logo
Big crowd discusses Brookville land development plan after 'Keep it Rural' fight

Big crowd discusses Brookville land development plan after 'Keep it Rural' fight

Yahoo28-01-2025

Jan. 28—More than 100 residents of Brookville and surrounding townships gathered Monday for the first in a series of public meetings as the city seeks the community's input for its new comprehensive land use plan.
The city has entered into a $100,000 contract with Cleveland-based consulting company Envision Group LLC, funded in tandem with a $50,000 planning grant from the Montgomery County Land Bank, as it works to generate an updated comprehensive land use plan, which will serve as a blueprint for future development.
Development has been a hot topic in Brookville for months. The Keep it Rural group unsuccessfully tried to recall the mayor and vice mayor after disputes on that topic, and voters led a referendum in November that rejected the rezoning of 85 acres on Upper Lewisburg Salem Road for business and residential growth.
A comprehensive land use plan guides a community's vision and goals to allow for strategic allocation of resources, to identify needs and priorities, and to build community consensus, according to Envision's Emil Liszniansky, who gave a presentation of the project Monday.
Liszniansky and Brookville City Manager Jack Kuntz stressed the city's intent to gather detailed input from residents and vowed to keep the community informed throughout the process. Brookville's most recent land use plan was created in 2004.
The city is asking Brookville residents to fill out a survey to provide input about how they think the city should grow. The survey is available on the city's website, at www.brookvilleohio.com.
"Receiving that community feedback is imperative to us to push this project forward because, at the end of the day, the comprehensive land use plan is a reflection of what the community wants to see in terms of how the city grows for the next 10 to 20 years," Kuntz said.
Liszniansky said the community survey went live in December and will remain open through February.
Developments currently underway
A development of 44 single-family houses by Arbor Homes near the East Upper Lewisburg Salem Road and Albert Road intersection, just east of Brookville Fire Station 76, is nearly finished. The neighborhood is called Harper Creek.
To the southwest, another single-family residential development, known as Hunters Run by Fischer Homes, is nearing completion.
Arbor Homes is also building a development of 32 single-family homes on South Wolf Creek Pike, south of East Westbrook Road.
Phase two of an apartment project by B&B Rentals is set to begin soon on a site west of Meadow Glen Avenue, southeast of Interstate 70, west of Arlington Road. This development primarily consists of free-standing doubles, according to Kuntz.
Arcon Builders is scheduled to begin the second phase of its Arlington Woods development this spring and summer. This neighborhood is located off Arlington Road, north of Westbrook Road.
"Much of the projects currently under construction or under infrastructure installation were originally approved in the 1990s and early 2000s; they have been on the books for years and have just recently started moving forward, as previous property owners sold the land to residential builders," Kuntz said. "There are a variety of factors as to why these projects stalled originally, but most of them are more than likely related to the housing crisis and recession in the mid-2000s."
Residents wary of hurried growth
Preliminary land use plan survey results were presented during Monday's meeting and show that most residents oppose continued development in and around the city, particularly residential development.
When asked what type of housing they feel Brookville needs more of, nearly 60% of survey respondents indicated they have "no desire for additional housing."
Similarly, when asked what area adjacent to the Brookville city limits is most appropriate for incremental residential development, just over 50% answered "none."
Perry Twp. resident Joan VanZant said she's apprehensive about the future but plans to stay involved in the comprehensive land use project as much as possible.
Perry Twp. is located just south of Westbrook Road near the south edge of Brookville. The township's boundaries go as far south as U.S. 35, just north of New Lebanon.
"I'm really concerned about the development that they seem to be rushing into ... I'm worried about not being prepared for the growth, and increased crime," she said. "I've lived here for 25 years and I'm not looking forward to the change."
Another concern from residents of Perry Twp. and nearby Clay Twp. is the potential for future annexation and development of rural township land.
"I think there's this concern a lot of us have, like, 'Are they going to annex us?'" said Jenny Riley, who lives on a 2-acre lot in Perry Twp. "I love living in a township for a couple reasons: number one is that we don't have a lot of neighbors out where we are, and number two is the benefit of not having to pay the city taxes."
Brookville resident Kathy Hubley moved to Brookville with her family at the age of 2, eventually graduating from Brookville High School in 1974.
Hubley said she thinks the city needs to regularly communicate with residents about the land use plan progress and any potential developments, but also suggests there will have to be some compromise between those who are in support of more growth and those who are not.
"I think people just don't want to lose the character and charm of Brookville," Hubley said. "... We live in kind of a confrontational world, but I do think there is hope."
Land use a continuing hot button issue
In November, voters soundly rejected a request that would have rezoned 85 acres of annexed Clay Twp. land located on Upper Lewisburg Salem Road.
A resident-led referendum gave voters the final say on this rezoning, which would have facilitated 27 acres of business development and 58 acres of residential. According to final results from the Montgomery County Board of Elections, 69.5% voted against the rezoning, with 30.5% voting in support.
Prior to that vote, political action committee Brookville Citizens for Keep It Rural filed petitions to recall Brookville Mayor Chuck Letner and Vice Mayor James Zimmerlin with the Montgomery County Board of Elections in October.
Jaime Iaquinta, treasurer for Brookville Citizens for Keep It Rural, said at the time that residents had lost trust in the leadership of Letner and Zimmerlin, also citing resident concerns about increased development in the city of just under 6,000.
The group fell short of removing the two leaders, though, as results from a special Jan. 7 election showed 52% of voters voted yes to keep both Letner and Zimmerlin seated.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

