Everyone should support whatever is in the national interest: Salman Khurshid
New Delhi: Senior Congress leader and former External Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid, who was part of an all-party parliamentary delegation on an 'Operation Sindoor' diplomatic outreach mission, has said that anything done in the national interest should be supported by all, regardless of political affiliations.
In an interview with IANS, Khurshid addressed criticism from within his party regarding the ongoing diplomatic initiative and emphasised the importance of unity when representing the country abroad. He said that if you have to go outside the country and speak for your nation, is it easy or difficult? And if someone is doing so, why should there be any objection?
His remarks come shortly after his post on social media platform X on Monday, where he expressed dismay over domestic political divisions while he was abroad on a mission against terrorism. "When on a mission to carry India's message to the world in the fight against terrorism, it's distressing that people at home are calculating political allegiances. Is it so difficult to be patriotic?' he had posted during the delegation's visit to Kuala Lumpur.
Excerpts from the interview:
IANS: You were part of the all-party delegation. How successful do you consider the outreach?
Salman Khurshid: I consider it very successful. The goal was to engage with multiple countries and urge them to go beyond expressing sympathy - to take concrete steps against terrorism. Terrorism affects not only India but also many other nations. We emphasised the need for global cooperation in fighting this menace, and the response was encouraging.
IANS: What would you like to say about your post on X where you asked, "Is it so difficult to be patriotic?" What were you referring to?
Salman Khurshid: That's exactly what I'm asking. And I'm not getting an answer. If someone has to go abroad and speak for the country, is that difficult or easy? If someone is doing it, why should there be a problem? I don't think it's a bad thing—I think it's a good thing. So, whatever is in the interest of the country, I believe everyone should support it.
IANS: Despite calling the outreach a success, your own party has raised questions. Congress MP Jairam Ramesh said, "While terrorists are roaming freely, so are our MPs." How do you respond?
Salman Khurshid: Jairam Ramesh is right - we were indeed travelling. But if we hadn't been travelling, we would have been sitting idle. I've already communicated our efforts and achievements to both my party and the government. Let me be clear: I was sent by the Congress; I didn't go on my own. I'm grateful for the opportunity and hopeful that the party will recognise the value of our work.
IANS: You praised the abrogation of Article 370 during your speech in Indonesia. What do you want to say about this?
Salman Khurshid: Why are you asking me about that? I don't live in Jammu and Kashmir, though I do visit occasionally. Whether it was right or wrong is a matter of ongoing public debate. However, there is a real issue of statehood, and elected representatives are demanding its restoration. If we can be united in supporting that demand, it would be better for everyone.
IANS: What is your view on Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi's 'Narendra Surrender' remark?
Salman Khurshid: Rahul Gandhi is absolutely right, and I support him. I am a member of the Congress party and take leadership directions from him. If others want to interpret my loyalty or position differently, they may do so. But I'm clear on where I stand.
IANS: The BJP claims that Rahul Gandhi's "Narendra Surrender" comment is being used by Pakistani media to further anti-India propaganda. They argue that even Pakistan hasn't used such harsh terms. What's your take?
Salman Khurshid: Frankly, I don't care what Pakistan says. I oppose everything they've done to promote terrorism. My only interest is in ensuring India gives a strong and clear message to Pakistan so that such behaviour is never repeated. I don't watch Pakistani TV—there are enough Indian news channels to keep me informed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
7 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Mediation between two unequals not possible: Tharoor on Trump's claims
Congress MP Shashi Tharoor has said that to suggest one can mediate between two unequals is not possible because there is no equivalence between terrorists and their victims, amid repeated claims by US President Donald Trump that he "helped settle" the tensions between India and Pakistan. Tharoor, currently in the US leading a multi-party delegation on Operation Sindoor, made the comments in response to a question during a conversation at the Council on Foreign Relations here Thursday. "Mediation is not a term that we are particularly willing to entertain. I'll tell you why not. The fact is that this implies, even when you say things like broker or whatever, you're implying an equivalence which simply doesn't exist," Tharoor said. He said there is no equivalence between terrorists and their victims. "There is no equivalence between a country that provides safe haven to terrorism, and a country that's a flourishing multi-party democracy that's trying to get on with its business," he said. "There is no equivalence between a state that is a status quo power that just wants to be left alone by its neighbours, where the neighbours don't agree with us, and a revisionist power that wants to upset the geopolitical arrangements that have existed for the last three-quarters of a century. There is no equivalence possible in these cases, and in these circumstances, to suggest that you can mediate between two unequals is not possible, Tharoor added. Since May 10, when Trump announced on social media that India and Pakistan had agreed to a full and immediate ceasefire after a long night of talks mediated by Washington, he has repeated his claim over a dozen times that he helped settle the tensions between India and Pakistan. He has also claimed that he told the nuclear-armed South Asian neighbours that America would do a lot of trade with them if they stopped the conflict. On being asked how he would characterize the American role in the conflict, Tharoor said he is "guessing to some degree that the American role would have been first of all to keep themselves informed, conversations on both sides, and certainly my government received a number of calls at high levels from the US government, and we appreciated their concern and their interest. He said that at the same time, the US must have been making similar calls at the highest levels to the Pakistan side, and our assumption is that's where, because that's the side that needed persuading to stop this process, that may well have been where their messages really had the greatest effect. But that's guesswork on my part. I don't know what they said to the Pakistanis. Trump repeated the claim as recently as Thursday when during a meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office, the US President said that he is