
The Startup Family Office: Agile Processes And Governance That Grows
Bringing together governance and processes is like weaving a masterpiece.
In the early days of a family office, few things matter more than alignment. This includes clarity around operations, decision-making, roles, and the long-term purpose of the office.
Governance plays a critical role here, not as a layer of bureaucracy, but as a flexible framework that evolves with the family. In startup terms, think of it as your early product spec. It should be just structured enough to reduce confusion, but open enough to adapt over time.
Before building anything, it helps to learn from others. Peer groups and informal networks can offer perspective and help validate your thinking. As David Werdiger, an Australian family enterprise advisor, puts it, 'Families tend to be open and generous with their time, and early conversations can help surface a broader set of options and validate your thinking through social proof.'
Startups grow by staying nimble. They rely on flat structures, fast learning, and clear expectations. Family offices can take a similar approach. Governance doesn't need to start with committees and policy manuals. It begins with shared understanding.
Christian Schiede, a German family business advisor and STEP practitioner, adds a word of caution. 'Scaling is rarely the objective when starting a family office,' he notes. 'So benchmarking without a clear vision can lead to copying a bootstrap setup that is not scalable.' Inspiration is helpful—but only if grounded in your family's own goals.
Before drafting formal structures, begin with a few key questions:
Lise Møller, a governance advisor to family businesses who has worked with FBN, IMD, INSEAD, and EY, also notes that answering these early helps reduce confusion during execution. Especially when hiring or onboarding external advisors.
It is tempting to assign titles early on. But in the early stages of a family office, clarity around what needs to be done is more important than job labels or hierarchy.
David Werdiger advises thinking of roles as functions. Begin by identifying the responsibilities that need to be fulfilled—whether that's overseeing investments, coordinating philanthropic activity, or managing operations. Then decide whether each function is best handled in-house, outsourced, or shared across structures like single-family or multi-family offices.
Once functions are defined, it becomes much easier to outline how decisions are made. A simple RACI model can help here. It clarifies who is responsible, who is accountable, who needs to be consulted, and who simply needs to be informed. This prevents confusion, avoids duplication, and brings structure without unnecessary complexity.
Speed matters in any entrepreneurial venture, but without structure, decisions often get stuck or second-guessed. Mapping out decision flows early—before your system is stress-tested—can prevent frustration later on. It can be as simple as answering a few key questions: Who approves investments? How are budgets allocated? When is consensus required, and when can someone act independently?
A one-page reference for how these decisions are handled will save time and reduce ambiguity. Schiede encourages families to take it one step further by embedding these flows into systems. Automating workflows from the outset not only builds consistency but also lays the groundwork for more agentic, AI-supported governance in the future.
Before building formal boards or committees, consider starting with an informal advisory group. This is a common early move for startups and works just as well in a family office context.
Form a small group that might include a trusted advisor, a next-generation family member, and someone with operational experience. Meet quarterly. Keep it informal. Their role is not to direct, but to reflect, challenge, and support. This lightweight structure fosters rhythm and accountability without bureaucracy. It also creates space for next-gen members to learn and contribute early.
Schiede continues on the topic of external advice, 'Move fast and break things may work in the startup world, but only if supported by short feedback loops and a strong learning culture.' This is often unfamiliar territory for professionals from traditional wealth backgrounds. Hiring with a different lens may be necessary.
Good governance is practical. You don't need a policy manual, but you do need written reference points to avoid confusion later. Start with simple documentation that covers:
This kind of alignment often takes the form of a short family charter. Increasingly, though, families are adopting what governance advisor Anne-Sofie van den Born Rehfeld, CEO at Harbour, calls an ownership strategy—a more human-centered approach to codifying shared values and expectations.
'Creating an ownership strategy doesn't just clarify business,' Rehfeld says. 'It brings clarity, direction, and often a surprisingly enormous sense of relief.'
The document itself is only half the story. 'It's not just the outcome. It's the process,' she adds. Co-creating these frameworks builds trust and sets a foundation for generational alignment.
Schiede reinforces this point: 'If alignment of values substitutes hierarchy and structures, the family charter is key. Its strength doesn't come from its length, but from the quality of its co-creation. Skip this step, and you risk the whole operation.'
Governance is not about control. It is about clarity. It gives your family office the structure to grow with purpose and adaptability.
Alex Kirby, founder of Total Family Management, puts it well in a recent article, 'The role of family offices is evolving beyond traditional estate, trust, and financial planning. Vision, encompassing purpose, values, and shared goals, is becoming a foundational practice.'
When families commit to this kind of proactive governance, they don't just build systems. They build culture. The result is less regret, stronger alignment, and more resilient legacies.
The most successful family offices don't wait until everything is perfect. They start early, learn fast, and refine along the way.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Belgium's Credit Rating Cut by Fitch as Budget Concerns Linger
Belgium 's sovereign credit was cut by Fitch Ratings, signaling an increase in uncertainty about the country's ability to rein in years of substantial debt accumulation. The rating company lowered its assessment of Belgium to A+ from AA-, leaving it four notches under the top rating and bringing it one level below Moody's and two levels below S&P. The outlook was revised to stable.