See Purdue's 50-year plan to transform downtown Indianapolis campus with high-rises
See Purdue's 50-year plan to transform downtown Indianapolis campus with high-rises

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

See Purdue's 50-year plan to transform downtown Indianapolis campus with high-rises

Over the next 50 years, Purdue University plans to transform its downtown Indianapolis campus into an urban hub with high-rise buildings hosting up to 15,000 students, according to a new master plan. Today, Purdue's 28-acre sliver of land wedged between Indiana Avenue and Michigan Street on downtown's west side — roughly the same acreage as the parcel on which Lucas Oil Stadium and its south parking lot sit — is home to three parking garages and five expansive parking lots. A conceptual master plan approved by Purdue's Board of Trustees June 6 envisions 16 new buildings on that site, featuring 4.5 million square feet and about 3,500 student beds. With leasing agreements at nearby apartments, Purdue expects to offer students more than 5,300 beds downtown. The plan foresees an increase in Purdue's student enrollment in Indianapolis from about 2,800 in fall 2024 to 15,000 by fall 2075. Despite the dense development, the plan sets aside about 60% of the downtown acreage for open spaces where students can gather and walk, according to Maryland-based architecture firm Ayers Saint Gross, which designed the 50-year master plan. Construction on the campus' main building, the 15-story Academic Success Building near the intersection of West and Michigan streets, began this April. The $187 million facility with classrooms, lab space, dining halls and student housing will be complete around May 2027. The long-term plan comes as Purdue and Indiana University in Indianapolis jostle for position on the west side of downtown following the 2024 split of the two schools' joint urban campus, IUPUI. As Purdue updates its plans, IU has allotted hundreds of millions of dollars to build multiple major facilities, including an 11-story School of Medicine building and a 4,500-seat athletics center, on its downtown campus in the next few years. IUPUI split: Indiana Ave. fell as IUPUI rose. After Purdue and IU split, can they help renew the Avenue? After the IUPUI division, IU retains most of the 536-acre downtown campus and enrolled more than 25,000 students in fall 2024. IU also owns the 28-acre wedge of land where Purdue will expand between Indiana Avenue to the north, Michigan Street to the south and Blake Street to the west. Purdue has signed a 100-year lease to use the property. Purdue is expanding into Indiana's capital city in part to ease the strain on housing and other facilities at the West Lafayette campus, which now enrolls an all-time high of more than 55,000 students. University leaders have also announced partnerships with Indianapolis-based science and engineering firms like animal health company Elanco and race car manufacturer Dallara. 'Rather than a single hub, Purdue is weaving into the fabric of the city's innovation and industry corridors," David Umulis, Purdue's senior vice provost for Indianapolis, said in a statement, "expanding from downtown all the way to the northwest side of Indianapolis." Email IndyStar Reporter Jordan Smith at JTsmith@ Follow him on X: @jordantsmith09 This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: What's in Purdue's 50-year plan for downtown Indianapolis campus

Debate heats up as Ocean City wind farm moves forward
Debate heats up as Ocean City wind farm moves forward

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Debate heats up as Ocean City wind farm moves forward