very proud" that he was able to stop the conflict between nuclear powers India and Pakistan. I spoke to some very talented people on both sides, very good people on both sides and said that Washington will not do any trade deals with either if you are going to go shooting each other and whipping out nuclear weapons that may be even affect us. Because you know that nuclear dust blows across oceans very quickly, it affects us," Trump said. You know what, I got that war am I going to get credit? I'm not going to get credit for anything. They don't give me credit for anything. But nobody else could have done it. I stopped it. I was very proud of that, Trump added. About two weeks after the horrific April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam in Jammu and Kashmir in which 26 civilians were killed, India launched Operation Sindoor targeting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir on May 7. India and Pakistan reached an understanding on May 10 to end the conflict after four days of intense cross-border drone and missile strikes. India has been maintaining that the understanding on cessation of hostilities with Pakistan was reached following direct talks between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of the two militaries. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
Firm on breaking 50% reservation cap in country: Rahul
Patna: Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Friday said wherever there is a Congress govt, 50% reservation barrier would be removed. Addressing the 'Samvidhan Suraksha Sammelan' at Rajgir in Nalanda district, Gandhi said he was firm on his commitment to break the 50% barrier on reservations. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "If the population of the marginalised communities is 90%, why is their reservation limited to only 50%?" he asked. He said, "the Telangana govt has already broken the barrier, and wherever a Congress govt is formed, this barrier will be removed there." Gandhi also said Bihar which once guided the world civilisations with its wisdom and philosophy has now turned into the "crime capital of the country". He said, "Bihar was once considered the land of truth, justice, and non-violence. It showed the path to the entire world; people from across the globe used to come to study at Nalanda University". But today, he said, the situation has completely changed. "People from Bihar are now forced to migrate to other states and even abroad because there are no employment opportunities here", he pointed out, while remarking, "Bihar has now become the crime capital of the country". Reaffirming his commitment to caste census and removing the 50% cap on reservation, he said, he will ensure both these are done. And once done, there will be a paradigm shift in the way development is carried out in the country. Gandhi disclosed that after joining politics, he learnt that "90% of the country's population has no real representation anywhere". The backward classes, dalits, adivasis, and extremely backward communities lack meaningful representation in key areas such as the corporate sector, judiciary, bureaucracy, and among the owners of private hospitals and other institutions. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now On the other hand, Gandhi added, these 90% of people can only be found among the MGNREGA and the gig workers. He said, while dalits, backward classes, adivasis, extremely backward communities, and the poor from the general category make up 90% of the population, they control less than 5% of the country's resources. "You have 90% shareholding in pain and suffering", he remarked about the 90% population. Gandhi also said while the BJP agreed under pressure to carry out the caste census, he was not sure whether they will do it the way it needs to be done. He referred to the Telangana model, where the questions were framed by about 3 lakh people, unlike the BJP model, where the questions are framed by a selective few officers behind closed doors with no representation from the "90% population". Referring to the Constitution, he said, it is not merely a 75-year-old book, but a collection of thoughts and philosophy of thousands of years. "The Constitution embodies an ancient philosophy — the thoughts of Lord Shiva, Buddha, Mahatma Gandhi, Dr Ambedkar, Periyar, Narayana Guru, and Basavanna", he said, while adding, "This ideological battle has been going on for thousands of years as on one side stands Mahatma Gandhi and on the other, Godse". Gandhi said, once the caste census is conducted properly, it will not just be an X-ray but an MRI, leading to a new paradigm of development. "The beginning will be made from Bihar; you have been doing it for thousands of years and you will do this also as this is in your DNA", he remarked amidst thundering applause.
The Hindu
17 minutes ago
- The Hindu
CPI(M) calls for all-party meet on modalities of census
CPI(M) General Secretary M.A. Baby on Friday (June 6, 2025) urged the Union Government to convene an all-party meeting to address the apprehensions of several States on the possibility of losing representation in the Lok Sabha because of the delimitation expected to be held on the basis of the upcoming general Census. The first meeting of the new #CPIM Central Committee was held from June 3-5. It has issued the following communique: — CPI (M) (@cpimspeak) June 6, 2025 Mr. Baby was addressing a press conference in Delhi, at the conclusion of the first meeting of the newly elected Central Committee of the party. 'The Central government, after deliberate and inordinate delay, was finally forced to announce that it will conduct the general Census in 2027 and along with it, the caste census. Various apprehensions are being expressed, especially by the southern States about the intentions of the government, about the modalities it intends to follow and whether they will lose representation. The government should immediately convene an all party meeting and discuss these issues,' Mr. Baby said. Mr. Baby also informed that the CPI(M) would hold a week-long campaign against terrorism in June, besides sending a delegation led by him next week. The other members of the delegation include Lok Sabha members Amra Ram, K. Radhakrishnan and Su Venkatesan, and Rajya Sabha members John Brittas, Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharyya and A.A. Rahim. Mr. Baby criticised the government's assertion that with Operation Sindoor, it had established a 'new normal' where every terror attack against India would be deemed an attack by Pakistan. He said, 'This means that India-Pak relations will now be dictated by terrorists.' This approach, he said, would only fuel jingoism, strengthen extremist forces on both sides of the border and further widen the communal divide. The Left party said it would hold programmes 'in defence of democracy' to mark 50 years of the declaration of Emergency, adding that the occasion would be used to 'expose the dubious role of the RSS during Emergency'. The decisions were taken at a meeting of the central committee of the CPI(M) held in the national capital from June 3-5.