Skift
3 hours ago
- Skift
U.S. Tourism Slide Continued in May, Canadians Stayed Away
We'd been hearing CEOs talk about stabilization in travel trends. But the declines in visits from key markets — Canada, Germany — show that it will take time to repair strained relationships. The U.S. tourism slump worsened in May as overseas arrivals dropped 2.8% from a year earlier — a setback made more severe by a sharp collapse in travel from Canada, America's largest foreign market, according to government data released Friday. Canadian air visits plunged 24%, while car crossings tumbled 38%, compounding concerns about the country's faltering tourism recovery. The data from the U.S
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Oil Market Long Numb to War Risk Confronts Weekend of Worry
(Bloomberg) -- The past two years of escalating tensions in the Middle East have taught oil traders to be sanguine about the risk of disruption to oil supplies. Shuttered NY College Has Alumni Fighting Over Its Future Trump's Military Parade Has Washington Bracing for Tanks and Weaponry NYC Renters Brace for Price Hikes After Broker-Fee Ban Do World's Fairs Still Matter? As Part of a $45 Billion Push, ICE Prepares for a Vast Expansion of Detention Space The barrage of headlines has revived memories of the political upheavals and prices spikes of the 1970s — and yet even when oil prices have jumped, it inevitably proved short-lived. As Iran and Israel traded volleys of missiles in April last year and again in October, Middle Eastern oil continued to flow to the global market unaffected. Now, the latest assault by Israel is putting oil traders' nonchalance to the test. There's been no impact on supplies so far, but the strikes have shaken a market that for most of this year has been overshadowed by worries about a looming surplus driving down prices, with OPEC+ quickly unwinding production cuts and output rising elsewhere from Brazil to Guyana, while President Donald Trump's trade war threatens demand. Even if many believe that the oil market may ultimately escape unscathed, the widespread uncertainty over how strongly Iran will respond, whether Israel will launch further attacks, and how the US will react is forcing traders to price in a huge range of possible outcomes. With hours left until the end of the trading week, few were brave enough to risk going into the weekend short. Brent futures spiked as much as 13% early on Friday and settled 7% higher at about $74 a barrel. 'When there's a war on you're not going to be short anything over the weekend,' said Andreas Laskaratos, chief executive officer of energy trading house AB Commodities. 'Although the fundamentals haven't changed you can't trade against the headlines over the weekend.' Traders and analysts began to game out scenarios for possible escalation or de-escalation almost as soon as the first Israeli missiles hit Iran in the early hours of Friday morning. Laskaratos says his Europe-based traders were at their desks by about 4:30 or 5:00 a.m. Read Bloomberg's live blog on the latest from the Middle East Analysts at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. raised their oil price forecasts for the coming months $2-$3 a barrel, but laid out possible scenarios ranging from a surge in prices above $100 a barrel in the worst-case scenario, to a drop below $50 next year in their most bearish scenario. 'The potential of further escalation in the Middle East implies that the short-term risks to our price forecast are now skewed to the upside,' the analysts including Daan Struyven wrote. Still, they maintained their call for prices to drop below $60 by the fourth quarter of this year. A surge of trading in out-of-the money call options showed that many were seeking to hedge against the possibility of a price spike. Among the most traded options were call options that would pay out if prices rise above $85 a barrel by Jun. 25; a measure of the price of WTI call options relative to the price of put options surged to the highest since March 2022, when the market was rocked by Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The most worrying possibility for the oil market is a disruption of shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, through which about one-fifth of global oil supply flows. Most analysts reckon that's unlikely. 'It is our understanding that it would be extremely difficult for Iran to close the strait for an extended period given the presence of the US Fifth Fleet in Bahrain,' said Helima Croft, head of global commodity strategy at RBC Capital Markets LLC, and a former CIA analyst. Still, even if small, any increase in the chance of disruption is enough to drive prices. 'The possibility that the Strait of Hormuz closes is such a huge binary event, it makes forecasting balances challenging,' consultancy FGE NexantECA wrote in a report. 'Most market participants we have spoken to are not expecting the Strait of Hormuz to be closed; the consequences are just too great.' Other possible scenarios worrying oil traders include the possibility of strikes on Iran's oil infrastructure – though Israel has so far avoided that – or the potential for sanctions against Iran to be ramped up if Tehran responds to the strikes by accelerating its nuclear program. For now at least, most traders are viewing current events through the lens of recent history. 'For the past decade, events like this have been sell-the-rip situations. They didn't escalate. Fears were worse than what actually happened,' Dan Pickering, chief investment officer at Pickering Energy Partners LP, an energy-focused investment bank in Houston, wrote on X. The strikes may even turn out to be bearish. Trump on Friday called on Iran to make a deal or face 'even more brutal' attacks. If Tehran were to heed his advice, a nuclear deal would likely involve a relaxation of sanctions, potentially lifting Iran's exports. FGE NexantECA said that market participants were 'looking at the recent price action and starting to consider the events as a 'sell' opportunity.' 'However, they acknowledge that taking a short position right now is hard given the risk/expectation of further escalation in tensions in the weeks ahead.' Even if there is a disruption, OPEC+ members Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have significant spare capacity that could be brought on to potentially help cool prices. 'It would take a lot of courage for someone to go against it but that said we can't see this rally being sustained in the long term,' said Laskaratos of AB Commodities. 'We don't believe the fundamentals have changed on supply and demand as things stand.' --With assistance from Anthony Di Paola, Nayla Razzouk, Salma El Wardany, Hayley Warren and Demetrios Pogkas. American Mid: Hampton Inn's Good-Enough Formula for World Domination The Spying Scandal Rocking the World of HR Software New Grads Join Worst Entry-Level Job Market in Years As Companies Abandon Climate Pledges, Is There a Silver Lining? US Tariffs Threaten to Derail Vietnam's Historic Industrial Boom ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data