it's preemptive abandonment. You'd rather hurt yourself than wait for someone else to do it. It feels safer, but it's emotionally corrosive. When someone gives you consistent, healthy affection, you find reasons to pull away. You question their motives or suddenly feel irritated by them. It's not that you don't want love—it's that you don't know how to trust it. You're waiting for the other shoe to drop. So you start loosening the laces yourself. Because safety feels foreign and unsafe feels familiar. Calm notes that people with abandonment issues often struggle to trust positive attention, fearing it will be taken away. You never want to be a burden, so you shrink your needs down to something more 'reasonable.' You pride yourself on not asking for much. But deep down, you resent never being fully seen. This is emotional minimalism rooted in survival. You learned early on that being needy made people disappear. So now you disappear your needs instead. As described by Psych Central, minimizing your needs is a protective adaptation to early emotional neglect. You bond hard and fast, craving connection like oxygen. But as soon as it starts feeling real, you're flooded with anxiety and self-doubt. You're either all in or ghosting without warning. This push-pull dance is your nervous system reenacting childhood instability. Intimacy feels intoxicating and terrifying. So you chase it and sabotage it simultaneously. You'd rather struggle in silence than risk someone letting you down. You've internalized the belief that needing others is weak—or dangerous. So you stay self-sufficient to a fault. Hyper-independence is a trauma response. It's what happens when the people who should've cared for you didn't. Now you trust no one but yourself. As explained by Charlie Health, hyper-independence is often rooted in childhood abandonment or neglect. You're drawn to people who are aloof, distant, or inconsistent—and you mistake it for chemistry. You chase the high of tiny crumbs of affection. It's not love; it's a trauma reenactment. Unavailable love feels familiar because it's what you knew. You're trying to win a battle you lost in childhood. But love that feels like chasing isn't love at all. You say sorry for having feelings, for asking questions, for taking up space. You're constantly scanning for signs that you've upset someone. Your default setting is guilt—even when you're innocent. This is emotional damage control. You learned early that love was conditional. So now you work overtime to earn safety you should never have to earn. As Psychology Today points out, over-apologizing is a common response to childhood emotional insecurity and abandonment. You give and give, but rarely receive. You're more comfortable being the emotional caretaker than being emotionally cared for. It lets you avoid vulnerability while still feeling connected. Caretaking gives you a sense of control. It mimics love without requiring you to trust. But it leaves you empty in the end. A delayed text, a shift in tone, a quiet evening—you read it all as abandonment. You catastrophize silence and spiral into worst-case scenarios. It feels like the beginning of the end every time. This hypervigilance is your nervous system on alert. You're wired to expect loss. So even calm moments feel threatening. You feel most alive when someone needs saving. You confuse love with labor—thinking if you can just fix them, you'll finally be safe. You fall for potential instead of presence. Fixing others distracts from your own pain. But it's a trap that reinforces your belief that love must be earned. Real intimacy doesn't need a rescue mission. When you're in pain, you retreat. You disappear from texts, cancel plans, and convince yourself no one would understand anyway. You tell yourself it's strength—but it's fear. You learned early that vulnerability equals abandonment. So now you armor up. But connection requires letting someone in. You wait for people to leave, no matter how present they are. You don't believe emotional security is real, because you've never truly known it. So you exist in low-grade panic even during good moments. Your body remembers what your mind tries to forget. Until that fear is addressed, love will always feel unstable. Healing starts when you stop bracing for the goodbye. You've lived in emotional isolation so long that it feels like home. You normalize disconnection and pretend you prefer it. You tell yourself you're fine, but something always feels missing. Loneliness isn't your fault—but it became your default. And it's not too late to choose differently. Real connection feels foreign at first—but that doesn't mean it's wrong.