The Maryland Department of the Environment has made a final determination to approve permits for Baltimore-based US Wind Inc. to build the first large-scale offshore wind project near Ocean City. According to MDE, 'The proposed construction and commissioning of the offshore wind project would not cause violations of any applicable air pollution control regulations.' The decision, issued Friday, is the latest move in a multi-year, controversial effort to bring the plan to fruition. U.S. Wind has proposed 114 turbines that would be about 11 miles from shore at their closest, according to documents filed by the company with the Maryland Public Service Commission. The project would deliver 1,710 megawatts with turbines about 10 miles from Ocean City, according to its Maryland PSC application. The build-out would occur in several phases, with the first turbines intended for operation in 2028, according to the commission document. Opponents of the project, who include Ocean City Mayor Richard Meehan, argue that the wind farms could harm the environment and wildlife, degrade air quality and damage the region's tourism economy by marring the beach view. 'It is unconscionable to believe that the Maryland Department of Environment is ignoring pre-established permitting deadlines and fundamentally ignoring every shred of feedback offered by those who will be directly involved if this poorly conceived and potentially disastrous offshore wind project is allowed to move forward,' Meehan said in a statement Friday, following the MDE decision. 'The entire economy of our coastal resort town is dependent on tourism, our eco system, and commercial fishing, all of which will be significantly impacted if hundreds of these giant eyesores are constructed 10 miles from our beaches.' In October, the town of Ocean City filed a lawsuit in federal court challenging the wind farm that is closest to beginning construction along its shoreline. The ongoing suit alleges that the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management violated federal law when it approved the construction plan for US Wind's project. There are several groups circulating petitions against the wind farms, including nonprofit Save Ocean City and Indian River High School Engineering Students Class Of 2025 & 2026. Ocean City resident Spencer Rowe said he is concerned about the environmental impact of the wind farms. 'In my experience, more and more people are starting to question the proposed wind farms, although many of them are not motivated enough to sign [petitions],' Rowe said in an email to The Baltimore Sun. 'Traveling [around] town, one sees a lot of bumper stickers and restaurant signs displaying opposition messages. I talk to a lot of people about this, and nearly everyone is opposed now that they are learning more about all the detrimental impacts, both to the offshore environment and to our priceless viewshed.' Maryland has made significant investments in wind energy in recent years. The US Wind project is projected to create 13,000 jobs and net more than $6 billion in economic benefits. For fiscal year 2025 alone, $5 million was allocated to build a wind energy workforce and supply chain. Under state law, Maryland must reach net-zero carbon emissions by 2045. The state also aims to develop up to 8,500 megawatts of offshore wind energy by 2031. Despite some expressing environmental and economic concerns, others continue to support the development of offshore wind farms. In a letter to The Sun, Berlin resident Larry Austin Ryan outlined 10 reasons why people should not sign a petition recently sponsored by the Town of Ocean City to push wind turbines more than 26 miles off Maryland's coast. 'Wind power is the fastest growing energy industry in the world! Jobs in wind turbine technology are also one of the fastest growing areas of employment in living wage jobs,' Ryan wrote. 'The Ocean City area is guaranteed 60 jobs and there will be many more jobs in Salisbury and Baltimore in the manufacture and distribution of wind turbines and their components. With the addition of this many jobs, more visitors will have more discretionary income allowing them to enjoy the fruits of their labor in Ocean City.' 'Electricity produced by offshore wind will supply more than 750,000 homes and businesses on the Eastern shore,' Ryan added. 'It will ensure a large-scale improvement of our already inadequate electrical grid here on the shore and avoid a surcharge to Maryland ratepayers for having to import electricity from out of state. This will allow continued economic growth for all the shore in the 21 st century.' A petition to review MDE's decision must be filed by July 14 in the circuit court for the county where the permit application indicates the proposed activity will occur. 'The permits were issued after a thorough review of US Wind's application and following a public process,' an MDE spokesperson said in an email Saturday. 'Due to significant public interest, the Department of the Environment extended the time for the public to provide input. All feedback was carefully reviewed.' Aside from public debate, US Wind's project is facing legal and political hurdles. On May 5, Maryland Attorney General Anthony Brown sued President Donald Trump's administration for freezing the development of offshore wind energy projects. Brown and a coalition of 17 attorneys general allege that the executive order threatens states' abilities to secure affordable energy sources, meet the increasing electricity demand, meet climate goals and disrupt billions of dollars in infrastructure and supply chain investments, according to the lawsuit. 'The president's actions violate federal law and will make it harder for us to help Marylanders keep the money they make. One of the best strategies for driving down utility costs is ramping up clean energy production through wind power,' Gov. Wes Moore said in a statement at the time. 'At a moment when families are feeling the strain of high energy bills, we should focus on cutting red tape, not halting critical infrastructure projects.' Have a news tip? Contact Todd Karpovich at tkarpovich@ or on X as @ToddKarpovich.

Road near bottlenecked I-77 Lake Norman exit to close for highway widening
Road near bottlenecked I-77 Lake Norman exit to close for highway widening

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Road near bottlenecked I-77 Lake Norman exit to close for highway widening

Crews will temporarily close a road near a Lake Norman-area retail center anchored by Belk, Kohl's and Big Lots for the $249 million N.C. 150 widening project, state highway officials said Friday. Portestowne Way in Mooresville will be closed 8 a.m.-4 p.m. Monday, June 9, through Thursday, June 12, so crews can safely install a storm drain at the N.C. 150 intersection, according to the N.C. Department of Transportation. That's just east of Interstate 77 exit 36. Drivers will be detoured from Portestowne Way to Forester Street and Corporate Center Drive, and back onto N.C. 150. Crews plan to widen 15 miles of N.C. 150 from just west of the U.S. 21/N.C. 150 interchange in Mooresville to N.C. 16 Bypass in Catawba County. A 5.5-mile stretch from Greenwood Road in Terrell on the lake to U.S. 21 in Mooresville is under construction. Charlotte-based contractor Blythe Development LLC is expanding the highway from four to six lanes, officials said. Part of the stretch includes the old two-lane bridge over the lake. An additional bridge will carry westbound traffic, from Mooresville into Catawba County. Improvements to the bottlenecked I-77/N.C. 150 exit 36 interchange are planned.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store